Document Detail


How zooplankton feed: mechanisms, traits and trade-offs.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20682007     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Zooplankton is a morphologically and taxonomically diverse group and includes organisms that vary in size by many orders of magnitude, but they are all faced with the common problem of collecting food from a very dilute suspension. In order to maintain a viable population in the face of mortality, zooplankton in the ocean have to clear daily a volume of ambient water for prey particles that is equivalent to about 10(6) times their own body volume. While most size-specific vital rates and mortality rates decline with size, the clearance requirement is largely size-independent because food availability also declines with size. There is a limited number of solutions to the problem of concentrating dilute prey from a sticky medium: passive and active ambush feeding; feeding-current feeding, where the prey is either intercepted directly, retained on a filter, or individually perceived and extracted from the feeding current; cruise feeding; and colonization of large particles and marine snow aggregates. The basic mechanics of these food-collection mechanisms are described, and it is shown that their efficiencies are inherently different and that each of these mechanisms becomes less efficient with increasing size. Mechanisms that compensate for this decline in efficiency are described, including inflation of feeding structures and development of vision. Each feeding mode has implications beyond feeding in terms of risk of encountering predators and chance of meeting mates, and they partly target different types of prey. The main dichotomy is between (inefficient) ambush feeding on motile prey and the more efficient active feeding modes; a secondary dichotomy is between (efficient) hovering and (less efficient) cruising feeding modes. The efficiencies of the various feeding modes are traded off against feeding-mode-dependent metabolic expenses, predation risks, and mating chances. The optimality of feeding strategies, evaluated as the ratio of gain over risk, varies with the environment, and may explain both size-dependent and spatio-temporal differences in distributions of various feeding types as well as other aspects of the biology of zooplankton (mating behaviour, predator defence strategies).
Authors:
Thomas Kiørboe
Related Documents :
16470407 - Trade-off in investment between dispersal and ingestion capability in phytophagous inse...
7253557 - Description of a disposable individual-mouse urine collection apparatus.
7373207 - Feeding motor programme in limax. ii. modulation by sensory inputs in intact animals an...
1211487 - Evoked release of [14c]norepinephrine from the rat hypothalamus during feeding.
1211447 - Satiety and hunger induced by small and large duodenal loads of isotonic glucose.
4087267 - An assessment of the diagnostic value of quantitative measurements of iga rheumatoid fa...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society     Volume:  86     ISSN:  1469-185X     ISO Abbreviation:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc     Publication Date:  2011 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-04-14     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0414576     Medline TA:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  311-39     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2010 The Author. Biological Reviews © 2010 Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Affiliation:
National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kavalergården 6, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Novel classification based on immunohistochemistry combined with hierarchical clustering analysis in...
Next Document:  Percentiles and mean values for neck circumference in Turkish children aged 6-18 years.