Document Detail

How to kill gamete donation: retrospective legislation and donor anonymity.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22786778     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Victoria (Australia) is considering retrospective legislation on the abolition of gamete donor anonymity. Retrospective legislation evokes many negative emotions mainly because it is considered unfair. It also makes it impossible for citizens to organize their life with reasonable certainty of the consequences. Introduction of this law for donor anonymity is defended by the right of the child to know its genetic origins. Against this law, people appeal to the right to privacy and confidentiality of the donor. This paper analyses the arguments for and against a retrospective law on donor anonymity by looking at the conditions that should be respected when two principles (the donor's right to privacy and the child's right to genetic information) have to be balanced. It is concluded that the justification for introducing retrospective law is lacking: the conditions are not fulfilled. Moreover, retroactive laws in the context of gamete donation may jeopardize the whole practice by destroying the trust of candidate donors and recipients in the government.
Guido Pennings
Related Documents :
22817708 - Twice is better: highlights of the second meeting focused on tau biology and pathology.
22707928 - The agricultural ethics of biofuels: climate ethics and mitigation arguments.
22722688 - Securing the data economy: translating privacy and enacting security in the development...
22611458 - Do new ethical issues arise at each stage of nanotechnological development?
11806778 - Selected highlights from the 50th annual scientific session of the american college of ...
23959648 - Errata.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-7-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  Human reproduction (Oxford, England)     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1460-2350     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-7-12     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8701199     Medline TA:  Hum Reprod     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, Gent B-9000, Belgium.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Is there a dose-response relationship of metformin treatment in patients with polycystic ovary syndr...
Next Document:  Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE...