|Histological, immunohistological, and clinical features of merkel cell carcinoma in correlation to merkel cell polyomavirus status.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 22649735 Owner: NLM Status: PubMed-not-MEDLINE|
|Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, but highly malignant tumor of the skin with high rates of metastasis and poor survival. Its incidence rate rises and is currently about 0.6/100000/year. Clinical differential diagnoses include basal cell carcinoma, cyst, amelanotic melanoma, lymphoma and atypical fibroxanthoma. In this review article clinical, histopathological and immunhistochemical features of Merkel cell carcinoma are reported. In addition, the role of Merkel cell polyomavirus is discussed.|
|T Jaeger; J Ring; C Andres|
Related Documents :
|1964625 - Cytogenetics, ploidy and differentiation of human testicular, ovarian and extragonadal ...
11406175 - Genetic damage by bifunctional agents in repair-active pre-meiotic stages of drosophila...
2900895 - Cellular distribution, developmental changes and effects of cryptorchidism on uridine k...
16267025 - Doxorubicin induces apoptosis in germ line stem cells in the immature rat testis and am...
9398995 - Pancreatic cancer cell regulation by lipids and by basic fibroblast growth factor expre...
12001955 - The radiobiological effects of heavy ions on mammalian cells and bacteria.
|Type: Journal Article Date: 2012-05-07|
|Title: Journal of skin cancer Volume: 2012 ISSN: 2090-2913 ISO Abbreviation: J Skin Cancer Publication Date: 2012|
|Created Date: 2012-05-31 Completed Date: 2012-08-23 Revised Date: 2013-03-04|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101546757 Medline TA: J Skin Cancer Country: United States|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 983421 Citation Subset: -|
|Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, Technische Universität München, 80802 Munich, Germany.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Skin Cancer
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): J Skin Cancer
Journal ID (publisher-id): JSC
Publisher: Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Copyright © 2012 T. Jaeger et al.
Received Day: 30 Month: 12 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 2 Month: 2 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 7 Month: 5 Year: 2012
Volume: 2012E-location ID: 983421
PubMed Id: 22649735
|Histological, Immunohistological, and Clinical Features of Merkel Cell Carcinoma in Correlation to Merkel Cell Polyomavirus Status|
|Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, Technische Universität München, 80802 Munich, Germany
|Correspondence: *T. Jaeger: firstname.lastname@example.org
[other] Academic Editor: Arash Kimyai-Asadi
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is one of the most malignant tumors of the skin which affects primarily sun-exposed skin from older Caucasian, predominantly males with a mean age at the time of diagnosis of about 70 years . Its incidence rate rises with immunosuppression [2, 3], and is currently 0.6/100000/year . Its biological behavior is highly aggressive with high rates of metastasis and poor survival . If the Merkel cell is the cell of origin of this cancer is still matter of debate. Recently, it was reported that Merkel cells are derived from the epithelial lineage . Besides, because of sarcomatous elements were found in MCC, so a totipotent epithelial stem cell as origin was suggested , but further examinations are requested.
MCC characteristically develops rapidly and asymptomatically over months . Most MCCs are located on sun-exposed areas. About 50% of MCCs occur on the head and neck, 40% on the extremities and remainder on the trunk and genitalia . It very rarely arises on sun-protected areas, such as the oral and genital mucous membranes, where it is characterized by a particularly poor prognosis [9, 10]. It usually manifests as solitary, firm, flesh-colored to red nodule with a smooth, shiny surface, sometimes with telangiectasia [11, 12]. Differential diagnosis includes basal cell carcinoma, cyst, amelanotic melanoma, lymphoma, and atypical fibroxanthoma .
The five most common clinical features were used to create an acronym AEIOU ;
- Asymptomatic/lack of tenderness,
- Expanding rapidly (≤3 months),
- Older than age 50,
- UV-exposed site.
MCC usually appears as a dermal tumor nodule, which frequently extends into the subcutaneous fatty tissue. The tumor cells are small blue cells with basophilic nuclei and minimal cytoplasm. Mitoses are frequent and the apoptosis index is high . The papillary dermis and adnexa are usually spared .
- the intermediate type,
- the small cell type,
- the trabecular type.
In the latest data the trabecular form is discussed as the best differentiated with a better prognosis, while the small cell form is relatively undifferentiated and has a worse prognosis. But comprehensive data are missing and mixed and transitional forms are frequent, so there is no clear histologic-prognostic association.
Tumor size ≤ 2 cm, female gender, primary tumour localized at the upper limb, and pathologically proven negative lymph nodes are factors highly significant for prognosis and are incorporated into the new staging system for MCC [6, 19].
Andea et al. evaluated retrospectively the following histologic features with regard to prognosis: tumor thickness, microanatomic compartment involved by tumor (dermis and/or subcutis and/or deeper), tumor growth pattern (nodular circumscribed versus infiltrative), lymphovascular invasion, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor necrosis, ulceration, and solar elastosis. On multivariate analysis, tumor thickness, the presence of a nodular growth pattern, low tumor depth and absence of lymphovascular invasion were statistically significantly associated with longer survival .
Morphometric analyses revealed that Merkel cell polyomavirus-negative Merkel cell carcinomas show a different histologic appearance with more irregular nuclei and more abundant cytoplasm than Merkel cell polyomavirus-positive Merkel cell carcinomas, which are characterized by uniform round nuclei and scant cytoplasm .
The “small round blue cell” histologic pattern of MCC must be differentiated from several other tumors, such as small-cell lung carcinoma, carcinoid tumor, malignant lymphoma, and small-cell melanoma. Therefore immunohistochemical stainings are required. MCCs are positive for epithelial and neuroendocrine markers, but are negative for lymphoid and melanoma markers . Table 1 shows characteristic immunohistochemical staining patterns for these entities.
Positive staining for CK20 and NSE are quite specific for MCC. Anti-cytokeratin 20 (CK20) staining is concordant to data from the previous literature showing “paranuclear dot-like pattern” in 97% of all included MCCs . This highly sensitive staining feature is very important for routine histopathology to distinguish MCCs from other small round blue cell tumors [22, 23].
Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is usually expressed in small-cell lung carcinoma but is consistently absent in MCC . Leucocyte common antigen (LCA) is negative in MCC, but positive in lymphoma [18, 24]. Small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCLC) is cytokeratin 7 (CK7) positive, but not MCC .
Another useful marker for the distinction between MCC and small-cell lung carcinoma is the neurofilament protein (NFP), which is usually positive in MCC and always negative in small-cell lung carcinoma .
The differentiation between MCC and malignant melanoma is based on the negativity of the latter for CK 20 and its positivity for HBM45, NKI/C3, and S-100, for which MCC is usually negative .
Further, the tumor cells of MCC display additional antigens in varying frequency and intensity; these include, among others, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, tenascin-C, CD56 as well as various neurofilaments and neuropeptides. Expression of the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) survivin and the member of the p53 family p63 appears to be associated with a poorer prognosis [17, 26–28].
Although MCC is one of the most aggressive skin cancers with a high mortality rate, little is known about potential signalling mechanism that drives carcinogenesis in MCC. The association of MCC with immunosuppression has prompted the hypothesis of a viral implication in the pathogenesis of the tumor. But the published data on the impact of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) presence or viral load on prognosis remain controversial.
Merkel cell Polyomavirus (MCPyV) was identified in January 2008 by Feng and colleagues in tumor tissue from MCC patients, proving clonal integration of the virus DNA into the host genome . Meanwhile several studies confirmed this observation showing frequent prevalence of MCPyV DNA in MCCs [29–35]. These data suggest MCPyV as the likely causative agent of MCC. It is supposed that an interaction of the MCC virus protein with p53 and members of the retinoblastoma (Rb-) Gen family could be responsible for the malignant degradation [30, 36].
Furthermore, Sihto et al. found evidence for better prognosis in MCPyV DNA-positive MCC having fewer regional nodal metastasis at time of diagnosis compared to MCPyV DNA-negative MCC . Andres et al. showed that MCPyV DNA-positive MCCs tend to be preferentially located on the limbs and tend to metastasize less frequently . It seems that MCPyV MCCs harbour more genomic aberrations than MCPyV ones . Besides it has been reported that absence of MCPyV or lower viral abundance is associated with increased p53 and KIT espression [39, 40]. Meanwhile, latest data did not show better clinical prognosis in patients with MCPyV-positive MCCs [2, 25].
There is only one report analyzing immunohistochemical features of MCCs in correlation to presence of MCPyV DNA . In the cohort studied there is no statistical significant association between MCPyV DNA prevalence and immunohistochemical expression of CK20, CK19, CD117, and ST3 was detected but some exciting trends.
CK 19 is a small human cytokeratin, expressed in undifferentiated germinative basaloid cells and usually not expressed by cells of nonepithelial origin . CD117 is a transmembrane protein of the receptor tyrosine kinase family. Stromeylsin-3/matrix metalloproteinase11 (ST3) overexpression could be associated with tumor invasion because of a antiapoptotic effects . A more frequent CK19 expression in MCPyV DNA-negative MCCs and CD117 expression in MCPyV DNA-positive MCCs was observed. Moreover, CK19 is a helpful diagnostic marker for CK20-negative MCC. The role of ST3 expression is not yet clear, being expressed by the MCC tumor cells themselves in about half of all cases, independent of MCPyV DNA-prevalence. However, in some studies MCPyV DNA-prevalence seems to influence the biological behavior of MCCs, resulting in better overall survival for patients with positive MCPyV DNA-status . Most probably due to different invasion and metastatic properties, Andres et al. were not able to find statistically significant differences in the expression pattern of CK20, CK19, CD117, and ST3 .
In conclusion, more data will be needed to get profound insight in the carcinogenesis of MCC. As MCC is a rare cancer, studies are limited and further molecular studies are required as well as clinical investigations to establish the impact of MCPyV on MCC which perhaps could open new therapetic options.
|CK 20:||Cytokeratin 20|
|LCA:||Leucocyte common antigen|
|MCC:||Merkel cell carcinoma|
|MCPyV:||Merkel cell Polyomavirus|
|TTF-1:||Thyroid transcription factor-1|
|SCLC:||Small cell carcinoma of the lung.|
|1.||Swann MH,Yoon J. Merkel cell carcinomaSeminars in OncologyYear: 2007341515617270666|
|2.||Rubel JR,Milford EL,Abdi R. Cutaneous neoplasms in renal transplant recipientsEuropean Journal of DermatologyYear: 200212653253512459521|
|3.||Engels EA,Frisch M,Goedert JJ,Biggar RJ,Miller RW. Merkel cell carcinoma and HIV infectionLancetYear: 2002359930549749811853800|
|4.||Bichakjian CK,Lowe L,Lao CD,et al. Merkel cell carcinoma: critical review with guidelines for multidisciplinary managementCancerYear: 2007110111217520670|
|5.||Morrison KM,Miesegaes GR,Lumpkin EA,Maricich SM. Mammalian Merkel cells are descended from the epidermal lineageDevelopmental BiologyYear: 20093361768319782676|
|6.||Albores-Saavedra J,Batich K,Chable-Montero F,Sagy N,Schwartz AM,Henson DE. Merkel cell carcinoma demographics, morphology, and survival based on 3870 cases: a population based studyJournal of Cutaneous PathologyYear: 2010371202719638070|
|7.||Dancey AL,Rayatt SS,Soon C,Ilchshyn A,Brown I,Srivastava S. Merkel cell carcinoma: a report of 34 cases and literature reviewJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryYear: 2006591212941299|
|8.||Poulsen M. Merkel cell carcinoma of skin: diagnosis and management strategiesDrugs and AgingYear: 200522321922915813655|
|9.||Yom SS,Rosenthal DI,El-Naggar AK,Kies MS,Hessel AC. Merkel cell carcinoma of the tongue and head and neck oral mucosal sitesOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and EndodontologyYear: 20061016761768|
|10.||Coleman NM,Smith-Zagone MJ,Tanyi J,et al. Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina with Merkel cell carcinoma phenotypeAmerican Journal of Surgical PathologyYear: 200630340541016538063|
|11.||Andres C,Flaig MJ,Belloni B. Red, glassy tumor in the lower leg: highly malignantFortschritte der MedizinYear: 201015215p. 5|
|12.||Goessling W,McKee PH,Mayer RJ. Merkel cell carcinomaJournal of Clinical OncologyYear: 200220258859811786590|
|13.||Andres C,Puchta U,Flaig MJ. Detection of merkel cell polyomavirus DNA in atypical fibroxanthoma in correlation to clinical featuresAmerican Journal of DermatopathologyYear: 201032879980320861707|
|14.||Heath M,Jaimes N,Lemos B,et al. Clinical characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma at diagnosis in 195 patients: the AEIOU featuresJournal of the American Academy of DermatologyYear: 200858337538118280333|
|15.||McCardle TW,Sondak VK,Zager J,Messina JL. Merkel cell carcinoma: pathologic findings and prognostic factorsCurrent Problems in CancerYear: 2010341476420371074|
|16.||Eng TY,Boersma MG,Fuller CD,et al. A comprehensive review of the treatment of Merkel cell carcinomaAmerican Journal of Clinical OncologyYear: 200730662463618091058|
|17.||Schrama D,Peitsch WK,Zapatka M,et al. Merkel cell polyomavirus status is not associated with clinical course of merkel cell carcinomaJournal of Investigative DermatologyYear: 201113181631163821562568|
|18.||Becker JC,Kauczok CS,Ugurel S,Eib S,Bröcker EB,Houben R. Merkel cell carcinoma: molecular pathogenesis, clinical features and therapyJournal of the German Society of DermatologyYear: 20086970972019000060|
|19.||Lemos BD,Storer BE,Iyer JG,et al. Pathologic nodal evaluation improves prognostic accuracy in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 5823 cases as the basis of the first consensus staging systemJournal of the American Academy of DermatologyYear: 201063575176120646783|
|20.||Andea AA,Coit DG,Amin B,Busam KJ. Merkel cell carcinoma: histologic features and prognosisCancerYear: 200811392549255818798233|
|21.||Kuwamoto S,Higaki H,Kanai K,et al. Association of Merkel cell polyomavirus infection with morphologic differences in Merkel cell carcinomaHuman PathologyYear: 201142563264021277612|
|22.||Bobos M,Hytiroglou P,Kostopoulos I,Karkavelas G,Papadimitriou CS. Immunohistochemical distinction between Merkel cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma of the lungAmerican Journal of DermatopathologyYear: 20062829910416625069|
|23.||Acebo E,Vidaurrazaga N,Varas C,Burgos-Bretones JJ,Díaz-Pérezt JL. Merkel cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological study of 11 casesJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologyYear: 200519554655116164706|
|24.||Becker J,Mauch C,Kortmann RD,et al. Short German guidelines: Merkel cell carcinomaJournal of the German Society of DermatologyYear: 200861S16S18|
|25.||Kontochristopoulos GJ,Stavropoulos PG,Krasagakis K,Goerdt S,Zouboulis CC. Differentiation between Merkel cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma: an immunohistochemical studyDermatologyYear: 2000201212312611053914|
|26.||Asioli S,Righi A,Volante M,Eusebi V,Bussolati G. p63 expression as a new prognostic marker in Mrkel cell carcinomaCancerYear: 2007110364064717599745|
|27.||Kim J,McNiff JM. Nuclear expression of survivin portends a poor prognosis in Merkel cell carcinomaModern PathologyYear: 200821676476918425079|
|28.||Tucci MG,Lucarini G,Giangiacomi M,et al. Immunohistochemical study of apoptosis markers and involvement of chemokine CXCR4 in skin Merkel cell carcinomaJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologyYear: 200620101220122517062035|
|29.||Andres C,Belloni B,Puchta U,Sander CA,Flaig MJ. Prevalence of MCPyV in Merkel cell carcinoma and non-MCC tumorsJournal of Cutaneous PathologyYear: 2010371283419615033|
|30.||Becker JC,Houben R,Ugurel S,Trefzer U,Pföhler C,Schrama D. MC polyomavirus is frequently present in Merkel cell carcinoma of European patientsThe Journal of investigative dermatologyYear: 2009129124825018633441|
|31.||Foulongne V,Kluger N,Dereure O,Brieu N,Guillot B,Segondy M. Merkel cell polyomavirus and Merkel cell carcinoma, FranceEmerging Infectious DiseasesYear: 20081491491149318760031|
|32.||Garneski KM,Warcola AH,Feng Q,Kiviat NB,Leonard JH,Nghiem P. Merkel cell polyomavirus is more frequently present in North American than Australian Merkel cell carcinoma tumorsJournal of Investigative DermatologyYear: 200912924624818650846|
|33.||Kassem A,Schöpflin A,Diaz C,et al. Frequent detection of merkel cell polyomavirus in human merkel cell carcinomas and identification of a unique deletion in the VP1 geneCancer ResearchYear: 200868135009501318593898|
|34.||Sihto H,Kukko H,Koljonen V,Sankila R,Böhling T,Joensuu H. Clinical factors associated with merkel cell polyomavirus infection in merkel cell carcinomaJournal of the National Cancer InstituteYear: 20091011393894519535775|
|35.||Mangana J,Dziunycz P,Kerl K,Dummer R,Cozzio A. Prevalence of merkel cell polyomavirus among Swiss Merkel cell carcinoma patientsDermatologyYear: 2010221218418820689250|
|36.||Moens U,van Ghelue M,Johannessen M. Oncogenic potentials of the human polyomavirus regulatory proteinsCellular and Molecular Life SciencesYear: 200764131656167817483871|
|37.||Andres C,Belloni B,Puchta U,Sander CA,Flaig MJ. Re: clinical factors associated with merkel cell polyomavirus infection in merkel cell carcinomaJournal of the National Cancer InstituteYear: 2009101231655165619864638|
|38.||Paulson KG,Lemos BD,Feng B,et al. Array-CGH reveals recurrent genomic changes in merkel cell carcinoma including amplification of L-MycJournal of Investigative DermatologyYear: 200912961547155519020549|
|39.||Bhatia K,Goedert JJ,Modali R,Preiss L,Ayers LW. Merkel cell carcinoma subgroups by Merkel cell polyomavirus DNA relative abundance and oncogene expressionInternational Journal of CancerYear: 2010126922402246|
|40.||Waltari M,Sihto H,Kukko H,et al. Association of Merkel cell polyomavirus infection with tumor p53, KIT, stem cell factor, PDGFR-alpha and survival in Merkel cell carcinomaInternational Journal of CancerYear: 20111293619628|
|41.||Andres C,Belloni B,Jaeger T,et al. Immunohistochemical features of merkel cell carcinoma in correlation with presence of merkel cell polyomavirus DNAActa Dermato-VenereologicaYear: 201191672272321681362|
|42.||Michel M,Török N,Godbout MJ,et al. Keratin 19 as a biochemical marker of skin stem cells in vivo and in vitro: keratin 19 expressing cells are differentially localized in function of anatomic sites, and their number varies with donor age and culture stageJournal of Cell ScienceYear: 19961095101710288743949|
|43.||Rio MC. From a unique cell to metastasis is a long way to go: clues to stromelysin-3 participationBiochimieYear: 2005873-429930615781316|
Previous Document: Is there truly no benefit with sunscreen use and Basal cell carcinoma? A critical review of the lite...
Next Document: Optimization of the Nutritional Parameters for Enhanced Production of B. subtilis SPB1 Biosurfactant...