Document Detail


Immediate nipple reconstruction on a free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17898584     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex is usually deferred until breast mound reconstruction is complete. The authors review their experience with a technique that allows for shaping of a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap and immediate nipple reconstruction and compare this technique with delayed nipple reconstruction.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review demonstrated 21 patients who underwent immediate nipple reconstruction, 10 of whom had complete photographs and records for review. Ninety patients underwent delayed nipple reconstruction. Twenty of these patients were chosen for comparison, 15 of whom had complete photographs and records. Age, body mass index, comorbidities, procedures required, complications, and time to completion were reviewed. A multiobserver, multicharacteristic, standardized photographic review of cosmetic outcomes was conducted.
RESULTS: Time from mastectomy to completion of reconstruction, not including areolar tattooing, was 1 day (median) versus 125 days (median) in the immediate and delayed groups, respectively (p = 0.003). The number of procedures required to complete reconstruction before areolar tattooing was one (median) in the immediate group and two (median) in the delayed group (p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Subjective review demonstrated no difference in the aesthetic outcome of the breast mound or nipple-areola complex reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients having immediate nipple reconstruction in the setting of a free TRAM breast reconstruction completed their reconstruction earlier, required fewer procedures, and had aesthetic results comparable to patients having traditional delayed nipple reconstruction. Complications and revision rates were comparable.
Authors:
Eric H Williams; Lawrence Z Rosenberg; Paul Kolm; Jorge I de la Torre; R Jobe Fix
Related Documents :
22191704 - Comparative study between porcine small intestinal submucosa and buccal mucosa in a par...
20811604 - Therapies with emerging evidence of efficacy: avotermin for the improvement of scarring.
20009824 - Gracilis myocutaneous free flap in autologous breast reconstruction.
23633794 - A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary ...
20884984 - The use of a femoral revision stem in the treatment of primary or secondary bone tumour...
23223144 - Topically applied flightless i neutralizing antibodies improve healing of blistered ski...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Plastic and reconstructive surgery     Volume:  120     ISSN:  1529-4242     ISO Abbreviation:  Plast. Reconstr. Surg.     Publication Date:  2007 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-09-27     Completed Date:  2007-10-19     Revised Date:  2011-02-16    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  1306050     Medline TA:  Plast Reconstr Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1115-24     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA. williamseb@gmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Esthetics
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty / methods*
Middle Aged
Nipples / surgery*
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Flaps*
Tattooing
Time Factors

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Validation of a questionnaire for measuring morbidity in breast hypertrophy.
Next Document:  Surveillance mammography following the treatment of primary breast cancer with breast reconstruction...