Document Detail


Health-related quality of life improvements in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion as a revision surgery.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20739917     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE.: To investigate health-related quality of life improvements in patients undergoing lumbar fusion to revise a previous lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Spinal fusion is often used as a surgical intervention in patients who have previously undergone lumbar surgery. Prior studies suggest results that are inferiorto primary fusions. However, most of these studies are based on subjective surgeon evaluations, lack patient-reported outcomes, and include various diagnoses such as prior discectomy, adjacent level degeneration, and nonunion. METHODS.: From a single-center database, we identified 171 patients who underwent lumbar fusion to revise a previous lumbar spine surgery. All had prospectively collected outcome measures at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The study group included 91 patients who had previous discectomy or laminectomy, 42 patients undergoing revision for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and 38 patients undergoing revision for nonunion. All patients completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), MOS Short Form 36 (SF-36), and back and leg pain numerical rating scores before surgery and at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We compared mean changes in outcome measures and percentage of patients reaching the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) threshold in the 3 groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperative factors which could predict significant improvement. RESULTS.: Statistically significant improvements were noted in back pain, leg pain, and ODI in all 3 groups. Postdecompression and ASD patients demonstrated significant improvements in SF-36 PCS at 2 years, while nonunion patients did not. A total of 49% of postdecompression patients, 38% of ASD patients, and 29% of nonunion patients reached the MCID for ODI. About 46% of postdecompression patients, 40% of ASD patients, and 24% of nonunion patients reached the MCID for SF-36 PCS. Significant improvement from index surgery was the only factor which able to predict reaching the MCID for ODI, while worker's compensation and narcotic use predicted failure to reach the MCID for SF-36 PCS. CONCLUSION.: The current study demonstrates that patients undergoing lumbar fusion as a revision of a prior lumbar surgery can expect only modest improvements in health-related quality of life. Postdecompression patients achieved moderate improvements in clinical outcome measures, whereas ASD and nonunion patients showed only modest improvements. Further investigation is needed to identify preoperative predictors that will assist the selection of patients who will benefit from revision lumbar fusion.
Authors:
Mladen Djurasovic; Steven D Glassman; Jennifer M Howard; Anne G Copay; Leah Y Carreon
Related Documents :
17906577 - The risk of progression of scoliosis in cerebral palsy patients after intrathecal baclo...
19412017 - A concomitant posterior approach improves fusion rates but not overall reoperation rate...
1447247 - Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
10984787 - Results of brace treatment of scoliosis in marfan syndrome.
21176307 - Randomized comparison of goserelin versus suction curettage prior to thermachoice ii ba...
9785807 - Prediction of fev1 reductions in patients undergoing pulmonary resection.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Spine     Volume:  36     ISSN:  1528-1159     ISO Abbreviation:  Spine     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-02-09     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7610646     Medline TA:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  269-76     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
From the *Norton Leatherman Center, Louisville, KY †The Spinal Research Foundation, Reston, VA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Morbidity and mortality in the surgical treatment of six hundred five pediatric patients with isthmi...
Next Document:  Potential of magnetic resonance imaging findings to refine case definition for mechanical low back p...