Document Detail

Handling baselines in repeated measures analyses with missing data at random.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21391005     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
In longitudinal clinical studies, after randomization at baseline, subjects are followed for a period of time for development of symptoms. A mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) can be used to analyze data from such studies. Fitzmaurice et al. (2004) outlined five approaches for handling baseline responses in an MMRM analysis. They are: (1) Retain the baselines as part of the outcome vector and make no assumptions about group differences in the mean response at baseline. (2) Retain the baselines as part of the outcome vector and assume the group means are equal at baseline. (3) Subtract the baselines from all of the remaining post-baseline responses, and analyze the differences from baseline. (4) Use the baselines as a covariate in the analysis of the post-baseline responses, assuming homogeneous regression slopes. (5) Use the baselines as a covariate in the analysis of the post-baseline responses, allowing different regression slopes. In this paper, we evaluate these five approaches in the presence of data missing at random. We evaluate the approaches based on the bias of the estimate and the coverage accuracy of the confidence interval. The results suggest that strategies 2 and 5 are recommended.
Phillip Dinh; Peiling Yang
Related Documents :
21869515 - Nitrous oxide dynamics in a braided river system, new zealand.
20575725 - Exploring the translational impact of a home telemonitoring intervention using time-mot...
21383475 - Breath biomarkers networking sessions at pittcon 2010, orlando, florida.
21251245 - The discovery of potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: a combination of pharmacoph...
18782255 - To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens s...
17613115 - An olfactory bulbectomy model to study plasticity of the nervous system in rat: a revie...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics     Volume:  21     ISSN:  1520-5711     ISO Abbreviation:  J Biopharm Stat     Publication Date:  2011 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-03-10     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9200436     Medline TA:  J Biopharm Stat     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  326-41     Citation Subset:  IM    
Division of Biometrics 1, Office of Biostatistics/Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Missing data handling in chronic pain trials.
Next Document:  Imputation method adjusted for covariates for nonrespondents in instruments with applications.