|Histopathological cutaneous alterations in systemic sclerosis: a clinicopathological study.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 21356083 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|INTRODUCTION: The aims of the present study were to identify histopathological parameters which are linked to local clinical skin disease at two distinct anatomical sites in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with skin involvement (limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc) or diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc)) and to determine the sensitivity of SSc specific histological alterations, focusing on SSc patients without clinical skin involvement (limited SSc (lSSc)).
METHODS: Histopathological alterations were systematically scored in skin biopsies of 53 consecutive SSc patients (dorsal forearm and upper inner arm) and 18 controls (upper inner arm). Clinical skin involvement was evaluated using the modified Rodnan skin score. In patients with lcSSc or dcSSc, associations of histopathological parameters with local clinical skin involvement were determined by generalised estimation equation modelling.
RESULTS: The hyalinised collagen score, the myofibroblast score, the mean epidermal thickness, the mononuclear cellular infiltration and the frequency of focal exocytosis differed significantly between biopsies with and without local clinical skin involvement. Except for mononuclear cellular infiltration, all of the continuous parameters correlated with the local clinical skin score at the dorsal forearm. Parakeratosis, myofibroblasts and intima proliferation were present in a minority of the SSc biopsies, but not in controls. No differences were found between lSSc and controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Several histopathological parameters are linked to local clinical skin disease. SSc-specific histological alterations have a low diagnostic sensitivity.
|Jens T Van Praet; Vanessa Smith; Marc Haspeslagh; Nele Degryse; Dirk Elewaut; Filip De Keyser|
Related Documents :
|15714413 - Cytomegalovirus infection of the heart is common in patients with fatal myocarditis.
522233 - Experimental study of cardiomyopathy induced by glucocorticoids.
3164363 - The recognition of craniomandibular disorders--a comparison between clinical and radiog...
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2011-02-28|
|Title: Arthritis research & therapy Volume: 13 ISSN: 1478-6362 ISO Abbreviation: Arthritis Res. Ther. Publication Date: 2011|
|Created Date: 2011-10-21 Completed Date: 2012-02-10 Revised Date: 2013-06-30|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101154438 Medline TA: Arthritis Res Ther Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: R35 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, BE-9000 Gent, Belgium. Jens.VanPraet@ugent.be|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Scleroderma, Limited / pathology*
Scleroderma, Systemic / pathology*
Skin / pathology*
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Arthritis Res Ther
Publisher: BioMed Central
Copyright ©2011 Van Praet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 16 Month: 10 Year: 2010
Revision Received Day: 19 Month: 1 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 28 Month: 2 Year: 2011
Print publication date: Year: 2011
Electronic publication date: Day: 28 Month: 2 Year: 2011
Volume: 13 Issue: 1
First Page: R35 Last Page: R35
Publisher Id: ar3267
PubMed Id: 21356083
|Histopathological cutaneous alterations in systemic sclerosis: a clinicopathological study|
|Jens T Van Praet1||Email: Jens.VanPraet@ugent.be|
|Vanessa Smith1||Email: Vanessa.Smith@ugent.be|
|Marc Haspeslagh23||Email: email@example.com|
|Nele Degryse1||Email: Nele.Degryse@ugent.be|
|Dirk Elewaut1||Email: Dirk.Elewaut@ugent.be|
|Filip De Keyser1||Email: Filip.DeKeyser@ugent.be|
1Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, BE-9000 Gent, Belgium
2Department of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, BE-9000 Gent, Belgium
3Department of Pathology, Stedelijk Ziekenhuis Roeselare, Brugsesteenweg 90, BE-8800 Roeselare, Belgium
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease which can affect the skin and various internal organs . One of the hallmark clinical features of SSc is skin thickening caused by oedema and excessive accumulation of collagen-rich extracellular matrix. Apart from sclerosis, the pathogenesis of SSc is characterized by vasculopathy, which is evidenced by nailfold capillary abnormalities and Raynaud's phenomenon, as well as by the presence of antinuclear antibodies such as anticentromere, anti-topoisomerase I and anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies. The most extensively validated technique to quantify skin involvement is the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) . In this scoring system, 17 body areas are examined by clinical palpation and scored on the basis of judgement of skin thickness on a 4-point ordinal scale. Because the extent of skin disease correlates with the disease course, patients are grouped into disease subsets on the basis of skin involvement. The currently most widely applied classification differentiates three subsets, namely, limited SSc (lSSc), limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) . Patients with lcSSc have skin involvement confined to the fingers, hands, forearms, lower legs or the face, whereas patients with dcSSc also have more proximal skin thickening. The group classified as lSSc has Raynaud's phenomenon with nailfold capillaroscopic abnormalities and/or SSc-associated autoantibodies, but no clinical skin involvement. This subset is considered to have 'early' SSc, as a longitudinal follow-up study has demonstrated that these patients are at risk for progression to definite SSc .
The histopathology of SSc skin has recently regained interest because it may be integrated as an outcome measure in clinical trials on skin disease, whereby skin biopsies are obtained before and after administration of a therapeutic drug [5,6]. In this way, the hyalinised collagen score and the myofibroblast score have previously been correlated with local skin score and durometry score in patients with dcSSc . Consequently, these parameters could potentially be used to study the effect of a drug on skin disease. Other alterations in skin histology, however, have not been linked to clinical assessment. In addition, studies on the skin histopathology of SSc patients have mainly focused on alterations in patients with established disease, leaving open the question whether patients with 'early' disease have SSc specific histological alterations.
The aims of this study were (1) to identify histopathological parameters which are linked with local clinical skin disease at two different anatomical sites in SSc patients with skin involvement (lcSSc or dcSSc) and (2) to determine the sensitivity of SSc-specific histological alterations, with a focus on SSc patients with lSSc.
Skin biopsies from the dorsal forearm (at the transition of the distal one-third and the proximal two-thirds) and the mid-upper inner arm were obtained from 53 consecutive SSc patients visiting the Scleroderma Clinic of the Ghent University Hospital. From two patients, only one biopsy was available for analysis. All patients fulfilled the criteria for early SSc set forth by LeRoy and Medsger . Video nailfold capillaroscopy and antinuclear antibody identification were performed as described previously . Patients were assigned to the lSSc, lcSSc or dcSSc group according to the criteria published by LeRoy et al. . Skin involvement was clinically assessed according to the 17-site mRSS, whereby local skin involvement is determined for each site, including the dorsal forearm, on a semiquantitative scale (0 = normal thickness, 1 = mild thickening, 2 = moderate thickening and 3 = severe thickening) . A normal reference set was included in the analysis. This set contained the skin biopsies from the inner upper arm of patients who were referred for a lupus band test and in whom further evaluation excluded any specified autoimmune disease. This study was conducted after approval of the Ghent University Hospital Ethical Committee was obtained and all patients had signed informed consent.
Full-thickness skin biopsies (approximately 1.5 cm long and 0.5 cm wide) were surgically obtained while the patients were under local anaesthesia. Biopsy samples were stored in formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 5 μm were cut and stained with haematoxylin and eosin, Masson trichrome and colloidal iron according to standard techniques. Paraffin-embedded sections were also used for immunohistochemistry.
Paraffin-embedded sections were dewaxed and heated in antigen retrieval buffer at 98°C for 20 minutes using citrate buffer (pH 6) or Tris buffer (pH 9) (Pascal: Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). After rinsing and blocking endogenous peroxidase, sections were incubated for 60 minutes with the following mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): CD3 (T cells; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (myofibroblasts, clone 1A4; Dako). Parallel sections were incubated with irrelevant isotype-matched mAbs as negative controls. The sections were subsequently incubated for 15 minutes with a biotinylated antimouse secondary antibody, followed by 15-minute incubation with a streptavidin-peroxidase complex (LSAB+ Kit; Dako). The colour reaction was developed using 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole substrate (Dako) as chromogen. Finally, the sections were counterstained with haematoxylin. All incubations were carried out at room temperature, and the sections were washed with phosphate-buffered saline between all steps.
Studies of SSc skin histopathology have described alterations in different skin compartments, including atrophy and increased pigmentation of the epidermis , loss of the epidermal papillae , increase of melanophages ('pigment incontinence') , the presence of a mononuclear perivascular infiltrate and myofibroblasts [7,12-14], sclerosis , narrowing of arteriolar lumina in the deep vascular plexus (reticular dermis)  and disappearance and entrapment of dermal adnexae and calcification [11,12]. To this set of alterations, we added two key histopathological features of other scleroderma-like disorders, namely, mucin deposition and fibroplasia [16,17]. Because analysis of routine biopsies revealed the presence of telangiectasia, focal exocytosis (that is, the presence of lymphocytes in the epidermis) and parakeratosis in some SSc biopsies, these items were also added to the set of scoring parameters . Scoring systems for different parameters were obtained from previous publications as much as possible. An overview of the skin parameters that were scored is shown in Table 1.
The hyalinised collagen score and the myofibroblast score were assessed on a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale . The epidermal thickness was scored using a semiquantitative scale on the basis of the mean number of keratinocyte layers (stratum basale and stratum spinosum) in a zone between two rete ridges (that is, undulations of the dermoepidermal junction) in five microscopic fields chosen at random (0 = mean less than three layers, 1 = mean of three or four layers, 2 = mean of five or six layers, 3 = mean of more than six layers), a scoring system which has also been used for the synovial lining layer [14,19]. Mononuclear cellular infiltration was scored on a semiquantitative scale as 0 (few scattered cells), 1 (maximum number of cells per collection at least 10), 2 (maximum number of cells per collection between 10 and 50) or 3 (maximum number of cells per collection at least 50) . Mucin deposition in the reticular dermis was evaluated by scoring the degree of acid mucopolysaccharide staining on a semiquantitative scale as negative, very slight, slight, fair or abundant . Entrapment of an eccrine sweat gland was defined as the absence of any surrounding fat tissue (Figure 1A). Focal exocytosis was defined as the presence of T-lymphocytes in the epidermis at least at two distinct sites (Figure 1B). Intima proliferation in deep arterioles was considered pathologic if the vessel wall thickness exceeded the diameter of the vessel lumen (Figure 1C). Parakeratosis was defined as the presence of nuclei in the stratum corneum (Figure 1D). Pigment incontinence was defined as the presence of melanin in papillary macrophages at least at two distinct sites (Figure 1E). Telangiectasia was defined as enlarged papillary capillaries (Figure 1F).
Stained slides were coded so that a blinded analysis could be performed. Slides from the dorsal forearm were analysed by two independent observers (MH and JTVP) who were uninformed of any clinical data. All scoring parameters were judged to be reliable, as the interobserver agreement was substantial (κ > 0.6 for all categorical parameters and intraclass correlation coefficient >0.7 for all continuous parameters). For continuous parameters, the mean of the two observers was used for analysis. In case of a discrepant score for a categorical parameter, a consensus was determined by the two observers. Slides from the upper inner arm were scored twice by one observer (JTVP). For continuous parameters, the mean of the two scores was used for analysis. In case of a discrepant score for a categorical parameter, a consensus was determined by a third evaluation. Because fibroplasia and calcification were not observed in a single biopsy, these items were left out of all analyses.
In patients with lcSSc or dcSSc, associations of histopathological parameters with local clinical skin involvement were determined by generalised estimation equation (GEE) modelling with a correction for subject level and biopsy site. Local skin involvement at the dorsal forearm was defined as a local clinical score of at least 1. Since the upper inner arm local skin score is not included in the mRSS, all patients with dcSSc were considered to have local skin involvement at this site. In case a significant interaction between biopsy site and local clinical skin involvement was found in the GEE model, statistical testing for the effect of skin involvement was separately performed for the dorsal forearm and the upper inner arm. For normally distributed parameters, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation with the dorsal forearm score. Otherwise, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used. For categorical parameters, Fisher's exact test was used to analyse the association with the dorsal forearm score. Mann-Whitney U test (continuous data) and Fisher's exact test (categorical data) were used to compare lSSc biopsies with normal controls. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using PASW 18.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Skin biopsies from the dorsal forearm and the upper inner arm were obtained from 53 consecutive SSc patients (17 males and 36 females; mean age ± SD, 52 ± 12 years). Seven SSc patients (13%) had no clinical skin involvement (lSSc), and 46 SSc patients (87%) had skin involvement (29 lcSSc and 17 dcSSc patients). Twenty-five patients used methotrexate, and 11 patients used low-dose corticosteroids (< 15 mg prednisolone/day). Table 2 summarizes the features of the different SSc patient subsets. Normal skin samples taken from the upper inner arm were included as a reference set (n = 18 comprising 7 males and 11 females; mean age ± SD, 44 ± 17 years).
To examine associations of local skin disease with histological parameters, we analysed the biopsies from patients with lcSSc or dcSSc (n = 46). We found that, independently of the anatomical site of the biopsy, the hyalinised collagen score, the myofibroblast score, the mean epidermal thickness, the mononuclear cellular infiltration and the frequency of focal exocytosis differed significantly between biopsies with and without local skin involvement (α = 0.05; GEE) (Table 3). For the continuous parameters, only the epidermal thickness (r = 0.553; P < 0.001), the myofibroblast score (r = 0.507; P < 0.001) and the hyalinised collagen score (r = 0.572; P < 0.001) correlated with the local clinical skin score. No association was found between the local clinical score and the frequency of focal exocytosis (P = 0.06).
To determine the specificity of the studied histological parameters, we analysed 18 upper inner arm biopsies from patients who were referred for a lupus band test and in whom further evaluation excluded any specified autoimmune disease. Myofibroblasts, intima proliferation of deep arterioles and parakeratosis were not seen in these biopsies (Table 4). Comparison with the biopsies of the patients with lSSc (n = 7) revealed no statistically significant differences (Table 4). Analysis of all SSc biopsies showed that myofibroblasts, intima proliferation of deep arterioles and parakeratosis were present in, respectively, 22%, 19% and 5.8% of the dorsal forearm biopsies and in 14%, 14% and 0% of the upper inner arm biopsies.
Because of the rarity of the disease, few studies have systemically addressed the skin histopathology of SSc. Previous studies may have been hampered by bias due to the inclusion of only dcSSc patients , by failure to perform biopsies at the same anatomical site in all patients  or by failure to include a normal control group or to link alterations to clinical scoring [11,13]. The present study was designed to overcome these issues and to identify histopathological alterations in the skin of SSc patients which are linked to clinical skin scoring or might have diagnostic relevance.
The results of this study show that independent of the biopsy site (dorsal forearm or inner upper arm), the hyalinised collagen score, the myofibroblast score and the mean epidermal thickness are associated with the presence of local clinical skin involvement. Furthermore, these three parameters correlated well with the local clinical skin score at the dorsal forearm. In agreement with our data, Kissin et al.  reported a good correlation of the hyalinised collagen score and the myofibroblast score with clinical scoring in patients with dcSSc. The link between histopathological alterations and clinical assessment at two independent skin sites in a large set of SSc biopsies, including patients from different disease subsets and with early and late disease, suggests these parameters might be potential candidates as outcome measures in clinical trials on skin disease. However, longitudinal studies should address their sensitivity to change before they can be considered validated measures . Given that the link with clinical scoring was independent of the skin site, our data indicate that in patients with dcSSc, biopsies from the upper inner arm may be used to study histological parameters.
One interesting finding of our study is the link between clinical skin scoring and epidermal changes. Apart from the increased mean epidermal thickness in biopsies with local clinical skin involvement, we also found parakeratosis in a minority of clinically involved skin biopsies from the dorsal forearm, which points to a disturbance of epidermal differentiation . Consistent with these results, Aden et al.  demonstrated that the epidermis in involved SSc skin shows thickening and altered differentiation, mimicking an active wound-healing phenotype. In contrast, older literature reported atrophy of the epidermis in SSc skin biopsies . Also, we found that local clinical skin involvement was associated with a higher epidermal pigmentation at the upper inner arm but not at the dorsal forearm, which is probably related to the different sun exposure of the two biopsy sites.
A second research aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of SSc-specific histological alterations, focusing on SSc patients without clinical skin involvement (lSSc). These patients have Raynaud's phenomenon and SSc-associated antinuclear antibodies and/or nailfold capillaroscopic alterations without skin involvement. At the upper inner arm, we found no differences between lSSc and control biopsies. Concerning the specificity of histological parameters for SSc, we could not detect parakeratosis, myofibroblasts or intima proliferation of the deep arterioles in controls. However, these alterations were present in only a minority of the SSc biopsies. Thus, SSc-specific histological alterations have a low diagnostic sensitivity.
In conclusion, the systematic analysis of skin biopsies from 53 consecutive SSc patients and 18 normal controls revealed that the mean epidermal thickness, the hyalinised collagen score and the myofibroblast score are linked to local clinical skin involvement and are correlated with the local skin score. Concerning histological alterations in lSSc, we found no significant differences with control skin at the upper inner arm. Finally, myofibroblasts, intima proliferation of the deep arterioles or parakeratosis in a skin biopsy are useful diagnostic markers for SSc, although they have a low sensitivity.
dcSSc: diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; GEE: generalised estimation equation; lcSSc: limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis; lSSc: limited systemic sclerosis; mRSS: modified Rodnan Skin Score; SSc: systemic sclerosis.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
JTVP, VS, MH and FDK designed the study. VS acquired the capillaroscopic and clinical data. JTVP and FDK acquired the serological data. JTVP, MH and ND acquired the histological data. JTVP, VS, MH, DE and FDK participated in the manuscript preparation and finalisation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors thank Rita Heyse, Sofie D'hont and Dorothea Van Limbergen for excellent technical assistance. JTVP is supported by a research grant from the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders.
|Denton CP,Black CM,Abraham DJ,Mechanisms and consequences of fibrosis in systemic sclerosisNat Clin Pract RheumatolYear: 2006213414410.1038/ncprheum011516932673|
|Akesson A,Fiori G,Krieg T,van den Hoogen FH,Seibold JR,Assessment of skin, joint, tendon and muscle involvementClin Exp RheumatolYear: 200321S5S812889214|
|LeRoy EC,Medsger TA Jr,Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosisJ RheumatolYear: 2001281573157611469464|
|Koenig M,Joyal F,Fritzler MJ,Roussin A,Abrahamowicz M,Boire G,Goulet JR,Rich E,Grodzicky T,Raymond Y,Senécal JL,Autoantibodies and microvascular damage are independent predictive factors for the progression of Raynaud's phenomenon to systemic sclerosis: a twenty-year prospective study of 586 patients, with validation of proposed criteria for early systemic sclerosisArthritis RheumYear: 2008583902391210.1002/art.2403819035499|
|Smith V,Van Praet JT,Vandooren B,Van der Cruyssen B,Naeyaert JM,Decuman S,Elewaut D,De Keyser F,Rituximab in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an open-label clinical and histopathological studyAnn Rheum DisYear: 20106919319710.1136/ard.2008.09546319103636|
|Nash RA,McSweeney PA,Crofford LJ,Abidi M,Chen CS,Godwin JD,Gooley TA,Holmberg L,Henstorf G,LeMaistre CF,Mayes MD,McDonagh KT,McLaughlin B,Molitor JA,Nelson JL,Shulman H,Storb R,Viganego F,Wener MH,Seibold JR,Sullivan KM,Furst DE,High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis: long-term follow-up of the US multicenter pilot studyBloodYear: 20071101388139610.1182/blood-2007-02-07238917452515|
|Kissin EY,Merkel PA,Lafyatis R,Myofibroblasts and hyalinized collagen as markers of skin disease in systemic sclerosisArthritis RheumYear: 2006543655366010.1002/art.2218617075814|
|Smith V,Pizzorni C,De Keyser F,Decuman S,Van Praet JT,Deschepper E,Sulli A,Cutolo M,Reliability of the qualitative and semiquantitative nailfold videocapillaroscopy assessment in a systemic sclerosis cohort: a two-centre studyAnn Rheum DisYear: 2010691092109610.1136/ard.2009.11556820439291|
|LeRoy EC,Black C,Fleischmajer R,Jablonska S,Krieg T,Medsger TA Jr,Rowell N,Wollheim F,Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesisJ RheumatolYear: 1988152022053361530|
|Clements PJ,Lachenbruch PA,Seibold JR,Zee B,Steen VD,Brennan P,Silman AJ,Allegar N,Varga J,Massa M,et al. Skin thickness score in systemic sclerosis: an assessment of interobserver variability in 3 independent studiesJ RheumatolYear: 199320189218968308774|
|Montgomery H,O'Leary PA,Ragsdale WE Jr,Dermatohistopathology of various types of sclerodermaAMA Arch DermYear: 195775788713381197|
|Prescott RJ,Freemont AJ,Jones CJ,Hoyland J,Fielding P,Sequential dermal microvascular and perivascular changes in the development of sclerodermaJ PatholYear: 199216625526310.1002/path.17116603071517881|
|Torres JE,Sanchez JL,Histopathologic differentiation between localized and systemic sclerodermaAm J DermatopatholYear: 19982024224510.1097/00000372-199806000-000039650695|
|Roumm AD,Whiteside TL,Medsger TA Jr,Rodnan GP,Lymphocytes in the skin of patients with progressive systemic sclerosis: quantification, subtyping, and clinical correlationsArthritis RheumYear: 19842764565310.1002/art.17802706076375682|
|Fleming JN,Shulman HM,Nash RA,Johnson PY,Wight TN,Gown A,Schwartz SM,Cutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease does not have the abnormal endothelial phenotype or vascular rarefaction characteristic of systemic sclerosisPLoS OneYear: 20094e620310.1371/journal.pone.000620319587802|
|Rongioletti F,Gambini C,Micalizzi C,Pastorino A,Rebora A,Mucin deposits in morphea and systemic sclerodermaDermatologyYear: 199418915715810.1159/0002468218075444|
|Boin F,Hummers LK,Scleroderma-like fibrosing disordersRheum Dis Clin North AmYear: 200834199220 ix. 10.1016/j.rdc.2007.11.00118329541|
|Ackerman AB,Histologic Diagnosis of Inflammatory Skin Diseases: An Algorithmic Method Based on Pattern AnalysisYear: 19972Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins|
|Baeten D,Demetter P,Cuvelier C,Van Den Bosch F,Kruithof E,Van Damme N,Verbruggen G,Mielants H,Veys EM,De Keyser F,Comparative study of the synovial histology in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathy, and osteoarthritis: influence of disease duration and activityAnn Rheum DisYear: 20005994595310.1136/ard.59.12.94511087697|
|Furst D,Khanna D,Matucci-Cerinic M,Clements P,Steen V,Pope J,Merkel P,Foeldvari I,Seibold J,Pittrow D,Polisson R,Strand V,Systemic sclerosis: continuing progress in developing clinical measures of responseJ RheumatolYear: 2007341194120017477486|
|Fitzpatrick TB,Wolff K,Access MedicineFitzpatrick's Dermatology in General MedicineYear: 20087New York: McGraw-Hill Medical|
|Aden N,Shiwen X,Aden D,Black C,Nuttall A,Denton CP,Leask A,Abraham D,Stratton R,Proteomic analysis of scleroderma lesional skin reveals activated wound healing phenotype of epidermal cell layerRheumatology (Oxford)Year: 2008471754176010.1093/rheumatology/ken37018829709|
Overview of the skin histology parameters and scoring systema
|Histology (H&E)||Epidermal pigmentation||10-cm VAS|
|Histology (MT)||Hyalinised collagen||10-cm VAS |
|IHC (α-SMA)||Myofibroblasts||10-cm VAS |
|Histology (H&E)||Mean epidermal thickness||Semiquantitative|
|Histology (H&E)||Mononuclear cellular infiltration||Semiquantitative |
|Histology (CI)||Mucin deposition in deep dermis||Semiquantitative |
|Histology (H&E)||Calcification||Present or absent|
|Histology (MT)||Entrapment of an eccrine sweat gland||Present or absent|
|Histology (H&E)||Fibroplasia||Present or absent|
|IHC (CD3)||Focal exocytosis||Present or absent|
|Histology (H&E)||Loss of adnexae||Present or absent|
|Histology (H&E)||Loss of epidermal papillae||Present or absent|
|Histology (H&E)||Intima proliferation of deep arterioles||Present or absent|
|Histology (H&E)||Parakeratosis||Present or absent|
|Histology (H&E)||Pigment incontinence||Present or absent|
|Histology (H&E)||Telangiectasia in papillary dermis||Present or absent|
aα-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; CI, colloidal iron; H&E, haematoxylin and eosin; IHC, immunohistochemistry; MT, Masson trichrome; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale.
Clinical data of patients with lSSc, lcSSc and dcSSca
|Subset||lSSc (n = 7)||lcSSc (n = 29)||dcSSc (n = 17)|
|Mean age, yr (± SD)||51 ± 16||51 ± 13||55 ± 8,0|
|Median disease durationb (rangec)||2 (2 to 21)||6 (0 to 35)||2 (0 to 12)|
|Median mRSS (range)||0 (0 to 0)||4 (0 to 14)||21 (4 to 27)|
|Median local skin score dorsal forearm (range)||0 (0 to 0)||0 (0 to 2)||1 (0 to 3)|
|ACR criteria, n||0||14||17|
|RNA polymerase III||0||1||3|
aACR, American College of Rheumatology; ANA, antinuclear antibodies; dcSSc, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; lSSc, limited systemic sclerosis; lcSSc, limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis; mRSS, modified Rodnan skin score; U1RNP, U1-ribonucleic protein; bdisease duration from first non-Raynaud's phenomenon symptom; cone patient had both anticentromere and anti-topoisomerase I antibodies. crange denotes the full interval between the smallest and largest values
Histological characteristics of patients with lcSSc or dcSSca
|Dorsal forearm||Upper inner arm|
|Histological characteristics||No local skin involvement
(n = 24)
|Local skin involvement
(n = 22)
|No local skin involvement
(n = 29)
|Local skin involvement
(n = 16)
pigmentation (± SD)
|33 ± 22||37 ± 23||17 ± 18||40 ± 20||NRc|
|Mean hyalinised collagen
|20 ± 21||42 ± 29||11 ± 13||43 ± 33||< 0.001|
|Mean myofibroblast score
|1.1 ± 4.9||12 ± 21||0.79 ± 3.8||14 ± 27||0.004|
|Mean epidermal thickness
|1.6 ± 0.58||2.3 ± 0.61||1.1 ± 0.51||1.5 ± 0.48||< 0.001|
|Mean mononuclear cellular
infiltration (± SD)
|0.89 ± 0.34||1.1 ± 0.38||1.4 ± 0.79||1.9 ± 0.77||0.005|
|Mean mucin deposition in
deep dermis (± SD)
|1.7 ± 1.3||2.1 ± 1.4||0.96 ± 0.83||1.5 ± 1.2||0.09|
|Entrapment of eccrine
sweat gland, n (%)
|10 (42)||11/21 (52)||8 (28)||6/15 (40)||0.284|
|Focal exocytosis, n (%)||1 (4.2)||5 (23)||14 (48)||11 (69)||0.043|
|Loss of adnexae, n (%)||10 (42)||12 (55)||9 (31)||3/15 (20)||0.94|
|Loss of epidermal papillae,
|10 (42)||5 (23)||1 (3,4)||0 (0)||0.122|
|Intima proliferation of deep
arterioles, n (%)
|3 (13)||6 (27)||5 (17)||2/15 (13)||0.596|
|Parakeratosis, n (%)||0 (0)||3 (14)||0 (0)||0 (0)||NRd|
|Pigment incontinence, n
|9 (38)||13 (59)||16 (55)||9 (56)||0.141|
|Telangiectasia in papillary
dermis, n (%)
|2 (8,3)||0 (0)||0 (0)||0 (0)||NRd|
alcSSc, limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis; dcSSc, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis; SD, standard deviation; NR, not reported; b generalised estimation equation (GEE) modelling was used to determine the effect of local skin involvement for each variable, correcting for subject level and biopsy site; cin the GEE model, the effect of this parameter differed significantly between the skin sites (Student's t-test was used to evaluate the upper inner arm, P < 0.001, and the dorsal forearm, P = 0.580); dstatistical testing could not be performed.
Histological characteristics of patients with lSSc and controlsa
|Upper inner arm|
(n = 7)
|Controls (n = 18)||P value|
|Mean epidermal pigmentation (± SD)||22 ± 23||16 ± 20||0.532|
|Mean hyalinised collagen (± SD)||2.3 ± 2.4||2.1 ± 1.9||0.893|
|Myofibroblast score (± SD)||0 ± 0||0 ± 0||NRb|
|Mean epidermal thickness (± SD)||0.86 ± 0.48||0.92 ± 0.31||0.714|
|Mononuclear cellular infiltration (± SD)||1.3 ± 1.1||1.5 ± 0.8||0.650|
|Mucine deposition in deep dermis (± SD)||1.2 ± 0.49||1.3 ± 0.7||0.663|
|Entrapment of eccrine sweat gland, n (%)||3 (43)||1/13 (7.7)||0.101|
|Focal exocytosis, n (%)||2 (29)||5/17 (16)||1.0|
|Loss of adnexae, n (%)||1 (14)||7 (50)||0.174|
|Loss of epidermal papillae, n (%)||2 (29)||2 (11)||0.548|
|Intima proliferation of deep arterioles, n (%)||0 (0)||0 (0)||NRb|
|Parakeratosis, n (%)||0 (0)||0 (0)||NRb|
|Pigment incontinence, n (%)||1 (14)||3 (17)||1.0|
|Telangiectasia in papillary dermis, n (%)||1 (14)||1 (5.6)||0.490|
alSSc, limited systemic sclerosis; NR, not reported; bstatistical testing could not be performed.
Previous Document: A factorial randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of micronutrients supplementation and...
Next Document: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression in human and murine pancreatic beta-cells affects cell viabil...