Document Detail


How predictability of feeding patches affects home range and foraging habitat selection in avian social scavengers?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23301024     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Feeding stations are commonly used to sustain conservation programs of scavengers but their impact on behaviour is still debated. They increase the temporal and spatial predictability of food resources while scavengers have supposedly evolved to search for unpredictable resources. In the Grands Causses (France), a reintroduced population of Griffon vultures Gyps fulvus can find carcasses at three types of sites: 1. "light feeding stations", where farmers can drop carcasses at their farm (spatially predictable), 2. "heavy feeding stations", where carcasses from nearby farms are concentrated (spatially and temporally predictable) and 3. open grasslands, where resources are randomly distributed (unpredictable). The impact of feeding stations on vulture's foraging behaviour was investigated using 28 GPS-tracked vultures. The average home range size was maximal in spring (1272±752 km(2)) and minimal in winter (473±237 km(2)) and was highly variable among individuals. Analyses of home range characteristics and feeding habitat selection via compositional analysis showed that feeding stations were always preferred compared to the rest of the habitat where vultures can find unpredictable resources. Feeding stations were particularly used when resources were scarce (summer) or when flight conditions were poor (winter), limiting long-ranging movements. However, when flight conditions were optimal, home ranges also encompassed large areas of grassland where vultures could find unpredictable resources, suggesting that vultures did not lose their natural ability to forage on unpredictable resources, even when feeding stations were available. However during seasons when food abundance and flight conditions were not limited, vultures seemed to favour light over heavy feeding stations, probably because of the reduced intraspecific competition and a pattern closer to the natural dispersion of resources in the landscape. Light feeding stations are interesting tools for managing food resources, but don't prevent vultures to feed at other places with possibly high risk of intoxication (poison).
Authors:
Sophie Monsarrat; Simon Benhamou; François Sarrazin; Carmen Bessa-Gomes; Willem Bouten; Olivier Duriez
Related Documents :
23336994 - Impact of agricultural policies on caloric consumption.
16739024 - Pheromone antagonism in the european corn borer moth ostrinia nubilalis.
24781984 - Long-term changes in nutrients and mussel stocks are related to numbers of breeding eid...
24370064 - Hidden cost of u.s. agricultural exports: particulate matter from ammonia emissions.
16147514 - The croonian lecture 2004 risk: food, fact and fantasy.
18504954 - Flushing history as a hydrogeological control on the regional distribution of arsenic i...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2013-01-03
Journal Detail:
Title:  PloS one     Volume:  8     ISSN:  1932-6203     ISO Abbreviation:  PLoS ONE     Publication Date:  2013  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-09     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101285081     Medline TA:  PLoS One     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e53077     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5175 CNRS, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Probing membrane protein interactions with their lipid raft environment using single-molecule tracki...
Next Document:  TGF-ß1 Enhances the BMP-2-Induced Chondrogenesis of Bovine Synovial Explants and Arrests Downstream...