Document Detail

The Impact of New Technologies on Radiation Oncology Events and Trends in the Past Decade: An Institutional Experience.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22494585     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
PURPOSE: To review the type and frequency of patient events from external-beam radiotherapy over a time period sufficiently long to encompass significant technology changes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten years of quality assurance records from January 2001 through December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the frequency of events affecting patient treatment from four radiation oncology process steps: simulation, treatment planning, data entry/transfer, and treatment delivery. Patient events were obtained from manual records and, from May 2007 onward, from an institution-wide database and reporting system. Events were classified according to process step of origination and segregated according to the most frequently observed event types. Events from the institution-wide database were evaluated to determine time trends. RESULTS: The overall event rate was 0.93% per course of treatment, with a downward trend over time led by a decrease in treatment delivery events. The frequency of certain event types, particularly in planning and treatment delivery, changed significantly over the course of the study, reflecting technologic and process changes. Treatments involving some form of manual intervention carried an event risk four times higher than those relying heavily on computer-aided design and delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall event rate was low, areas for improvement were identified, including manual calculations and data entry, late-day treatments, and staff overreliance on computer systems. Reducing the incidence of pretreatment events is of particular importance because these were more likely to occur several times before detection and were associated with larger dosimetric impact. Further improvements in quality assurance systems and reporting are imperative, given the advent of electronic charting, increasing reliance on computer systems, and the potentially severe consequences that can arise from mistakes involving complex intensity-modulated or image-guided treatments.
Margie A Hunt; Gerri Pastrana; Howard I Amols; Aileen Killen; Kaled Alektiar
Related Documents :
3985655 - Prognosis and treatment of polymyositis with particular reference to steroid resistant ...
23563735 - Treatment of the residual cavity during hepatic hydatidosis surgery: a cohort study of ...
7685895 - A randomized comparison of a bipolar steroid-eluting electrode and a bipolar microporou...
19705415 - Azathioprine maintains long-term steroid-free remission through 3 years in patients wit...
10954955 - A comparison of a five-day regimen of cefdinir with a seven-day regimen of loracarbef f...
17975845 - Randomized controlled study of extracorporeal albumin dialysis for hepatic encephalopat...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-4-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1879-355X     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-4-12     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7603616     Medline TA:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Twelve-Month Prostate-Specific Antigen Values and Perineural Invasion as Strong Independent Prognost...
Next Document:  Reproducibility of Tumor Motion Probability Distribution Function in Stereotactic Body Radiation The...