Document Detail


Health economic modelling of the cost-effectiveness of microalbuminuria screening in Switzerland.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22307760     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PRINCIPLES: Current evidence indicates that chronic kidney disease (CKD) can be detected by simple laboratory tests. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of microalbuminuria screening and subsequent treatment in different populations.
METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of microalbuminuria screening in a cohort of simulated subjects aged ≥50 years was assessed using a validated microsimulation model. Microalbuminuria screening was simulated for 1-, 2-, 5- or 10-year intervals and for 3 groups: diabetes (DM), hypertension but no diabetes (HTN), and no diabetes or hypertension. Positive microalbuminuria screening was followed by treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). The model outcomes evaluate costs from a health care system perspective.
RESULTS: Screening of risk groups is cost-effective at a 2-year interval for the DM group with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 54,000 CHF/ Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALY) and at a 5-year interval for the HTN group with an ICER of 33,000 CHF/QALY. Screening of the remaining population is cost-effective at a 10-year interval with an ICER of 34,000 CHF/QALY. The ICER improves with longer screening intervals for all groups. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) confirmed 2-year, 5-year and 10-year intervals as the most cost-effective for the DM group, the HTN group and the remaining population respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Microalbuminuria screening can be considered cost-effective starting at the age of 50 years at bi-annual intervals for subjects with diabetes, at 5-year intervals for subjects with hypertension and at 10-year intervals for the remaining population. Our results indicate that early detection and treatment of CKD might lead to optimised patient care, and offer guidance for future implementation of CKD screening programmes.
Authors:
R Kessler; G Keusch; T Szucs; J Wittenborn; T Hoerger; U Brügger; S Wieser
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2012-02-03
Journal Detail:
Title:  Swiss medical weekly     Volume:  142     ISSN:  1424-3997     ISO Abbreviation:  Swiss Med Wkly     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-02-06     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100970884     Medline TA:  Swiss Med Wkly     Country:  Switzerland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  0     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Amgen Switzerland AG, Zählerweg 6, P.O. Box 1459, 6301, Zug (Zug), SWITZERLAND; reto.kessler@amgen.com.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Joint immobilisation prevents murine osteoarthritis, and reveals the highly mechanosensitive nature ...
Next Document:  Malt-induced premature yeast flocculation: current perspectives.