Document Detail


Immediate restoration with ti-unite implants: practice-based evidence compared with animal study outcomes.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21519565     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Purpose: Clinicians often do not have the benefit of adequate safety or clinical data when evaluating the merit of either newly marketed implant devices or novel clinical procedures. This has been the case for dental implants following the initial documentation of their safety and efficacy and is demonstrated in the evolution of immediate load application. Following demonstration of safety and successful application of an implant in an animal study prior to its market release, this report provides the clinical outcomes for the first 100 Ti-Unite implants provided to 24 patients in a clinical practice over 9 years. Materials and Methods: An electronic record/clinical database review of consecutive early loaded implants from a multiple surgeon/single prosthodontist practice was conducted for quality assurance. Data extraction of standard exposure and outcome variables was accomplished by a trained individual not affiliated with the clinical practice. Results: The results revealed one failure before and none following definitive restoration with a variety of prostheses. The mean length of time from immediate to definitive restorations was 5.3 ± 1.1 months for crowns, 3.9 ± 1.3 months for fixed partial dentures, and 7.8 ± 4.1 months for mandibular "hybrid" prostheses. The most common unexpected findings during the initial three postinsertion visits were lost access restoration and cement failure. Conclusions: Pre-market animal data regarding the safety and success of a new implant used with an early loading protocol was replicated in the clinical results of the first 100 implants used in practice. Additionally, the clinical results are favorable when compared to conventional loading protocols from this same practice and provide helpful comparative metrics (delayed vs immediate loading) to use when discussing implant treatment with patients. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:199-203.
Authors:
Kudiyirickal Marina George; Yong-Geun Choi; Kevin L Rieck; James Van Ess; Romana Ivancakova; Alan B Carr
Related Documents :
18343095 - Effect of bone sialoprotein and collagen coating on cell attachment to ticer and pure t...
11145355 - Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in r...
18226985 - Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces.
8007025 - An histologic and histomorphometric study of bone reactions to unloaded and loaded non-...
24348615 - The effect of re-bonding using surface sealant or adhesive system on microleakage of cl...
18003345 - Biomimetic synthesis of calcium phosphate materials on alkaline-treated titanium.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The International journal of prosthodontics     Volume:  24     ISSN:  0893-2174     ISO Abbreviation:  Int J Prosthodont     Publication Date:    2011 May-Jun
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-04-26     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8900938     Medline TA:  Int J Prosthodont     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  199-203     Citation Subset:  D    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Hard Tissue Structural Changes In TMJ Morphology Prior To Orthodontic Therapy: A Complex Motion Tomo...
Next Document:  Six-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate fixed partial dentures.