Document Detail

How accurate are published recurrence rates after rectal prolapse surgery? A meta-analysis of individual patient data.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16720147     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: The literature shows wide variations of recurrence rates (RRs) after abdominal surgery for rectal prolapse. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of published RRs. METHODS: An electronic search was performed with no restrictions. Inclusion criterion was abdominal surgery in at least 10 adults with follow-up evaluation of any length of time. Two reviewers screened 1669 references. A total of 190 investigators were asked to provide individual patient data that should be the same used at the time their reports were written. The RR was estimated by actuarial analysis. Investigators were asked for comments on results. RESULTS: Individual patient data from 6 reports published with 273 patients (186 women, 87 men) with a median age of 54 years (range, 18-88 y) were available. Abdominal surgery included mobilization with pexy (88%), with additional resection (7%), or mobilization only (5%). There were 16 recurrences at a median follow-up period of 3.94 years (range, .05-15.11 y). The effect of age (hazard ratio [HR], 2.010; P = .3443), sex (HR, 2.070; P = .4260), surgical technique (HR, .743; P = .7669), and publication (HR, 1.014; P = .8747) on RR was not significant. Two publications reported a RR of 0. In another report, the published and estimated RRs of 15% did not differ. Published RRs differed from estimated RRs in 3 reports (2.5% vs 4%; 7% vs 54%; and 9.6% vs 36%). The pooled odds ratios of 6 reports revealed a borderline significant difference between the published and estimated RRs (P = .066). CONCLUSIONS: Published RRs differed by as much as 47% from the RRs estimated by actuarial analysis depending on event definition and how the data were censored.
Giuseppe DiGiuro; Dejan Ignjatovic; Jan Brogger; Roberto Bergamaschi;
Related Documents :
14974077 - Therapy with glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis.
19645837 - Comparison of two regimens for the treatment of meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown eti...
17443617 - Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery.
1369727 - The effect of naftidrofuryl on intermittent claudication: a meta-analysis.
11419827 - Pantoprazole therapy in the long-term management of severe acid peptic disease: clinica...
25361707 - Narrowing of the dorsal vein complex technique during laparoscopic radical prostatectom...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  American journal of surgery     Volume:  191     ISSN:  0002-9610     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Surg.     Publication Date:  2006 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-05-24     Completed Date:  2006-06-22     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370473     Medline TA:  Am J Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  773-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Research and Development, Forde Health System, Forde, Norway 6807.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Actuarial Analysis*
Age Distribution
Aged, 80 and over
Follow-Up Studies
Laparotomy / adverse effects,  methods*
Middle Aged
Rectal Prolapse / diagnosis,  epidemiology*,  surgery*
Reproducibility of Results
Severity of Illness Index
Sex Distribution

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Prevention of nausea and vomiting following breast surgery.
Next Document:  Open repair of pectus excavatum and carinatum deformities with minimal cartilage resection.