Document Detail


Hydronephrotic kidney: pediatric three-dimensional US for relative renal size assessment--initial experience.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15955855     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography (US) for assessment of relative renal size in infants and children with hydronephrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from parents and also from children who were older than 8 years. Study was approved by ethics committee. Two-dimensional (2D) US, 3D US, and scintigraphy were performed in 40 patients with hydronephrosis (age range, neonate to 16 years; seven girls, 33 boys) without acute renal disease. Twenty patients also underwent magnetic resonance (MR) urography. US and MR urography were performed by one experienced pediatric radiologist; 3D US and MR urographic volume calculations were performed by specifically trained radiologists. Three-dimensional US was performed with integrated 3D volume probes or external system based on electromagnetic positioning devices. At 2D US, kidney volume was calculated with application of ellipsoid equation. At MR urography and 3D US, real renal parenchymal volume was calculated with subtraction of dilated collecting system. Split renal function was assessed with static renal scintigraphy. Three-dimensional US results were graded with respect to image quality and compared with results of 2D US, scintigraphy, and MR urography by using mean difference percentage and standard deviation of the difference. All investigations were performed with blinding. Inter- and intraobserver variability were calculated with coefficient of variation. RESULTS: In 76 of 80 kidneys, 3D US image of diagnostic quality was obtained. Three-dimensional US volume measurements compared well with MR urographic measurements (mean difference, -2.5% +/- 7.8 [standard deviation] vs 25.8% +/- 32.2 for 2D US) and with scintigraphically assessed split renal function (mean difference, 1.2% +/- 9.2 vs 15.9% +/- 43.8 for 2D US). Intra- and interobserver variability were +/-6.4% and +/-9.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Initial experience with renal 3D US indicates that it is an accurate method for assessment of renal parenchymal volume and relative renal size, provided there is no acute renal disease.
Authors:
Michael Riccabona; Gerald A Fritz; Helmut Schöllnast; Thomas Schwarz; Michael J Deutschmann; Christoph J Mache
Related Documents :
3131945 - Rational guidelines in renal trauma assessment.
3828705 - Computed tomography in acute pyelonephritis.
10437695 - Unenhanced helical ct for renal colic--is the radiation dose justifiable?
6659205 - Opacification of the gallbladder following intravenous contrast injection in patients w...
6982875 - Ototoxicity of tobramycin in humans - influence of renal impairment.
11961015 - Henoch-schönlein purpura in adults: outcome and prognostic factors.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2005-06-13
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiology     Volume:  236     ISSN:  0033-8419     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiology     Publication Date:  2005 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-06-30     Completed Date:  2005-08-04     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401260     Medline TA:  Radiology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  276-83     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright RSNA, 2005
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, A-8036 Graz, Austria. michael.riccabona@meduni-graz.at
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Hydronephrosis / radionuclide imaging,  ultrasonography*
Imaging, Three-Dimensional*
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Prospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
Urography

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Endovascular brachytherapy: restenosis in de novo versus recurrent lesions of femoropopliteal artery...
Next Document:  Treatment of hepatic venous outflow obstruction after piggyback liver transplantation.