Document Detail


How the need for cognition scale predicts behavior in mock jury deliberations.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15264449     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The role of Need for Cognition (NC) in mock jury deliberations was examined. Study 1 showed that when groups of 4 (2 high and 2 low in NC) deliberated together, high-NCs spoke significantly longer than low-NCs and were perceived as more active and more persuasive. High-NCs were not, however, viewed as generating arguments that were more valid or more logical. In Study 2, participants deliberated in dyads with a confederate who delivered either strong or weak arguments against the participant's position. Contrary to expectation, low-NCs were more responsive to differences in argument quality. The findings suggest that, in mock jury deliberations, high-NCs are the active participators whereas low-NCs are the quiet contemplators. Implications for legal practice and policy are discussed.
Authors:
Donna Shestowsky; Leonard M Horowitz
Related Documents :
7814789 - Cognitive decline in alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal investigation of risk factors ...
17348579 - Myths of ageing.
1564079 - Psychosocial adjustment among intellectually gifted adolescents: the role of cognitive-...
17454979 - Gonadal steroids and visuo-spatial abilities in adult males: implications for generaliz...
4008879 - Tests of the neural noise hypothesis of age-related cognitive change.
17272729 - Strong association of the rest-activity rhythm with well-being in demented elderly women.
7388229 - Computed tomography in the elderly. 3. affective disorder.
7585749 - Interrelationships between lipoprotein(a) and other cardiovascular risk factors.
6890009 - Aging-related changes in retrograde amnesia for mice.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Law and human behavior     Volume:  28     ISSN:  0147-7307     ISO Abbreviation:  Law Hum Behav     Publication Date:  2004 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-07-21     Completed Date:  2004-08-10     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7801255     Medline TA:  Law Hum Behav     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  305-37     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis School of Law, Davis 95616, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Cognition / classification*
Criminal Law*
Decision Making
Female
Group Processes*
Humans
Interpersonal Relations*
Judicial Role*
Male
Motivation
Persuasive Communication*
Students
Thinking
United States
Verbal Behavior

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and re...
Next Document:  Lineup identification by children: effects of clothing bias.