Document Detail


Impact of isolated clinical performance feedback on clinical productivity of an academic surgical faculty.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16648013     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: There is increasing financial pressure to maximize clinical productivity for academic physicians. We examined whether clinical performance feedback alone could contribute to improving the clinical productivity of surgeons in an academic department of surgery. STUDY DESIGN: We implemented a clinical performance feedback program in January 2003. We then compared clinical productivity in terms of relative value units (RVUs) of surgeons for 18 months before and 18 months after this intervention, using each surgeon as his or her own control. Regression was performed with dependent variable ln (monthly RVUs) and independent variables "calendar month," "pre/post" January 2003, and "surgeon." The coefficient on "pre/post" reflected average change in RVUs. We also surveyed faculty on their use of and attitudes toward this feedback. RESULTS: There was a 58% survey response. Ninety-two percent of responding faculty reported that they viewed and used the performance feedback, and that it affected their practice. Ninety-two percent believed the information accurately reflected their performance, 89% thought that the comparisons were useful, and 79% desired more feedback information, specifically, comparisons with external benchmarks. When RVU data were examined, the coefficient on change pre- and postintervention indicated a 7.4% increase in productivity (p < 0.001), or a 6.0% increase (p=0.003) after exclusion of outliers. CONCLUSIONS: Performance feedback was associated with a small (6.0%) but significant improvement in productivity in this academic surgical faculty group. Performance feedback can be useful and should be used in conjunction with other management tools for this population.
Authors:
E Scott Paxton; Barton H Hamilton; Vivian R Boyd; Bruce L Hall
Related Documents :
12031943 - Hypothesis testing as a laboratory exercise: a simple analysis of human walking, with a...
18776323 - Development of ribonucleopeptide-based fluorescent sensors for biologically active amin...
18603603 - Antioxidant treatment with n-acetylcysteine regulates mammalian skeletal muscle na+-k+-...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American College of Surgeons     Volume:  202     ISSN:  1072-7515     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Am. Coll. Surg.     Publication Date:  2006 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-05-01     Completed Date:  2006-06-08     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9431305     Medline TA:  J Am Coll Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  737-45     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Academic Medical Centers / organization & administration*
Attitude of Health Personnel
Efficiency, Organizational / statistics & numerical data*
Faculty, Medical / organization & administration*
Feedback
Humans
Physician's Practice Patterns / statistics & numerical data*
Questionnaires
Regression Analysis
Relative Value Scales
Surgery Department, Hospital*
Workload
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Sep;203(3):402-3   [PMID:  16931316 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Number of lymph node metastases is better predictor of prognosis than level of lymph node metastasis...
Next Document:  Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder.