Document Detail


Impact of detailed informed consent on research subjects' participation: a prospective, randomized trial.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18022787     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This study was undertaken to measure potential research subjects' participation in a survey research design, based on level and type of informed consent required before enrollment. In this prospective, randomized trial, 300 eligible Emergency Department participants were randomized to one of three groups: verbal consent (n = 100), limited written consent (n = 100), and detailed written consent with signature (n = 100). The consent was related to a self-administered patient satisfaction survey. The primary outcome was level of participation, where participation was categorized as full, limited, or refusal. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CI) constructed about proportions were used to assess differences in participation rates between the three consent groups. Among 300 participants, no demographic differences were found between groups for age or gender. Participants who were randomized to complete the detailed written consent had a significantly lower rate of full participation (72%) when compared to those randomized to verbal consent (85%; mean difference between groups 13%, 95% CI 2% to 24%) and to those with limited written consent (84%; mean difference between groups 12%, 95% CI 1% to 23%). Participants randomized to detailed written consent also had a significantly higher refusal rate (23%) when compared to those in the limited written group (12%; mean difference between groups -11%, 95% CI -21% to -1%). The length and type of informed consent required affected potential research subject participation in a survey research design. Participants who were asked to sign a detailed written informed consent document had a lower rate of participation compared to those with verbal or limited written consent.
Authors:
Catherine A Marco
Related Documents :
22390557 - Meeting the obligation to communicate clinical trial results to study volunteers.
19787987 - A petition to mr peel: gideon mantell and the trial of hannah russell.
9335197 - Using british trial procedures in american cases: a more civil trial?
22582337 - Close relationships and health in daily life: a review and empirical data on intimacy a...
9147177 - Psychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia treated in a psychogeriatric day hospital.
10079047 - Poststroke depression and anxiety: different assessment methods result in variations in...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2007-11-26
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of emergency medicine     Volume:  34     ISSN:  0736-4679     ISO Abbreviation:  J Emerg Med     Publication Date:  2008 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-03-14     Completed Date:  2008-07-10     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8412174     Medline TA:  J Emerg Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  269-75     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio 43608-2691, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Confidence Intervals
Consent Forms / statistics & numerical data*
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Research Subjects / psychology

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Chronic methadone therapy complicated by torsades de pointes: a case report.
Next Document:  Developmental neurotoxicity role of cyclophosphamide on post-neural tube closure of rodents in vitro...