Document Detail

Impact of helicopter emergency medical services in major incidents: systematic literature review.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23959759     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) aim to bring highly specialised crews to the major incident for triage, treatment and transport. When the site is difficult to access, HEMS may be the only mode of transportation of both personnel and patients. This systematic review will identify, describe and appraise literature regarding the role of HEMS in medical response to major incidents. We aim to improve knowledge on HEMS role in a major incident and provide a basis for future research.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic literature review will be conducted with search phrases that combine HEMS and major incidents to identify when and how HEMS have been used. Included literature will be subject to quality appraisal and data extraction.
ETHICS: No ethical approval is sought because this is a literature review. It will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and the PRISMA guidelines will be followed.
REGISTRATION DETAILS: PROSPERO CRD42013004473.
Authors:
Anne Siri Johnsen; Sabina Fattah; Stephen J M Sollid; Marius Rehn
Related Documents :
8838179 - Central nervous system abscesses due to coccidioides species.
18190309 - Epidemiology of severe pneumonia caused by legionella longbeachae, mycoplasma pneumonia...
10959659 - Salmonella virchow meningitis in an adult.
12850229 - Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: a 17-year prospective series and review of 267 re...
11229839 - Reappraisal of lung tap: review of an old method for better etiologic diagnosis of chil...
2128699 - Counter immuno electrophoresis for the early diagnosis of acute pyogenic meningitis.
9590899 - Ectopic eruption of maxillary first permanent molar: a case report.
11314389 - Bilateral cleft lip and palate and limb deformities: a presentation of amniotic band se...
25141549 - Bionomics and vectorial capacity of anopheles annularis with special reference to india...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2013-08-19
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMJ open     Volume:  3     ISSN:  2044-6055     ISO Abbreviation:  BMJ Open     Publication Date:  2013  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-08-20     Completed Date:  2013-08-20     Revised Date:  2014-11-13    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101552874     Medline TA:  BMJ Open     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e003335     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMJ Open
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMJ Open
Journal ID (hwp): bmjopen
Journal ID (publisher-id): bmjopen
ISSN: 2044-6055
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR
Article Information
Download PDF
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
open-access:
Received Day: 2 Month: 6 Year: 2013
Revision Received Day: 11 Month: 7 Year: 2013
Accepted Day: 16 Month: 7 Year: 2013
collection publication date: Year: 2013
Electronic publication date: Day: 17 Month: 8 Year: 2013
Volume: 3 Issue: 8
E-location ID: e003335
PubMed Id: 23959759
ID: 3753476
Publisher Id: bmjopen-2013-003335
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003335

Impact of helicopter emergency medical services in major incidents: systematic literature review
Anne Siri Johnsen123
Sabina Fattah14
Stephen J M Sollid12
Marius Rehn125
1Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway
2Department of Health Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
3Department of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
4Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
5Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
Correspondence to Dr Anne Siri Johnsen; anne.siri.johnsen@norskluftambulanse.no

Article summary
Article focus
  • We aim to identify, describe and appraise relevant literature regarding the role of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) in medical response to major incidents.
Key message
  • Collecting and reviewing data from previous experiences may improve the role of HEMS in medical response to major incidents.
Strengths and limitations of this study
  • The major strength of this article is that it is a systematic literature review.
  • The main limitation is that only English and Scandinavian languages are included.

Introduction

A major incident is any incident where the location, number, severity or type of casualties requires extraordinary resources.1 In 2011, an estimated 332 natural disasters killed over 30 000 people, affected more than 240 million people and caused economic damages for over US$300 billion, with the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan being the most expensive natural disaster ever recorded.2

Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) aims to bring a highly specialised crew to the incident for triage, treatment and provide a time-efficient way of transporting patients directly to trauma centre for definitive care.3, 4 When the site is difficult to access, HEMS may be the only mode of transportation that is viable for both personnel and patients.4, 5 The triage system in use has to be valid and reliable to prevent both overtriage and undertriage.6, 7 When specially trained personnel perform the triage, hospitals may avoid reaching their surge capacity.6–10 The HEMS crew may also provide an overview of in-hospital resources, thereby increasing the probability of getting the right patient to the right place in the right time.11 However, HEMS crew combinations may differ from country to country.12

In previous literature, death and disease have been the most common outcomes evaluated, while discomfort, disability, dissatisfaction and depth (cost) were infrequently measured.13 Earlier reviews have tried to determine whether HEMS, compared to ground emergency medical services (GEMS), improve mortality and morbidity, although morbidity was difficult to assess.3, 14 A meta-analysis on the percentage of HEMS patients transported with non-life-threatening injuries has been preformed.15 Other reviews, with non-systematic design, have aimed to determine outcomes in literature,16, 17 identify patients that will benefit from HEMS,18 costs19 and survival benefits.20 Assessment of results is difficult because of the heterogeneity of literature.

This systematic review will identify, describe and appraise literature regarding the role of HEMS in medical response to major incidents. We aim to improve knowledge on HEMS role in a major incident and provide the basis for future research.


Methods
Study selection

Search terms include ‘Air Ambulance’ AND ‘Major Incidents’ (see additional file I for search strategy). The search will include papers published in the period from 1946 to date of search.

Databases:

  • MEDLINE
  • EMBASE
  • Cochrane
  • Web of Knowledge
  • Swemed
  • Norart
  • Scopus
  • CINAHL
  • PsycINFO

Grey literature will not be included. Previous experience has shown that this generates a large workload without results.21

Inclusion criteria:

  • Literature describing the role of HEMS in medical response to major incidents.
  • Original manuscripts.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Articles in languages other than English and Scandinavian.
  • Articles without abstract.
  • Book chapters.
  • Letters to the editor, comments and editorials.

One author (ASJ) will scan titles and abstracts and exclude articles clearly not meeting the inclusion criteria. Uncertain articles based on abstract will be subjected to consensus among all the authors. The remaining articles will be derived in full-text and divided among the authors in pairs (ASJ and MR, SF and SJMS) and screened further for eligibility according to inclusion and exclusion criteria listed above. The articles excluded in this phase will be listed with reason in the final article. Reference lists of included literature will be scanned to identify relevant literature. Authors of included articles with email listed will be contacted if necessary. ASJ will perform a quality appraisal (box 1) to depict the internal and external validity of the literature at hand and extract pre-defined data from included articles. Data extraction (box 2) will aim to describe the incident background and how HEMS contribute on the scene of the major incident with resources and transportation. Data extraction variables will be entered into a template22 (box 2) which has been pilot tested on four randomly selected articles. The results of quality appraisal and data extraction will be double-checked by another author. Included articles will be described separately, but articles describing the same major incident will be compared and grouped.

Box 1  Quality appraisal

Internal validity (yes, no, not applicable)

  • Is the author a person directly involved in the major incident medical response?
  • Does the literature provide reference to where the data were obtained?
  • Does the literature provide reference to how the data were obtained?
  • Do the authors have conflicts of interest?
  • Has an ethics committee approved the reporting?

External validity

  • Does the literature describe the local emergency medical services (EMS) and helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) structure before the incident?
  • Is the major incident clearly described?
  • Are the medical resources used in the major incident response clearly described?
  • Does the literature report the type, number and capacity of HEMS?
  • Are there indications on missing data?
  • Are other limitations discussed?
  • Is the study design clearly explained?

Box 2  Different terms and characteristics that will be extracted from the included articles.

Data extraction—does the included literature report the following:

Pre-incident data on affected area

  • Basic information on affected area?
  • Basic information on affected population?
  • Accessibility in the region?
  • Other preincident data on the affected area?

Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) characteristics

  • Population covered by HEMS?
  • HEMS service area?
  • Type of helicopter?
  • Crew combination
    • In everyday operations?
    • During a major incident?
  • Operating hours?
  • Previous experiences with major incidents?
  • Other HEMS characteristics?

Incident characteristics

  • Time, date and place?
  • Description of incident and the damage it caused?
  • Number of dead?
  • Number of injured
    • Severely, moderately, slightly?
  • Total number of victims involved?
  • Scene access?
  • Distance to hospitals?
  • Other incident characteristics?

Incident response

  • How the major incident was declared?
  • The timeline for the medical response?
  • Who participated
    • Personnel (health, fire, police, military)?
    • Transports?
    • Voluntary organizations?
  • What tasks they preformed?
  • Which prehospital resources were lacking?
  • Prehospital surge capacity?
  • Patient logistics?
  • Hospital surge capacity?
  • HEMS
    • Number of crews involved?
    • Time from alarm to arrival at scene?
    • Information received from scene and ambulance dispatch centre?
    • Did they bring extra crew?
    • Did they bring extra equipment?
    • Number of patients transported by HEMS?
    • Which hospitals received the patients?
    • Were other responsibilities described?
    • Were other tasks preformed?
  • Communication?
  • Scene safety?
  • Other incident response data?

Patient characteristics

  • All age groups involved?
  • Classification of injury?
  • Triage at first evaluation?
  • Triage before transport?
  • Injury score reported?
  • Medical illnesses reported and classified?
  • Other patient characteristics?

Other relevant information reported?


Supplementary Material Author's manuscript
Reviewer comments

Notes

Contributors: ASJ and MR conceived the idea. All authors were part of the study design. ASJ, SF, SJMS and MR wrote the manuscript. All authors have approved final version of the protocol.

Funding: The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation (NAAF) employs all authors. However, the NAAF played no part in study design, data collection, analysis, writing or submitting to publication.

Competing interests: None.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Marie Isachsen, Ullevål University Hospital Library, Oslo, Norway, designed and will conduct the literature search.


References
1. Advanced Life Support Group. Major Incident Medical Management and Support (MIMMS)2nd ednBMJ Publishing Group, Year: 2002
2. Guha-Sapir D,Vos F,Below R,et al. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2011. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, Year: 2012:1–52 http://www.cred.be/sites/default/files/ADSR_2011.pdf (accessed 30 May 2013).
3. Butler DP,Anwar I,Willett K. Is it the H or the EMS in HEMS that has an impact on trauma patient mortality? A systematic review of the evidence. Emerg Med JYear: 2010;27:692–70120679422
4. Assa A,Landau D-A,Berenboim E,et al. Role of air-medical evacuation in mass-casualty incidents-a train collision experience. Prehosp Disaster MedYear: 2009;24:271–619618366
5. Lyon RM,Sanders J. The Swiss bus accident on 13 March 2012: lessons for pre-hospital care. Crit CareYear: 2012;16:13822784360
6. Hasler RM,Kehl C,Exadaktylos AK,et al. Accuracy of prehospital diagnosis and triage of a Swiss helicopter emergency medical service. J Trauma Acute Care SurgYear: 2012;73:709–1522929499
7. Aylwin CJ,König TC,Brennan NW,et al. Reduction in critical mortality in urban mass casualty incidents: analysis of triage, surge, and resource use after the London bombings on July 7, 2005. LancetYear: 2006;368:2219–2517189033
8. Frykberg ER,Tepas J. Terrorist bombings. Ann SurgYear: 1988;208:569–763056287
9. Hirshberg A,Scott BG,Granchi T,et al. How does casualty load affect trauma care in urban bombing incidents? A quantitative analysis. J TraumaYear: 2005;58:686–9515824643
10. Lennquist S. Medical response to major incidents and disasters. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, Year: 2012:78
11. Stohler SA,Jacobs LM,Gabram SG. Roles of a helicopter emergency medical service in mass casualty incidents. J Air Med TranspYear: 1991;10:7–13
12. Krüger AJ,Skogvoll E,Castrén M,et al. Scandinavian pre-hospital physician-manned emergency medical services—same concept across borders?ResuscitationYear: 2010;81:427–3320122784
13. Brice JH,Garrison HG,Evans AT. Study design and outcomes in out-of-hospital emergency medical research: a ten year analysis. Prehosp Emerg CareYear: 2000;4:144–5010782603
14. Galvagno SM Jr,Thomas S,Stephens C,et al. Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma (review). The Cochrane Library, Year: 2013
15. Bledsoe BE,Wesley AK,Eckstein M,et al. Helicopter scene transport of trauma patients with non life-threatening injuries: a meta-analysis. J TraumaYear: 2006;60:1257–6516766969
16. Thomas SH,Harrison TH,Buras WR,et al. Helicopter transport and blunt trauma mortality: a multicenter trial. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit CareYear: 2002;52:136–45
17. Thomas SH. Helicopter emergency medical services transport outcomes literature: annotated review of articles published 2004–2006. Prehosp Emerg CareYear: 2007;11:477–8817907037
18. Thomas SH,Biddinger PD. Helicopter trauma transport: an overview of recent outcomes and triage literature. Curr Opin AnaesthesiolYear: 2003;16:153–817021454
19. Taylor CB,Stevenson M,Jan S,et al. A systematic review of costs and benefits of helicopter emergency medical services. InjuryYear: 2010;41:10–2019853251
20. Ringburg AN,Thomas SH,Steyerberg EW,et al. Lives saved by helicopter emergency medical services: an overview of literature. Air Med JYear: 2009;28:298–30219896582
21. Fattah S,Rehn M,Reierth E,et al. Templates for reporting pre-hospital major incident medical management: systematic literature review. BMJ OpenYear: 2012;2:e001082
22. Higgins JP,Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Internet]. 5th ednThe Cochrane Collaboration; [cited 2013 Jan 30]. http://handbook.cochrane.org.

Article Categories:
  • Emergency Medicine
    • Protocol
Article Categories:
  • 1506
  • 1691
  • 1704

Keywords: Air Ambulances, Helicopter Emergency Medical Services, Major Incidents, Disasters, Mass Casualty Incidents.

Previous Document:  Protocol for a qualitative study of knowledge translation in a participatory research project.
Next Document:  Predicting risk of emergency admission to hospital using primary care data: derivation and validatio...