Document Detail

High levels of peripheral blood circulating plasma cells as a specific risk factor for progression of smoldering multiple myeloma.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22902364     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) carries a 50% risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM) or related malignancy within the first 5 years following diagnosis. The goal of this study was to determine if high levels of circulating plasma cells (PCs) are predictive of SMM transformation within the first 2-3 years from diagnosis. Ninety-one patients diagnosed with SMM at Mayo Clinic from January 1994 through January 2007, who had testing for circulating PCs using an immunofluorescent assay and adequate follow-up to ascertain disease progression, were studied. High level of circulating PCs was defined as absolute peripheral blood PCs >5 × 10(6)/l and/or >5% PCs per 100 cytoplasmic immunoglobulin (Ig)-positive peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Patients with high circulating PCs (14 of 91 patients, 15%) were significantly more likely to progress to active disease within 2 years compared with patients without high circulating PCs, 71% versus 24%, respectively, P=0.001. Corresponding rates for progression within 3 years were 86% versus 34%, respectively, P<0.001. Overall survival (OS) after both SMM diagnosis and MM diagnosis was also significantly different. High levels of circulating PCs identify SMM patients with an elevated risk of progression within the first 2-3 years following diagnosis.
G Bianchi; R A Kyle; D R Larson; T E Witzig; S Kumar; A Dispenzieri; W G Morice; S V Rajkumar
Related Documents :
2768954 - Hemodynamic alterations in hemiplegic patients as a cause of edema in lower extremities.
14872254 - The impact of syme amputation in surgical treatment of patients with diabetic foot synd...
22319004 - Reliable identification of 'truly low' thromboembolic risk in patients initially diagno...
21393044 - Association of the metabolic syndrome with physical activity performance in patients wi...
8509044 - Surgical treatment of congenital dilatation of the biliary system.
21185004 - Warfarin use and outcomes in patients with advanced chronic systolic heart failure with...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural     Date:  2012-08-20
Journal Detail:
Title:  Leukemia     Volume:  27     ISSN:  1476-5551     ISO Abbreviation:  Leukemia     Publication Date:  2013 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-03-06     Completed Date:  2013-04-30     Revised Date:  2013-09-03    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8704895     Medline TA:  Leukemia     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  680-5     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Disease Progression
Middle Aged
Multiple Myeloma / blood,  diagnosis*,  etiology,  mortality
Neoplastic Cells, Circulating / pathology*
Plasma Cells / pathology*
Risk Factors
Survival Rate
Grant Support

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-journal-id): 8704895
Journal ID (pubmed-jr-id): 5536
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Leukemia
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Leukemia
ISSN: 0887-6924
ISSN: 1476-5551
Article Information
Download PDF

nihms-submitted publication date: Day: 13 Month: 9 Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 20 Month: 8 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Month: 3 Year: 2013
pmc-release publication date: Day: 01 Month: 9 Year: 2013
Volume: 27 Issue: 3
First Page: 680 Last Page: 685
PubMed Id: 22902364
ID: 3597230
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.237
ID: NIHMS397957

High Levels of Peripheral Blood Circulating Plasma Cells as a Specific Risk Factor for Progression of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Giada Bianchi, M.D.1
Robert A. Kyle, M.D.2
Dirk R. Larson, M.S.3
Thomas E. Witzig, M.D.2
Shaji Kumar, M.D.2
Angela Dispenzieri, M.D.2
William G. Morice, M.D., Ph.D.4
S. Vincent Rajkumar, M.D.2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
2Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
3Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
4Division of Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Correspondence: Corresponding Author: S. Vincent Rajkumar, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905;


Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic, premalignant condition characterized by monotypic bone marrow plasma cell (PC) infiltration comprising 10% or more of the total cellularity and/or a serum monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) of 3 g/dL or more in the absence of end organ damage (CRAB criteria: hyperCalcemia, Renal failure, Anemia, Bone lesions) attributable to PC proliferation.13 In contrast to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) which carries a 1% per year risk of progression to active multiple myeloma (MM), or related plasma cell dyscrasia such as amyloidosis or Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia or lymphoma, patients with SMM have a 10% per year risk of transformation.4 A recent cohort study found that the overall risk of progression in SMM is 10% per year in the first 5 years, but then decreases to 3% per year in the following 5 years, and 1% per year thereafter, suggesting that SMM is a heterogenous clinical entity ranging from biologically aggressive cases most akin to early, active MM, to a more indolent form with a natural history similar to MGUS. Overall, the cumulative probability of progression of SMM at 15 years is over 70%.5

Current guidelines recommend close observation and monitoring with no active treatment for patients with SMM.6 Yet, the paradigm of PC dyscrasia is evolving; with the timing of active therapy for high risk SMM patients recently questioned and early treatment advocated, in an attempt to slow disease progression and possibly prolong survival.7 Indeed, an interim analysis of a randomized, phase III study evaluating lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus no treatment for patients with high risk SMM showed prolonged time to progression (TTP) and suggestion of increased overall survival (OS) in the treated arm.8 This trend was confirmed by a small, phase III, randomized trial evaluating the use of thalidomide plus zolendronic acid (ZA) versus single agent ZA in patients with SMM that showed significantly improved TTP in the active treatment group.9

In order to accurately refer patients for early therapy and enrollment in clinical trials, it is critical to identify the subset of SMM patients who will inevitably progress to active MM within the first 2–3 years following diagnosis. Bone marrow PC infiltration over 10%, serum monoclonal protein above 3 g/dL, and abnormal free light chain (FLC) ratio (κ to λ ratio less than 0.125 or more than 8) are recognized as statistically significant predictors of SMM progression to active MM.10,11 Such risk factors increase the probability of progression from 10% per year in the first 2 years to approximately 20% per year, which is still inadequate in terms of either specificity or positive predictive value (PPV), to use as a rationale for early chemotherapeutic intervention. A long-term goal in the care of SMM patients is to identify risk factors with a PPV nearing or exceeding 90% for disease progression in the first 2–3 years. Circulating monotypic PCs are known to be associated with a worse prognosis in MM.12 Such studies also suggest that the presence of circulating PCs is a risk factor for progression in MGUS and SMM.13,14 However, it is currently unclear what percentage of SMM patients have circulating PCs at diagnosis and whether this finding is of prognostic significance.15 We hypothesized that above a certain threshold, high levels of circulating PCs are a signature feature of malignant transformation and will therefore be a highly specific, predictive biomarker to identify patients with near 90% probability of developing MM or related malignancy in the first 2–3 years following diagnosis.

Materials and Methods
Study cohort

Review of the Mayo Clinic electronic medical records (EMR) between January 1st 1994 and January 31st 2007 identified 171 patients who were labeled as having SMM and had circulating PC immunofluorescent studies performed prior to disease progression. To this initial cohort the strict diagnostic criteria of International Myeloma Working Group were applied to confirm the diagnosis of SMM: presence of a serum monoclonal Ig level equal or higher than 3 g/dL, and/or bone marrow infiltration with monotypic PCs equal or exceeding 10%, in the absence of PC dyscrasia-related end organ damage (CRAB). Based on this review, we excluded patients who did not meet the strict definition of SMM but rather had MGUS, active MM (according to CRAB criteria), primary amyloidosis or other related PC malignancies; patients who were treated with chemotherapy for hematologic or solid malignancy within the previous 5 years; those with ongoing or recent (less than 5 years) therapy with high dose steroids (more than 15 mg prednisone daily or equivalent), and patients who did not have adequate documented follow up either at Mayo Clinic or elsewhere for at least 48 months following diagnosis. The presence of a second malignancy or myeloproliferative disease did not represent an exclusion criterion, unless patients were actively receiving chemotherapy. After applying the above mentioned exclusion criteria to the initial cohort, 91 patients remained and were studied. This retrospective study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and patients were asked to give informed consent to review their medical records for research purposes.

Data collection and endpoints

Mayo Clinic EMR, including demographic data; physician notes; laboratory tests; imaging studies; and pathologic reports such as bone marrow aspirate and biopsy, were reviewed. Relevant laboratory data including circulating PCs, M spike, FLC ratio, hemoglobin, total calcium, creatinine, beta2-microglobulin, Ig subtype quantification, 24 hour urinary protein electrophoresis and immunofixation, bone marrow PC percentage, cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) results were abstracted for analysis.

The method used to quantify circulating PCs in this paper is based on immunofluorescent assay performed on fixed peripheral blood mononucleated cells and required single-slide review by a trained physician. This method was first described by Witzig et al.14 Patients who underwent quantification of circulating PCs via a different technique (i.e.: flow cytometry) were not included in this study to guarantee consistency and reproducibility of data.

Statistical analysis

The primary study goal was to identify a threshold for circulating PC assay associated with a PPV nearing or exceeding 90% for progression of SMM to MM in the first 2–3 years. The secondary endpoints were evaluation of TTP and OS in patients with high versus low circulating PCs in order to assess the value of this metric in risk stratification of SMM. Two-sided Fisher exact tests were used to test for differences between categorical variables. Two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare continuous variables. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between survival curves were tested for statistical significance using the 2-sided log-rank test unless otherwise specified. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox’s proportional hazards model. Median follow up time was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method.

Patient characteristics

Ninety-one patients diagnosed with SMM at Mayo Clinic from January 1994 through January 2007 who also had testing for circulating PCs immunofluorescent assay and adequate follow up to ascertain disease progression were studied. Seventy-five patients (83%) had circulating PCs tested on the same day that bone marrow biopsy was obtained; 9 patients (10%) underwent the test within one month from diagnosis; 5 patients (5%) within 6 months and 2 patients (2%) were tested at 12 months and 14 months from initial diagnosis. These latter two patients remained free from disease progression at long-term follow up. To account for this variability, we verified that no disease progression occurred in the interim time between SMM diagnosis and circulating PC assay and derived TTP using both date of bone marrow biopsy and circulating PC test as starting time. As results were comparable with no change in median time, only the analyses of these subjects as a single group are shown. All patients had bone marrow plasma cell percentage ≥ 10%.

High Circulating PCs and Risk of Progression

The primary scope of studying circulating PCs in SMM patients was to determine whether we could identify a level of peripheral blood disease burden that carries a strong positive predictive value (approaching 90%) for disease progression within 2–3. Our analysis revealed that patients with either an absolute peripheral blood PCs >5000 ×106/L and/or >5% cytoplasmic Ig positive PCs per 100 mononuclear cells had a significantly higher likelihood of progression to active disease within 2 years of diagnosis as compared with patients not meeting either criteria (71% versus 25%, respectively, P=0.001). Hence these criteria were used to define high circulating PCs. Fourteen patients in the cohort (15%) were found to have high circulating PCs according to the above mentioned thresholds. Seven of these patients (50%) met high circulating PC criteria according to both absolute and percentage PC count; in five patients (36%) only the percentage of circulating PC exceeded the set cutoff, while two patients (14%) only had an absolute count of PC exceeding the 5000 ×106/L threshold.

The threshold of absolute peripheral blood PCs >5000 ×106/L and/or >5% cytoplasmic Ig positive PCs per 100 mononuclear cells was selected for testing based on our previous studies, and the patients identified by this risk factor appear to be unique and non-overlapping with other known risk factors as shown on Table 1.16 For example, patients with high circulating PCs had lower bone marrow infiltration compared with the low level group (13.5% versus 20%, P value 0.07), suggesting that the presence of high circulating cells can not be predicted on the base of high bone marrow disease burden (Table 1).

Since one of our goals was to identify an optimal threshold, we also tested higher levels of circulating PCs to determine if we can improve on the PPV of the test for near inevitable progression in the first 2–3 years. We found that the probability of progression to active malignancy within the first 2 years is improved to 77% by applying a threshold of an absolute peripheral blood PCs >6000 ×106/L and/or proportion of cytoplasmic Ig positive PCs per 100 peripheral blood mononuclear cells >6% (test specificity, 95%). The probability of progression within the same time span increases to 86% in SMM patients (n=7) with absolute peripheral blood PCs >10,000 ×106/L and/or proportion of cytoplasmic Ig positive PCs per 100 peripheral blood mononuclear cells >25% (test specificity, 98%). Taken together, these findings indicate that high level of circulating PCs is a biomarker that identifies SMM patients at a remarkably high risk of progression in the first 2–3 years following diagnosis. The initially identified criteria for high circulating PCs (absolute peripheral blood PCs >5000 ×106/L and/or proportion of cytoplasmic Ig positive PCs per 100 peripheral blood mononuclear cells >5%) remained the best single discriminatory point for identifying SMM patients with an increased risk of early disease progression and was used in the rest of the study for TTP and OS analysis.

Details of progression differences based on high versus low circulating PCs are given in Table 2. Thirteen of 14 patients with high circulating PCs eventually progressed, and MM was the progression event in all these patients. The median TTP was 12 months versus 57 months for those with high and low circulating PCs respectively, P<0.001 (Figure 1). All patients in this study had bone marrow plasma cell percentage ≥ 10%, one of the known risk factors for progression in SMM. We looked at the prognostic value of circulating PC after adjusting for size of the serum M protein, the other known risk factor for progression. Patients with high level circulating PCs had a significantly higher risk of progression to MM compared with patients with low level circulating PCs independent of the size of the M protein, hazard ratio 5.0, (95% CI 2.5–9.5) P<0.001 (Table 3). Of note, the median TTP for patients with a monoclonal component exceeding 3 g/dL was 30 months, compared to 57 months for patients with an M spike less than 3 g/dL, (Figure 2, P value 0.01). The prognostic value of circulating PCs for TTP remained significantly different (P<0.001) after adjusting for age, the only variable that was significantly different at baseline between the high and low circulating PCs groups.

Circulating PCs as a component of a risk stratification strategy for SMM

On the basis of our data, we tested whether high circulating PCs could be integrated into a risk stratification model to predict evolution of SMM into MM. A model based uniquely on M spike level exceeding 3 g/dL and high circulating PCs was powerful in discriminating patients according to the likelihood of progression to active disease (Figure 3). Patients with no risk factors had a median TTP of 65 months compared with 30 months for patients with only one risk factor, and 12 months if both risk factors were present, P <0.001. These differences translated in a relative risk of progression to MM or a related malignancy 2.2 times higher for patients with one risk factor, and 14 times higher for SMM patients presenting with both high M spike and circulating PCs, when compared with individuals presenting with no risk factors.

High Circulating PCs and Overall Survival

Patients with SMM presenting with high level of circulating PCs had significantly poor overall survival (OS) compared with patients who did not have high circulating PCs, 49 months versus 148 months, P<0.001 with an hazard ratio of 5.9 (95% CI, 2.7–12.8) (Figure 4A). Corresponding OS differences from MM diagnosis were 31 months versus 66 months, respectively, P = 0.02 (Figure 4B). OS differences remained significant after adjusting for baseline age differences between the two groups, both for survival from SMM (P<0.001) and from MM diagnosis (P=0.03).


SMM is a premalignant condition with an overall risk of progression to MM or a related PC cancer of 70% over 15 years. Rather than a unique disease, SMM is a heterogeneous entity created primarily for clinical purposes to identify patients with asymptomatic plasma cell disorders that have a much higher risk of progression than MGUS (10% versus 1% per year, respectively), and therefore need close follow up.17,18 From a biologic standpoint, the SMM category includes patients with premalignancy (biological MGUS) as well as those with early, active MM, but there are currently no cellular characteristics that can reliably differentiate the two groups.

Historically, patients with SMM have been observed without therapy because of limited therapeutic options, lack of data from randomized controlled trials, and in consideration of the fact that a proportion of patients can remain progression free for many years. This watchful waiting approach has a number of drawbacks. First, it delays treatment for the 20% of SMM patients who are destined to progress within the first two years, increasing the risk of morbidity and potentially irreversible end organ damage. Second, our prior studies show that it is usually not practical or possible to identify the transformation to MM in a timely manner and intervene before serious end organ damage occurs, as most progression events (even in MGUS) occur in the interval between visits.19 Third, as our treatment options improve, we and others have hypothesized that one of the reasons MM is traditionally considered incurable is the fact that we have not been able to intervene at the early stages of disease, but have rather waited until the development of end organ damage, such as lytic bone lesions or renal failure, in order to initiate therapy.20 These concerns all illustrate the need to identify risk factors for early progression of SMM to allow for prompt therapeutic intervention in those who may benefit. Recent studies have shown that one can increase the probability of progression from 10% per year to approximately 20–25% per year using simple biomarkers such as M spike exceeding 3 g/dL in conjunction with bone marrow infiltration above 10%, and abnormal serum FLC ratio <0.125 or >8.0.10,11 Although these parameters are useful for counseling patients, they do not rise to a threshold in which immediate therapy can be justified in the absence of end organ damage. We need to identify biomarkers that are predictive with an accuracy exceeding 90% of progression in the first 2 years following diagnosis of SMM in order to be able to consider therapy. Only one such factor has been identified so far: bone marrow plasma cells of 60% or higher.21 Nevertheless, this risk factor is present in less than 5% of patients with SMM.

Circulating monoclonal PCs is a known prognostic factor in newly diagnosed MM, SMM, and MGUS.15,22 In an earlier smaller study we had found that increased proliferative rate of circulating PCs and/or numbers of circulating plasma cells had prognostic value, but estimation of proliferative rate of circulating plasma cells is cumbersome.15 The purpose of this study was to determine in a new cohort of patients if a high level of circulating plasma cells identifies SMM patients with an almost inevitable risk of progression to MM within the first 2–3 years of diagnosis. We hypothesized that high circulating PC levels was not a feature of premalignancy, but rather was an occurrence more consistent with malignant transformation and the resultant ability of monotypic PCs to migrate away from the supportive bone marrow microenvironment into the systemic circulation. In this perspective we hypothesized that circulating PCs represent a sign of impending transformation to active disease and suggest the presence of radiologically and clinically occult distant disease foci. Our study found that 15% of patients with SMM have high circulating PC levels as defined by an absolute peripheral blood PCs >5000 ×106/L and/or >5% cytoplasmic Ig positive PCs per 100 peripheral blood mononuclear cells. This subset of patients had a significantly shorter TTP compared with patients who did not have high circulating PCs, 12 months versus 57 months, P <0.001, independent of previously established risk factors for disease progression. More importantly, patients with high circulating PCs had a remarkably high risk of progression within the first 2 years following diagnosis, compared to the rest of the cohort, 71% versus 25%, respectively, P=0.001. Corresponding rates for progression within 3 years were 86% versus 35%, respectively, P<0.001. While raising the threshold for defining high circulating PCs further increased the probability of progression, these criteria for high circulating PCs provided clinically useful criteria with high discriminatory power. Overall, these findings are consistent with our initial hypothesis as the OS of SMM patients with high circulating PCs was more in keeping with the OS seen in newly diagnosed MM patients, suggesting that these represented a subset of patients with true PC malignancy despite absence of end organ damage. When we combined this risk factor with the size of the M protein, we were able to construct a powerful risk stratification model (Figure 3).

There are some limitations to this study that need to be considered. The sample size is relatively small since this is a rare plasma cell disorder compared with MM or MGUS, and the technology for accurately measuring circulating PCs has been available only in the last 10–15 years.23 Furthermore, given the need for extended disease follow up, data acquired from a slide based immunofluorescent method employed in the clinical laboratory for a number of years was analyzed. The clinical laboratory now uses a high power with multiparametric flow cytometric approach for the detection of circulating monotypic PCs that will need to be validated. Furthermore, it remains to be established if the incorporation into our risk stratification model of other recently identified laboratory parameters such as FLC, allows for even more powerful prediction of disease progression in SMM and other plasma cell dyscrasias. Irrespective of methodology, however, this study provides a compelling biologic case that capacity of abnormal PCs to readily liberate from the bone marrow niche to the peripheral blood is a distinct feature of malignant transformation that has already occurred or is imminent. Additional studies to further evaluate the peripheral blood PCs using newer, more readily applicable modalities and assessment of other potential biomarkers such as abnormal immunophenotype, cytogenetic abnormalities, PC proliferative rate etc. should be pursued in association with ongoing clinical trials to best determine how to identify and treat SMM patients with high risk of early disease progression.


FN2Authorship Contributions

G.B. and S.V.R. were involved in the concept and design of the study, data collection, data analysis, and wrote the manuscript; R.A.K., D.R.L., T.E.W., S.K., W.G.M., and A.D. were involved with data interpretation, critical review, and critical edits to the manuscript. All authors gave final approval to the manuscript.

FN3Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (CA107476, CA100707, CA 83724) and by the NIH/NCRR CTSA Grant Number TL1 RR024152. Also supported in part by the Jabbs Foundation, Birmingham, United Kingdom and the Henry J. Predolin Foundation, USA.

1. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working GroupBr J HaematolYear: 200312174975712780789
2. Bianchi G,Ghobrial IM. Does My Patient with a Serum Monoclonal Spike have Multiple Myeloma?Hematology/oncology clinics of North AmericaYear: 20122638339322463833
3. Kyle RA,Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myelomaLeukemia : official journal of the Leukemia Society of America, Leukemia Research Fund, UKYear: 20092339
4. Blade J,Dimopoulos M,Rosinol L,Rajkumar SV,Kyle RA. Smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: current diagnostic criteria, new predictors of outcome, and follow-up recommendationsJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical OncologyYear: 20102869069720026810
5. Kyle RA,Remstein ED,Therneau TM,Dispenzieri A,Kurtin PJ,Hodnefield JM,et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myelomaThe New England journal of medicineYear: 20073562582259017582068
6. Kyle RA,Buadi F,Rajkumar SV. Management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM)OncologyYear: 20112557858621888255
7. Korde N,Kristinsson SY,Landgren O. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM): novel biological insights and development of early treatment strategiesBloodYear: 20111175573558121441462
8. Detweiler-Short K,Hayman S,Gertz MA,Lacy MQ,Dispenzieri A,Kumar S,et al. Long-term results of single-agent thalidomide as initial therapy for asymptomatic (smoldering or indolent) myelomaAmerican journal of hematologyYear: 20108573774020730790
9. Witzig TE,Mandrekar S,Detweiler-Short K,Lacy MQ,Laumann K,Dispenzieri A,et al. A Phase III Randomized Trial of Thalidomide (THAL) Plus Zoledronic Acid (ZLD) Versus Zoledronic Acid Alone In Patients with Early Stage Multiple Myeloma (MC0289)BloodYear: 201011612591260
10. Kyle RA,Durie BG,Rajkumar SV,Landgren O,Blade J,Merlini G,et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and managementLeukemia : official journal of the Leukemia Society of America, Leukemia Research Fund, UKYear: 20102411211127
11. Dispenzieri A,Kyle RA,Katzmann JA,Therneau TM,Larson D,Benson J,et al. Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myelomaBloodYear: 200811178578917942755
12. Nowakowski GS,Witzig TE,Dingli D,Tracz MJ,Gertz MA,Lacy MQ,et al. Circulating plasma cells detected by flow cytometry as a predictor of survival in 302 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myelomaBloodYear: 20051062276227915961515
13. Kumar S,Rajkumar SV,Kyle RA,Lacy MQ,Dispenzieri A,Fonseca R,et al. Prognostic value of circulating plasma cells in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceJ Clin OncolYear: 2005235668567416110026
14. Witzig TE,Kyle RA,Greipp PR. Circulating peripheral blood plasma cells in multiple myelomaCurrent Topics in Microbiology and ImmunologyYear: 19921821951991490354
15. Witzig TE,Kyle RA,Ofallon WM,Greipp PR. Detection of Peripheral-Blood Plasma-Cells as a Predictor of Disease Course in Patients with Smoldering Multiple-MyelomaBritish journal of haematologyYear: 1994872662727947266
16. Witzig TE,Dhodapkar MV,Kyle RA,Greipp PR. Quantitation of circulating peripheral blood plasma cells and their relationship to disease activity in patients with multiple myelomaCancerYear: 1993721081138508395
17. Rajkumar SV. Prevention of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer ResearchYear: 2009155606560819737944
18. Rajkumar SV. Preventive strategies in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myelomaAmerican journal of hematologyYear: 20128745345422488611
19. Bianchi G,Kyle RA,Colby CL,Larson DR,Kumar S,Katzmann JA,et al. Impact of optimal follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance on early diagnosis and prevention of myeloma-related complicationsBloodYear: 201011620192025 quiz 2197. 20495076
20. Rajkumar SV. Treatment of multiple myelomaNature reviews Clinical oncologyYear: 20118479491
21. Rajkumar SV,Larson D,Kyle RA. Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myelomaThe New England journal of medicineYear: 201136547447521812699
22. Billadeau D,Van Ness B,Kimlinger T,Kyle RA,Therneau TM,Greipp PR,et al. Clonal circulating cells are common in plasma cell proliferative disorders: a comparison of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering multiple myeloma, and active myelomaBloodYear: 1996882892968704185
23. Witzig TE,Gonchoroff NJ,Katzmann JA,Therneau TM,Kyle RA,Greipp PR. Peripheral Blood-B Cell Labeling Indexes Are a Measure of Disease-Activity in Patients with Monoclonal GammopathiesJournal of Clinical OncologyYear: 19886104110463286829

Article Categories:
  • Article

Keywords: Smoldering multiple myeloma, circulating plasma cells, predictive factor, progression, multiple myeloma.

Previous Document:  A phase III randomized trial of thalidomide plus zoledronic acid versus zoledronic acid alone in pat...
Next Document:  Allosteric competitive inactivation of hematopoietic CSF-1 signaling by the viral decoy receptor BAR...