Document Detail


Impact of [(11)c]methionine positron emission tomography for target definition of glioblastoma multiforme in radiation therapy planning.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21095072     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to define the optimal margins for gadolinium-enhanced T(1)-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) and T(2)-weighted MRI (T(2)-MRI) for delineating target volumes in planning radiation therapy for postoperative patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) by comparison to carbon-11-labeled methionine positron emission tomography ([(11)C]MET-PET) findings.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomography (CT), MRI, and [(11)C]MET-PET were separately performed for radiation therapy planning for 32 patients newly diagnosed with GBM within 2 weeks after undergoing surgery. The extent of Gd-MRI (Gd-enhanced clinical target volume [CTV-Gd]) uptake and that of T(2)-MRI of the CTV (CTV-T(2)) were compared with the extent of [(11)C]MET-PET (CTV--[(11)C]MET-PET) uptake by using CT--MRI or CT--[(11)C]MET-PET fusion imaging. We defined CTV-Gd (x mm) and CTV-T(2) (x mm) as the x-mm margins (where x = 0, 2, 5, 10, and 20 mm) outside the CTV-Gd and the CTV-T(2), respectively. We evaluated the relationship between CTV-Gd (x mm) and CTV-- [(11)C]MET-PET and the relationship between CTV-T(2) (x mm) and CTV-- [(11)C]MET-PET.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of CTV-Gd (20 mm) (86.4%) was significantly higher than that of the other CTV-Gd. The sensitivity of CTV-T(2) (20 mm) (96.4%) was significantly higher than that of the other CTV-T(2) (x = 0, 2, 5, 10 mm). The highest sensitivity and lowest specificity was found with CTV-T(2) (x = 20 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to use a margin of at least 2 cm for CTV-T(2) for the initial target planning of radiation therapy. However, there is a limit to this setting in defining the optimal margin for Gd-MRI and T(2)-MRI for the precise delineation of target volumes in radiation therapy planning for postoperative patients with GBM.
Authors:
Masayuki Matsuo; Kazuhiro Miwa; Osamu Tanaka; Jun Shinoda; Hironori Nishibori; Yusuke Tsuge; Hirohito Yano; Toru Iwama; Shinya Hayashi; Hiroaki Hoshi; Jitsuhiro Yamada; Masayuki Kanematsu; Hidefumi Aoyama
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-11-20
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics     Volume:  82     ISSN:  1879-355X     ISO Abbreviation:  Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.     Publication Date:  2012 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-12-20     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7603616     Medline TA:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  83-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Minokamo, Japan.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Dose-painted intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: a multi-institutional report of ...
Next Document:  Progression of non-small-cell lung cancer during the interval before stereotactic body radiotherapy.