|Honey--a novel antidiabetic agent.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 22811614 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|Diabetes mellitus remains a burden worldwide in spite of the availability of numerous antidiabetic drugs. Honey is a natural substance produced by bees from nectar. Several evidence-based health benefits have been ascribed to honey in the recent years. In this review article, we highlight findings which demonstrate the beneficial or potential effects of honey in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), on the gut microbiota, in the liver, in the pancreas and how these effects could improve glycemic control and metabolic derangements. In healthy subjects or patients with impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes mellitus, various studies revealed that honey reduced blood glucose or was more tolerable than most common sugars or sweeteners. Pre-clinical studies provided more convincing evidence in support of honey as a potential antidiabetic agent than clinical studies did. The not-too-impressive clinical data could mainly be attributed to poor study designs or due to the fact that the clinical studies were preliminary. Based on the key constituents of honey, the possible mechanisms of action of antidiabetic effect of honey are proposed. The paper also highlights the potential impacts and future perspectives on the use of honey as an antidiabetic agent. It makes recommendations for further clinical studies on the potential antidiabetic effect of honey. This review provides insight on the potential use of honey, especially as a complementary agent, in the management of diabetes mellitus. Hence, it is very important to have well-designed, randomized controlled clinical trials that investigate the reproducibility (or otherwise) of these experimental data in diabetic human subjects.|
|Omotayo O Erejuwa; Siti A Sulaiman; Mohd S Ab Wahab|
Related Documents :
|16541004 - Role of ghrelin in the regulation of appetite in children.
10946794 - Interactions of perturbations in intrauterine growth and growth during childhood on the...
14970004 - Glucose homeostasis in abdominal obesity: hepatic hyperresponsiveness to growth hormone...
22811614 - Honey--a novel antidiabetic agent.
18230894 - Fetal and neonatal pathways to obesity.
24026944 - Impaired sustained attention in adult patients with type 1 diabetes is related to diabe...
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review Date: 2012-07-07|
|Title: International journal of biological sciences Volume: 8 ISSN: 1449-2288 ISO Abbreviation: Int. J. Biol. Sci. Publication Date: 2012|
|Created Date: 2012-07-19 Completed Date: 2012-10-25 Revised Date: 2013-07-12|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101235568 Medline TA: Int J Biol Sci Country: Australia|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 913-34 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia. email@example.com|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Diabetes Mellitus / drug therapy, prevention & control
Glucose Intolerance / drug therapy, prevention & control
Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Int J Biol Sci
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Int. J. Biol. Sci
Journal ID (publisher-id): ijbs
Publisher: Ivyspring International Publisher, Sydney
© Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
Received Day: 23 Month: 10 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 24 Month: 1 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 7 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Volume: 8 Issue: 6
First Page: 913 Last Page: 934
PubMed Id: 22811614
Publisher Id: ijbsv08p0913
|Honey - A Novel Antidiabetic Agent|
|Omotayo O. Erejuwa✉|
|Siti A. Sulaiman|
|Mohd S. Ab Wahab|
|Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
|Correspondence: ✉ Corresponding author: E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Tel.: +609-7666-877; Fax: +609-7653-370.
[conflict] Competing Interests: The authors have declared that they have no personal or financial conflict of interest..
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, estimated as 285 million people in 2010, is predicted to increase to 439 million people by the year 2030 1. The majority of this diabetic population will emerge from developing countries 1. Despite the availability of various classes of antidiabetic agents, diabetes mellitus remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally 2, 3. As a result, there has been a considerable effort to search for more effective drugs. This has resulted in a renewed interest in research that investigates the health benefits of herbs and natural products including honey in the management of diabetes mellitus. Honey is a natural substance produced by bees from nectar. It is considered one of the last untreated natural food substances 4. The composition of honey is influenced by a number of factors such as geographical origin, botanical sources of nectar, environmental and climatic conditions as well as processing techniques 4, 5. The various varieties of honey may be grouped into monofloral or multifloral 6. The classification basically depends on whether a dominating pollen grain originated from only one particular plant (monofloral honey) or no dominant pollen type in the sample (multifloral honey) 6, 7.
Honey, which comprises predominantly monosaccharides and oligosaccharides, contains at least 181 constituents 8, 9. It also contains other bioactive constituents such as phenolic compounds, flavonoids, organic acids, carotenoid-derived compounds, nitric oxide (NO) metabolites, ascorbic acid, Maillard reaction products, aromatic compounds, trace elements, vitamins, amino acids and proteins 5, 9, 10. Evidence indicates that some varieties of honey contain kynurenic acid (a tryptophan metabolite with neuroactive activity) which may contribute to its antinociceptive and antimicrobial properties 11. A number of enzymes such as glucose oxidase, diastase, invertase, phosphatase, catalase and peroxidase have also been documented in honey 9, 12. The use of honey in folk medicine dates back to 2100-2000 BC 4, 12. In the past, most of the health benefits attributed to honey were based on mere observations or generalizations without any scientific support 13. However, in the last few years, there has been a renewed interest in research that investigates the potential health benefits of natural and unprocessed honey in the management of various diseases. This has resulted in findings that attribute several medicinal effects to honey. These include cardioprotective 14, hepatoprotective 15, hypoglycemic 16, antioxidant 16-21 and antihypertensive effects 22, 23. Other effects such as antibacterial 24, anti-fungal 25, anti-viral 26, anti-inflammatory 27 and antitumor 28 have also been documented and attributed to honey. In this review, the first of its kind, we summarize both experimental and clinical findings which demonstrate that the effects of honey in the GIT, on the gut microbiota, in the liver as well as in the pancreas may result in improved glycemic control and metabolic derangements. Based on the not-too-impressive clinical findings (due to improper study designs), recommendations on how to ensure that these compelling data obtained in animal studies are successfully translated to the benefits of diabetic patients are made.
Fructose and glucose, the main carbohydrates in honey, have the same molecular formula but different structural formula (figure 1) 29-30. These monosaccharides do not need to be hydrolyzed by GIT enzymes and thus are ready for absorption. Fructose and glucose have different transporters, GLUT5 (and/or GLUT2) and SGLT1, respectively 31. Studies have shown that fructose reduces hyperglycemia or glucose levels in rodent models of diabetes, healthy subjects and diabetic patients 32-35. Evidence suggests that fructose consumption prolongs gastric emptying 36, which may slow down the rate of intestinal absorption 37. In addition to fructose, oligosaccharides such as palatinose (isomaltulose) present in honey have been reported to delay digestion and intestinal absorption of glucose resulting in reduced glycemia 38, 39. Besides delaying absorption, evidence suggests that fructose consumption lowers food intake 40. Reduced food intake is attributed to delayed gastric emptying 41. Reduced food intake due to fructose ingestion has been reported to influence the selection of macronutrients 40, 42. Even though the findings on satiety are inconclusive 42, a recent study also corroborates this suppressant effect of fructose on food intake 43. It is suggested that the slow absorption of fructose in the intestine might elongate the duration of contact and interaction between fructose and intestinal receptors that play a key role in satiety 44, 45. This might allow more macronutrients (including carbohydrates) to be passed into the large intestine, thereby preventing/limiting their intestinal absorption. Moreover, with the evidence suggesting that fructose reduces food intake, there is a possibility for reduced weight gain. A recent study reported that supplementation with a low or moderate fructose diet (together with natural fruit supplements) resulted in weight loss in obese subjects 46. The study further showed that obese subjects on the moderate-fructose diet lost more weight than those on the low-fructose diet 46. However, some studies have found that fructose feeding or consumption at high doses is associated with increased weight gain 43, 47.
After fructose, glucose is the second major constituent in most varieties of honey 4. Compelling evidence indicates that the intestinal absorption of fructose is enhanced in the presence of glucose 48. Although it remains unclear how glucose enhances fructose absorption, the recruitment of GLUT2 carrier to the brush border membrane caused by increased intestinal fructose may contribute to the synergistic effect of glucose on the absorption of fructose 48, 49. In addition, increased expression levels of GLUT5 mRNA after ingestion of fructose but not glucose has been documented 50. It is also suggested that there may be a disaccharidase-related transport system which considers both fructose and glucose as products of the enzymatic hydrolysis of sucrose 51. Evidence also suggests that fructose is absorbed via a saturable carrier in the absence of glucose 52. In contrast, in the presence of glucose, fructose is absorbed via a disaccharidase-related transport system 52. The presence of this disaccharidase-related transport system appears to be corroborated by a study which showed that the greatest absorption of fructose occurred when equal amounts of fructose and glucose were given simultaneously 53. Passive diffusion across the intestinal epithelium is also a possible mechanism 48, 54. These studies have generally shown that glucose enhances the transportation and absorption of fructose but not vice versa. This enhancing effect of glucose on fructose absorption may further increase the amounts of fructose that reach the liver, a primary target of fructose.
The absorption of some macromolecules, nutrients and drugs may be influenced by the concurrent intake or ingestion of certain food constituents. Although little is known about the role of honey in facilitating the absorption and uptake of food constituents or drugs, however, evidence suggests a potential role of honey in modulating such an effect 55. This differential absorption of macronutrients and drugs, due to concomitant ingestion of food components may also influence considerably their systemic effects. Studies have documented a number of changes or alterations in the brush border membrane (BBM) fluidity in diabetes 56. These alterations (such as increased number and size of cells, increased number and area of microvilli per cell, enhanced activities of carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes such as maltase, sucrase and trehalase as well as facilitated glucose absorption) may aggravate diabetes and its related complications 57-59. Besides alterations in the BBM fluidity, Bhor and Sivakami reported increased oxidative damage and non-enzymatic glycation in duodenum and jejunum of diabetic rats 56. The authors also found a significant correlation between reduced BBM fluidity and increased oxidative stress in the duodenum and jejunum of diabetic rats 56. Vitamin E, an antioxidant, has been shown to ameliorate intestinal oxidative stress 60. Even though there is no evidence to suggest that honey ameliorates oxidative stress in the intestine, there is overwhelming evidence in support of such an effect in pancreas, kidney and liver 16, 17, 19, 61-63. Considering that the antioxidant effect of honey is not likely to be limited to these tissues alone, therefore, amelioration of intestinal oxidative stress might restore alterations associated with BBM fluidity, promote healing and enhance intestinal health during diabetes. Besides, studies have also implicated the role of oxidation-reduction reactions in the differential transport of molecules 64. Additional evidence also showed that intestinal oxidative state can influence the bioavailability of nutrients and drugs 65. Considering the reported antioxidant effect of honey 16, 17, 19, 61-63, this might be one of the reasons co-administration of glibenclamide or metformin with honey improved glycemic control better than either hypoglycemic drug in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats 66.
Studies have shown that diabetes mellitus impairs gastric ulcer healing in rodents 67. Evidence also suggests diabetes may be a predictor of peptic ulcer disease or aggravate associated complications or mortality in patients with gastric and duodenal ulcers 68, 69. In view of findings which demonstrated that honey prevented chemical-induced gastric mucosal injury in rodents 70, this gastroprotective effect of honey might be beneficial in diabetes mellitus. Evidence that monosaccharides (fructose and glucose) and disaccharides (sucrose and maltose) present in honey may contribute to the gastroprotective effect of honey is provided by Gharzouli and co-workers 70. The authors showed that a mixture comprising glucose, fructose, sucrose and maltose exerted gastroprotective effect, which was similar to that produced by honey 70. Additional evidence in support of the potential role of honey in ameliorating gastric ulcer is provided by studies which showed that honey inhibited the growth of Helicobacter pylori, a main causative pathogen in gastric and duodenal ulcers 71. As demonstrated by Osato and colleagues, fructose and glucose in honey might contribute to the inhibitory effect of honey on Helicobacter pylori71. Other beneficial effects of honey supplementation in the GIT have also been documented. These effects include improved intestinal morphology and protection against intra-abdominal adhesions and anastomotic dehiscence in rats after colonic resection and anastomosis 72. In rats with obstructive jaundice, honey supplementation also improved morphology of the ileum 73 or anastomotic wound healing 74.
These potential effects of honey or its constituents on gastric emptying 36, rate of intestinal absorption 37-39, 42, 55, fructose transporter 48-49, 51-52, food intake 40, 43, 46 and perhaps the synergistic effect of glucose on fructose 48, 53 may contribute to the glucose-lowering effect of honey in systemic circulation. Some yet-to-be-delineated preabsorptive signals elicited by honey or its constituents may also contribute to the glucose-lowering effect of honey. Other potential beneficial GIT effects of honey include the amelioration of intestinal oxidative stress (with a resultant effect on the restoration of BBM fluidity) which may enhance bioavailability of vital macronutrients or drugs 64, 65. By and large, these studies indicate that honey or its constituents may modulate several physiological and pathophysiological conditions in the GIT. Together with its potential to improve intestinal morphology 72-74 or its gastroprotective effect 70, 71, these GIT effects of honey might promote healing and enhance GIT health in diabetes mellitus. This might impact positively on glycemic control.
The gut microbiota is recognized to play an important role in health and disease 75. Recent evidence now indicates that the role of gut microbiota extends beyond the gut 76, 77. As demonstrated in recent studies, these gut microorganisms can influence several functions in systemic organs such as liver 76 and brain 77. Even though the gut microbiota has not been linked directly to the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus, these latest findings on the systemic effects of gut microbiota suggest a possibility 76, 77. These data are important in view of the fact that an imbalance or alteration in the intestinal composition of microbiota is implicated in the development of insulin resistance and obesity 78. A study by Cani et al. provides evidence in support of a potential role of the gut microbiota in diabetes 79. The authors reported that mice fed high fat had markedly declined levels of intestinal bifidobacteria. Treatment of these high-fat-fed mice with oligofructose totally restored the intestinal contents of bifidobacteria 79. The study also indicated that in high-fat-fed mice treated with oligofructose, the levels of bifidobacteria considerably and positively correlated with improved glucose-induced insulin secretion and glucose tolerance 79.
Besides the monosaccharides, honey contains a variety of oligosaccharides which constitute about 5-10 % of the total carbohydrates in honey 9, 80. Oligosaccharides are sugars formed from the condensation of monosaccharides (usually 2 to 6). These monosaccharide monomers are linked together by a glycosidic bond 42. Based on the number of their monosaccharide units, oligosaccharides are grouped into disaccharides, trisaccharides, tetrasaccharides, pentasaccharides and hexasaccharides. Some of the oligosaccharides which are present in honey include maltose, sucrose, melezitose, palatinose, trehalose, raffinose, isomaltose, maltulose, maltotriose, panose, erlose, turanose, gentiobiose and cellobiose 80-83. The molecular structures of these oligosaccharides are presented in figures 2, 3 and 4, 29, 84-87. The effect of honey on beneficial or non-pathogenic gut microorganisms is well documented 80. Evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies has shown that honey markedly increased the number of Lactobacillus (L. acidophilus and L. plantarum) counts 88. Honey was also reported to enhance the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrukeii sub. sp. bulgaricus89. The study also showed that honey enhanced lactic acid production 89. The fact that the effect of honey on these microbes was comparable to that of fructose or sucrose implies that the sugar constituents of honey might contribute to the prebiotic effect of honey. Similarly, a study that investigated the effect of honey (5% w/v) on five different species of human intestinal Bifidobacterium (B. longum, B. adolescentis, B. breve, B. bifidum and B. infantis) revealed that honey considerably augmented the growth of these bacteria 90. The study further showed that the effect of honey on these microbes, as measured by production of lactic and acetic acid, was comparable to that of fructooligosaccharide, galactooligosaccharide or inulin 90. As reported by Sanz et al., fractions of honey oligosaccharides exhibited prebiotic activity and increased the populations of beneficial or non-pathogenic bacteria, lactobacilli and bifidobacteria 91. A number of other studies have also documented the beneficial effect of different varieties of honey on the growth and activity of intestinal microorganisms 92, 93.
Additional in vivo evidence in support of prebiotic effect of honey is provided by Ezz El-Arab and colleagues 94. The authors showed that honey feeding inhibited the harmful and genotoxic effects of mycotoxins in Swiss albino mice and considerably increased the colonic bifidobacteria and lactobacilli counts 94. Similarly, a recent study also demonstrated the prebiotic effect of honey 95. The authors reported that the growth, activity and viability of microorganisms were not influenced by the type of sweetener, oligosaccharide content or floral source of the different varieties of honey 95. In addition to the oligosaccharides in honey, evidence suggests that the large quantities of monosaccharides (fructose and glucose) in honey may also augment the growth of intestinal microflora 89, 91, 95. Therefore, considering that honey is enriched in oligosaccharides, fructose, glucose and other sugars 9, 90, 91, honey supplementation in diabetes mellitus may enhance intestinal health and growth of gut microbiota; and thus may contribute to glucose management by yet-to-be-identified mechanisms 66.
Evidence implicates the role of oligosaccharides in the antidiabetic effect of honey 80. Considering that honey is enriched in oligosaccharides, even though data are still lacking, the pharmacokinetic parameters of honey are likely to be similar to those of oligosaccharides such as palatinose and isomaltose. These include delayed gastric emptying, slower rate of digestion, delayed intestinal absorption, reduced intestinal absorption of calorie resulting from increased intestinal calorie extraction by pathogenic gut microbiota, urinary excretion of honey metabolites 38, 39, 79, 96-98. Besides, some of these pharmacokinetic properties have also been reported for fructose, a major constituent of honey 36, 37, 40-42. These effects will result in lower elevations in blood glucose which may as well stimulate minimal secretion of insulin 39, 79, 98.
The liver is recognized for its role in the pathophysiology and control of glycemia in diabetes mellitus 99. Honey comprises predominantly carbohydrates which can be classified into monosaccharides and oligosaccharides. Monosaccharides are grouped into trioses, tetroses, pentoses, hexoses and heptoses based on their number of carbon atoms (usually 3 to 7). The two monosaccharides in honey, glucose and fructose, are basically hexoses. The molecular structures of these monosaccharides are shown in figure 1, 29-30. In the liver, the uptake and metabolism of these monosaccharides in honey (glucose and fructose) are different 42. Evidence suggests that less quantities of glucose than fructose are metabolized in the liver 42. Available data also indicate that the uptake of glucose into the liver is impaired in the absence or insufficiency of insulin. Likewise, the metabolism of glucose is impaired by inadequate amounts of insulin 42, 100. In contrast, neither the uptake nor metabolism of fructose is impaired or affected by the levels of insulin 42, 100. Earlier authors have described the metabolism of fructose and glucose in more details 42, 100.
Based on the literature, fructose (the major constituent in honey) may contribute to the antidiabetic or hypoglycemic effect of honey 35. Fructose has been shown to increase hepatic glucose phosphorylation via activation of glucokinase 101; and inhibit glycogenolysis via suppression of phosphorylase 102. Increased hepatic glycogen synthesis via activation of glycogen synthase produced by fructose administration in diabetic and non-diabetic rats has been reported 101, 103. Evidence has also implicated the complementary and synergistic role of fructose and glucose on key enzymes involved in the metabolism of glucose and glycogen in the liver 104, 105. Evidence indicates that these monosaccharides produce a synergistic effect in the liver only when present or administered at a low or moderate dose or concentration 106. It has been reported that the percentage of the absorbed fructose phosphorylated in the liver is two-fold or more that of the absorbed glucose 100, 107.
With greater amounts of fructose compared to glucose (which undergoes less extensive metabolism) being extensively metabolized in the liver 108, more quantities of glucose than fructose pass through the liver unmetabolized 108. With the activation of glucokinase by fructose, more of the unmetabolized glucose might be taken up from the circulation into the liver. This might further contribute to improved glycemic control. With honey supplementation, the fructose in honey might enhance hepatic glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis and storage resulting in improved glycemic control in diabetes mellitus. Compelling evidence indicates that diabetes mellitus is commonly associated with hepatic dysfunction or abnormalities such as elevations in serum alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase 109. Honey supplementation has been shown to exert a protective effect against streptozotocin-induced, carbon tetrachloride-induced or trichlorfon-induced liver damage 15, 63, 110. In view of the important role of the liver in mediating glycemic control and the hypoglycemic effect of honey, the hepatoprotective effect of honey might be beneficial in diabetes mellitus. Considering that increased hepatic oxidative damage is documented in diabetes mellitus 111, honey supplementation might protect the liver against oxidative stress and damage 63, 112. This hepatoprotective effect of honey might retard deterioration and improve hepatic functions and thus contribute to improved glucose homeostasis 99.
Recent findings indicate that fructose consumption is associated with a number of deleterious effects such as increased weight gain, hepatic de novo lipogenesis, hypertriglyceridemia, reduced insulin sensitivity, increased visceral adiposity and hepatic steatosis 43, 113-117. Considering that these detrimental effects do not occur with acute use of fructose, it may suggest that the glycemic index is not directly important in evaluating the effects of foods or drinks containing fructose. Instead, the medium or long term effects of fructose-containing foods or drinks on plasma lipids may be more important than the acute effect in glycemia. It is also important to note that fructose is not the same as honey. Honey is quite unique in the sense that it contains more than 181 constituents including free radical scavenging and antioxidant compounds 8, 9. Fructose is just one of these numerous constituents. As evidence has shown, antioxidants do not cause weight gain and hepatic deleterious effects associated with fructose 118. Instead, antioxidants reduce weight gain and ameliorate these abnormalities of lipids 46. Similarly, reduced weight gain and anti-lipidemic effect has been demonstrated for honey in rats 119, diabetic human subjects 120 or no change in body weight in overweight or obese subjects 121. It is also worth mentioning that these detrimental effects of fructose in the liver are not associated with low or moderate doses of fructose but with high doses of fructose consumption 117, 122, 123. The lack of deleterious effects of honey in the liver, in spite of its fructose content, may be due to the health beneficial effects of its numerous bioactive constituents which counter potential deleterious effects of fructose. It may also indicate that the amount of fructose in honey is relatively low compared to the levels in many sugar- or fructose-sweetened beverages.
The measurements of blood glucose, fructosamine and glycosylated hemoglobin are commonly employed to assess the extent of glycemic control in diabetes mellitus 124. Unlike fasting blood glucose, fructosamine and glycosylated hemoglobin measure glycemic control over a period of two to three weeks and eight to twelve weeks, respectively 66. Some of the studies which have investigated the effect of honey on glycemic control are highlighted below.
Honey was reported to produce lower glycemic response in both diabetic and non-diabetic rabbits 125. We and others have shown that honey supplementation significantly reduced blood glucose concentrations in alloxan-induced diabetic rats 126 and STZ-induced diabetic rats 16, 61. Our data and those of other authors also indicated that the hypoglycemic or health beneficial effects of honey might be dose-dependent 9, 16. As regards the effect of honey on the levels of fructosamine or glycosylated hemoglobin, limited data are available. Chepulis and Starkey reported that chronic honey supplementation reduced glycosylated hemoglobin in non-diabetic rats 127. In one of our published articles, we reported that administration of honey to STZ-induced diabetic rats reduced significantly serum concentrations of fructosamine 66. The study also showed that the combination of antidiabetic drugs, glibenclamide or metformin, with honey resulted in further reductions in serum concentrations of both glucose and fructosamine in STZ-induced diabetic rats 66. Even though studies demonstrating the effect of honey on glycemic control are still limited, these available data indicate that honey has a potential to lower elevated blood glucose, fructosamine or glycosylated hemoglobin.
Honey, compared with dextrose, sucrose or other sweeteners, was reported to attenuate postprandial glycemic response in non-diabetic volunteers 128. In healthy human subjects, natural honey produced minimal increment (20%) compared to simulated honey and D-glucose which elevated the blood glucose levels by 47% and 52%, respectively after 60 minutes 129. The study further showed that after 180 minutes, the reduction in blood glucose levels following D-glucose consumption was 20%, whereas it was twice lower (9.75%) following natural honey consumption 129. Another related study also showed that honey supplementation in healthy subjects resulted in lower serum glucose concentrations and glycemic response than honey-comparable glucose-fructose solution did 81. Other authors also reported reduced serum glucose levels in non-diabetic subjects administered honey 121, 130.
In patients with diabetes mellitus, studies showed that honey supplementation considerably reduced postprandial glycemic response or elicited much lower rise in plasma glucose than other sugars or sweeteners did 128, 131. Similarly, honey administered orally or via inhalation was reported to reduce considerably the concentrations of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 22, 120. Compared to sucrose, honey was shown to produce lower glycemic and peak incremental indices in type 1 diabetic patients 130. A recent study also showed that honey reduced hyperglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus 132. A similar glucose-lowering effect of honey was also reported in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance or patients with mild diabetes 133. With regard to the effect of honey on serum concentrations of fructosamine or glycosylated hemoglobin, there is a dearth of data. Conversely, as reported by Bahrami and co-workers, honey supplementation for 8 weeks caused increased glycosylated hemoglobin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 120. The elevated levels of glycosylated hemoglobin may be due to the high dose of honey administered to the diabetic patients 134.
However, in spite of the evidence which demonstrates the hypoglycemic effect of honey, some studies found no beneficial effect of honey on hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetic patients 135, 136. Similarly, in rodents, Nemoseck et al. found no significant difference in the concentrations of glucose and fructosamine in non-diabetic rats fed honey, a honey-based diet or sucrose 119. Likewise, we reported that honey supplementation in non-diabetic rats did not alter the serum concentrations of glucose and fructosamine 66. The lack of significant beneficial effect of honey on glucose, fructosamine and glycosylated hemoglobin in non-diabetic rats may be due to the short duration of honey supplementation or feeding. A study by Chepulis 137 showed that honey feeding in non-diabetic rats for 6 weeks reduced % weight gain only. In contrast, in another related follow-up study, honey feeding in non-diabetic rats for 52 weeks resulted in significantly reduced % weight gain, body fat and glycosylated hemoglobin while HDL cholesterol level was increased 127.
Similar to the data obtained in animal studies, honey supplementation in diabetic patients or in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance lowers hyperglycemia. Even though honey consumption causes short-term hyperglycemia, compelling evidence indicates that the hyperglycemia resulting from honey consumption is significantly less than that following the consumption of other common sugars. Thus, honey consumption or its addition to carbohydrate diets will still be beneficial in individuals with diabetes. With the exception of data published by Bahrami et al. 120, most other clinical studies did not measure fructosamine or glycosylated hemoglobin in diabetic patients. Thus, it is difficult to ascertain the actual effect of honey on elevated levels of fructosamine or glycosylated hemoglobin in diabetic patients. Therefore, there is a need for clinical studies that investigate both the short and long term effect of honey on fructosamine and/or glycosylated hemoglobin in diabetic patients.
A number of substances (both natural and synthetic) with antidiabetic effect are known to modulate key glucose-regulating hormones especially insulin 138. In healthy subjects, compared to dextrose, honey supplementation has been shown to elicit lower increments in serum insulin and C-peptide levels 139. A study by Munstedt et al. showed that honey, compared to honey-comparable glucose-fructose solution, produced significantly lower serum insulin and C-peptide concentrations in healthy men 82. In diabetic patients, honey supplementation was shown to increase insulin concentrations more than sucrose did 139. In another study, it was reported that type 2 diabetic patients administered honey had reduced insulin resistance 136. Similarly, in STZ-induced diabetic rats, honey supplementation was associated with considerable improvement in pancreatic islets as well as increased serum insulin levels 18, 66. In general, as these studies have revealed, when there is insulin resistance, honey supplementation reduces or ameliorates insulin resistance 136. On the other hand, with impaired pancreatic function and low levels of insulin, honey improves islets and increases insulin concentrations 18, 66. These findings suggest that the effect of honey on insulin and/or C-peptide is dependent on their circulating concentrations.
Diabetes mellitus is frequently associated with impaired lipid metabolism such as elevated cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) as well as impaired lipoprotein synthesis or metabolism 2. In healthy sheep, inhalation or intrapulmonary administration of honey was reported to ameliorate lipid abnormalities, though most of the parameters except TG were not statistically significant compared with dextrose 110. In rats fed honey, reduced TG 140 or increased high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol 127 was reported. A study found that rats fed honey had lower epididymal fat weight and TG while non-HDL cholesterol was higher 119. We also reported that honey supplementation significantly increased HDL cholesterol while it reduced TG and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol in STZ-induced diabetic rats 66. Additionally, the study showed that combination of glibenclamide with honey resulted in further reductions in TG and VLDL cholesterol while HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were slightly elevated in STZ-induced diabetic rats. On the other hand, the combination of metformin with honey resulted in further reductions in TG, TC, LDL cholesterol and VLDL cholesterol whereas HDL cholesterol was slightly reduced in STZ-induced diabetic rats 66.
In healthy subjects as well as patients with hyperlipidemia, honey consumption reduced TC, LDL cholesterol and C-reactive proteins while it increased HDL cholesterol 139. However, the study found significant reductions in some of the elevated lipid parameters in hyperlipidemic subjects only 139. A study by Yaghoobi et al. found that honey supplementation produced only minimal reductions in TC, LDL cholesterol and triacylglycerole in subjects with normal or elevated parameters but significantly reduced triacylglycerole in subjects with elevated values 121. Likewise in subjects with elevated cholesterol, the beneficial effect of honey on TC or TG was not observed except that it prevented the rise in LDL cholesterol in women 141. In type 2 diabetic patients, honey was reported to reduce TG 136. Similarly, a recent study showed that honey supplementation in type 2 diabetic patients for 8 weeks significantly reduced TG, TC, LDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL ratio and increased HDL cholesterol compared with baseline data 120. However, compared with the untreated diabetic patients, no significant effect of honey was found except for TC 120. Taken together, these data suggest that honey supplementation could ameliorate lipid abnormalities in both animal and human diabetes mellitus.
In addition to impaired lipid metabolism, abnormalities caused by reduced or impaired functions of liver and kidney have been documented in diabetes mellitus 109, 142. Findings from a study performed in healthy sheep showed that administration of honey increased serum protein, albumin, hemoglobin, white blood cell counts and neutrophil percentage, while it decreased blood urea nitrogen 110. We also reported that honey supplementation in diabetic rats considerably increased serum albumin and albumin/globulin ratio while serum bilirubin was markedly reduced 66. The study showed that honey tended to lower serum creatinine and urea in diabetic rats. Further analysis of some of the parameters showed that combination of antidiabetic drugs with honey resulted in synergism 66. This synergistic effect was evident from the significantly reduced serum creatinine and bilirubin in the honey + glibenclamide-treated or honey + metformin-treated diabetic rats 66. Similarly, we reported that honey supplementation in diabetic rats significantly reduced elevated levels of hepatic enzymes including aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), suggestive of hepatoprotective effect of honey in diabetes mellitus 15. A study by Al-Waili showed that the activities of several enzymes such as AST, ALT, ALP, lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH), creatinine kinase (CK) and glutathione reductase (GR) were markedly or moderately reduced in healthy individuals administered honey 143. The author also reported that honey consumption in healthy subjects increased considerably the serum concentrations of copper and iron while the levels or percentages of zinc, magnesium, vitamin C, eosinophils and monocytes were moderately increased 143. Calcium, phosphorus, ferritin, blood sugars and immunoglobulin E concentrations were either markedly or mildly reduced following honey supplementation 143. Similarly, honey was shown to increase urinary creatinine and nitrite excretion while it reduced renal excretion of prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin F2 alpha and thromboxane B2 in healthy volunteers 144. Findings from a recent study suggest that honey may exert an inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation as well as blood coagulation 145. These findings suggest that, similar to the anti-lipidemic effect of honey, honey supplementation in both rodents and human subjects has the potential to ameliorate or restore renal and hepatic functions as well as other biochemical parameters.
Certain hormones such as leptin, ghrelin and peptide YY are recognized for their role in modulating satiety, appetite, calorie intake, energy expenditure and body weight 146, 147. At the moment, only very few studies have investigated the effect of honey on appetite-regulating hormones - leptin, ghrelin and peptide YY. In rats, a recent study reported that the levels of leptin were considerably lower in rats administered honey than in those fed sucrose 119. Similarly, compared with sucrose-containing diet, honey was reported to delay postprandial ghrelin release and enhance total peptide YY response in healthy human subjects 148. Even though the data are still limited, fructose in honey may contribute to the modulating effect of honey on appetite-regulating hormones 35, 149.
As regards the effect of honey on body weight, available data (especially in experimental studies) are inconsistent. Weight gain or percentage weight gain was reported to be significantly lower in honey-fed healthy rats than in sucrose-fed rats 127, 137. Another study also reported a considerably lower weight gain and food/energy intake in honey-supplemented non-diabetic rats 119. In contrast, in most of our previous studies, no significant effect of honey on body weight in non-diabetic rats was observed 16, 18, 62, 66, 150. However, Fasanmade and Alabi found that honey supplementation significantly increased body weight in non-diabetic and fructose-fed rats 126. In alloxan-induced or STZ-induced diabetic rats (commonly characterized by weight loss), honey administration considerably prevented weight loss or improved body weight 16, 18, 62, 66, 126, 150. As previously reported, we did not find any significant effect of honey on food intake in both diabetic and non-diabetic rats 16, 19, 66. Although there are limited data in clinical studies, available evidence suggests that honey supplementation in human subjects is associated with reduced weight gain. In overweight or obese human subjects, Yaghoobi et al. reported that honey consumption produced a mild reduction in body weight and body fat 121. Bahrami and colleagues showed that honey supplementation in type 2 diabetic patients significantly reduced body weight 120.
Although the mechanisms by which honey decreases weight gain are still not fully understood, findings from some recent studies suggest that honey might reduce weight gain via modulation of appetite-regulating hormones such as leptin, ghrelin and peptide YY 119, 148. Furthermore, based on findings which showed lack of significant difference in food efficiency ratio (FER) in sucrose- and honey-fed rats, reduced food intake might contribute considerably to reduced weight gain in honey-fed rats 119. Fructose and oligosaccharides which are present in honey might also contribute to reduced body weight and food intake in honey-fed rats 35, 43, 46, 151. Besides, available evidence indicates that honey might reduce body weight through reduced digestion and absorption of protein and increased fecal nitrogen output 137. Considering the overwhelming evidence which indicates that honey increases plasma antioxidants and ameliorates oxidative stress in tissues 16, 18, 19, 143, 150, 152, 153, the antioxidant effect of honey might also contribute to reduced weight gain 118.
It seems important to briefly highlight the relative strengths and weaknesses of studies that investigated the hypoglycemic or antidiabetic effect of honey. Some of these studies investigated the acute effect of honey 82, 83, 129, 133, 135, 136, 154, 155 whereas only very few studies evaluated the effect of honey over a long duration 120. This may influence the outcome, leading to significant findings in some studies and lack of significant results in others. Investigating the acute effect of honey in blood glucose in subjects with diabetes mellitus does not provide detailed and valid findings because diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease. Some studies could not compare and differentiate if honey samples, despite differences in their fructose content and fructose to glucose ratios, were better than common sugars due to lack of controls 156. In contrast, others could differentiate the differences between various honey samples as well in comparison with common sugars or artificial honey due to inclusion of controls 82, 83, 121, 129, 130, 135, 139, 155. Some studies were performed in healthy and non-diabetic subjects 82, 83, 139, 155, 156 while others used impaired glucose tolerant or diabetic subjects 130, 133, 135, 136, 139. As we reported earlier, in the majority of our studies, honey did not alter or affect the blood glucose in non-diabetic rats but only in diabetic rats 16, 18, 62, 66, 151. Therefore, the inclusion of different subjects with or without diabetes may influence the findings. Among the diabetic subjects, some authors recruited type 1 diabetic patients 130 while others enlisted type 2 diabetic subjects 120. As a result of the differences in the etiologies of these two types of diabetes, compared to type 1 diabetic subjects, type 2 diabetic patients are more likely to respond to the antidiabetic effect of honey 120. This difference in study participants may influence the data obtained as well as the deductions from those data.
Besides, some studies used doses of honey that ranged from low 135, 136, 154, moderate 155 to high doses 82, 83, 120, 121, 129, 130. The fructose proportion in relation to glucose in the honey samples also differed. While the fructose content and fructose to glucose ratios in some honeys were within the stipulated or normal range 66, 82, 83, 156, some studies used honeys with low fructose and high glucose levels as well as unusually low fructose to glucose ratio 120. Fructose is a potential hypoglycemic constituent of honey 35. Hence, diabetic patients administered honey containing usual fructose amounts are likely to demonstrate better improvements in glycemic control than those administered honey with unusually low fructose content 120. The sample size also differed. While some studies recruited small or moderate number of subjects or patients 82, 83, 130, 135, 136, 139, 154, 155, only very few studies recruited larger or adequate number 120, 121. Improper study design was another major problem. Most studies were not randomized control trials and/or did not have definite criteria for enlisting participants, whereas some (few) studies were randomized control trials and/or had well defined inclusion and exclusion criteria 82, 83, 120. Additionally, the measurement of glycemic control (fructosamine or glycosylated hemoglobin), an important parameter, was not measured in most of these studies with the exception of few 66, 120. Those are some of the weaknesses and strengths observed in these studies. These differences in study designs including study participants and the variations among honeys lead to difficulties in comparing the data obtained in a study with those of other studies. For instance, despite the fact that some of the studies were properly randomized with controls and had well defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, findings from such studies cannot be compared due to differences in the doses of honey used, honey constituents, types or nature of recruited subjects or patients, and other study design related issues 82, 120, 130. Therefore, it is important to consider all these factors while making an inference on the ineffectiveness (or otherwise) of honey as an antidiabetic agent. Any of these factors may influence and give inaccurate data, either false positive or negative, resulting in misinterpretation of data.
Before the main highlights of this review are summarized, two important toxic effects that may result from honey consumption - honey intoxication and infant botulism, will be discussed briefly. Honey intoxication (also known as mad honey disease, Rhododendrons poisoning or grayanotoxin poisoning) refers to a poisoning that results from the consumption of honey produced from the nectar of Rhododendrons 157. Rhododendron plants can be found in many countries and regions such as Turkey, Japan, Nepal, North America and Brazil 158. The first written account of honey intoxication dates back to the 4th Century BC when thousands of soldiers were poisoned after the consumption of honey produced from the nectar of Rhododendron luteum (Azalea pontica) in Greece 157, 158. Several cases of honey poisoning have also been reported in Turkey, Germany and Austria 157, 159, 160. The easy and rapid food transport, together with a renewed interest in consumption of natural foods all over the world may increase cases of honey poisoning 158. It is suggested that while the general population may be vulnerable to honey intoxication, individuals who consume honey from (local) beekeepers who have only a few hives are at higher risk 160. Commercially produced honey is considered safe or safer. Commercial processing of massive quantities of honey obtained from different farmers helps to dilute any toxic substances that may be present in honey 160. This toxic substance is identified as a poisonous compound, grayanotoxin, found in rhododendron nectar 159. Grayanotoxins belong to a group of toxins known as diterpenes which are polyhydroxylated cyclic hydrocarbons that do not have nitrogen 158, 159. Consumption of between 5 and 30 g of mad honey may cause honey poisoning 158. In most reported cases, honey intoxication is hardly critical and the patients usually recover within 24 hours without any intervention 159. In most cases, discontinuation of mad honey intake is sufficient for patient recovery 160. Some of the symptoms of honey intoxication, which are dose-dependent, include salivation, nausea, vomiting, sharp burning sensation in the throat, dizziness, excessive perspiration, abnormal sensations, breathing problems and progressive muscular weakness 157, 159, 160. However, severe honey intoxication may lead to life threatening complications such as atrioventricular block, cardiac arrhythmia, bradycardia, low blood pressure and shock 157, 159. This may necessitate fluid supplementation and treatment of bradycardia with atropine to restore severe low blood pressure. The use of a pacemaker or treatment with vasopressors may be required but only rarely 157, 159.
Infant botulism is a neuroparalytic disease characterized by a blockade of voluntary motor and autonomic functions 161. It was first recognized in the United States in the late 1976 161. Several cases have since been reported in USA, Argentina, Australia, Italy, Canada, Japan, China and India 161. Infant botulism affects mostly healthy children less than one year old. It is caused by a heat-labile neurotoxin produced by Clostridium botulinum 161, 162. It occurs when infants ingest Clostridium botulinum spores which grow and produce toxin after it has colonized the infant's gut 161. The most common symptoms include constipation, poor sucking reflex, weak cry, irritability, lack of facial expression, hypotonia, hyporeflexia, progressive to generalized weakness, respiratory failure and loss of head control 162. The Clostridium botulinum spores are commonly found in the environment, in the dust, inside or outside the house and in the soil 161, 163. The exposure of infants to spores of Clostridium botulinum is increased by factors such as staying in a windy site, soil disruption caused by farming activities and disturbing the soil, as in a building site 163, 164. More than 1,000 cases have been reported and intake of honey has been linked to infant botulism 161, 163, 165, 166. Clostridium botulinum spores and toxins have also been detected in many honey samples 163, 165. Although it remains unclear how Clostridium botulinum finds its way into the honey, the honeybee may carry and bring the Clostridium botulinum spores to the hive 161, 165. Also being ubiquitous, the Clostridium botulinum spores may easily be found around the hive as well. At the moment, even though the exposure to botulinum spores is widespread and several host factors may contribute to the cause of infant botulism, consumption of honey is the only food-borne related case. Honey, therefore, is considered an avoidable source of Clostridium botulinum spores 161, 163, 165, 167. This has prompted the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to recommend that honey not be given to infants who are less than 1 year old 163, 165, 166.
Considering that honey is reported to contain at least 181 substances 8, the exact mechanism of its antidiabetic effect is complex and therefore will necessitate detailed investigation 16. Even though the mechanisms by which honey improves glycemic control and other diabetic profiles remain unclear, available evidence suggests that fructose in honey may modulate the hypoglycemic or antidiabetic effect of honey 35. Certain varieties of honey have been reported to increase plasma concentrations of fructose in healthy humans 83. Similarly, evidence indicates that the fructose content of honey negatively correlates with glycemic index 4, 9, 154. Small amounts of fructose have been reported to reduce blood glucose through increased hepatic glucose uptake by activating glucokinase 168. The beneficial effect of fructose administration on glycemic control has also been documented in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 169.
In view of the fact that sucrose and honey contain similar proportions of fructose and glucose, data which indicate that honey improves glycemic control much better than sucrose does suggest that the hypoglycemic or antidiabetic effect of honey cannot be attributed entirely to fructose. Honey is enriched in oligosaccharides such as sucrose, maltose, trehalose, turanose, panose,1-kestose, 6-kestose and palatinose 9, 80. Evidence suggests that a number of oligosaccharides present in honey might play a role in the antidiabetic effect of honey 80. Palatinose-based balanced formula has been shown to improve glycemic response in patients with impaired glucose tolerance 170 or produce a lower blood glucose levels in healthy subjects 96. Similar beneficial effects of palatinose on glucose and lipd metabolism in rodents have also been reported 171, 172. The oligosaccharides in honey may contribute to the antidiabetic effect of honey either via modulation of gut microbiota 80, 88, 90, 92 or through the systemic effects of oligosaccharides 80, 173.
Honey contains a number of mineral elements such as zinc, selenium, copper, calcium, potassium, chromium, manganese and so on 4, 9. Some of these minerals such as chromium are recognized for their role in the reduction of elevated blood glucose, maintenance of normal glucose tolerance and insulin secretion from the pancreatic β-cells 174, 175. Other studies have also shown that copper and zinc can improve insulin sensitivity thereby decreasing blood glucose levels 176, 177. Even though the amounts of these minerals in honey may be low 4, 9, it is suggested that daily ingestion of honey might achieve adequate concentrations of these minerals and thus exert pharmacological responses 66. Coupled with the evidence which demonstrates increased serum concentrations of these minerals after honey supplementation 143, these ions might also contribute to the antidiabetic effect of honey 176, 178. Increased C-peptide and insulin secretion 66, 132 and modulation of appetite-regulating hormones such as leptin, ghrelin and peptide YY 119, 148, 179 as a result of honey supplementation may also contribute to improved glycemic control. With these proposed mechanisms of action, we have not excluded the prospect of a yet to be identified substance or substances in honey contributing to or mediating the antidiabetic effect of honey.
Compelling evidence implicates the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis and/or deterioration of glycemic control in diabetes mellitus 180, 181. Increased glucose uptake in both skeletal muscle and adipose tissue enhances reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and oxidative stress which in turn impairs glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis 182. Oxidative stress causes insulin resistance through impaired insulin signaling pathways such as interference with insulin receptor, insulin receptor substrate-1 and protein kinase B/Akt 181, 183-186. Thus, through its antioxidant effect 153, honey might enhance insulin sensitivity in the liver and muscle thereby increase glucose uptake resulting in reduced hyperglycemia. The pancreas expresses low level of antioxidant enzymes, which makes it vulnerable to oxidative stress 187. The toxic effect of hyperglycemia in the β-cells, a condition referred to as glucotoxicity, is mediated via oxidative stress 188. The role of glucotoxicity is implicated in the declined β-cell function 188. A number of studies have demonstrated that ROS or oxidative products impair insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells, inhibit glucose-induced insulin secretion and biosynthesis, deplete insulin content of the pancreatic β-cells and increase β-cell apoptosis 189-191. The beneficial effect of antioxidants in β-cells has been reported 190, 192. A number of studies have shown that honey can scavenge free radicals 20, 21, 153, 190. Thus, honey supplementation may ameliorate oxidative stress in the pancreas, protect the pancreas against oxidative damage and thus enhance insulin secretion resulting in improved glycemic control 17-19, 62.
Diabetes mellitus is characterized by impairments in lipid metabolism leading to lipid abnormalities such as elevated levels of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs). The increased oxidative environment in diabetes further enhances the oxidation and glycation of LDLs to form oxLDLs, which is implicated in endothelial dysfunction 193. The antioxidant and free radical scavenging effects of honey may help to reduce the oxidative milieu and enhance antioxidant defenses in diabetes 16, 19, 20, 153, 194-196. This may reduce vascular ROS, inhibit inactivation and increase bioavailability of NO, suppress the formation of oxLDLs and thus reduce or prevent deterioration of endothelial function 20, 197-199. These potential antioxidant effect and free radical scavenging activities of honey on LDL oxidation 16, 19, 20, 194-196 and its potential anti-lipidemic effect 66, 120, 121, 127, 139 may delay or prevent the development of atherosclerosis. The beneficial effects of antioxidants including honey in glycemic control have also been demonstrated 16, 66, 199-203.
Evidence also indicates antioxidants may reduce protein glycosylation in diabetic subjects independently of changes in plasma glucose 204, 205. Antioxidants have been shown to ameliorate oxidative stress and increase the levels of C-peptide and insulin as well as improve insulin resistance in diabetes mellitus 66, 199-201, 206-208. Antioxidants may ameliorate intestinal oxidative stress and enhance BBM fluidity thereby promote GIT health which may impact positively on glycemic control in diabetes mellitus 56, 65. In view of the role of liver in glucose homeostasis, the antioxidant effect of honey may ameliorate hepatic oxidative stress and damage 15, 111. These hepatic effects may enhance liver functions and contribute to improved glycemic control.
Recent evidence indicates that hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress is the underlying mechanism by which hyperglycemia induces cellular damage 209, 210. This mechanism is now known to activate all the different pathogenic pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications 209, 210. These pathogenic or mechanistic pathways include (1) polyol pathway; (2) formation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs); (3) protein kinase C (PKC) pathway; (4) hexosamine pathway; and (5) Poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) pathway 209-211. These pathways increase the consumption or utilization of NADPH and inhibit glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) 212. NADPH is an obligate co-factor for several intracellular enzymes and metabolic processes. For instance, GR requires NADPH for the regeneration of reduced glutathione (GSH), a potent endogenous scavenger of ROS. GAPDH is the rate-limiting enzyme of the pentose phosphate pathway necessary for generating reducing equivalents to the antioxidant defense system 212, 213. These pathways (via intracellular NADPH depletion and intracellular GAPDH inhibition) play a major role in impairing antioxidant defenses and increasing the cellular susceptibility to oxidative stress and damage.
Nishikawa et al. classified these mechanisms of hyperglycemia-induced cellular damage into two groups 211. The first group involves constant acute fluctuations in cellular metabolism which are temporary and reversible following restoration of normoglycemia 211. This is where most of the anti-diabetic drugs are beneficial. The second group of mechanisms entails cumulative changes in long-lived macromolecules which are irreversible even after normoglycemia is restored 211. Here, the anti-diabetic drugs have no or limited role to play 214-217. This second group of mechanisms-induced irreversible changes or alterations, despite improved glycemic control, is explained by a phenomenon known as glycemic or metabolic memory 211, 218. Oxidative stress is identified or recognized as the major mechanism by which glycemic or metabolic memory induces tissue damage 211, 215, 216, 218-220. This is where the antioxidant effect of honey may complement its antidiabetic effect [16, 18-20, 62, 66, 153 194-196]. This might result in synergistic and beneficial effects in diabetic patients. Honey, via its antioxidant effect, may prevent depletion of intracellular NADPH and inhibition of intracellular GAPDH. These two effects may enhance antioxidant defenses in tissues or organs that are susceptible to oxidative stress-mediated diabetic complications. These include kidney (reducing diabetic nephropathy), retina (reducing diabetic retinopathy), nerve (reducing diabetic neuropathy) and heart (reducing diabetic cardiomyopathy). This assertion is further supported by findings in honey-supplemented diabetic rats 17-19, 62, 66, 153. Honey supplementation may also increase the expression of cytoprotective genes through up-regulation of Nrf2 activity and expression 23, 221. Diabetic patients are also likely to benefit more if honey is used as a complementary agent or combined with the conventional or standard anti-diabetic therapy 17-19, 62, 66.
A closer look at the proposed mechanisms of action of antidiabetic effect of honey (figure 5) suggests the following:
- Honey, through its GIT effects, would possess characteristic effects of α-glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose.
- Honey, through its hepatic and/or pancreatic effects, would possess characteristic effects of insulin secretagogues such as sulfonylureas (glibenclamide) as well as repaglinide and nateglinide.
- Honey, through its hepatic and muscular amelioration of oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance, would possess characteristic effects of thiazolidinediones and biguanides such as metformin.
- Honey, through its effects on incretin and appetite-regulating hormones, would possess characteristic effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors such as sitagliptin and GLP-1 mimetic such as exenatide.
- Honey, through its anti-lipidemic effects, would possess characteristic effects of anti-obesity drugs.
All these clearly indicate that honey possesses characteristics of most of the currently prescribed antidiabetic drugs and suggest it is a novel antidiabetic agent.
At the moment, the underlying pathogenic mechanism remains unknown. However, evidence suggests that insulin resistance precedes impaired glucose tolerance and onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus in type 2 diabetic patients 180, 181. In view of the compelling evidence which implicates the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance 181, 183-186. Honey supplementation in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance or who are at pre-diabetic stage may delay or prevent the development of diabetes mellitus. In individuals at the early stages of or with mild type 2 diabetes mellitus, honey supplementation in combination with regular exercise and dietary management may suffice to maintain glycemic control. Honey as an antidiabetic agent is likely to be more effective and beneficial if combined with conventional antidiabetic therapy. Therefore, in patients with moderate or severe type 2 diabetes mellitus, honey supplementation in combination with one or two (instead of multiple) antidiabetic drugs may be sufficient to achieve glycemic control 17, 18, 62, 66. Considering that oxidative stress-induced diabetic complications are similar in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, the use of honey in combination with insulin therapy would also be beneficial in type 1 diabetic patients. If combined with conventional antidiabetic drugs or insulin, the use of honey may necessitate lower doses of these synthetic drugs or insulin to achieve similar glycemic control. Supplementation with honey may also help to counteract and/or minimize the adverse effects such as hypoglycemia and weight gain associated with some of these drugs. Its anti-lipidemic effect will also be beneficial in diabetic patients 66, 119-121, 139. In addition to its antidiabetic effect, honey in combination with antidiabetic drugs may also help to delay or prevent the development of hypertension in diabetic patients or reduce elevated blood pressure in diabetic hypertensive patients 23, 150, 203, 222.
The potential of honey to be used in the prevention (prophylactic effect) and treatment (antidiabetic effect) of diabetes mellitus holds much promise in view of the rising prevalence and complications of this disorder. The goal of conventional antidiabetic therapy is to achieve glycosylated hemoglobin target of ≤ 7.0% 223, 224. While this is beneficial 223, 224, evidence indicates that it is difficult to achieve and maintain this glycemic goal 225. In many patients, this will necessitate the use of multiple drugs 226. This further exposes patients to toxicities of these drugs 225, 226. The latest findings reveal that the intensive therapy of hyperglycemia, which benefits are limited to only microvascular complications, is associated with increased weight gain, severe hypoglycemia and increased mortality 227, 228. In light of these limitations and adverse effects, combination of these drugs with honey might be a new and more effective therapeutic option in the management of diabetes mellitus in the near future. The recent statistics have shown that the majority of the newly diagnosed diabetes cases will emerge from developing countries 1. The vast majority of whom cannot afford the high cost of these synthetic drugs 229, 230. In such developing countries, considering the global availability of honey, honey may be one of the few sources of succor or relief among diabetics in the near future. Due to its sweetness, combination of antidiabetic therapy with honey may also help to improve patients' compliance. There is no doubt that as more compelling data become available in the future, the potential of honey to be used as a prophylactic and antidiabetic agent (especially in combination with conventional antidiabetic drugs) holds much promise. In the future, honey might become a valued commodity that will be adopted as self-medication by the general public. As research interest into the potential prophylactic and antidiabetic effects of honey intensifies, the discovery of biologically active antidiabetic constituents in honey is anticipated. With the aid of biotechnology or medicinal chemistry synthesis, there is a possibility to develop these identified bioactive principles into a pharmacologically active molecule or a drug candidate. In the future, honey or its identified drug candidate might become one of the lead antidiabetic agents to be added to the classes of antidiabetic drugs.
There is no doubt that studies investigating the potential role of honey in the management of diabetes mellitus are at a relatively early stage. In spite of a dearth of data, these studies have overwhelmingly shown that honey is more tolerable than most common sugars or sweeteners in healthy subjects or patients with impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes mellitus. It is worth mentioning that honey consumption is associated with short-term hyperglycemia. However, due to its minimal incremental effect on blood glucose compared to other sweeteners or common sugars, consumption of honey or its addition to other carbohydrate diets is highly encouraged in diabetic patients. This is very important because it is well known that the majority of diabetic patients do not always adhere to the dietary guidelines such as the exclusion of simple sugars in the diabetic diets.
In animal models of diabetes, there is more compelling evidence in support of honey as a novel antidiabetic agent. However, at the moment, this does not seem to be the case in clinical diabetes mellitus. This is because, unlike in animal studies, most of the data obtained on the antidiabetic effect of honey in human subjects were significant or showed improved trends in comparison with baseline data only. The majority of the clinical studies lacked control groups. Among the few studies that did include controls, most of the data obtained in the honey-supplemented subjects or diabetic patients were not significant in comparison with the controls. The lack of significant data in some of the clinical studies with controls could largely be attributed to poor study designs or due to the fact that the studies were too preliminary. Considering that honey has a potential to be used as an antidiabetic agent, the following recommendations are made: there is a need for (1) well designed clinical studies that enlist a large sample size; (2) randomized clinical trials comprising diabetic patients (if possible, should be grouped into mild, moderate or severe) treated with graded doses of honey as well as controls; and (3) clinical studies investigating and comparing both the short-term and long-term effects of honey supplementation in diabetic patients.
Besides, the experimental findings which indicate that glibenclamide or metformin, the two most commonly prescribed antidiabetic drugs, combined with honey improves glycemic control and other metabolic abnormalities merit further studies in type 2 diabetic patients. In view of the similarities and differences between animal and human diabetes mellitus, it will be interesting and worthwhile to explore whether these experimental data can be reproduced and substantiated or perhaps refuted in diabetic human subjects. Besides, considering that most of the studies that investigated the antidiabetic effect of honey did not pay much attention to possible mechanisms of action, it will be desirable to ensure that future studies emphasize mechanisms by which honey improves glycemic control and ameliorates metabolic derangements in diabetes mellitus. These mechanism studies might also help our understanding on how a chemically bioactive substance or substances in honey could bypass various epithelial membrane barriers including GIT, undergo (extensive) hepatic metabolism, and still be able to elicit an antidiabetic effect including increased insulin secretion. Therefore, in order to ensure that these novel findings obtained in animal studies are successfully reproduced in clinical studies and translated to the benefits of diabetic patients, the significance of having rigorous and well-designed randomized controlled clinical trials cannot be overemphasized.
The studies on the effects of tualang honey were supported by grants from Universiti Sains Malaysia.
|1.||Shaw JE,Sicree RA,Zimmet PZ,Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030Diabetes Res Clin PractYear: 20108741419896746|
|2.||Kokil GR,Rewatkar PV,Verma A,et al. Pharmacology and chemistry of diabetes mellitus and antidiabetic drugs: a critical reviewCurr Med ChemYear: 20101744052320939806|
|3.||Roglic G,Unwin N,Mortality attributable to diabetes: estimates for the year 2010Diabetes Res Clin PractYear: 20108715919914728|
|4.||Honey as nutrient and functional foodBogdanov S http://www.bee-hexagon.net.|
|5.||Wang J,Li QX,Chemical composition, characterization, and differentiation of honey botanical and geographical originsAdv Food Nutr ResYear: 2011628913721504822|
|6.||Molan P,The limitations of the methods of identifying the floral source of honeysBee WorldYear: 1998975968|
|7.||Ramírez-Arriaga E,Navarro-Calvo AL,Díaz-Carbajal E,Botanical characterisation of Mexican honeys from a subtropical region (Oaxaca) based on pollen analysisGranaYear: 201150405|
|8.||Gheldof N,Wang XH,Engeseth NJ,Identification and quantification of antioxidant components of honeys from various floral sourcesJ Agric Food ChemYear: 2002505870712358452|
|9.||Bogdanov S,Jurendic T,Sieber R,et al. Honey for nutrition and health: a reviewJ Am Coll NutrYear: 2008276778919155427|
|10.||Beretta G,Gelmini F,Lodi V,et al. Profile of nitric oxide (NO) metabolites (nitrate, nitrite and N-nitroso groups) in honeys of different botanical origin: nitrate accumulation as index of origin, quality and of therapeutic opportunitiesJ Pharm Biomed AnalYear: 201053343920451343|
|11.||Beretta G,Caneva E,Facino RM,Kynurenic acid in honey from arboreal plants: MS and NMR evidencePlanta MedYear: 2007731592517999354|
|12.||Crane E. History of honeyCrane EHoney, a comprehensive surveyLondonWilliam HeinemannYear: 197543988|
|13.||Heitkamp K,Busch-Stockfisch M,[The pros and cons of honey--are statements about the effects of honey "scientifically verified"?]Z Lebensm Unters ForschYear: 1986182279862424192|
|14.||Rakha MK,Nabil ZI,Hussein AA,Cardioactive and vasoactive effects of natural wild honey against cardiac malperformance induced by hyperadrenergic activityJ Med FoodYear: 20081191818361743|
|15.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Hepatoprotective effect of tualang honey supplementation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic ratsInt J Appl Res Nat ProdYear: 201243741|
|16.||Erejuwa OO,Gurtu S,Sulaiman SA,et al. Hypoglycemic and antioxidant effects of honey supplementation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic ratsInt J Vitam Nutr ResYear: 201080748220533247|
|17.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Antioxidant protective effect of glibenclamide and metformin in combination with honey in pancreas of streptozotocin-induced diabetic ratsInt J Mol SciYear: 20101120566620559501|
|18.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Comparison of antioxidant effects of honey, glibenclamide, metformin, and their combinations in the kidneys of streptozotocin-induced diabetic ratsInt J Mol SciYear: 2011128294321340016|
|19.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Antioxidant protection of Malaysian tualang honey in pancreas of normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic ratsAnn Endocrinol (Paris)Year: 201071291620398890|
|20.||Beretta G,Orioli M,Facino RM,Antioxidant and radical scavenging activity of honey in endothelial cell cultures (EA.hy926)Planta MedYear: 2007731182917823875|
|21.||Beretta G,Granata P,Ferrero M,et al. Standardization of antioxidant properties of honey by a combination of spectrophotometric/fluorimetric assays and chemometricsAnal Chim ActaYear: 200553318591|
|22.||Al-Waili N,Intrapulmonary administration of natural honey solution, hyperosmolar dextrose or hypoosmolar distill water to normal individuals and to patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus or hypertension: their effects on blood glucose level, plasma insulin and C-peptide, blood pressure and peaked expiratory flow rateEur J Med ResYear: 2003829530312911866|
|23.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Honey supplementation in spontaneously hypertensive rats elicits antihypertensive effect via amelioration of renal oxidative stressOxid Med Cell LongevYear: 20122012114|
|24.||Tan HT,Rahman RA,Gan SH,et al. The antibacterial properties of Malaysian tualang honey against wound and enteric microorganisms in comparison to manuka honeyBMC Complement Altern MedYear: 200991819144128|
|25.||Feas X,Estevinho ML,A survey of the in vitro antifungal activity of heather (erica sp.) organic honeyJ Med FoodYear: 2011141284821663476|
|26.||Zeina B,Othman O,al-Assad S,Effect of honey versus thyme on Rubella virus survival in vitroJ Altern Complement MedYear: 1996234589395668|
|27.||Kassim M,Achoui M,Mustafa MR,et al. Ellagic acid, phenolic acids, and flavonoids in Malaysian honey extracts demonstrate in vitro anti-inflammatory activityNutr ResYear: 201030650920934607|
|28.||Fukuda M,Kobayashi K,Hirono Y,et al. Jungle honey enhances immune function and antitumor activityEvid Based Complement Alternat MedYear: 2011201118|
|29.||The chemistry of carbohydrates found in food http://www.medbio.info.|
|31.||Wright EM,Hirayama BA,Loo DF,Active sugar transport in health and diseaseJ Intern MedYear: 2007261324317222166|
|32.||Vaisman N,Niv E,Izkhakov Y,Catalytic amounts of fructose may improve glucose tolerance in subjects with uncontrolled non-insulin-dependent diabetesClin NutrYear: 2006256172116403592|
|33.||Stanhope KL,Griffen SC,Bremer AA,et al. Metabolic responses to prolonged consumption of glucose- and fructose-sweetened beverages are not associated with postprandial or 24-h glucose and insulin excursionsAm J Clin NutrYear: 201194112921613559|
|34.||Kwon S,Kim YJ,Kim MK,Effect of fructose or sucrose feeding with different levels on oral glucose tolerance test in normal and type 2 diabetic ratsNutr Res PractYear: 20082252820016727|
|35.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,Fructose might contribute to the hypoglycemic effect of honeyMoleculesYear: 20121719001522337138|
|36.||Moran TH,McHugh PR,Distinctions among three sugars in their effects on gastric emptying and satietyAm J PhysiolYear: 1981241R25307246798|
|37.||Kellett GL,Brot-Laroche E,Mace OJ,et al. Sugar absorption in the intestine: the role of GLUT2Annu Rev NutrYear: 200828355418393659|
|38.||Kashimura J,Nagai Y,Inhibitory effect of palatinose on glucose absorption in everted rat gutJ Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo)Year: 20075387917484386|
|39.||Lina BA,Jonker D,Kozianowski G,Isomaltulose (Palatinose): a review of biological and toxicological studiesFood Chem ToxicolYear: 20024013758112387299|
|40.||Thibault L,Dietary carbohydrates: effects on self-selection, plasma glucose and insulin, and brain indoleaminergic systems in ratAppetiteYear: 199423275867537031|
|41.||Gregory PC,McFadyen M,Rayner DV,Relation between gastric emptying and short-term regulation of food intake in the pigPhysiol BehavYear: 198945677832780833|
|42.||Henry RR,Crapo PA,Thorburn AW,Current issues in fructose metabolismAnnu Rev NutrYear: 19911121391892698|
|43.||Meirelles CJ,Oliveira LA,Jordao AA,et al. Metabolic effects of the ingestion of different fructose sources in ratsExp Clin Endocrinol DiabetesYear: 20111192182021465428|
|44.||Lavin JH,Wittert GA,Andrews J,et al. Interaction of insulin, glucagon-like peptide 1, gastric inhibitory polypeptide, and appetite in response to intraduodenal carbohydrateAm J Clin NutrYear: 19986859189734735|
|45.||Anderson GH,Woodend D,Effect of glycemic carbohydrates on short-term satiety and food intakeNutr RevYear: 200361S172612828188|
|46.||Madero M,Arriaga JC,Jalal D,et al. The effect of two energy-restricted diets, a low-fructose diet versus a moderate natural fructose diet, on weight loss and metabolic syndrome parameters: a randomized controlled trialMetabolismYear: 2011601551921621801|
|47.||Bocarsly ME,Powell ES,Avena NM,et al. High-fructose corn syrup causes characteristics of obesity in rats: increased body weight, body fat and triglyceride levelsPharmacol Biochem BehavYear: 201097101620219526|
|48.||Jones HF,Butler RN,Brooks DA,Intestinal fructose transport and malabsorption in humansAm J Physiol Gastrointest Liver PhysiolYear: 2011300G202621148401|
|49.||Gouyon F,Caillaud L,Carriere V,et al. Simple-sugar meals target GLUT2 at enterocyte apical membranes to improve sugar absorption: a study in GLUT2-null miceJ PhysiolYear: 20035528233212937289|
|50.||Miyamoto K,Hase K,Takagi T,et al. Differential responses of intestinal glucose transporter mRNA transcripts to levels of dietary sugarsBiochem JYear: 199329521158216218|
|51.||Riby JE,Fujisawa T,Kretchmer N,Fructose absorptionAm J Clin NutrYear: 199358748S53S8213606|
|52.||Ushijima K,Riby JE,Fujisawa T,et al. Absorption of fructose by isolated small intestine of rats is via a specific saturable carrier in the absence of glucose and by the disaccharidase-related transport system in the presence of glucoseJ NutrYear: 19951252156647643250|
|53.||Fujisawa T,Riby J,Kretchmer N,Intestinal absorption of fructose in the ratGastroenterologyYear: 199110136072065911|
|54.||Fine KD,Santa Ana CA,Porter JL,et al. Mechanism by which glucose stimulates the passive absorption of small solutes by the human jejunum in vivoGastroenterologyYear: 1994107389958039615|
|55.||Ariefdjohan MW,Martin BR,Lachcik PJ,et al. Acute and chronic effects of honey and its carbohydrate constituents on calcium absorption in ratsJ Agric Food ChemYear: 20085626495418361495|
|56.||Bhor VM,Sivakami S,Regional variations in intestinal brush border membrane fluidity and function during diabetes and the role of oxidative stress and non-enzymatic glycationMol Cell BiochemYear: 20032521253214577585|
|57.||Zoubi SA,Williams MD,Mayhew TM,et al. Number and ultrastructure of epithelial cells in crypts and villi along the streptozotocin-diabetic small intestine: a quantitative study on the effects of insulin and aldose reductase inhibitionVirchows ArchYear: 1995427187937582250|
|58.||Fedorak RN,Gershon MD,Field M,Induction of intestinal glucose carriers in streptozocin-treated chronically diabetic ratsGastroenterologyYear: 19899637442521211|
|59.||Sharma SD,Sivakami S,Responses of intestinal and renal alpha-glycosidases to alloxan and streptozotocin-induced diabetes: a comparative studyBiochem Mol Biol IntYear: 199844647569584978|
|60.||Shirpoor A,Ansari MH,Salami S,et al. Effect of vitamin E on oxidative stress status in small intestine of diabetic ratWorld J GastroenterolYear: 2007134340417708608|
|61.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Effects of Malaysian tualang honey supplementation on glycemia, free radical scavenging enzymes and markers of oxidative stress in kidneys of normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic ratsInt J CardiolYear: 2009137S45|
|62.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Effect of glibenclamide alone versus glibenclamide and honey on oxidative stress in pancreas of streptozotocin-induced diabetic ratsInt J Appl Res Nat ProdYear: 20114110|
|63.||Eraslan G,Kanbur M,Silici S,et al. Beneficial effect of pine honey on trichlorfon induced some biochemical alterations in miceEcotoxicol Environ SafYear: 20107310849120303175|
|64.||Faria A,Mateus N,de Freitas V,et al. Modulation of MPP+ uptake by procyanidins in Caco-2 cells: involvement of oxidation/reduction reactionsFEBS LettYear: 20065801556016364314|
|65.||Faria A,Monteiro R,Pestana D,et al. Intestinal oxidative state can alter nutrient and drug bioavailabilityOxid Med Cell LongevYear: 20092322720716920|
|66.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Glibenclamide or metformin combined with honey improves glycemic control in streptozotocin-induced diabetic ratsInt J Biol SciYear: 201172445221448302|
|67.||Naito Y,Takagi T,Oya-Ito T,et al. Impaired gastric ulcer healing in diabetic mice: role of methylglyoxalJ Physiol PharmacolYear: 200960Suppl 71233020388955|
|68.||Boehme MW,Autschbach F,Ell C,et al. Prevalence of silent gastric ulcer, erosions or severe acute gastritis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus - a cross-sectional studyHepatogastroenterologyYear: 200754643817523341|
|69.||Thomsen RW,Riis A,Christensen S,et al. Diabetes and 30-day mortality from peptic ulcer bleeding and perforation: a Danish population-based cohort studyDiabetes CareYear: 2006298051016567819|
|70.||Gharzouli K,Amira S,Gharzouli A,et al. Gastroprotective effects of honey and glucose-fructose-sucrose-maltose mixture against ethanol-, indomethacin-, and acidified aspirin-induced lesions in the ratExp Toxicol PatholYear: 2002542172112484559|
|71.||Osato MS,Reddy SG,Graham DY,Osmotic effect of honey on growth and viability of Helicobacter pyloriDig Dis SciYear: 199944462410080135|
|72.||Gollu A,Kismet K,Kilicoglu B,et al. Effect of honey on intestinal morphology, intraabdominal adhesions and anastomotic healingPhytother ResYear: 2008221243718697181|
|73.||Gencay C,Kilicoglu SS,Kismet K,et al. Effect of honey on bacterial translocation and intestinal morphology in obstructive jaundiceWorld J GastroenterolYear: 2008143410518528939|
|74.||Ergul E,Ergul S,The effect of honey on the intestinal anastomotic wound healing in rats with obstructive jaundiceBratisl Lek ListyYear: 20101112657020568415|
|75.||Quigley EM,Prebiotics and probiotics; modifying and mining the microbiotaPharmacol ResYear: 201061213820080184|
|76.||Bjorkholm B,Bok CM,Lundin A,et al. Intestinal microbiota regulate xenobiotic metabolism in the liverPLoS OneYear: 20094e695818|
|77.||Heijtz RD,Wang S,Anuar F,et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behaviorProc Natl Acad Sci U S AYear: 201110830475221282636|
|78.||Cani PD,Delzenne NM,Amar J,et al. Role of gut microflora in the development of obesity and insulin resistance following high-fat diet feedingPathol Biol (Paris)Year: 200856305918178333|
|79.||Cani PD,Neyrinck AM,Fava F,et al. Selective increases of bifidobacteria in gut microflora improve high-fat-diet-induced diabetes in mice through a mechanism associated with endotoxaemiaDiabetologiaYear: 20075023748317823788|
|80.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,Oligosaccharides might contribute to the antidiabetic effect of honey: a review of the literatureMoleculesYear: 2012172486622205091|
|81.||Sanz ML,Gonzalez M,Lorenzo C,et al. Carbohydrate composition and physicochemical properties of artisanal honeys from Madrid (Spain): occurrence of Echium sp. honeyJ Sci Food AgricYear: 200484157784|
|82.||Munstedt K,Sheybani B,Hauenschild A,et al. Effects of basswood honey, honey-comparable glucose-fructose solution, and oral glucose tolerance test solution on serum insulin, glucose, and C-peptide concentrations in healthy subjectsJ Med FoodYear: 200811424818800887|
|83.||Munstedt K,Bohme M,Hauenschild A,et al. Consumption of rapeseed honey leads to higher serum fructose levels compared with analogue glucose/fructose solutionsEur J Clin NutrYear: 201165778020823899|
|85.||Raffinose, palatinose and turanose http://www.chemblink.com.|
|86.||Isomaltose, cellobiose, melezitose, trehalose and maltotriose http://www.extrasynthese.com.|
|87.||Maltulose, panose and erlose http://www.carbosynth.com.|
|88.||Shamala TR,Shri Jyothi Y,Saibaba P,Stimulatory effect of honey on multiplication of lactic acid bacteria under in vitro and in vivo conditionsLett Appl MicrobiolYear: 200030453510849275|
|89.||Chick H,Shin HS,Ustunol Z,Growth and acid production by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria grown in skim milk containing honeyJ Food SciYear: 20016647881|
|90.||Kajiwara S,Gandhi H,Ustunol Z,Effect of honey on the growth of and acid production by human intestinal Bifidobacterium spp.: an in vitro comparison with commercial oligosaccharides and inulinJ Food ProtYear: 200265214811808799|
|91.||Sanz ML,Polemis N,Morales V,et al. In vitro investigation into the potential prebiotic activity of honey oligosaccharidesJ Agric Food ChemYear: 20055329142115826039|
|92.||Shin HS,Ustunol Z,Carbohydrate composition of honey from different floral sources and their influence on growth of selected intestinal bacteria: An in vitro comparisonFood Res IntYear: 2005387218|
|93.||Riazi A,Zia H,Growth and viability of yogurt starter organisms inhoney-sweetened skimmed milAfr J BiotechYear: 20087205563|
|94.||Ezz El-Arab AM,Girgis SM,Hegazy EM,et al. Effect of dietary honey on intestinal microflora and toxicity of mycotoxins in miceBMC Complement Altern MedYear: 2006611316412227|
|95.||Popa D,Ustunol Z,Influence of sucrose, high fructose corn syrup and honey from different floral sources on growth and acidproduction by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteriaInt J Dairy TechnolYear: 20114624753|
|96.||Kawai K,Okuda Y,Yamashita K,Changes in blood glucose and insulin after an oral palatinose administration in normal subjectsEndocrinol JpnYear: 19853293363914416|
|97.||Tonouchi H,Yamaji T,Uchida M,et al. Studies on absorption and metabolism of palatinose (isomaltulose) in ratsBr J NutrYear: 201110510420807468|
|98.||Gentilcore D,Vanis L,Teng JC,et al. The oligosaccharide alpha-cyclodextrin has modest effects to slow gastric emptying and modify the glycaemic response to sucrose in healthy older adultsBr J NutrYear: 2011106583721554816|
|99.||Klip A,Vranic M,Muscle, liver, and pancreas: Three Musketeers fighting to control glycemiaAm J Physiol Endocrinol MetabYear: 2006291E1141317082345|
|100.||Mayes PA,Intermediary metabolism of fructoseAm J Clin NutrYear: 199358754S65S8213607|
|101.||Van Schaftingen E,Davies DR,Fructose administration stimulates glucose phosphorylation in the livers of anesthetized ratsFASEB JYear: 19915326302001793|
|102.||Youn JH,Kaslow HR,Bergman RN,Fructose effect to suppress hepatic glycogen degradationJ Biol ChemYear: 19872621147073114246|
|103.||Ciudad CJ,Carabaza A,Guinovart JJ,Glycogen synthesis from glucose and fructose in hepatocytes from diabetic ratsArch Biochem BiophysYear: 1988267437473145717|
|104.||Regan JJ Jr,Doorneweerd DD,Gilboe DP,et al. Influence of fructose on the glycogen synthase and phosphorylase systems in rat liverMetabolismYear: 19802996596775172|
|105.||Shiota M,Galassetti P,Igawa K,et al. Inclusion of low amounts of fructose with an intraportal glucose load increases net hepatic glucose uptake in the presence of relative insulin deficiency in dogAm J Physiol Endocrinol MetabYear: 2005288E1160715671083|
|106.||Wei Y,Bizeau ME,Pagliassotti MJ,An acute increase in fructose concentration increases hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase mRNA via mechanisms that are independent of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in ratsJ NutrYear: 20041345455114988444|
|107.||Cherrington AD,Banting Lecture 1997. Control of glucose uptake and release by the liver in vivoDiabetesYear: 199948119821410331429|
|108.||Wright EM,Martin MG,Turk E,Intestinal absorption in health and disease--sugarsBest Pract Res Clin GastroenterolYear: 2003179435614642859|
|109.||Leeds JS,Forman EM,Morley S,et al. Abnormal liver function tests in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: prevalence, clinical correlations and underlying pathologiesDiabet MedYear: 20092612354120002475|
|110.||Al-Waili NS,Intravenous and intrapulmonary administration of honey solution to healthy sheep: effects on blood sugar, renal and liver function tests, bone marrow function, lipid profile, and carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injuryJ Med FoodYear: 200362314714585190|
|111.||Dias AS,Porawski M,Alonso M,et al. Quercetin decreases oxidative stress, NF-kappaB activation, and iNOS overexpression in liver of streptozotocin-induced diabetic ratsJ NutrYear: 2005135229930416177186|
|112.||Kilicoglu B,Gencay C,Kismet K,et al. The ultrastructural research of liver in experimental obstructive jaundice and effect of honeyAm J SurgYear: 20081952495618083132|
|113.||Malik VS,Schulze MB,Hu FB,Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic reviewAm J Clin NutrYear: 2006842748816895873|
|114.||Huynh M,Luiken JJ,Coumans W,et al. Dietary fructose during the suckling period increases body weight and fatty acid uptake into skeletal muscle in adult ratsObesity (Silver Spring)Year: 20081617556218483476|
|115.||Bocarsly ME,Powell ES,Avena NM,et al. High-fructose corn syrup causes characteristics of obesity in rats: increased body weight, body fat and triglyceride levelsPharmacol Biochem BehavYear: 201097101620219526|
|116.||Stanhope KL,Schwarz JM,Keim NL,et al. Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humansJ Clin InvestYear: 200911913223419381015|
|117.||Tappy L,Le KA,Metabolic effects of fructose and the worldwide increase in obesityPhysiol RevYear: 201090234620086073|
|118.||Razquin C,Martinez JA,Martinez-Gonzalez MA,et al. 3 years follow-up of a Mediterranean diet rich in virgin olive oil is associated with high plasma antioxidant capacity and reduced body weight gainEur J Clin NutrYear: 20096313879319707219|
|119.||Nemoseck TM,Carmody EG,Furchner-Evanson A,et al. Honey promotes lower weight gain, adiposity, and triglycerides than sucrose in ratsNutr ResYear: 201131556021310307|
|120.||Bahrami M,Ataie-Jafari A,Hosseini S,Foruzanfar MH,Rahmani M,Pajouhi M,Effects of natural honey consumption in diabetic patients: an 8-week randomized clinical trialInt J Food Sci NutrYear: 2009606182619817641|
|121.||Yaghoobi N,Al-Waili N,Ghayour-Mobarhan M,et al. Natural honey and cardiovascular risk factors; effects on blood glucose, cholesterol, triacylglycerole, CRP, and body weight compared with sucroseScientificWorldJournalYear: 20088463918454257|
|122.||Dolan LC,Potter SM,Burdock GA,Evidence-based review on the effect of normal dietary consumption of fructose on blood lipids and body weight of overweight and obese individualsCrit Rev Food Sci NutrYear: 20105088991821108071|
|123.||Perez-Pozo SE,Schold J,Nakagawa T,et al. Excessive fructose intake induces the features of metabolic syndrome in healthy adult men: role of uric acid in the hypertensive responseInt J Obes (Lond)Year: 2009344546120029377|
|124.||Rohlfing CL,Wiedmeyer HM,Little RR,et al. Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA(1c): analysis of glucose profiles and HbA(1c) in the Diabetes Control and Complications TrialDiabetes CareYear: 200225275811815495|
|125.||Akhtar MS,Khan MS,Glycaemic responses to three different honeys given to normal and alloxan-diabetic rabbitsJ Pak Med AssocYear: 198939107132501525|
|126.||Fasanmade AA,Alabi OT,Differential effect of honey on selected variables in alloxan-induced and fructose-induced diabetic ratsAfr J Biomed ResYear: 2008111916|
|127.||Chepulis L,Starkey N,The long-term effects of feeding honey compared with sucrose and a sugar-free diet on weight gain, lipid profiles, and DEXA measurements in ratsJ Food SciYear: 200873H1718211352|
|128.||Shambaugh P,Worthington V,Herbert JH,Differential effects of honey, sucrose, and fructose on blood sugar levelsJ Manipulative Physiol TherYear: 19901332252394949|
|129.||Ahmad A,Azim MK,Mesaik MA,et al. Natural honey modulates physiological glycemic response compared to simulated honey and D-glucoseJ Food SciYear: 200873H165718803712|
|130.||Abdulrhman M,El-Hefnawy M,Hussein R,et al. The glycemic and peak incremental indices of honey, sucrose and glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: effects on C-peptide level-a pilot studyActa DiabetolYear: 201148899419941014|
|131.||Samanta A,Burden AC,Jones GR,Plasma glucose responses to glucose, sucrose, and honey in patients with diabetes mellitus: an analysis of glycaemic and peak incremental indicesDiabet MedYear: 1985237132951092|
|132.||Abdulrhman M,El-Hefnawy M,Ali R,et al. Honey and type 1 diabetes mellitusLiu CPType 1 diabetes - complications, pathogenesis, and alternative treatmentsCroatiaInTechYear: 201122833|
|133.||Agrawal OP,Pachauri A,Yadav H,et al. Subjects with impaired glucose tolerance exhibit a high degree of tolerance to honeyJ Med FoodYear: 200710473817887941|
|134.||Erejuwa OO,The use of honey in diabetes mellitus: is it beneficial or detrimental?Int J Endocrinol MetabYear: 20121044445|
|135.||Bornet F,Haardt MJ,Costagliola D,et al. Sucrose or honey at breakfast have no additional acute hyperglycaemic effect over an isoglucidic amount of bread in type 2 diabetic patientsDiabetologiaYear: 19852821373894134|
|136.||Katsilambros NL,Philippides P,Touliatou A,et al. Metabolic effects of honey (alone or combined with other foods) in type II diabeticsActa Diabetol LatYear: 1988251972033071065|
|137.||Chepulis LM,The effect of honey compared to sucrose, mixed sugars, and a sugar-free diet on weight gain in young ratsJ Food SciYear: 200772S224917995819|
|138.||Aronoff SL,Berkowitz K,Shreiner B,et al. Glucose metabolism and regulation: beyond insulin and glucagonDiabetes SpectrumYear: 20041718390|
|139.||Al-Waili NS,Natural honey lowers plasma glucose, C-reactive protein, homocysteine, and blood lipids in healthy, diabetic, and hyperlipidemic subjects: comparison with dextrose and sucroseJ Med FoodYear: 20047100715117561|
|140.||Busserolles J,Gueux E,Rock E,et al. Substituting honey for refined carbohydrates protects rats from hypertriglyceridemic and prooxidative effects of fructoseJ NutrYear: 200213233798212421854|
|141.||Munstedt K,Hoffmann S,Hauenschild A,et al. Effect of honey on serum cholesterol and lipid valuesJ Med FoodYear: 200912624819627212|
|142.||Erbey JR,Silberman C,Lydick E,Prevalence of abnormal serum alanine aminotransferase levels in obese patients and patients with type 2 diabetesAm J MedYear: 20001095889011063962|
|143.||Al-Waili NS,Effects of daily consumption of honey solution on hematological indices and blood levels of minerals and enzymes in normal individualsJ Med FoodYear: 200361354012935325|
|144.||Al-Waili NS,Effects of honey on the urinary total nitrite and prostaglandins concentrationInt Urol NephrolYear: 2005371071116132771|
|145.||Ahmed A,Khan RA,Azim MK,et al. Effect of natural honey on human platelets and blood coagulation proteinsPak J Pharm SciYear: 2011243899721715274|
|146.||Batterham RL,Heffron H,Kapoor S,et al. Critical role for peptide YY in protein-mediated satiation and body-weight regulationCell MetabYear: 200642233316950139|
|147.||Klok MD,Jakobsdottir S,Drent ML,The role of leptin and ghrelin in the regulation of food intake and body weight in humans: a reviewObes RevYear: 20078213417212793|
|148.||Larson-Meyer DE,Willis KS,Willis LM,et al. Effect of honey versus sucrose on appetite, appetite-regulating hormones, and postmeal thermogenesisJ Am Coll NutrYear: 2010294829321504975|
|149.||Teff KL,Elliott SS,Tschop M,et al. Dietary fructose reduces circulating insulin and leptin, attenuates postprandial suppression of ghrelin, and increases triglycerides in womenJ Clin Endocrinol MetabYear: 20048929637215181085|
|150.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Differential responses to blood pressure and oxidative stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetic wistar-kyoto rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats: effects of antioxidant (honey) treatmentInt J Mol SciYear: 201112188890721673929|
|151.||Parnell JA,Reimer RA,Weight loss during oligofructose supplementation is associated with decreased ghrelin and increased peptide YY in overweight and obese adultsAm J Clin NutrYear: 2009891751919386741|
|152.||Gheldof N,Wang XH,Engeseth NJ,Buckwheat honey increases serum antioxidant capacity in humansJ Agric Food ChemYear: 2003511500512590505|
|153.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,Honey: a novel antioxidantMoleculesYear: 20121744002322499188|
|154.||Deibert P,Konig D,Kloock B,et al. Glycaemic and insulinaemic properties of some German honey varietiesEur J Clin NutrYear: 201064762419756024|
|155.||Robert SD,Ismail AA,Two varieties of honey that are available in Malaysia gave intermediate glycemic index values when tested among healthy individualsBiomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech RepubYear: 2009153145719771140|
|156.||Ischayek JI,Kern M,US honeys varying in glucose and fructose content elicit similar glycemic indexesJ Am Diet AssocYear: 20061061260216863724|
|157.||Koca I,Koca AF,Poisoning by mad honey: a brief reviewFood Chem ToxicolYear: 2007451315817540490|
|158.||Yilmaz O,Eser M,Sahiner A,et al. Hypotension, bradycardia and syncope caused by honey poisoningResuscitationYear: 200668405816457936|
|159.||Demir H,Denizbasi A,Onur O,Mad honey intoxication: A case series of 21 patientsISRN ToxicologyYear: 2011201113|
|160.||Aliyev F,Turkoglu C,Celiker C,et al. Chronic mad honey intoxication syndrome: a new form of an old disease?EuropaceYear: 200911954619502248|
|161.||Fenicia L,Anniballi F,Infant botulismAnn Ist Super SanitaYear: 2009451344619636165|
|162.||Arriagada SD,Wilhelm BJ,Donoso FA,Infant botulism: case report and reviewRev Chilena InfectolYear: 200926162719621149|
|163.||Arnon SS,Midura TF,Damus K,et al. Honey and other environmental risk factors for infant botulismJ PediatrYear: 1979943316368301|
|164.||Thompson JA,Glasgow LA,Warpinski JR,et al. Infant botulism: clinical spectrum and epidemiologyPediatricsYear: 198066936427005856|
|165.||Tanzi MG,Gabay MP,Association between honey consumption and infant botulismPharmacotherapyYear: 20022214798312432974|
|166.||Fenicia L,Ferrini AM,Aureli P,et al. A case of infant botulism associated with honey feeding in ItalyEur J EpidemiolYear: 1993967138150073|
|167.||van der Vorsta MMJ,Jamal W,Rotimi VO,et al. Infant botulism due to consumption of contaminated commercially prepared honeyMed Princ PractYear: 200615456817047355|
|168.||Watford M,Small amounts of dietary fructose dramatically increase hepatic glucose uptake through a novel mechanism of glucokinase activationNutr RevYear: 200260253712199300|
|169.||Vozzo R,Baker B,Wittert GA,et al. Glycemic, hormone, and appetite responses to monosaccharide ingestion in patients with type 2 diabetesMetabolismYear: 2002519495712145765|
|170.||Oizumi T,Daimon M,Jimbu Y,et al. A palatinose-based balanced formula improves glucose tolerance, serum free fatty acid levels and body fat compositionTohoku J Exp MedYear: 200721291917548953|
|171.||Häberer D,Thibault L,Langhans W,et al. Beneficial effects on glucose metabolism of chronic feeding of isomaltulose versus sucrose in ratsAnn Nutr MetabYear: 200954758219270448|
|172.||Sato K,Arai H,Mizuno A,et al. Dietary palatinose and oleic acid ameliorate disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism in Zucker fatty ratsJ NutrYear: 200713719081517634263|
|173.||Cani PD,Knauf C,Iglesias MA,et al. Improvement of glucose tolerance and hepatic insulin sensitivity by oligofructose requires a functional glucagon-like peptide 1 receptorDiabetesYear: 20065514849016644709|
|174.||Anderson RA,Cheng N,Bryden NA,et al. Elevated intakes of supplemental chromium improve glucose and insulin variables in individuals with type 2 diabetesDiabetesYear: 1997461786919356027|
|175.||Kar A,Choudhary BK,Bandyopadhyay NG,Preliminary studies on the inorganic constituents of some indigenous hypoglycaemic herbs on oral glucose tolerance testJ EthnopharmacolYear: 1999641798410197754|
|176.||Sitasawad S,Deshpande M,Katdare M,et al. Beneficial effect of supplementation with copper sulfate on STZ-diabetic mice (IDDM)Diabetes Res Clin PractYear: 200152778411311961|
|177.||Song MK,Hwang IK,Rosenthal MJ,et al. Antidiabetic actions of arachidonic acid and zinc in genetically diabetic Goto-Kakizaki ratsMetabolismYear: 20035271212524655|
|178.||Oh HM,Yoon JS,Glycemic control of type 2 diabetic patients after short-term zinc supplementationNutr Res PractYear: 20082283820016731|
|179.||Li F,Zhang G,Liang J,et al. Sleeve gastrectomy provides a better control of diabetes by decreasing ghrelin in the diabetic Goto-Kakizaki ratsJ Gastrointest SurgYear: 2009132302819727970|
|180.||Folli F,Corradi D,Fanti P,et al. The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus micro- and macrovascular complications:avenues for a mechanistic-based therapeutic approachCurr Diabetes RevYear: 201173132421838680|
|181.||Chang YC,Chuang LM,The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes: from molecular mechanism to clinical implicationAm J Transl ResYear: 201023163120589170|
|182.||Kim JS,Saengsirisuwan V,Sloniger JA,et al. Oxidant stress and skeletal muscle glucose transport: roles of insulin signaling and p38 MAPKFree Radic Biol MedYear: 2006418182416895802|
|183.||Talior I,Yarkoni M,Bashan N,et al. Increased glucose uptake promotes oxidative stress and PKC-delta activation in adipocytes of obese, insulin-resistant miceAm J Physiol Endocrinol MetabYear: 2003285E29530212857675|
|184.||Rudich A,Tirosh A,Potashnik R,et al. Prolonged oxidative stress impairs insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation in 3T3-L1 adipocytesDiabetesYear: 199847156299753293|
|185.||Dokken BB,Saengsirisuwan V,Kim JS,et al. Oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance in rat skeletal muscle: role of glycogen synthase kinase-3Am J Physiol Endocrinol MetabYear: 2008294E6152118089761|
|186.||Henriksen EJ,Dysregulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in skeletal muscle and the etiology of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetesCurr Diabetes RevYear: 201062859320594161|
|187.||Tiedge M,Lortz S,Drinkgern J,et al. Relation between antioxidant enzyme gene expression and antioxidative defense status of insulin-producing cellsDiabetesYear: 1997461733429356019|
|188.||Drews G,Krippeit-Drews P,Dufer M,Oxidative stress and beta-cell dysfunctionPflugers ArchYear: 20104607031820652307|
|189.||Miwa I,Ichimura N,Sugiura M,et al. Inhibition of glucose-induced insulin secretion by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and other lipid peroxidation productsEndocrinologyYear: 200014127677210919261|
|190.||Tanaka Y,Gleason CE,Tran PO,et al. Prevention of glucose toxicity in HIT-T15 cells and Zucker diabetic fatty rats by antioxidantsProc Natl Acad Sci U S AYear: 199996108576210485916|
|191.||Marchetti P,Dotta F,Lauro D,et al. An overview of pancreatic beta-cell defects in human type 2 diabetes: implications for treatmentRegul PeptYear: 200814641117889380|
|192.||Janjic D,Andereggen E,Deng S,et al. Improved insulin secretion of cryopreserved human islets by antioxidant treatmentPancreasYear: 199613166728829185|
|193.||Penckofer S,Schwertz D,Florczak K,Oxidative stress and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: the role of antioxidants and pro-oxidantsJ Cardiovasc NursYear: 200216688511800069|
|194.||Mohamed M,Sirajudeen K,Swamy M,et al. Studies on the antioxidant properties of Tualang honey of MalaysiaAfr J Tradit Complement Altern MedYear: 20107596321304614|
|195.||Khalil MI,Alam N,Moniruzzaman M,et al. Phenolic acid composition and antioxidant properties of Malaysian honeysJ Food SciYear: 201176C921822417491|
|196.||Kishore RK,Halim AS,Syazana MS,et al. Tualang honey has higher phenolic content and greater radical scavenging activity compared with other honey sourcesNutr ResYear: 201131322521530807|
|197.||Gheldof N,Engeseth NJ,Antioxidant capacity of honeys from various floral sources based on the determination of oxygen radical absorbance capacity and inhibition of in vitro lipoprotein oxidation in human serum samplesJ Agric Food ChemYear: 2002503050511982440|
|198.||Fava D,Cassone-Faldetta M,Laurenti O,et al. Gliclazide improves anti-oxidant status and nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in type 2 diabetesDiabet MedYear: 200219752712207812|
|199.||Rahimi R,Nikfar S,Larijani B,et al. A review on the role of antioxidants in the management of diabetes and its complicationsBiomed PharmacotherYear: 2005593657316081237|
|200.||Lai MH,Antioxidant effects and insulin resistance improvement of chromium combined with vitamin C and E supplementation for type 2 diabetes mellitusJ Clin Biochem NutrYear: 200843191819015754|
|201.||Ihara Y,Yamada Y,Toyokuni S,et al. Antioxidant alpha-tocopherol ameliorates glycemic control of GK rats, a model of type 2 diabetesFEBS LettYear: 200047324610802052|
|202.||Opara EC,Role of oxidative stress in the etiology of type 2 diabetes and the effect of antioxidant supplementation on glycemic controlJ Investig MedYear: 2004521923|
|203.||Erejuwa OO,Management of diabetes mellitus: could simultaneous targeting of hyperglycemia and oxidative stress be a better panacea?IJMSYear: 20121329657222489136|
|204.||Ceriello A,Giugliano D,Quatraro A,et al. Vitamin E reduction of protein glycosylation in diabetes. New prospect for prevention of diabetic complications?Diabetes CareYear: 19911468721991440|
|205.||Vinson JA,Howard TB,Inhibition of protein glycation and advanced glycation end products by ascorbic acid and other vitamins and nutrientsJ Nutr BiochemYear: 1996765963|
|206.||Lautt WW,Ming Z,Legare DJ,Attenuation of age- and sucrose-induced insulin resistance and syndrome X by a synergistic antioxidant cocktail: the AMIS syndrome and HISS hypothesisCan J Physiol PharmacolYear: 2010883132320393596|
|207.||Tong X,Dong J,Wu Z,et al. [Whey protein improves insulin resistance via the increase of antioxidant capacity in model rats]Wei Sheng Yan JiuYear: 201140617922043714|
|208.||Wright D,Sutherland L,Antioxidant supplemention in the treatment of skeletal muscle insulin resistance: potential mechanisms and clinical relevanceAppl Physiol Nutr MetabYear: 200833213118347650|
|209.||Brownlee M,The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanismDiabetesYear: 20055416152515919781|
|210.||Giacco F,Brownlee M,Oxidative stress and diabetic complicationsCirc ResYear: 201010710587021030723|
|211.||Nishikawa T,Edelstein D,Brownlee M,The missing link: a single unifying mechanism for diabetic complicationsKidney Int SupplYear: 200077S263010997687|
|212.||Brownlee M,Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complicationsNatureYear: 20014148132011742414|
|213.||Brand MD,The sites and topology of mitochondrial superoxide productionExp GerontolYear: 2010454667220064600|
|214.||Genuth S,Sun W,Cleary P,et al. Glycation and carboxymethyllysine levels in skin collagen predict the risk of future 10-year progression of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy in the diabetes control and complications trial and epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications participants with type 1 diabetesDiabetesYear: 20055431031116249432|
|215.||Kowluru RA,Effect of reinstitution of good glycemic control on retinal oxidative stress and nitrative stress in diabetic ratsDiabetesYear: 2003528182312606525|
|216.||Kowluru RA,Kanwar M,Kennedy A,Metabolic memory phenomenon and accumulation of peroxynitrite in retinal capillariesExp Diabetes ResYear: 2007200717|
|217.||Seghrouchni I,Drai J,Bannier E,et al. Oxidative stress parameters in type I, type II and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus; insulin treatment efficiencyClin Chim ActaYear: 2002321899612031597|
|218.||Ceriello A,Hypothesis: the "metabolic memory", the new challenge of diabetesDiabetes Res Clin PractYear: 200986Suppl 1S2620115927|
|219.||Ihnat MA,Thorpe JE,Kamat CD,et al. Reactive oxygen species mediate a cellular 'memory' of high glucose stress signallingDiabetologiaYear: 20075015233117508197|
|220.||Ceriello A,Ihnat MA,Thorpe JE,Clinical review 2: The "metabolic memory": is more than just tight glucose control necessary to prevent diabetic complications?J Clin Endocrinol MetabYear: 200994410519066300|
|221.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Impaired Nrf2-ARE pathway contributes to increased oxidative damage in kidney of spontaneously hypertensive rats: Effect of antioxidant (honey)Int J CardiolYear: 2011152S45|
|222.||Erejuwa OO,Sulaiman SA,Wahab MS,et al. Influence of rat strains and/or severity of hyperglycemia on systolic blood pressure and antioxidant enzymes in kidney of rats with hypertension and/or diabetes: role of honeyInt J CardiolYear: 2011152S29|
|223.||DCCTThe effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research GroupN Engl J MedYear: 1993329977868366922|
|224.||UKPDSUK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)LancetYear: 1998352837539742976|
|225.||Cook MN,Girman CJ,Stein PP,et al. Glycemic control continues to deteriorate after sulfonylureas are added to metformin among patients with type 2 diabetesDiabetes CareYear: 200528995100015855556|
|226.||Turner RC,Cull CA,Frighi V,et al. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) GroupJAMAYear: 199928120051210359389|
|227.||Ismail-Beigi F,Craven T,Banerji MA,et al. Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trialLancetYear: 20103764193020594588|
|228.||Simpson SH,Corabian P,Jacobs P,et al. The cost of major comorbidity in people with diabetes mellitusCMAJYear: 20031681661712821619|
|229.||Patel H,Srishanmuganathan J,Car J,et al. Trends in the prescription and cost of diabetic medications and monitoring equipment in England 1991-2004J Public Health (Oxf)Year: 200729485217124257|
|230.||Justin-Temu M,Nondo RS,Wiedenmayer K,et al. Anti-diabetic drugs in the private and public sector in Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaEast Afr Med JYear: 200986110419702097|
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, antidiabetic, hypoglycemic, glycemic control, liver, pancreas, insulin, honey..
Previous Document: A large amniocele with protruded umbilical cord diagnosed by 3D ultrasound.
Next Document: The role of ?-synuclein and tau hyperphosphorylation-mediated autophagy and apoptosis in lead-induce...