Document Detail


High ultraviolet A protection affords greater immune protection confirming that ultraviolet A contributes to photoimmunosuppression in humans.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  14632207     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Solar radiation causes immunosuppression that contributes to skin cancer growth. Photoprotective strategies initially focused on the more erythemogenic ultraviolet B. More recently, the relationship of ultraviolet A and skin cancer has received increased attention. We hypothesized that if ultraviolet A contributes significantly to human ultraviolet-induced immune suppression, then increased ultraviolet A filtration by a sunscreen would better protect the immune system during ultraviolet exposure. Two hundred and eleven volunteers were randomized into study groups and received solar-simulated radiation, ranging from 0 to 2 minimum erythema dose, on gluteal skin, with or without sunscreen, 48 h prior to sensitization with dinitrochlorobenzene. Contact hypersensitivity response was evaluated by measuring the increase in skin fold thickness of five graded dinitrochlorobenzene challenge sites on the arm, 2 wk after sensitization. Clinical scoring using the North American Contact Dermatitis Group method was also performed. Solar-simulated radiation dose-response curves were generated and immune protection factor was calculated using a nonlinear regression model. Significance of immune protection between study groups was determined with the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon exact test. The sunscreen with high ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviolet A protection factor of 10, based on the in vivo persistent pigment darkening method) and a labeled sun protection factor of 15 demonstrated better immune protection than the product that had a low ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviolet A protection factor of 2) and a labeled sun protection factor of 15. Nonlinear regression analysis based on skin fold thickness increase revealed that the high ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 50, more than three times its sun protection factor, whereas the low ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 15, which was equal to its labeled sun protection factor. This study demonstrates that ultraviolet A contributes greatly to human immune suppression and that a broad-spectrum sunscreen with high ultraviolet A filtering capacity results in immune protection that exceeds erythema protection. These results show that high ultraviolet A protection is required to protect against ultraviolet-induced damage to cutaneous immunity.
Authors:
Elma D Baron; Anny Fourtanier; Delphine Compan; Chantal Medaisko; Kevin D Cooper; Seth R Stevens
Related Documents :
23465357 - Does the devil facial tumour produce immunosuppressive cytokines as an immune evasion s...
2230207 - Immunology of aids related to psoriasis.
8941677 - Allergen specificity of skin-infiltrating t cells is not restricted to a type-2 cytokin...
11601657 - Norepinephrine induces apoptosis in skin melanophores by attenuating camp-pka signals v...
23733107 - Induction of apoptosis in t lymphoma cells by long-term treatment with thyroxine involv...
17966427 - Disparity between yersinia pestis and yersinia enterocolitica o:8 in yopj/yopp-dependen...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of investigative dermatology     Volume:  121     ISSN:  0022-202X     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Invest. Dermatol.     Publication Date:  2003 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-11-24     Completed Date:  2003-12-12     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0426720     Medline TA:  J Invest Dermatol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  869-75     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA. edb4@po.cwru.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Dermatitis, Contact / immunology*
Dinitrochlorobenzene
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Erythema / immunology,  prevention & control
Humans
Immune System / drug effects,  radiation effects*
Irritants
Middle Aged
Skin / immunology*,  radiation effects*
Sunscreening Agents / administration & dosage*
Ultraviolet Rays / adverse effects*
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Irritants; 0/Sunscreening Agents; 97-00-7/Dinitrochlorobenzene
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Oct;121(4):ix-x   [PMID:  14632175 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Sunscreens inadequately protect against ultraviolet-A-induced free radicals in skin: implications fo...
Next Document:  DNA mismatch repair protein Msh6 is required for optimal levels of ultraviolet-B-induced apoptosis i...