Human migration has been described as 'one of the defining issues of the 21st century'. It refers to the movement of a person or group of people from one geographical region to another, across an administrative or a political border, to settle definitively or temporarily [¹]. Various types and practices of migration have been identified including orderly migration, return migration, forced migration, irregular migration, smuggling, and trafficking. Migration takes place mainly because of the outbreak, renewal and prolongation of armed conflict has a negative impact on peace, stability and security in many regions of the world [²].

Among the 42 million forcibly displaced people worldwide at the end of 2008, Iraqis form the second largest refugee group, with 1.9 million having sought refuge mainly in neighboring countries [³]. Despite the fact that Iraq is one of the largest oil producing countries in the world, many Iraqis have been displaced from their country mainly for political reasons prior to American invasion of Iraq in 2003 and thereafter due to loss of security, the collapse of the infrastructure and political and sectarian violence [⁴].

In view of the rapidly growing global mobility, migration health has become an important field within the field of medical sciences[⁵]. Measuring health status of a population is not just limited to the traditional measures of morbidity and mortality, but also the assessment of Quality Of Life (QOL). QOL is a multi-dimensional concept, which encompasses crucial areas such as physical health, psychological well being, social relationships, economic circumstances, personal beliefs and their relationships to salient features of the environment. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) refers to the patient's sense of his own health and well-being in the broad areas of physical, psychological and social functioning[⁶].

Migrants face several challenges for health, among those include income and educational achievements. Exposure to new lifestyles may affect both physical and mental health [⁷,⁸], and language gap, when present, together with lack of proper health insurance cover could significantly undermine access to health care [⁹]. Racial discrimination, when present, can also result in inequalities in the provision of health care and could adversely impact opportunities in and quality of health care[¹⁰]. Lack of cohesive social support and cultural gaps may influence health behavior [¹¹]. As such, maintaining good health and quality of life can be very challenging to a lot of the migrants.

Migrants in Spain have been reported to have worse HRQOL than the Spanish natives, which is incidental to their disadvantages in socioeconomic status, social support, and psychological distress[¹²]. Although the mental component of HRQOL among Mexican Americans living in colonias was of similar status when compared to the general population of the United States, the physical health component was however significantly worse. Poor education and long-term residency in colonias were predictors of lower physical health[¹³].

A group of elderly Iranians in Sweden reported a HRQOL worse than that of Swedish citizens [¹⁴]. Migration was also reported to affect negatively the sleep quality of some Portuguese and Moroccan women when compared to German women [¹⁵]. It has been suggested that discrepancy between aspiration and achievement, which can result in poor self-esteem, leads to depression among immigrants [¹⁶]. The impact of migration might also to depend on differences in the developed status between the migrant's country of origin and the country of eventual residence. For example, migrants from Germany and France to Switzerland have reported that their status of health did not differ significantly from that of the majority of the Swiss population, while immigrants from Italy, the former Yugoslavia, Portugal, Spain and Turkey, on the other hand reported lower levels of health status [¹⁷].

Findings from Germany have also indicated that inadequate medical care due to language barriers or sociocultural differences leads to a higher rate of chronic headache among first generation of Turkish immigrants in Germany [¹⁸].

Immigrants who reported financial and job strain, suffer greater impact from their pain conditions and exhibit higher levels of emotional distress, compared to natives[¹⁵,¹⁹].

On the other hand, migration may contribute to a better QOL of immigrants compared to that of their countrymen, especially when immigration takes place into a country with higher human development index and better amenities and accessibility to health care services [¹⁴].

Latino immigrants in the USA reported that exposure to political violence was higher in their country of origin, which was found to be a predictor of associated impairments in mental health and health-related quality of life [²⁰].

The quality of life among a group of Turkish immigrants in Sweden was found to be better when compared with the Turkish people [²¹].

Most information about immigration and health has come from studies carried out in the developed countries where refugees sought a new home. These studies have mainly emphasized on the predictors of HRQOL and sought a comparison with the native population to determine the effect of immigration on HRQOL.

Very few studies have actually documented information on the health of migrants to less developed or developing countries. In this regard, there is very little research carried out on the health aspects of Iraqi immigrant population and there is an extreme paucity of literature on the subject. We strongly felt it as a necessity to prepare a database of the Iraqi immigrants in Malaysia, which would be of use in future evaluation.

Understanding HRQOL is critical in order to track and improve the health of the poor, vulnerable population to reduce the health care disparities. The aim of this study is therefore to assess the HRQOL among a sample of Iraqis living in Malaysia

The demographic characteristics of participants are presented in Table 1. A total of 253 Iraqi immigrants responded to the questionnaire. The age ranged from18-67 years with mean of 33.6 ± 12.2 years. Further categorization of age revealed that around half of the participants are below the age of 30 years, 22.5% between 30-39 years and the rest were above the age of 40 years. Majority of the respondents were males (60.1%) who also reported higher educational level and employment status. More than half of the respondents were married (59.5%). In terms of their education, 45.4% and about 25.9% reported holding a bachelor's degree and having secondary school education respectively and the remaining 28.7% had either a master or a PhD degree.

The mean score of sf-36 scales for participants is presented in Table 2. PF was the highest among the 8 scales (77.4 ± 21.5) and VT was the lowest (56.8 ± 17.7). The physical component summary score was higher than the mental component summary score (70.22 ± 18.64 vs. 63.34 ± 18.52).

Table 3 summarizes the association between the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents and their HRQOL. Only age was significantly associated with PF (p = 0.025) and MH (p = 0.001), where the highest PF scores (79.32 ± 20.99) and the lowest MH scores (57.62 ± 17.27) were in the youngest age group.

Women had significantly lower scores than men in three of the physical components, namely; PF (p = 0.018), GH (p = 0.04) and BP (p = 0.018) and overall lower PCS (p = 0.014).

Although participants with lower education had lower scores in most of the eight subscales, only MH was significantly associated with education (p = 0.036).

Those in employment had significantly higher PF score (p = 0.038) whereas the unemployed had the highest MH score (p = 0.017) compared to other work groups. Regarding marital status, it was found that those who were married had high scores in REE (p = 0.008), MH (p = 0.001) and MCS (p = 0.008).

Table 4 depicts the results of stepwise MLR, it is apparent that only gender is significantly associated with PCS (p = 0.007) and marital status associated with MCS (p = 0.004).

To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing HRQOL among the Iraqi community residing outside Iraq. The major objective of this study was to determine the perception of the Iraqi immigrants about their quality of life within the Malaysian context. Quality of life as a measurement can identify groups with physical or mental health problems and provide a guide to intervention and follow-up evaluation.

It might be argued that the two different methods used to distribute the questionnaire might have influenced the results as clarification could be better sought by the respondents when the questionnaire is distributed by hand than by email. However, this was not the case as recipients in both situations had equal access to the researcher and generally there was very little clarification sought by the respondents. For both these methods, answering the questionnaire nevertheless imposed cognitive demands on the respondents equally, whereby the respondent had to have reading and comprehension skills and be literate in reading the language of the questionnaire.

Electronic methods required easy access to a computer and internet facilities, basic computer literacy, and also familiarity with numbers and keyboards. We made all necessary modifications to make the electronic word version of the questionnaire easily answerable [²⁶]. On the whole we believe that the method of data collection did not have any significant effect on the results.

The reason for the majority of the respondents being young (18-29 years), is that this age group constitutes around 2.8 million of the total 31 million Iraqi population [²⁷], and the age group that is most likely to migrate. Most of the Iraqis settled in Malaysia came in pursuit of their studies and to escape the unstable political condition in their home country. A few of the respondents were senior migrants who worked as professionals, mainly in the field of education.

Analysis of the relationship between the sociodemographic variables and HRQOL was inconclusive across the 8 scales. The finding that the youngest age is significantly associated with better PF and worse MH may be explained by the younger age-group's more active lifestyle compared to older age group [¹⁴,²¹] and having lower morbidity. Lower MH may be explained by the fact that the majority of the young were not married, which is found to be a contributing factor for better mental health [²⁸] as also their position in the society, exposure to new culture, lifestyle and challenges. Similar findings have been reported among the Lebanese and Malaysian population using the same instrument where the older age had lower PF and higher MH [²³,²⁹].

Apart from MH, the non significant differences of the different scales observed among different educational levels may be explained by the fact that the Iraqi community has almost the same living condition, lifestyle and socio-cultural values including health perception [³⁰]. Interestingly all the subjects in the study had secondary to higher and tertiary education and none with just primary or no formal education at all. This is not surprising given that education is compulsory in Iraq and most have attended school at least until the American invasion in 2003 [³¹].

The final MLR model showed that significant association is only present between gender and PCS and between marital status and MCS.

Differences in PCS with regard to gender could be explained mainly in terms of social perspectives and longevity. It has been documented that women live longer than men but experience more health problems. Men and women differ in their social behavior that prompts or avoids health problems and the way they adopt some risk behaviors and exposures [³²]. Women usually report higher levels of health problems because they react differently than men to the material, behavioral and psychosocial conditions that foster health [³³]. Females tend to be less employed compared to men in addition to inequalities in income and education [³⁴]. The lower score among the females may also be explained by the hormonal variation, child birth and role as a mother and wife, these factors are often found to be the detrimental to a woman's health [³⁵,³⁶].

Iraqi females in our sample reported lower education level, higher marital status and lower employment. Similar findings were reported from studies on the Malaysian and Lebanese populations, where females scored lower than males in the mentioned QOL scales [²³,²⁹]. Similar results were reported from elderly Iranian population, where females had PCS and MCS worse than males[³⁷]. Among a sample of Turkish immigrants, the quality of life of male immigrants was found to be higher than that of females [²¹].

Contradictory to our findings, a researcher using different QOL instrument reported that female Iranian refugees who were resettled in Sweden had the overall QOL and general health scores that were higher than those of Iranian males [³⁸].

The significant difference in MH in regard to marital status may be attributed to stability and emotional support provided by the spouse. Marriage may provide an emotionally fulfilling, intimate relationship, satisfying the need for social connection, which could have implications on both physical and mental health[³⁹]. In addition, a spouse may play an important role in monitoring and encouraging healthy

behaviors, such as good eating habits and regular exercise, as well as discouraging unhealthy ones, such as smoking or heavy drinking [⁴⁰]. The most recent research examining the effect of marriage on health suggests that marriage reduces depressive symptoms for both men and women [⁴¹,⁴²].

Marriage has been found to contribute to better physical and mental health. Married couples, who have two incomes would enjoy economic well-being which in turn could improve health outcomes by enhancing access to health care and lowering stress [⁴³]. Married respondents in our sample had a higher level of education, which is conducive to better coping skills and access to health information. High education also contributes to a higher employability which in turn contributes to better financial stability. A group of married Turkish immigrants reported significant QOL difference from single and widowed immigrants[²¹].

In spite of the absence of objective evidence about the effect of the new environment, the data from this study suggests that Iraqi migrants in Malaysia have a relatively moderate QOL and enjoy the same living conditions as the Malaysians. They have an almost equal access to health care as the Malaysians, though they may incur some additional costs unless they are employed by the Malaysian Government.

Although the data has provided a first database of its kind of Iraqis living in Malaysia, there are however a number of limitations evident both in the study and its interpretation. Firstly, the lack of studies of HRQOL in the Iraqi population in Iraq limited the comparison between Iraqi immigrants in Malaysia with Iraqis living in Iraq.

Secondly, data on chronic illnesses and smoking habits among Iraqi immigrants were not collected because incorrect or under reporting of such variables might compromise the results.

Thirdly, generalization of the result might have been affected by the exclusion of those who were not registered with the Iraqi embassy.

Lastly a cross sectional study does not reflect change in HRQOL unless repeated at a different point of time.

It appears that Iraqi immigrants in Malaysia have HRQOL scores that might be considered to indicate a relatively moderate HRQOL, which like in other studies, is influenced by gender and marital status. We hope that this study provokes the interest of researcher inside Iraq to assess the HRQOL among the Iraqi population, which will be of great value as no published data are so far available.

Without the availability of data from Iraq it is not possible to determine if the migration to Malaysia has had a positive or negative impact on the HRQOL of Iraqi immigrants.

Further studies assessing the factors affecting quality of life among Iraqi migrants are needed. We recommend future studies to include other factors that play a role in HRQOL of migrants, especially ethnic differences, coping with new environment and job and financial security.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AMD conceived the study, collected the data and performed statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. HSI participated to conceive and design the study, collected the data and helped to draft the manuscript. TMD and AKA participated in data collection and manuscript drafting. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/407/prepub

The authors would like to thank Professor Dr Than Winn, Professor of Biostatistics and Epidemiology from the Faculty of Medicine, MAHSA University College and Dr Ahmed Samir Al-Naaimi from Baghdad Medical College for reviewing the manuscript critically. In addition, we would like to thank all participants who responded to the questionnaire