Document Detail

Human cardiosphere-derived cells from patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease can be routinely expanded from atrial but not epicardial ventricular biopsies.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22752803     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
To investigate the effects of age and disease on endogenous cardiac progenitor cells, we obtained right atrial and left ventricular epicardial biopsies from patients (n = 22) with chronic ischaemic heart disease and measured doubling time and surface marker expression in explant- and cardiosphere-derived cells (EDCs, CDCs). EDCs could be expanded from all atrial biopsy samples, but sufficient cells for cardiosphere culture were obtained from only 8 of 22 ventricular biopsies. EDCs from both atrium and ventricle contained a higher proportion of c-kit+ cells than CDCs, which contained few such cells. There was wide variation in expression of CD90 (atrial CDCs 5-92 % CD90+; ventricular CDCs 11-89 % CD90+), with atrial CDCs cultured from diabetic patients (n = 4) containing 1.6-fold more CD90+ cells than those from non-diabetic patients (n = 18). No effect of age or other co-morbidities was detected. Thus, CDCs from atrial biopsies may vary in their therapeutic potential.
Authors:
Helen H L Chan; Zaal Meher Homji; Renata S M Gomes; Dominic Sweeney; George N Thomas; Jun Jie Tan; Huajun Zhang; Filippo Perbellini; Daniel J Stuckey; Suzanne M Watt; David Taggart; Kieran Clarke; Enca Martin-Rendon; Carolyn A Carr
Related Documents :
14689413 - Lung isolation during port-access cardiac surgery: double-lumen endotracheal tube versu...
11527133 - Antiarrhythmic properties of beta-blockers.
10502233 - Overview of clinical trials of glycoprotein iib-iiia inhibitors in acute coronary syndr...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-07-03
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of cardiovascular translational research     Volume:  5     ISSN:  1937-5395     ISO Abbreviation:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-09-20     Completed Date:  2013-02-20     Revised Date:  2014-02-20    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101468585     Medline TA:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  678-87     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antigens, Thy-1 / metabolism
Biological Markers / metabolism
Biopsy
Cell Culture Techniques
Cell Differentiation
Cell Proliferation*
Cell Separation* / methods
Chronic Disease
Diabetes Mellitus / pathology
Female
Flow Cytometry
Heart Atria / immunology,  metabolism,  pathology
Heart Ventricles / immunology,  metabolism,  pathology*
Humans
Hypercholesterolemia / pathology
Hypertension / pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Ischemia / immunology,  metabolism,  pathology*
Pericardium / immunology,  metabolism,  pathology*
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit / metabolism
Severity of Illness Index
Smoking / pathology
Spheroids, Cellular
Stem Cells / immunology,  metabolism,  pathology*
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
PG/07/059/23259//British Heart Foundation; PS/02/002/14893//British Heart Foundation; RG/07/004/22659//British Heart Foundation
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Antigens, Thy-1; 0/Biological Markers; EC 2.7.10.1/Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit
Comments/Corrections
Erratum In:
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Oct;5(5):688

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Cardiovasc Transl Res
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): J Cardiovasc Transl Res
ISSN: 1937-5387
ISSN: 1937-5395
Publisher: Springer US, Boston
Article Information
Download PDF
© The Author(s) 2012
Received Day: 23 Month: 4 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 14 Month: 6 Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 3 Month: 7 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 3 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Month: 10 Year: 2012
Volume: 5 Issue: 5
First Page: 678 Last Page: 687
ID: 3447135
PubMed Id: 22752803
Publisher Id: 9389
DOI: 10.1007/s12265-012-9389-0

Human Cardiosphere-Derived Cells from Patients with Chronic Ischaemic Heart Disease Can Be Routinely Expanded from Atrial but Not Epicardial Ventricular Biopsies
Helen H. L. Chan1
Zaal Meher Homji1
Renata S. M. Gomes1
Dominic Sweeney23
George N. Thomas23
Jun Jie Tan15
Huajun Zhang24
Filippo Perbellini1
Daniel J. Stuckey1
Suzanne M. Watt23
David Taggart4
Kieran Clarke1
Enca Martin-Rendon23
Carolyn A. Carr1 Address: +44-1865-282247 +44-1865-282272 Carolyn.Carr@dpag.ox.ac.uk
1Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Sherrington Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT UK
2Stem Cell Research Laboratory, NHS Blood and Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
3Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
4Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
5Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in the Western world [1]. Cardiac stem/progenitor cells, identified in the heart in 2003 [2, 3], are primed to repair damaged myocardium. To provide sufficient cells for therapy, cardiac stem/progenitor cells can be expanded in vitro, by selection using cell surface markers such as c-kit [2] or sca-1 [3], or from explanted biopsies via the formation of cardiospheres [4, 5]. Stem/progenitor cells isolated using each of these methods have improved cardiac function in animal models [2, 3, 5, 6].

Cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) are an heterogeneous population, comprising c-kit+/CD105+ cells, CD90+/CD105+ cells and a small number of CD31+ and CD34+ progenitor cells [7]. In 2009, Andersen et al. suggested that CDCs did not contain cardiac stem cells but were a combination of cardiac fibroblasts and CD45+ blood-borne cells [8]. However, this was rebutted by Davis et al. [7], who demonstrated that c-kit+, CD31+/CD34+ and CD90+ explant-derived cells (EDCs) could be cultured from human, mouse, rat and pig hearts and that rat CDCs were clonogenic and exhibited multilineage potential. Furthermore, they showed that human CDCs, when expanded from endomyocardial biopsies and transplanted into the infarcted mouse heart, differentiated into cardiomyocytes, endothelial and smooth muscle cells [9]. However, it is still uncertain whether biopsy location, increasing grades of cardiac failure or the presence of co-morbid risk factors, such as diabetes or hypertension, can affect the number and characteristics of the CDC population. Markers of cell senescence increase with increasing age and with type 1 diabetes in c-kit+ cells from human and mouse hearts [1012], suggesting that this population of the cardiac stem/progenitor cells may be susceptible to damage.

CDCs have recently been tested in a phase 1 clinical trial, in patients 2–4 weeks after acute myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS trial) [13]. Selected c-kit+ progenitor cells have also been tested in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO trial) [14]. As the heart contains few c-kit+ cells (approximately 1 in 10,000 myocytes [2]), it took 3 to 4 months to culture 1 million c-kit+ cells for the SCIPIO trial [14]. The cells were tested to confirm high expression of c-kit and low indicators of senescence. In contrast, for the CADUCEUS trial, 25 million CDCs were cultured in 36 days. The CDCs were assessed by flow cytometry to confirm high expression of CD105 and low numbers of CD45+ cells. The proportion of c-kit+ cells was not reported. Despite the higher number of cells administered in the CADUCEUS trial, and a significantly reduced infarct size at 6 months, there was no significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Conversely, the SCIPIO trial showed an improvement in LVEF in patients after 4 months, suggesting that selected c-kit+ cells may be more effective than the heterogeneous CDC population.

Here, we cultured CDCs from the atria and ventricles of patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery to characterise the cell population. We also assessed the effect of increasing severity of cardiac failure, and the existence of co-morbidities, such as diabetes and hypertension, on the number and characteristics of the CDC population obtained.


Materials and Methods
Biopsy Collection

Full-thickness right atrial biopsies and left ventricular epicardial biopsies were obtained at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, from coronary artery bypass graft patients, with informed written consent. Ethical approval was granted by the relevant Research Ethics Committee to obtain cardiac biopsies and conduct this study (REC reference: 07/H0607/95), which was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. All human tissue samples and cells were handled, processed and stored under a Human Tissue Authority licence.

Culture of CDCS

Biopsies were placed in Complete Explant Medium (CEM, see Electronic Supplementary Material) on ice and processed within 2–3 h. Gross connective and adipose tissues were removed to leave only cardiac tissue. After washing twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Invitrogen, UK), the sample was cut into 5-mm segments and digested in 0.05 % trypsin (Invitrogen) for 3 min at room temperature. The segments were further minced into 1-mm fragments that were washed again in PBS and plated out as explants onto fibronectin-coated (Sigma, USA) 60-mm Petri dishes (Corning, UK) containing 0.5 mL of CEM. Explants were incubated for 1 h at room temperature to allow adhesion of explants to the fibronectin coating, before a further 1 mL of CEM was added. Explants were cultured at 37 °C in 5 % CO2, with the CEM replaced every 4 days. A layer of long thin fibroblast-like cells spontaneously emerged from edges of adherent explants, followed by overlying round phase bright cells. Phase bright cells were harvested once confluent by washing explants with PBS, with 1 mL 0.53 mM EDTA (Versene, Invitrogen), then treating enzymatically with 1 mL trypsin for 5–7 min at 37 °C. An additional wash of PBS ensured complete removal of phase bright cells in addition to some fibroblasts. Explants could be harvested twice, allowing 1 week between harvests. Harvested cells were seeded into poly-D-lysine-coated wells at a concentration of 3 × 105 cells in 500 μL of Cardiosphere Growth Medium (see Electronic Supplementary Material). Fully formed, loosely adherent cardiospheres were harvested by gentle pipetting and plated onto fibronectin-coated T75 flasks (Corning) for expansion as CDCs to passage 2.

Flow Cytometry

Once confluent at passage 2, CDCs were harvested using trypsin (5 min at 37 °C) after washing three times with PBS and once with Versene. Non-specific binding of antibodies was blocked using human FcR block (Miltenyi Biotec., Germany) at a concentration of 100 μL/1 × 106, incubated on ice in the dark for 30 min. Cells were washed, suspended in PBS to a final concentration of 2 × 106 cells/mL and incubated with the appropriate antibody (see Electronic Supplementary Material) for flow cytometric analysis using a BD LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, UK) equipped with UV, blue and red lasers.

Cardiomyogenic Differentiation

Cardiomyogenic differentiation was induced using cardiomyocyte differentiation medium (CDM) (2 % FBS ESQ (embryonic stem cell-qualified; Invitrogen), 1 % insulin transferrin selenium in IMDM:DMEM/F12 (1:1, Sigma) supplemented with 1 mM dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO). The DMSO-supplemented CDM was changed every 2 days for 6 days. Then, all cells were aspirated with PBS to remove the dead cells, and 2 ml CDM supplemented with 0.1 mM ascorbic acid was added to the plate. The medium was changed every 2 days for the following 6 days.

Immunocytochemistry

Conditioned CDCs were grown on Nunc Lab-Tek® 4-well chamber slides precoated with 10 μg/ml fibronectin and fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde (Sigma) for 10 min on ice. Fixed cells were blocked with 10 % donkey serum (Biosera, UK) in 0.1 % PBS-tween for an hour at room temperature and then incubated with the primary antibody (see Electronic Supplementary Material) diluted in PBS, overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber. Cells were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody for an hour at 4 °C and the immunofluorescence detected using a confocal microscope (Zeiss Confocal LSM 520 META).

For filamentous actin staining, a rhodamine phalloidin probe was used. Cells were permeabilised with 0.1 % Triton after fixation and blocking for 30 min using a solution of 2 % FBS + 2 % BSA in PBS. Rhodamine phalloidin (Invitrogen) was diluted in PBS and added to the cells for 15 min before washing and mounting.

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means ± standard error. Analysis of variance, with a Tukey post hoc test, T tests and Pearson correlations were performed using Excel and SPSS software. Statistical significance was assumed to be p < 0.05.


Results
Patient Demographics

Full-thickness right atrial biopsies (n = 22; 468 ± 40 mg) and left ventricular epicardial biopsies (n = 22; 164 ± 29 mg) were taken from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (40–83 years of age), three of whom underwent concurrent valve replacement. Details of the patient population are given in Table 1.

Cell Culture

Biopsies were explanted onto fibronectin-coated dishes for culture of explant-derived cells (EDCs). A bed of fibroblast-like cells grew out from the explants, over which phase-bright cells migrated. Once confluent, EDCs could be harvested for culture as cardiospheres.

The time taken for each stage of the cell culture process and the number of cells produced varied considerably (Fig. 1a, Table S1). Cardiospheres grow slowly when EDCs are seeded at a low density [15], so at least 40,000 EDCs need to be harvested for successful cardiosphere culture. All atrial biopsies generated sufficient EDCs for cardiosphere formation, over 7 to 55 days, but it was only possible to culture cardiospheres from eight ventricular biopsies (denoted group AV).

There was a significant correlation between the number of EDCs produced from atrial and ventricular biopsies from the same patients (Fig. 1b). The time taken to culture confluent atrial EDCs inversely correlated with the doubling time of the resultant CDCs, in that fast growing EDCs generated fast-growing CDCs (Fig. 1c). The low sample number prevented confirmation of a similar result for ventricular EDCs.

There were no correlations between the rate of growth or the number of EDCs or CDCs with age or disease (Table 2).

EDC and CDC Characterisation

Cell surface markers on all CDCs (n = 22) and a subset of EDCs (n = 3) were characterised using flow cytometry (Fig. 2a, b; Tables 2 and 3). EDCs and CDCs comprised predominantly of CD105+ cells, with a wide variation in expression of CD90 (atrial EDCs 26–71 %, ventricular EDCs 38–70 %; atrial CDCs 5–92 % CD90+; ventricular CDCs 11–89 % CD90, Table S1) and with low expression of c-kit, CD31 and CD34. There were significantly more c-kit+ cells in EDCs than CDCs, from both atrial and ventricular biopsies, and ventricular EDCs contained more c-kit+ cells than atrial EDCs (Fig. 2b; Table 3). EDCs contained 1 % CD45+ cells, which were not detected in the CDC population. There were no other significant differences in expression of cell surface markers in EDCs or CDCs from atrial tissue compared with those from ventricular tissue (Fig. 2b).

The percentage of CD90+ CDCs inversely correlated with the time taken to culture confluent EDCs, indicating that where biopsies produced confluent EDCs relatively rapidly, these EDCs contained more CD90+ cells (Fig. 2c). Predominantly, the atrial biopsies with rapid outgrowth came from hearts from which insufficient ventricular EDCs were produced (denoted group A). CDCs from group A contained 21 % more CD90+ cells than those from group AV (Table 3). Furthermore, the percentage of CD105+ CDCs inversely correlated with the CDC doubling time (Fig. 2d), suggesting that the doubling time of CD105+ cells is faster than that of CD105− cells.

Atrial CDCs from diabetic patients (n = 4) contained significantly more CD90+ cells (79 ± 8 %) than those from non-diabetic patients (50 ± 5 %; n = 18; Fig. 2e), but there was no other correlation between age or disease and CDC numbers, doubling time or cell surface markers (Table 2).

CDC Differentiation

To further investigate differences between CDCs from diabetic and non-diabetic patients, we treated CDCs from non-diabetic (n = 2) or diabetic patients (n = 2) with cardiomyogenic differentiation medium for 2 weeks. Untreated and treated CDCs were stained for CD90, the fibroblast marker discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2), smooth muscle actin (SMA) and troponin T (TnnT) (Fig. 3). Confirming the flow cytometric analysis, untreated CDCs from diabetic patients contained more CD90+ cells than those from non-diabetic patients and also contained more cells positive for DDR2. Untreated CDCs also contained cells expressing smooth muscle actin (SMA) but few cells positive for TnnT. Following treatment with cardiomyogenic differentiation medium, there was a decrease in the proportion of cells expressing CD90 and SMA and an increase in the number of cells positive for TnnT, but possibly to a lesser extent in the CDCs from diabetic patients.


Discussion

Here, we show that CDCs cannot be cultured routinely from ventricular epicardial biopsies from patients with ischaemic heart disease. Furthermore, both atrial and ventricular epicardial CDCs contain variable numbers of CD90+ cells and few c-kit+ cells.

As has been seen with studies in bone marrow stem cells, there is a disparity between results observed in the single human clinical trial using CDCs [13] and those in animal models [46, 16] where cells were predominantly isolated from young, healthy animals rather than those with heart disease. Additionally, in animal models, there are no potentially confounding pharmacological or surgical treatments, whereas in the clinic, ethical practice mandates that cells be administered in addition to current ‘best practice’ therapy. Here, we found that CDCs from patients with ischaemic heart disease contained few c-kit+ cells and an increased proportion of CD90+ cells than reported originally [5] (Fig. 2). There are now at least 12 papers reporting cell surface markers on cells expanded from human biopsies using the cardiosphere protocol (Table 4), although not all give details of patient age or disease. While there is consensus that the majority of cells are CD105+, the proportions of c-kit+ and CD90+ cells vary considerably. The effect of co-morbid risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension on the types and proportions of cells obtained has not been reported, although it is likely that at least some of the variation results from differences in culture protocols between laboratories, as small changes to the length of time before harvest of EDCs and of culture of cardiospheres may affect the resultant CDC population, even within laboratories [17, 18].

It is well documented that c-kit+ cardiac stem/progenitor cells are clonogenic and able to differentiate into cells of the cardiac lineage [1921]. Human CDCs containing few c-kit+ cells are also capable of differentiation towards the cardiomyocyte lineage, as has been shown here and by others [2224] (Fig. 3). However, the increased proportion of CD90+ cells seen in CDCs from diabetic patients and in fast-growing CDCs may indicate that these cells contain a greater proportion of cardiac fibroblasts, as suggested by staining for DDR2 (Fig. 3). Increased fibrosis is observed in the ischaemic [25] and diabetic heart [26] and with age [27], increasing the likelihood of culturing fibroblasts within the CDC population. Here, we found no correlation between age and the proportion of CD90+ cells, but this may be because we did not isolate CDCs from younger, non-ischaemic hearts. Mishra et al. expanded CDCs from the hearts of children with congenital, non-ischaemic heart defects [28] which contained 55-70 % CD90+ cells and showed a decline in the number of c-kit+ cells with age (Table 4). They also showed that administration of CDCs to the infarcted mouse heart improved cardiac function compared with administration of cardiac fibroblasts, emphasising the need to minimise the cardiac fibroblast population in CDCs. Although the formation of cardiospheres was proposed to enhance the stem cell population of EDCs, many cell types have now been shown to form spheres, including myofibroblasts and bone marrow and dermal mesenchymal cells [24]. However, Zakharova et al. found that EDCs from atrial biopsies obtained from patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery contained high levels of vimentin-positive cells, but that the proportion of these cells decreased after cardiosphere culture [29].

All atrial biopsies yielded CDCs, but we found that only 8 out of 22 ventricular epicardial biopsies yielded sufficient EDCs for CDC culture. Although the epicardium contains progenitor cells, epicardial biopsies require stimulation for significant outgrowth to occur [30]. It may be that the ventricular biopsies from which EDCs were cultured here contained significant amounts of myocardial tissue. Atrial CDCs from hearts from which no ventricular CDCs were cultured contained more CD90+ cells, as did CDCs from rapid-growing EDCs. Atrial tissue contains more fibroblasts than ventricular tissue, and atrial fibroblasts proliferate more rapidly than those from the ventricle [31]. More work is required to establish whether rapid-outgrowth EDCs contain more fibroblasts than those that take longer to migrate from the explant. It is thought that cardiac stem cells predominantly reside in the atria and apex of the heart [32], although we found significally more c-kit+ cells in the small subset of EDCs from the ventricle than in those from the atrium. For the CADUCEUS trial [13], 25 million CDCs were cultured within 36 ± 6 days from biopsies taken from the endomyocardial septum. Interestingly, here, no atrial or epicardial biopsy yielded that number of CDCs and the calculated time to reach 25 million CDCs ranged from 47 to 278 days (Table S1). For the SCIPIO trial [14], c-kit+ cells were isolated and expanded from atrial biopsies. The improvement in LVEF, measured in that study, indicated that c-kit+ cells may be more potent than other cells in the EDC or CDC populations. Here, we saw a decrease in the number of c-kit+ cells between the EDC and CDC stages of expansion. Expression of c-kit has been shown to vary with time in EDCs, peaking at about 21 days after plating in rat EDCs [33], and cardiosphere culture has been reported to increase the proportion of ckit+ cells [4]. Our data suggest that this may be lost again during expansion as a monolayer of CDCs.

Clearly, further careful characterisation of CDCs expanded from human patients is essential to establish transferable and reproducible cell culture techniques necessary for large multi-centre clinical trials. Lessons from the clinical trials using bone marrow cells have shown that changes to the conditions used for isolation and storage of cells can adversely affect their therapeutic potential [34, 35]. Thus, modification to the expansion protocol may be necessary to optimise the cell population produced from both diabetic and non-diabetic patients for maximum therapeutic effect.


Electronic Supplementary Material


Notes

Helen H.L. Chan and Zaal Meher Homji contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation (grant number PG/07/059/23259), the University of Melbourne Advanced Medical Science studentships (HHLC, ZMH, GNT) and by a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) UK programme grant to NHSBT (RP-PG-0310-1001) (DS, SMW and EMR). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of NHS, NIHR or the Department of Health.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.


References
1.. World Health Organization Statistics (2008). BHF Statistics website. http://www.heartstats.org.
2.. Beltrami AP,Barlucchi L,Torella D,Baker M,Limana F,Chimenti S. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regenerationCellYear: 200311476377610.1016/S0092-8674(03)00687-114505575
3.. Oh H,Bradfute SB,Gallardo TD,Nakamura T,Gaussin V,Mishina Y,et al. Cardiac progenitor cells from adult myocardium: homing, differentiation, and fusion after infarctionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaYear: 2003100123131231810.1073/pnas.213212610014530411
4.. Messina E,Angelis L,Frati G,Morrone S,Chimenti S,Fiordaliso F,et al. Isolation and expansion of adult cardiac stem cells from human and murine heartCirculation ResearchYear: 20049591192110.1161/01.RES.0000147315.71699.5115472116
5.. Smith RR,Barile L,Cho HC,Leppo MK,Hare JM,Messina E,et al. Regenerative potential of cardiosphere-derived cells expanded from percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy specimensCirculationYear: 200711589690810.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.65520917283259
6.. Carr CA,Stuckey DJ,Tan JJ,Tan SC,Gomes RS,Camelliti P,et al. Cardiosphere-derived cells improve function in the infarcted rat heart for at least 16 weeks—an MRI studyPloS OneYear: 20116e2566910.1371/journal.pone.002566922043289
7.. Davis DR,Zhang Y,Smith RR,Cheng K,Terrovitis J,Malliaras K,et al. Validation of the cardiosphere method to culture cardiac progenitor cells from myocardial tissuePloS OneYear: 20094e719510.1371/journal.pone.000719519779618
8.. Andersen DC,Andersen P,Schneider M,Jensen HB,Sheikh SP. Murine "cardiospheres" are not a source of stem cells with cardiomyogenic potentialStem CellsYear: 2009271571158110.1002/stem.7219544463
9.. Davis DR,Ruckdeschel Smith R,Marban E. Human cardiospheres are a source of stem cells with cardiomyogenic potentialStem CellsYear: 20102890390420309960
10.. Kajstura J,Gurusamy N,Ogorek B,Goichberg P,Clavo-Rondon C,Hosoda T,et al. Myocyte turnover in the aging human heartCirculation ResearchYear: 20101071374138610.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.23149821088285
11.. Rota M,LeCapitaine N,Hosoda T,Boni A,Angelis A,Padin-Iruegas ME,et al. Diabetes promotes cardiac stem cell aging and heart failure, which are prevented by deletion of the p66shc geneCirculation ResearchYear: 200699425210.1161/01.RES.0000231289.63468.0816763167
12.. Torella D,Rota M,Nurzynska D,Musso E,Monsen A,Shiraishi I,et al. Cardiac stem cell and myocyte aging, heart failure, and insulin-like growth factor-1 overexpressionCirculation ResearchYear: 20049451452410.1161/01.RES.0000117306.10142.5014726476
13.. Makkar, R. R., Smith, R. R., Cheng, K., Malliaras, K., Thomson, L. E., Berman, D., et al. (2012). Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60195-0.
14.. Bolli R,Chugh AR,D'Amario D,Loughran JH,Stoddard MF,Ikram S,et al. Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trialLancetYear: 20113781847185710.1016/S0140-6736(11)61590-022088800
15.. Tan J.J., Carr C.A., Stuckey D.J., Ellison G.M., Messina E., Giacomello A., Clarke K.(2011). Isolation and expansion of cardiosphere-derived stem cells. Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology 2C 3.12.
16.. Johnston PV,Sasano T,Mills K,Evers R,Lee ST,Smith RR,et al. Engraftment, differentiation, and functional benefits of autologous cardiosphere-derived cells in porcine ischemic cardiomyopathyCirculationYear: 20091201075108310.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.81605819738142
17.. Barth AS,Kizana E,Smith RR,Terrovitis J,Dong P,Leppo MK,et al. Lentiviral vectors bearing the cardiac promoter of the Na+–Ca2+ exchanger report cardiogenic differentiation in stem cellsMolecular TherapyYear: 20081695796410.1038/mt.2008.3018388932
18.. Li TS,Cheng K,Malliaras K,Smith RR,Zhang Y,Sun B,et al. Direct comparison of different stem cell types and subpopulations reveals superior paracrine potency and myocardial repair efficacy with cardiosphere-derived cellsJournal of the American College of CardiologyYear: 20125994295310.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.02922381431
19.. Bearzi C,Rota M,Hosoda T,Tillmanns J,Nascimbene A,Angelis A,et al. Human cardiac stem cellsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaYear: 2007104140681407310.1073/pnas.070676010417709737
20.. Gambini E,Pompilio G,Biondi A,Alamanni F,Capogrossi MC,Agrifoglio M,et al. C-kit+ cardiac progenitors exhibit mesenchymal markers and preferential cardiovascular commitmentCardiovascular ResearchYear: 20108936237310.1093/cvr/cvq29220833650
21.. Torella D,Ellison GM,Mendez-Ferrer S,Ibanez B,Nadal-Ginard B. Resident human cardiac stem cells: role in cardiac cellular homeostasis and potential for myocardial regenerationNature Clinical Practice. Cardiovascular MedicineYear: 20063Suppl 1S8S1310.1038/ncpcardio040916501638
22.. Tateishi K,Ashihara E,Honsho S,Takehara N,Nomura T,Takahashi T,et al. Human cardiac stem cells exhibit mesenchymal features and are maintained through Akt/GSK-3beta signalingBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsYear: 200735263564110.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.09617150190
23.. Gaetani R,Ledda M,Barile L,Chimenti I,Carlo F,Forte E,et al. Differentiation of human adult cardiac stem cells exposed to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fieldsCardiovascular ResearchYear: 20098241142010.1093/cvr/cvp06719228705
24.. Koninckx, R., Daniels, A., Windmolders, S., Carlotti, F., Mees, U., Steels, P., et al. (2010). Mesenchymal stem cells or cardiac progenitors for cardiac repair? A comparative study. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. doi:10.1007/s00018-010-0560-y.
25.. Camelliti P,Borg TK,Kohl P. Structural and functional characterisation of cardiac fibroblastsCardiovascular ResearchYear: 200565405110.1016/j.cardiores.2004.08.02015621032
26.. Chen S,Evans T,Mukherjee K,Karmazyn M,Chakrabarti S. Diabetes-induced myocardial structural changes: role of endothelin-1 and its receptorsJournal of Molecular and Cellular CardiologyYear: 2000321621162910.1006/jmcc.2000.119710966825
27.. Gramley F,Lorenzen J,Knackstedt C,Rana OR,Saygili E,Frechen D,et al. Age-related atrial fibrosisAge (Dordrecht, Netherlands)Year: 2009312738
28.. Mishra R,Vijayan K,Colletti EJ,Harrington DA,Matthiesen TS,Simpson D,et al. Characterization and functionality of cardiac progenitor cells in congenital heart patientsCirculationYear: 201112336437310.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.97162221242485
29.. Zakharova, L., Mastroeni, D., Mutlu, N., Molina, M., Goldman, S., Diethrich, E., et al. (2010). Transplantation of cardiac progenitor cell sheet onto infarcted heart promotes cardiogenesis and improves function. Cardiovascular Research. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq027.
30.. Smart N,Risebro CA,Melville AA,Moses K,Schwartz RJ,Chien KR,et al. Thymosin beta4 induces adult epicardial progenitor mobilization and neovascularizationNatureYear: 200744517718210.1038/nature0538317108969
31.. Burstein B,Libby E,Calderone A,Nattel S. Differential behaviors of atrial versus ventricular fibroblasts: a potential role for platelet-derived growth factor in atrial-ventricular remodeling differencesCirculationYear: 2008117131630164110.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.74805318347210
32.. Urbanek K,Cesselli D,Rota M,Nascimbene A,Angelis A,Hosoda T,et al. From the Cover: stem cell niches in the adult mouse heartProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaYear: 20061039226923110.1073/pnas.060063510316754876
33.. Davis DR,Kizana E,Terrovitis J,Barth AS,Zhang Y,Smith RR,et al. Isolation and expansion of functionally-competent cardiac progenitor cells directly from heart biopsiesJournal of Molecular and Cellular CardiologyYear: 20104931232110.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.02.01920211627
34.. Assmus B,Tonn T,Seeger FH,Yoon CH,Leistner D,Klotsche J,et al. Red blood cell contamination of the final cell product impairs the efficacy of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell therapyJournal of the American College of CardiologyYear: 2010551385139410.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.05920338501
35.. Seeger FH,Tonn T,Krzossok N,Zeiher AM,Dimmeler S. Cell isolation procedures matter: a comparison of different isolation protocols of bone marrow mononuclear cells used for cell therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarctionEuropean Heart JournalYear: 20072876677210.1093/eurheartj/ehl50917298974
36.. Maxeiner H,Krehbiehl N,Muller A,Woitasky N,Akinturk H,Muller M,et al. New insights into paracrine mechanisms of human cardiac progenitor cellsEuropean Journal of Heart FailureYear: 201012773073710.1093/eurjhf/hfq06320406797
37.. Li TS,Cheng K,Lee ST,Matsushita S,Davis D,Malliaras K,et al. Cardiospheres recapitulate a niche-like microenvironment rich in stemness and cell-matrix interactions, rationalizing their enhanced functional potency for myocardial repairStem CellsYear: 201028112088209810.1002/stem.53220882531

Figures

[Figure ID: Fig1]
Fig. 1 

Expansion of EDCs and CDCs from atrial and ventricular biopsies. a Considerable variation was observed in the time taken for culture of confluent explant- and cardiosphere-derived cells and in the number of cells obtained. b The number of EDCs generated from atrial biopsies correlated with the number from ventricular biopsies. c The time taken for atrial EDCs to reach confluence correlated inversely with the doubling time of CDCs



[Figure ID: Fig2]
Fig. 2 

Cell surface markers on EDCs and CDCs. a Representative flow cytometry plots for CD117 (c-kit), CD90 and CD105 (with isotype controls in grey) in CDCs from atrial (top) and ventricular (bottom) biopsy samples. b Expression of cell surface markers by EDCs and CDCs from atrial and ventricular biopsies (n = 3 for atrial and ventricular EDCs, n = 22 for atrial CDCs and 8 for ventricular CDCs; *p < 0.05 compared with atrial EDCs, †p < 0.05 compared with ventricular EDCs). c The time taken for culture of confluent EDCs inversely correlated with CD90 expression in CDCs and d the doubling time of CDCs inversely correlated with CD105 expression in CDCs. e Atrial CDCs from diabetic patients (n = 4) contained significantly more CD90+ cells than those from non-diabetic patients (n = 18; *p < 0.05 compared with non-diabetic patients). Error bars show standard errors



[Figure ID: Fig3]
Fig. 3 

Immuno-staining of CDCs. Representative confocal images from immuno-staining of atrial CDCs for actin filaments, CD90, discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2), smooth muscle actin (SMA) and troponin-T (TnnT). Cells from diabetic patients (right 2 panels) contained higher levels of the fibroblast marker DDR2 than those from non-diabetic patients (left 2 panels) and showed low expression of TnnT after treatment with differentiation medium containing dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) for 2 weeks. Scale bars = 50 μm



Tables
[TableWrap ID: Tab1] Table 1 

Patients’ demographics


Age 67 ± 2
BMI 28 ± 1
Sex (male) 20 (91 %)
 Class I 1 (0.05 %)
 Class II 11 (50 %)
 Class III 7 (32 %)
 Class IV 2 (9 %)
 Missing 1 (4.5 %)
Diabetes 4 (18 %)
Smoker 9 (41 %)
Hypertension 15 (68 %)
High cholesterol 19 (86 %)
Aspirin 15 (68)%
ACE inhibitors 12 (55)%
Beta blockers 15 (68 %)
Statins 20 (90 %)

Data are n (percent) or mean (SEM)

BMI body mass index, NYHA New York Heart Association


[TableWrap ID: Tab2] Table 2 

Number of EDCs and CDCs produced by atrial biopsies, time taken for growth, and cell surface markers divided by age or disease


All Age < 65 Age > 65 Non-diabetic Diabetic Normo-tensive Hyper-tensive Normal cholesterol High cholesterol NYHA 1 or 2 NYHA 3 or 4
n = 22 n = 10 n = 12 n = 18 n = 4 n = 6 n = 16 n = 3 n = 19 n = 12 n = 10
Time for EDC growth (days) 28 ± 3 26 ± 3 29 ± 5 27 ± 3 30 ± 6 35 ± 7 25 ± 3 35 ± 1 27 ± 3 25 ± 4 32 ± 5
EDC/g (×106) 4.7 ± 1.4 3.8 ± 1.4 5.4 ± 2.4 5.3 ± 1.7 1.9 ± 1.1 5.3 ± 4.4 4.4 ± 1.2 10.8 ± 3.1 3.7 ± 1.4 3.7 ± 1.6 5.9 ± 5
CDC/g (×106) 8.9 ± 1.7 9.2 ± 3.8 8.6 ± 1.3 8.1 ± 1.7 12.3 ± 6.8 6.5 ± 2.7 9.7 ± 2.2 8.8 ± 4.2 8.9 ± 2.0 7.6 ± 2.3 10.3 ± 2.9
Doubling time (days) 10 ± 2 9 ± 2 10 ± 3 10 ± 3 6 ± 1 5 ± 1 11 ± 3 3 ± 1 11 ± 2 12 ± 4 6 ± 1
CD117 (%) 0.2 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.1 0 ± 0 0.2 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.1
CD31 (%) 2.1 ± 0.7 2.9 ± 1.9 1.5 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.8 1.2 ± 0.8 1.9 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 1.0 2.9 ± 1.4 1.9 ± 0.8 2.6 ± 1.5 1.5 ± 0.5
CD34 (%) 1.2 ± 0.6 1.9 ± 1.6 0.6 ± 2 1.2 ± 0.8 1.0 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.42 1.4 ± 0.9 0.7 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 1.1 1.0 ± 0.3
CD90 (%) 55 ± 5 53 ± 7 57 ± 8 50 ± 5 79 ± 8* 47 ± 11 58 ± 6 38 ± 10 58 ± 6 58 ± 4 52 ± 10
CD105 (%) 80 ± 4 84 ± 4 76 ± 7 78 ± 5 90 ± 8 79 ± 9 80 ± 5 94 ± 2 78 ± 5 78 ± 6 82 ± 6

NYHA New York Heart Association

*p < 0.05 compared with non-diabetic


[TableWrap ID: Tab3] Table 3 

Cell surface markers on EDCs and CDCs from atrial and ventricular biopsies, analysed using flow cytometry


Marker EDCs CDCs CDCs
Atrial (n = 3) Ventricular (n = 3) Atrial (n = 22) Ventricular (n = 8) Atrial group AV (n = 8) Atrial group A (n = 14)
CD117 (c-kit) 4 ± 2 %* 9 ± 5 %** 0.2 ± 0.1 %* ** 0.1 ± 0.1 %* ** 0 %* ** 0.3 ± 0.1 %* **
CD45 1.1 ± 1.4 % 1.3 ± 1.8 % 0. % 0 % 0 % 0 %**
CD31 2.6 ± 1.8 % 0.6 ± 0.4 % 2.1 ± 0.7 % 1.3 ± 0.4 % 1.7 ± 0.7 % 2.3 ± 1.3 %
CD34 1.2 ± 0.6 % 0.6 ± 0.5 % 0.9 ± 0.3 % 1.4 ± 1.0 %
CD133 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
CD90 49 ± 32 % 54 ± 23 % 55 ± 5 % 46 ± 9 % 42 ± 9 % 63 ± 5 %***
CD105 83 ± 6 % 76 ± 1 % 80 ± 4 % 84 ± 6 % 83 ± 7 % 78 ± 5 %

Group AV indicates hearts from which ventricular CDCs were cultured, group A indicates hearts from which no ventricular CDCs could be obtained

*p < 0.05 compared with ventricular EDCs; **p < 0.05 compared with atrial EDCs; ***p < 0.05 compared with group AV


[TableWrap ID: Tab4] Table 4 

Cell surface markers reported for cells cultured from human biopsy samples using the cardiosphere protocol


First author Year Cell type Patient age Patient number Biopsy location c-Kit CD90 CD105 CD31 CD34 Troponin Vimentin/collagen 1
Davis [7] 2009 EDC 32 ± 12 years 59 Endomyocardium ∼12 % ∼32 % ∼5 %
49 ± 15 years 12
Csp pos pos pos pos neg pos pos for vimentin
Zakharova [29] 2010 EDC 53–73 years Not given Atrium ∼31 % ∼34 % ∼28 % vimentin
Csp 32 % 28 % 6 % vimentin
Messina [4] 2004 Csp 1 month–80 years 8 Atrium/ventrical pos pos pos pos
Maxeiner [36] 2010 EDC/Csp 0.2–9 years 6 Not given mRNA but no protein neg for vimentin
24–81 years 4
Li [37] 2010 Csp 11 Endomyocardium 17 %
CDC 5 % 18 % 100 %
Smith [5] 2007 CDC 31 ± 2 years 59 Endomyocardium ∼15 % ∼40 % ∼95 % ∼4 % ∼10 %
47 ± 4 years 11
Tateishi [22] 2007 CDC 9 days–77 years 18 Not given 0.8 % 68 % 99 % 0.4 % 0.5 % Csp pos for vimentin and collagen 1
Barth [17] 2008 CDC 28 Endomyocardium 13 % 34 % 99 % 9 % 6 %
Konincx [24] 2010 CDC 68 ± 7 years 12 RAA neg Partial expression
Mishra [28] 2011 CDC Neonate 118 RAA 9 % 55 % 85 % neg for collagen I
Infant 7 % 70 % 80 %
2–13 years 3 % 70 % 80 %
Li [18] 2012 CDC Endomyocardium 7 % 18 % 100 % 0.6 % 1 % 9 %
Makkar [13] 2012 CDC 54 ± 2.5 years 31 Endomyocardium 98 %

Approximate values are estimated from published graphs

pos positive, neg negative



Article Categories:
  • Article

Keywords: Keywords Cardiosphere-derived cells, Ischaemic heart disease, Diabetes, Human.

Previous Document:  Exposure of pollinators to plant protection products.
Next Document:  Impact of MCP-1 and CCR-2 gene polymorphisms on coronary artery disease susceptibility.