Document Detail

Higher body mass, older age and higher monounsaturated fatty acids intake reflect better quantitative ultrasound parameters in Inuit preschoolers.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22789515     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: Investigate the effects of selected factors associated with quantitative ultrasound parameters among Inuit preschoolers living in Arctic communities (56° 32'-72° 40'N).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children were selected randomly in summer and early fall (n=296). Dietary intake was assessed through the administration of a 24-h dietary recall (24-h recall) and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Anthropometry was measured using standardized procedures. Plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured using a chemiluminescent assay (Liaison, Diasorin). Quantitative ultrasound parameters were measured using Sahara Sonometer, (Hologic Inc.).
RESULTS: Children divided by speed of sound (SoS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) quartiles were not different for age (years), sex (M/F), calcium (mg/d) and vitamin D intake (µg/d) and plasma 25(OH)D concentration (nmol/L). However, children in the highest BUA and SoS quartile had higher body mass index (BMI) compared to those in quartile 1. Using multivariate linear regression, higher BMI, older age and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) intake were predictors of BUA while only BMI was a predictor of SoS.
CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation assessing intakes of traditional foods (TF) and nutrients affecting bone parameters along with assessment of vitamin D status of Inuit children across seasons is required.
Authors:
Jessy El Hayek; Grace Egeland; Hope Weiler
Related Documents :
22417625 - Eating patterns and lipid levels in older adolescent girls.
22309475 - Nutritional behavior of cyclists during a 24-hour team relay race: a field study report.
8185495 - Estimating human incisal bite forces from the electromyogram/bite-force function.
20592965 - Objective and quantitative definitions of modified food textures based on sensory and r...
12426515 - Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between grapefruit juice and halofantrine.
20038145 - Testing and enhancing the in vitro bioaccessibility and bioavailability of rosmarinus o...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-07-09
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of circumpolar health     Volume:  71     ISSN:  2242-3982     ISO Abbreviation:  Int J Circumpolar Health     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-07-13     Completed Date:  2012-10-23     Revised Date:  2013-07-12    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9713056     Medline TA:  Int J Circumpolar Health     Country:  Sweden    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  18999     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Anthropometry
Arctic Regions
Body Mass Index*
Calcium, Dietary / administration & dosage
Child, Preschool
Dietary Fats / administration & dosage*
Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated / administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Inuits*
Male
Multivariate Analysis
Nutrition Assessment
Quebec
Ultrasonography / standards*
Vitamin D / administration & dosage
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
//Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Calcium, Dietary; 0/Dietary Fats; 0/Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated; 1406-16-2/Vitamin D
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Int J Circumpolar Health
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Int J Circumpolar Health
Journal ID (publisher-id): IJCH
ISSN: 1239-9736
ISSN: 2242-3982
Publisher: Co-Action Publishing
Article Information
Download PDF
© 2012 Jessy El Hayek et al.
open-access:
Received Day: 21 Month: 12 Year: 2011
Revision Received Day: 18 Month: 4 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 25 Month: 5 Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 09 Month: 7 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Volume: 71E-location ID: 10.3402/ijch.v71i0.18999
ID: 3417545
PubMed Id: 22789515
Publisher Id: IJCH-71-18999
DOI: 10.3402/ijch.v71i0.18999

Higher body mass, older age and higher monounsaturated fatty acids intake reflect better quantitative ultrasound parameters in Inuit preschoolers
Jessy El Hayek12
Grace Egeland12
Hope Weiler12*
1School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
2Centre for Indigenous Peoples’, Nutrition and Environment, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, QC, Canada
*Hope Weiler, School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada. Email: hope.weiler@mcgill.ca

Reaching the highest peak bone mass within one’s genetic potential, or reducing the rate of bone loss are the main strategies for reducing the risk of osteoporosis (1). Although 60–80% of peak bone mass is determined by genetics (2), nutrition and lifestyle factors of relevance to children and development of bone mass include, body weight and composition, physical activity and nutrition (2,3).

Ethnicity is also known to have a strong impact on bone health (46). In adults, those who are black have higher bone mineral density (BMD) compared to Caucasians (6) and Caucasians have higher BMD than Asians (7). These differences are also apparent in newborns (8) and continue later in childhood (9). On the other hand, Aboriginal American women have higher rates of bone loss compared to their white counterparts (5), while Aboriginal Canadian women have lower BMD z-scores compared to their white counterparts (4). However, data from Aboriginal newborns did not show lower whole body or regional bone mineral content (10), suggesting that disparities in the postnatal environment underlies the differences observed in adults.

Several dietary and lifestyle factors may predispose Aboriginal and Inuit people to low BMD, beginning as early as childhood. Traditional food (TF) is rich in nutrients that would support bone health, including protein, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), zinc, and vitamins A, D, and C (11,12). Instead of complementing the diet with market food (MF) rich in nutrients including calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin K (3,13) that would optimize bone health, Inuit children are shifting from a nutrient dense diet to an energy dense diet, characterized by low quality MF consumption (12,14). Further, infrequent use of dietary supplements (14) and polar latitude that limits endogenous vitamin D synthesis (15) may also play a role in predisposing Inuit children to poor bone health. The quantitative ultrasound technique is being used among the paediatric population and its parameters, particularly broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SoS), correlate well with BMD and with bone quality measures (16).

Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to investigate whether anthropometric, dietary, biochemical and lifestyle risk factors are associated with bone health, as reflected by BUA and SoS among Inuit preschoolers (3–5 years) living in Arctic communities (56° 32′–72° 40′N). We hypothesize, based on the literature, that vitamin D and calcium intake, body mass index (BMI), and plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) would be important predictors of SoS and BUA.


Materials and methods
Subjects

The sample consisted of Inuit preschool children recruited in the late summer and early fall of 2007 (August–November) and 2008 (August–September) in 16 of the 25 communities of Nunavut, representing all 3 regions of the territory (Kivalliq, Baffin, and Kitikmeot). Communities were selected based upon logistical and cost consideration and upon achieving representation of latitude, region, and community size. Inclusion criteria for participation consisted of self-identified Inuk by parents or a caregiver and 3–5 years of age. Children were recruited from both the community health centre lists of age-appropriate children and from randomly selected households with 3–5 year-olds that had participated in the International Polar Year Inuit Adult Health Survey. A randomized list of children was created from the health centre list using a random number table and parents/caregivers were contacted in the order that they appeared on the list. Caregivers were contacted either by phone, when available, or in person. Of the 537 successfully contacted households, 75 refused upon initial contact and 74 cancelled or failed to attend the study appointment; thus, the overall participation rate was 72.3% and 388 children were recruited. A more detailed description of the survey methodology is available elsewhere (17).

Ethics

The study was approved by the McGill Faculty of Medicine Institutional Review Board and by the Nunavut Research Institute. A parent or primary caregiver provided signed informed consent. A person was considered a child’s primary caregiver if he/she was the person primarily responsible for the child at the time of the study. Consent forms and an information DVD were available in English and Inuit languages.

Research team and interviews

The research team consisted of bilingual interviewers who conducted face-to-face interviews. Information about household composition, living conditions, diet, supplement use, and health status were collected through interviews with the child’s caregiver. Information about sun exposure was collected. Caregivers were asked an open ending question “on average, about how many hours per day, does your child play outside?”

A qualitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) (without assessment of portion sizes) was completed by the child’s caregiver. The FFQ reflected the previous month and contained 30 commonly consumed TF items, some of which are considered good sources of vitamin D, (whitefish, arctic char, seal meat, seal liver, caribou, caribou liver, polar bear meat and walrus meat). It also contained the following MF sources of vitamin D: milk, margarine, and eggs. Furthermore, 24-hour dietary recalls (24-h recalls) were conducted with the caregiver using a multiple pass technique. Portion sizes were estimated using a 3-dimensional food model kit (Santé Quebec) to better standardize 24-h recalls. Twenty percent of the caregivers were asked to return for a repeat 24-h recall, which was conducted on a non-consecutive day to allow assessment of nutrient adequacy. Interviewers recorded if there were times when the caregiver did not know what the child ate. Daycares were called regarding daycare snacks and meals to complete dietary recall. This approach has been shown to be an accurate method of assessing intake in this age group (18). Vitamin D and calcium intakes were adjusted for the second 24-h recall and an estimation of the adjusted intake for sequence and day of week was calculated using the Iowa State Software for Intake Distribution Estimate (Iowa State University, 1996). The adjusted data were only used to compare intakes against the DRIs. Since data collection for this study was performed before the release of the 2011 guidelines of the Institute of Medicine, accordingly, vitamin D and calcium intake of participants were compared to the both the adequate intake (AI) (19) and the estimated average requirement (EAR) (20). Vitamin and/or mineral supplement use and frequency were recorded, however, due to low prevalence of supplement intake, vitamin D or calcium intake reflected only dietary intake.

Clinical assessments

Venous blood (3 mL) was collected into heparin coated vacutainers followed by centrifugation and storage of plasma at −20°C and was then transported on ice packs in coolers to McGill University and stored at −80°C until analysis. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a portable stadiometer (Road Rod214 Portable Stadiometer, Seca) and weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using an electronic scale. BMI-for-age z-score (BAZ), height-for-age z-score (HAZ) and weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) were calculated and interpreted using the World health organization (WHO) Child Growth Charts for children (21). The non-dominant calcaneus was measured using ultrasound Sahara Sonometer (Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA). Measurement of the os calcis consisted of BUA (expressed in decibels per megahertz, Δdb/ΔMHz) and SoS (expressed in meters per second, m/s). The quantitative ultrasound device measures BUA and SoS and the results are combined to estimate BMD. Ultrasound bone densitometry was shown to be sensitive enough to detect physiological bone development in childhood (22) and compromised bone health in diseased children (16). At the start of each clinical day, the sonometer was quality checked according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the machine was checked using a control bone also known as a “phantom”. These assessments were recorded in a quality control log and tracked to ensure the machine was working consistently.

Laboratory analysis

Plasma Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and total calcium were measured by Beckman Coulter D×C 800 (Beckman Coulter Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) at the Royal Victoria Hospital. The Laboratory participated in external validation and received a proficiency certificate for 2009–2010 from DigitalPT. High sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured in the serum using Enzyme Linked Immunosorbance Assay. Plasma 25(OH)D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations were measured using LIAISON total 25(OH)D and N-tact PTH assays (DiaSorin Inc., Stillwater, MN, USA) at McGill University. The inter-assay and the intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) were 4.5 and 11.1% for the low 25(OH)D control (38.2 nmol/L) and 6.2 and 5.3% for the high 25(OH)D control (127.2 nmol/L); the accuracy using the mid-range of the manufacturer’s specifications was 95%. For the PTH low control, the inter-assay CV% was 19.1 (5.2 pmol/L) and 8.7 for the high PTH control (52.1 pmol/L). The accuracy using the mid-range of manufacture specifications was 86.7%. The laboratory (HW) that measured 25(OH)D participated in the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme program and obtained a certificate of proficiency for 2009–2010, which reflects that ≥80% of the reported results fell within 30% of the All-Laboratory Trimmed Mean.

Statistical analysis

Questionnaires and clinical information were entered into a Microsoft Access Database and 24-h dietary recall data were entered using CANDAT (Godin London). For outliers, all dietary variables exceeding mean+3 standard deviations (SD) were substituted with mean+3 SD. For all other variables, values exceeding mean+3 SD were excluded. All variables were tested for normality prior to statistical analysis using Shapiro–Wilk test. Since variables were skewed, spearman correlations were used to identify correlations between BUA or SoS and different continuous characteristics. ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc tests whenever appropriate, were used to determine whether dietary, anthropometric, biochemical and lifestyle factors were different by BUA or SoS quartiles when variables were continuous and Chi-square was used when variables were categorical. Prior to ANOVA, all skewed variables were log transformed or square rooted. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify predictors of SoS or BUA. SoS and BUA measurements were available for 285 children and full multivariable analysis was possible for 211 children, because data on food intake, accurate anthropometry measures, the number of hours spent outside or 25(OH)D concentration were missing. Various models were constructed. Normality of residuals was ensured using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test along with visual examination of residual-normal quantile plot, and heteroskedasticity was evaluated using the Breusch–Pagan/Cook–Weisberg test. Variance inflation factors were examined post-regression to ensure the absence of multicollinearity. For all tests, p<0.05 was considered significant. Values in the text are percent (95% CI), means±SD, or medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). All statistical analyses were completed using Stata 10 (Stata Corp).


Results

Although 388 children participated in the health survey, not all children had BMD measures. Children with available SoS and BUA measures (n=285) were similar to those with unavailable values (n=103) for age, gender, BMI percentile, number of hours spent outside, amount of TF consumed the previous day, milk intake, calcium intake, vitamin D intake, carbohydrates intake, protein intake, fat intake, PUFA intake, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) intake, saturated fatty acids (SFA) intake, plus concentrations of CRP, ALP, total calcium, PTH, and 25(OH)D. Thus, results are presented for only the 285 children with available BMD measures (Table I).

The average latitude of communities participating in the study was 65.2 [95% CI: 64.8–65.6°N]. Median plasma total calcium, ALP, CRP, and PTH concentrations of Inuit preschoolers fell in the normal range. However, median 25(OH)D concentration was below 50 nmol/L (Table I) with 57.5% [95% CI: 50.9–64.1%] of the children below this cut off and 82.2% were below 75 nmol/L. Of Inuit preschoolers, 60.9% met the EAR of 800 mg/d for calcium while 10.5% met the EAR of 10 µg/d for vitamin D.

Since correlation coefficients were similar between boys and girls, all participants were analyzed together. Anthropometric variables, including WAZ, HAZ and BAZ correlated significantly (p<0.01) with SoS (r2=0.21, 0.19 and 0.19, respectively). Anthropometric variables, including WAZ, HAZ and BAZ correlated significantly (p<0.01) with BUA (r2=0.39, 0.28 and 0.32, respectively). None of the dietary variables, including energy (Kcal/d), carbohydrates (g/d), fat (g/d), SFA (g/d), MUFA (g/d), PUFA (g/d), vitamin D (µg/d) and calcium (mg/d) correlated significantly with either BUA or SoS, except protein (g/d). Protein intake correlated positively with SoS (r2=0.12, p=0.03). None of the food groups, including milk intake (mL/d), dairy products including milk (servings/d), fruits and vegetables (servings/d), TF (g/d), frequency of fish consumption (times/month) and frequency of marine mammals consumption (times/month) correlated significantly with BUA or SoS.

None of the biochemical variables, including 25(OH)D (nmol/L), PTH (pmol/L), calcium (mmol/L) or CRP (mg/L), correlated with SoS and BUA, except ALP (U/L). ALP correlated positively with SoS (r2=0.17, p=0.02). From the lifestyle variables, latitude inversely correlated with SoS (r2=−0.11, p=0.04) while it did not correlate with BUA and the number of hours spent outside (h/d) did not correlate with either variables.

Children in the SoS and BUA quartiles were not different by age (years), sex (M/F), presence of an active hunter in the household (yes/no), carbohydrates intake, milk intake, fruits and vegetables intake, TF intake, fish and marine mammals, plasma CRP, calcium, PTH and latitude. However, children in the highest quartile of SoS or BUA had higher BMI and BAZ compared to those in quartiles 1 (Tables II and III). Also, children in SoS quartile 4 had higher ALP compared to those in quartile 3, while results were not different by BUA quartiles.

Using multivariate linear regression, higher BMI and MUFA intake plus older age were the only positive predictors of BUA in Inuit preschool children (Table IV), while age, sex, number of hours spent outside, vitamin D status (0<75 and 1≥75 nmol/L), energy, saturated fat, vitamin D, protein and calcium intake did not contribute to the model. On the other hand, only higher BMI was a significant predictor of SoS in Inuit preschoolers (r2=0.19, p<0.01) (Table V).


Discussion

This is the first study to report upon parameters of bone health in Inuit children. Children in the highest SoS and BUA quartile had higher adiposity, as measured using BMI than those in quartile 1. The strongest predictors of BUA were higher BMI, older age and higher MUFA while only higher BMI was a predictor of SoS.

Previous studies suggest Aboriginal children as a group are at a higher risk for low bone mass compared to other Canadian infants as a function of low vitamin D status (23). It appears from this sample that median vitamin D concentration of Inuit preschoolers was below the 50 nmol/L cut-off recommended by the Institute of Medicine (20). In contrast to the suggested hypothesis, vitamin D intake and plasma 25(OH)D concentration, regardless of the definition of optimal concentration (≥50 or 75 nmol/L) in the regression model, were not associated with SoS and BUA in our cross-sectional analysis. Very few children (18%) had 25(OH)D values in the range suggested to enhance bone health (≥75 nmol/L) based on adult studies (24). Our results were in concordance with other studies that used a quantitative ultrasound measurement. Krieg et al. (25) and Zochling et al. (18) did not find an association between vitamin D status and QUS parameters among large samples of institutionalized elderly. On the other hand, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, among a younger sample of 12–15 year-old adolescents recruited throughout the year, in the United Kingdom, vitamin D status (≥74.1 nmol/L) was not associated with heel BMD. However, within the same study, only girls with high vitamin D status (≥74.1 nmol/L) had significantly greater forearm BMD (26). It has been suggested that the effect of vitamin D on the skeleton may be site-specific (27).

Using multivariable linear regression, age was a significant predictor of BUA. The effect of age on BUA was in agreement with results derived from quantitative ultrasound (28,29). Further, BMI was a significant predictor of SoS and BUA in the multivariable linear regression model, as hypothesized. Similarly, anthropometry including weight and BMI were positively associated with BUA (29,30) and SoS (28,31) in children and adults, but not once obesity is reached. An increasing number of studies suggests that a BMI>30 kg/m2 might interfere with bone health (32). In the current study, at this age and in absence of obesity, the lifestyle variables support accommodation of bone to the larger weight bearing load.

We did not find differences between BUA and SoS parameters in either gender. Similar results were reported by others among school-aged children using quantitative ultrasound (29,33). However, Zhu et al. (28) found gender differences, measured by BUA, between the ages of 12 to 13 years old. It is likely that gender differences might not appear until adolescence.

Higher MUFA intake was also a predictor of BUA. Similarly, MUFA intake was positively associated with bone health, particularly BMD measured by single photon absorptiometry, in both men and women in an epidemiological study in Greece (34). It is important to point out the main source of MUFA, in the Greek diet, is olive oil, which also contains PUFA. Likewise, the Inuit diet is known to be high in MUFA and PUFA, particularly derived from marine mammals and their oils (35) which are also rich sources of vitamin D (36). In the present study, MUFA, SFA and PUFA contributed to 11.1, 10.0 and 4.6%, respectively, of total energy intake which is close to the intake of 1–8 year-old Canadian children in the Canadian Community Health Survey, Cycle 2.2 which reported an intake of MUFA, SFA and PUFA of 11, 12 and 4% of energy intake (37). Children in the 4th quartile of BUA or SoS tended to have higher intakes of PUFA and MUFA than children in the first quartile, but these trends did not reach statistical significance. It is likely that we did not observe any difference in PUFA intake, since we did not differentiate between omega 3 and omega 6 and the ratio of omega 6: omega 3 due to the lack of the data in TF in the Canadian Nutrient File. Evidence suggests that BMD is positively correlated with omega 3 intake and is negatively associated with omega 6: omega 3 ratio in both men and women (38). Further, children in the higher 2 BUA or SoS quartiles did not have higher milk intake, dairy intake, TF intake, and monthly consumption of fish and marine mammals. All of these dietary variables were consumed scarcely, for instance mean daily milk intake of Inuit preschoolers was below 1 serving (data derived from the 24 h recall) and almost one-third of children did not consume fish and marine mammals in the previous month (data derived from the FFQ). Accordingly, it might be difficult to detect statistical differences in SoS or BUA. Several investigations have evaluated the role of calcium intake in bone health. Strong evidence suggests that calcium intake and absorption from childhood through early adulthood, is a crucial determinant of bone health throughout life (39), however, in the current study, this association was not detected, in contrast to the hypothesis. This observation is similar to another study among a large sample (n=1,016) of children (6–13 years old) in Taiwan (29). It has been suggested that cross-sectional studies are less sensitive in finding the influence of calcium intake on bone health, in comparison to prospective studies involving calcium interventions (40). Recently, we published nutrient intakes of Inuit preschoolers using all available 24-h recall data (n=374) (12). Mean intake of most nutrients, including protein, vitamin D and calcium was above the recommendations set by the Institute of Medicine (19). Only 8.8 and 24.0% met the recommended daily servings of fruits and vegetables and dairy products, respectively, of Canada’s Food Guide for First Nations, Inuit and Métis.

The strength of this study is that, to our knowledge, it is the first to assess bone parameters in Inuit children, in combination with vitamin D intake, age, gender, latitude, BMI and other known predictors of bone health. However, the study findings cannot be generalizable beyond Inuit preschoolers and because the study was cross-sectional in nature, causality cannot be inferred. Further, for PTH measurements, intact PTH assays were used, instead of bioactive 1–84 PTH assays, that might have cross-reacted with carboxyl-terminal PTH fragments and lead to an overestimation of biologically active PTH (41). Physical activity was not assessed among Inuit preschoolers, and the literature has shown positive association between physical activity and bone health (39), future studies should take this factor into consideration. It is very challenging to measure physical activity in such a young population. Measuring physical activity through a pedometer or accelerometer would be an accurate measure; however compliance issues are problematic among preschoolers. Even though, peripheral quantitative ultrasound is the most suitable method to assess BMD in large populations in the field for its several advantages, being easy, portable, safe, cost-effective, rapid, and radiation-free, this technique is limited by the difficulty to compare its results with those of the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (16).

In summary, these data suggest that factors in support of bone health in young Inuit children are higher MUFA intake, older age and BMI. Since the dietary data was mainly derived from the 24 h recall data, further investigation assessing usual intakes of TF and nutrients affecting bone health using multiple 24 h recalls and FFQ along with serial assessment of vitamin D status of Inuit children across different seasons is required to confirm this observation. Further, future studies should assess physical activity, including weight bearing activities, and body composition, particularly body fat, as important predictors of bone health.


Acknowledgements

We thank Mrs Nelofar Athar Sheikh for her contribution in the data management and statistical advice, Mrs Louise Johnson-Down for her assistance in the analysis of the dietary data, Mrs Sherry Agellon for her help with the measurements of 25(OH)D and PTH concentrations, Mrs Angela Pacey for the data entry of BMD measures.

Authors’ contributions

The author’s responsibilities were as follows: GE and HW designed research; JH, GE and HW conducted research; GE and HW provided essential materials and reagents; JH analyzed data; JH wrote the manuscript and GE and HW critically reviewed the manuscript; JH had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest and funding

This study was supported by the Canadian Federal Program for International Polar Year, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, ArcticNet, Government of Nunavut, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, and Health Canada.


References
1. Heaney RP,Abrams S,Dawson-Hughes B,Looker A,Marcus R,Matkovic V,et al. Peak bone massOsteoporosis IntYear: 2000119851009
2. Krall EA,Dawson-Hughes B. Heritable and life-style determinants of bone mineral densityJ Bone Miner ResYear: 19938198427042
3. Cashman KD. Diet, nutrition, and bone healthJ NutrYear: 2007137Suppl 11S250712
4. Leslie WD,Metge CJ,Weiler HA,Doupe M,Wood Steiman P,O’Neil JD. Bone density and bone area in Canadian Aboriginal women: the first nations bone health studyOsteoporosis IntYear: 200617175562
5. Perry HM III,Bernard M,Horowitz M,Miller DK,Fleming S,Baker MZ,et al. The effect of aging on bone mineral metabolism and bone mass in Native American womenJ Am Geriatr SocYear: 1998461418229809765
6. Tracy JK,Meyer WA,Grigoryan M,Fan B,Flores RH,Genant HK,et al. Racial differences in the prevalence of vertebral fractures in older men: the Baltimore Men’s Osteoporosis StudyOsteoporosis IntYear: 20061799104
7. Hou YL,Wu XP,Luo XH,Zhang H,Cao XZ,Jiang YB,et al. Differences in age-related bone mass of proximal femur between Chinese women and different ethnic women in the United StatesJ Bone Mineral MetabYear: 20072524352
8. Rupich RC,Specker BL,Lieuw AFM,Ho M. Gender and race differences in bone mass during infancyCalcif Tissue IntYear: 19965839578661478
9. Bachrach LK,Hastie T,Wang MC,Narasimhan B,Marcus R. Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal studyJ Clin Endocrinol MetabYear: 19998447021210599739
10. Weiler HA,Fitzpatrick-Wong SC,Schellenberg JM. Bone mass in First Nations, Asian and white newborn infantsGrowth Dev AgingYear: 200871354318710174
11. Kuhnlein HV,Receveur O,Soueida R,Berti PR. Unique patterns of dietary adequacy in three cultures of Canadian Arctic indigenous peoplesPublic Health NutrYear: 2008113496017610753
12. Johnson-Down L,Egeland GM. Adequate nutrient intakes are associated with traditional food consumption in nunavut inuit children aged 3–5 yearsJ NutrYear: 20101401311620444949
13. Favus MJ. American Society for Bone and Mineral ResearchPrimer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolismYear: 2006xv6th edWashingtonAmerican Society for Bone and Mineral Research514
14. El Hayek J,Egeland G,Weiler H. Vitamin D status of Inuit preschoolers reflects season and vitamin D intakeJ NutrYear: 201014018394520702752
15. Holick MF. Resurrection of vitamin D deficiency and ricketsJ Clin InvestYear: 200611620627216886050
16. Baroncelli GI. Quantitative ultrasound methods to assess bone mineral status in children: technical characteristics, performance, and clinical applicationPediatr ResYear: 200863220818287958
17. Egeland GM,Faraj N,Osborne G. Cultural, socioeconomic, and health indicators among Inuit preschoolers: Nunavut Inuit Child Health Survey, 2007–2008Rural Remote HealthYear: 201010136520568906
18. Basch CE,Shea S,Arliss R,Contento IR,Rips J,Gutin B,Irigoyen M,Zybert P. Validation of mothers’ reports of dietary intake by four to seven year-old childrenAm J Public HealthYear: 199080131472240296
19. Institute of Medicine (US)Standing committee on the scientific evaluation of dietary reference intakesDietary reference intakes: for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D, and fluorideYear: 1997xvWashingtonNational Academy Press432
20. Ross AC,Manson JE,Abrams SA,Aloia JF,Brannon PM,Clinton SK,et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to knowJ Clin Endocrinol MetabYear: 20109653821118827
21. de Onis M,Onyango AW. WHO child growth standardsLancetYear: 200837120418207015
22. Wunsche K,Wunsche B,Fahnrich H,Mentzel HJ,Vogt S,Abendroth K,et al. Ultrasound bone densitometry of the os calcis in children and adolescentsCalcif Tissue IntYear: 2000673495511136531
23. Ward LM,Gaboury I,Ladhani M,Zlotkin S. Vitamin D-deficiency rickets among children in CanadaCMAJYear: 2007177161617600035
24. Bischoff-Ferrari HA,Willett WC,Wong JB,Giovannucci E,Dietrich T,Dawson-Hughes B. Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsJAMAYear: 200529322576415886381
25. Krieg MA,Cornuz J,Jacquet AF,Thiebaud D,Burckhardt P. Influence of anthropometric parameters and biochemical markers of bone metabolism on quantitative ultrasound of bone in the institutionalized elderlyOsteoporos IntYear: 19988115209666933
26. Cashman KD,Hill TR,Cotter AA,Boreham CA,Dubitzky W,Murray L,et al. Low vitamin D status adversely affects bone health parameters in adolescentsAm J Clin NutrYear: 20088710394418400729
27. Lehtonen-Veromaa MK,Mottonen TT,Nuotio IO,Irjala KM,Leino AE,Viikari JS. Vitamin D and attainment of peak bone mass among peripubertal Finnish girls: a 3-y prospective studyAm J Clin NutrYear: 20027614465312450915
28. Zhu ZQ,Liu W,Xu CL,Han SM,Zu SY,Zhu GJ. Ultrasound bone densitometry of the calcaneus in healthy Chinese children and adolescentsOsteoporos IntYear: 2007185334117262173
29. Lin YC,Tu SH,Pan WH. Bone mass status of school-aged children in Taiwan assessed by quantitative ultrasound: the Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan Elementary School Children (NAHSIT Children 2001–2002)Asia Pac J Clin NutrYear: 200716Suppl 2S58593
30. Babaroutsi E,Magkos F,Manios Y,Sidossis LS. Lifestyle factors affecting heel ultrasound in Greek females across different life stagesOsteoporosis IntYear: 20051655261
31. Kauppi M,Impivaara O,Mäki J,Heliovaara M,Marniemi J,Montonen J,et al. Vitamin D status and common risk factors for bone fragility as determinants of quantitative ultrasound variables in a nationally representative population sampleBoneYear: 2009451192419328875
32. Greco EA,Fornari R,Rossi F,Santiemma V,Prossomariti G,Annoscia C,et al. Is obesity protective for osteoporosis? Evaluation of bone mineral density in individuals with high body mass indexInt J Clin PractYear: 2010648172020518955
33. Lavado-Garcia JM,Calderon-Garcia JF,Moran JM,Canal-Macias ML,Rodriguez-Dominguez T,Pedrera-Zamorano JD. Bone mass of Spanish school children: impact of anthropometric, dietary and body composition factorsJ Bone Miner MetabYear: 20123019320121822585
34. Trichopoulou A,Georgiou E,Bassiakos Y,Lipworth L,Lagiou P,Proukakis C,et al. Energy intake and monounsaturated fat in relation to bone mineral density among women and men in GreecePrev MedYear: 1997263954009144765
35. Nobmann ED,Ponce R,Mattil C,Devereux R,Dyke B,Ebbesson SO,et al. Dietary intakes vary with age among Eskimo adults of Northwest Alaska in the GOCADAN study, 2000–2003J NutrYear: 20051358566215795447
36. Kuhnlein HV,Bartheta V,Farrena A,Falahia E,Leggee D,Receveur O,et al. Vitamins A, D, and E in Canadian Arctic traditional food and adult dietJ Food Compos AnalYear: 200619495506
37. Health CanadaDo Canadian children meet their nutrient requirements through food intake alone?Year: 2009OttawaHealth Canada [cited 2011 Mar 16]. Available from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/alt_formats/pdf/surveill/nutrition/commun/art-nutr-child-enf-eng.pdf.
38. Weiss LA,Barrett-Connor E,von Muhlen D. Ratio of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids and bone mineral density in older adults: the Rancho Bernardo StudyAm J Clin NutrYear: 2005819343815817874
39. Babaroutsi E,Magkos F,Manios Y,Sidossis LS. Body mass index, calcium intake, and physical activity affect calcaneal ultrasound in healthy Greek males in an age-dependent and parameter-specific mannerJ Bone Miner MetabYear: 2005231576615750695
40. Lin YC,Lyle RM,Weaver CM,McCabe LD,McCabe GP,Johnston CC,et al. Peak spine and femoral neck bone mass in young womenBoneYear: 2003325465312753871
41. Koller H,Zitt E,Staudacher G,Neyer U,Mayer G,Rosenkranz AR. Variable parathyroid hormone(1–84)/carboxylterminal PTH ratios detected by 4 novel parathyroid hormone assaysClin NephrolYear: 2004613374315182128

Tables
[TableWrap ID: T0001] Table I 

Selected characteristics of Inuit preschool children: Nunavut Inuit Child Health Survey, 2007–2008a


Characteristics n
Demographics
 Age (years) 285 4.4±0.8
 Boys (%) 132 46.3
Anthropometry
 BMI (kg/m2) 284 18.2 [17.1–19.3]
 BMI percentile (%)b 284 96.8 [88.1–99.3]
 BMI-for-age z-score 284 1.85 [1.18–2.48]
 Weight-for-age z-score 284 1.03 [0.43–1.72]
 Height-for-age z-score 285 −0.39 [−0.93 to 0.25]
 BUA (Δdb/ΔMHz) 285 40.6 [36.2–47.8]
 SoS (m/s) 285 1541.7 [1532.7–1549.1]
Dietary intake
 Energy (Kcal/d) 276 1762 [1336–2234]
 Carbohydrate (g/d) 276 239.6 [186.1–311.3]
 Protein (g/d) 276 66.2 [45.6–90.9]
 Fat (g/d) 276 54.3 [38.6–75.8]
 SFA (g/d) 276 18.6 [12.0–25.5]
 MUFA (g/d) 276 19.6 [12.8–28.8]
 PUFA (g/d) 276 7.8 [5.0–12.2]
 Vitamin D (µg/d) 276 4.9 [2.7–8.1]
 Calcium (mg/d) 276 812 [522–1111]
Supplemental intake
 Vitamin D (% yes) 13 4.6
 Multivitamins including vitamin D (% yes) 47 16.8
Biochemistry
 25(OH)D (nmol/L) 219 46.7 [30.2–68.9]
 PTH (pmol/L) 205 2.33 [1.68–3.29]
 Calcium (mmol/L) 168 2.34 [2.29–2.39]c
 ALP (U/L) 169 183.0 [160.0–207.5]d
 CRP (ng/mL) 222 0.7 [0.2–2.3]e

aValues are percent, mean±SD, or median [IQR].

bAccording to World Health Organization (23).

cNormal range: [2.0–2.4] mmol/L.

dNormal range: [111–356] U/L.

eCRP values ≥8 ng/mL indicating active infection (40) were excluded (n=8).


[TableWrap ID: T0002] Table II 

Comparison of selected characteristics by broadband ultrasound attenuation of Inuit preschool children: Nunavut Inuit Child Health Survey, 2007–2008


Broadband ultrasound attenuation (Δdb/ΔMHz)

Nutrients/foods/characteristicsa,b Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
Median [IQR] 32.5 [30.2–34.5] 38.4 [37.2–39.5] 52.3 [49.6–59.9] 52.3 [49.6–59.9]
Anthropometryc,d (n=71) (n=71) (n=70) (n=71)
 BMI (kg/m2) 17.0±1.1x 18.2±1.1x,y 18.6±1.1y,z 19.5±1.1z
 BMI for age z-score 1.2±2.3x 1.6±2.0x,y 1.7±2.2x,y 2.2±1.7y
 Weight for age z-score 0.6±3.3x 0.8±2.9x,z 1.2±2.2y,z 1.3±2.3y,z
 Height for age z-score 0.3±4.0 0.4±3.1 0.4±3.0 0.4±3.1
Dietaryc,e (n=69) (n=69) (n=69) (n=69)
 Vitamin D (µg/d) 5.7±0.9 5.7±1.2 4.4±0.9 5.8±1.1
 Calcium (mg/d) 795±71 829±94 734±74 918±66
 Energy (Kcal/d) 1764±104 1789±76 1689±64 1892±68
 Total protein (g/d) 63.1±1.9 64.6±1.9 63.1±1.7 63.1±1.8
 Total fat intake (g/d) 52.5±2.0 53.0±1.8 47.9±1.7 57.5±1.7
 MUFA intake (g/d) 19.4±2.9 21.4±2.2 18.8±1.5 22.6±1.9
 PUFA intake (g/d) 8.1±1.4 8.5±1.0 7.4±0.8 9.5±1.1
 SFA intake (g/d) 18.2±2.2 19.0±1.6 18.1±1.6 19.9±1.6
Biochemistryc (n=55) (n=55) (n=55) (n=54)
 25(OH)D (nmol/L) 41.7±1.9 44.7±1.7 47.9±1.7 44.7±1.7
Lifestylec (n=67) (n=67) (n = 67) (n = 67)
 The number of hours spent outside (h/d) 2.1±2.5 2.2±2.3 2.0±2.4 2.2±2.3

aData were log-transformed or square rooted before statistical analysis.

bValues are median [IQR] and geometric means±SD. For a variable, means for variables with superscripts without a common letter differ, p≤0.05.

cANOVA, followed by Bonferroni.

dAccording to World Health Organization (20).

eData derived from 24-h recall.


[TableWrap ID: T0003] Table III 

Comparison of selected characteristics by speed of sound quartiles of Inuit preschool children: Nunavut Inuit Child Health Survey, 2007–2008.


Nutrients/foods/characteristicsa,b SoS quartiles (m/s)

Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
Median [IQR] 1527.3 [1522.0–1530.1] 1537.7 [1535.1–1539.2] 1544.6 [1543.7–1546.6] 1557.9 [1553.4–1566.1]
Anthropometryc,d (n=71) (n=71) (n=70) (n=71)
 BMI (kg/m2) 18.0±1.1x 18.1±1.1x,y 18.2±1.1x,y 19.0±1.1y
 BMI for age z-score 1.5±2.5x 1.6±2.0x,y 1.5±2.1x,y 2.1±1.7y
 Weight for age z-score 0.9±2.5x,y 0.7±3.7x 0.9±2.6x,y 1.4±2.0y
 Height for age z-score 0.3±5.7 0.4±2.7 0.4±2.7 0.5±2.7
Dietaryc,e (n=69) (n=69) (n=69) (n=69)
 Vitamin D (µg/d) 5.0±1.0 4.7±1.0 6.1±1.2 5.6±1.1
 Calcium (mg/d) 727±58 756±85 954±83 841±75
 Energy (Kcal/d) 1776±107 1618±72 1910±81 1832±49
 Total protein (g/d) 60.2±1.8 54.9±2.0 72.4±1.6 69.2±1.6
 Total fat intake (g/d) 56.2±1.8 57.4±1.6 47.3±1.9 54.9±1.7
 MUFA intake (g/d) 19.2±2.8 18.1±1.9 23.7±2.2 21.3±1.5
 PUFA intake (g/d) 7.5±0.9 7.9±1.1 9.6±1.1 8.5±0.8
 SFA intake (g/d) 17.4±2.2x 16.0±1.5x 22.8±1.5y 19.3±1.5x,y
Biochemistryc (n=55) (n=55) (n=55) (n=54)
 25(OH)D (nmol/L) 41.7±1.8 46.8±1.8 46.8±1.7 45.7±1.7
(n=42) (n=42) (n=42) (n=43)
 ALP (U/L) 173.8±6.1x,y 182.0±1.2x,y 173.8±1.2x 195.0±1.3y
Lifestylec (n=67) (n=67) (n=67) (n=67)
 The number of hours spent outside (h/d) 2.4±2.4 2.0±2.5 2.1±2.4 2.0±2.2

aData were log-transformed or square rooted before statistical analysis.

bValues are median [IQR] and geometric means±SD. For a variable, means for variables with superscripts without a common letter differ, p≤0.05.

cANOVA, followed by Bonferroni.

dAccording to World Health Organization (21).

eData derived from 24-h recall.


[TableWrap ID: T0004] Table IV 

Predictors of broadband ultrasound attenuation of Inuit preschool children: Nunavut Inuit Child Health Survey, 2007–2008a,b


Variables Coefficient [95% CI] p
Age (years) 2.70 [0.71–4.70] <0.01
BMI percentile categories (1<85th, 2=85th–95th, 3≥95th) 10.33 [6.24–14.43] <0.01
MUFA intake (g/d) 0.29 [−0.08 to 0.49] <0.01
Latitude degree (°N)c −0.08 [−0.56 to 0.40] 0.74
Constant 32.28 [−1.21 to 65.76] 0.06

aMultivariate linear regression.

bThe number of hours spent outside, vitamin D status, sex, energy, protein, vitamin D and calcium intake did not contribute to the model.

cLatitude ranged from 56° 32′–72° 40′N.


[TableWrap ID: T0005] Table V 

Predictors of speed of sound of Inuit preschool children: Nunavut Inuit Child Health Survey, 2007–2008a,b


Variables Coefficient [95% CI] p
Age (years) 1.26 [−1.25 to 3.78] 0.32
BMI percentile categories (1<85th, 2=85th–95th, 3≥95th) 8.34 [3.16–13.52] <0.01
MUFA intake (g/d) 0.23 [−0.33 to 0.49] 0.09
Latitude degree (°N)c −0.59 [−1.2 to 0.20] 0.06
Constant 1570.28 [1527.89–1612.67] <0.01

aMultivariate linear regression.

bThe number of hours spent outside, vitamin D status, latitude, sex, age, energy, protein, vitamin D and calcium intake did not contribute to the model.

cLatitude ranged from 56° 32′–72° 40′N.



Article Categories:
  • Original Research Article

Keywords: speed of sound, broadband ultrasound attenuation, preschoolers, Inuit, vitamin D.

Previous Document:  Contribution of monocytes Siglec-1 in stimulating T cells proliferation and activation in atheroscle...
Next Document:  The best of two worlds: how the Greenland Board of Nutrition has handled conflicting evidence about ...