Document Detail


Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20091618     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The burden of cardiovascular disease world-wide is one of great concern to patients and health care agencies alike. Traditionally centre-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes are offered to individuals after cardiac events to aid recovery and prevent further cardiac illness. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes have been introduced in an attempt to widen access and participation.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes compared with supervised centre-based cardiac rehabilitation on mortality and morbidity, health-related quality of life and modifiable cardiac risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease.
SEARCH STRATEGY: We updated the search of a previous review by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2007, Issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from 2001 to January 2008. We checked reference lists and sought advice from experts. No language restrictions were applied.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared centre-based cardiac rehabilitation (e.g. hospital, gymnasium, sports centre) with home-based programmes, in adults with myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure or who had undergone revascularisation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were selected independently by two reviewers, and data extracted by a single reviewer and checked by a second one. Authors were contacted where possible to obtain missing information.
MAIN RESULTS: Twelve studies (1,938 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies recruited a lower risk patient following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) and revascularisation. There was no difference in outcomes of home- versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation in mortality risk ratio (RR) was1.31 (95% confidence interval (C) 0.65 to 2.66), cardiac events, exercise capacity standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.11 (95% CI -0.35 to 0.13), as well as in modifiable risk factors (systolic blood pressure; diastolic blood pressure; total cholesterol; HDL-cholesterol; LDL-cholesterol) or proportion of smokers at follow up or health-related quality of life. There was no consistent difference in the healthcare costs of the two forms of cardiac rehabilitation.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Home- and centre-based cardiac rehabilitation appear to be equally effective in improving the clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes in acute MI and revascularisation patients. This finding, together with an absence of evidence of difference in healthcare costs between the two approaches, would support the extension of home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes such as the Heart Manual to give patients a choice in line with their preferences, which may have an impact on uptake of cardiac rehabilitation in the individual case.
Authors:
Rod S Taylor; Hayes Dalal; Kate Jolly; Tiffany Moxham; Anna Zawada
Related Documents :
23581808 - Does severity of psoriasis increase coronary artery calcification?
8810598 - Daily asthma severity in relation to personal ozone exposure and outdoor fungal spores.
24713138 - Mitral chordal-leaflet-myocardial interactions in mitral valve prolapse.
24529648 - Five-year outcomes for first generation drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in...
15044708 - Abrogation of ventricular arrhythmias in a model of ischemia and reperfusion by targeti...
7686658 - Transesophageal defibrillation: animal studies and preliminary clinical observations.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review     Date:  2010-01-20
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Cochrane database of systematic reviews     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1469-493X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Publication Date:  2010  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-01-21     Completed Date:  2010-04-16     Revised Date:  2014-09-11    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100909747     Medline TA:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  CD007130     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Female
Home Care Services*
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction / rehabilitation*
Myocardial Revascularization / rehabilitation*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Rehabilitation Centers*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Immediate-release versus controlled-release carbamazepine in the treatment of epilepsy.
Next Document:  Music therapy for end-of-life care.