| How Good Is Google?: The Quality of Otolaryngology Information on the Internet. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 22597577 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Objective. To assess the quality of the information a patient (parent) may encounter using a Google search for typical otolaryngology ailments.Study Design. Cross-sectional study.Setting. Tertiary care center.Methods. A Google keyword search was performed for 10 common otolaryngology problems including ear infection, hearing loss, tonsillitis, and so on. The top 10 search results for each were critically examined using the 16-item (1-5 scale) standardized DISCERN instrument. The DISCERN instrument was developed to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of patient treatment choice literature.Results. A total of 100 Web sites were assessed. Of these, 19 (19%) were primarily advertisements for products and were excluded from DISCERN scoring. Searches for more typically chronic otolaryngic problems (eg, tinnitus, sleep apnea, etc) resulted in more biased, advertisement-type results than those for typically acute problems (eg, ear infection, sinus infection, P = .03). The search for "sleep apnea treatment" produced the highest scoring results (mean overall DISCERN score = 3.49, range = 1.81-4.56), and the search for "hoarseness treatment" produced the lowest scores (mean = 2.49, range = 1.56-3.56). Results from major comprehensive Web sites (WebMD, EMedicinehealth.com, Wikipedia, etc.) scored higher than other Web sites (mean DISCERN score = 3.46 vs 2.48, P < .001).Conclusion. There is marked variability in the quality of Web site information for the treatment of common otolaryngologic problems. Searches on more chronic problems resulted in a higher proportion of biased advertisement Web sites. Larger, comprehensive Web sites generally provided better information but were less than perfect in presenting complete information on treatment options. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Max D Pusz; Scott E Brietzke |
Related Documents
:
|
19918557 - The unintended consequences of clinical trials regulations. 12822837 - Grouping and gambling: a gestalt approach to understanding the gambler's fallacy. 15195037 - Recruitment and accrual of women in a placebo-controlled clinical pilot study on manual... 22549537 - Adherence patterns with first- versus second-generation antipsychotics for newly diagno... 469967 - Quality of life after major burns. 23101457 - Use of randomisation in clinical trials: a survey of uk practice. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2012-5-17 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Volume: - ISSN: 1097-6817 ISO Abbreviation: - Publication Date: 2012 May |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2012-5-18 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8508176 Medline TA: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Country: - |
Other Details:
|
Languages: ENG Pagination: - Citation Subset: - |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Molecular Basis of Tobacco-Induced Bacterial Biofilms: An In Vitro Study.
Next Document: Audiovestibular Dysfunction Associated with Adoptive Cell Immunotherapy for Melanoma.