|Haemodynamic optimisation improves tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation after major surgery: a randomised controlled trial.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 20698956 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|INTRODUCTION: Post-operative outcomes may be improved by the use of flow related end-points for intra-venous fluid and/or low dose inotropic therapy. The mechanisms underlying this benefit remain uncertain. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of stroke volume guided intra-venous fluid and low dose dopexamine on tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation and inflammatory markers in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.
METHODS: Randomised, controlled, single blind study of patients admitted to a university hospital critical care unit following major gastrointestinal surgery. For eight hours after surgery, intra-venous fluid therapy was guided by measurements of central venous pressure (CVP group), or stroke volume (SV group). In a third group stroke volume guided fluid therapy was combined with dopexamine (0.5 mcg/kg/min) (SV & DPX group).
RESULTS: 135 patients were recruited (n = 45 per group). In the SV & DPX group, increased global oxygen delivery was associated with improved sublingual (P < 0.05) and cutaneous microvascular flow (P < 0.005) (sublingual microscopy and laser Doppler flowmetry). Microvascular flow remained constant in the SV group but deteriorated in the CVP group (P < 0.05). Cutaneous tissue oxygen partial pressure (PtO2) (Clark electrode) improved only in the SV & DPX group (P < 0.001). There were no differences in serum inflammatory markers. There were no differences in overall complication rates between the groups although acute kidney injury was more frequent in the CVP group (CVP group ten patients (22%); pooled SV and SV & DPX groups seven patients (8%); P = 0.03) (post hoc analysis).
CONCLUSIONS: Stroke volume guided fluid and low dose inotropic therapy was associated with improved global oxygen delivery, microvascular flow and tissue oxygenation but no differences in the inflammatory response to surgery. These observations may explain improved clinical outcomes associated with this treatment in previous trials.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 94850719.
|Shaman Jhanji; Amanda Vivian-Smith; Susana Lucena-Amaro; David Watson; Charles J Hinds; Rupert M Pearse|
Related Documents :
|3881226 - Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications with cpap, incentive spirometry, an...
15091216 - Uvulopalatoplasty (up2): a modified technique for selected patients.
21616676 - Urgent lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis patients: experience of a french center.
9821996 - Does norepinephrine modify the effects of inhaled nitric oxide in septic patients with ...
9233096 - Comparison of axillary block techniques: is there a difference in success rates?
19723396 - The incidence of pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacteria in british columbia, canada.
|Type: Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2010-08-10|
|Title: Critical care (London, England) Volume: 14 ISSN: 1466-609X ISO Abbreviation: Crit Care Publication Date: 2010|
|Created Date: 2010-09-24 Completed Date: 2011-01-18 Revised Date: -|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 9801902 Medline TA: Crit Care Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: R151 Citation Subset: IM|
|Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary's University of London, Turner Street, London E1 2AD, UK. email@example.com|
|Data Bank Information|
Bank Name/Acc. No.:
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Blood Gas Analysis
Central Venous Pressure / physiology
Digestive System Surgical Procedures / methods*
Dopamine / analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use
Fluid Therapy / methods
Hemodynamics / physiology
Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 / blood
Interleukin-1beta / blood
Interleukin-6 / blood
Interleukin-8 / blood
Intraoperative Care / methods*
Microcirculation / physiology*
Oxygen / blood*
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / blood
Vasodilator Agents / therapeutic use
|0/Interleukin-1beta; 0/Interleukin-6; 0/Interleukin-8; 0/Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; 0/Vasodilator Agents; 126547-89-5/Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1; 7782-44-7/Oxygen; 86197-47-9/dopexamine|
|Crit Care. 2010;14(5):1001
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Crit Care
Publisher: BioMed Central
Copyright ©2010 Jhanji et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 11 Month: 7 Year: 2010
Accepted Day: 10 Month: 8 Year: 2010
Print publication date: Year: 2010
Electronic publication date: Day: 10 Month: 8 Year: 2010
Volume: 14 Issue: 4
First Page: R151 Last Page: R151
Publisher Id: cc9220
PubMed Id: 20698956
|Haemodynamic optimisation improves tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation after major surgery: a randomised controlled trial|
|Shaman Jhanji1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Amanda Vivian-Smith2||Email: email@example.com|
|Susana Lucena-Amaro2||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|David Watson1||Email: email@example.com|
|Charles J Hinds1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Rupert M Pearse1||Email: email@example.com|
1Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary's University of London, Turner Street, London E1 2AD, UK
2Intensive Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Barts & The London NHS Trust, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1BB, UK
Complications are common following major non-cardiac surgery and represent an important cause of avoidable morbidity and mortality [1-3]. Estimates suggest that as many as 234 million major surgical procedures are performed worldwide each year, around 15% of which fall into a high-risk sub-group [2-4]. With mortality rates of up to 12%, this high-risk surgical population accounts for over 80% of early post-operative deaths [2,3]. Long-term survival is also significantly reduced following surgery, in particular for those patients who develop complications [5-7]. Importantly, survival among patients who develop post-operative complications varies widely between hospitals, confirming both the potential and the need to improve clinical outcomes in this population .
The association between low cardiac output, inadequate global oxygen delivery (DO2), reduced venous oxygen saturation (mixed venous haemoglobin saturation with oxygen (SvO2) central venous haemoglobin saturation with oxygen (ScvO2)) and poor outcomes following major surgery is well recognised [9-11]. In several relatively small studies, the use of these variables as treatment end-points for intravenous fluid and inotropic therapy has been associated with improved clinical outcomes [12-18]. It has long been suggested that these beneficial effects relate to improved tissue perfusion and oxygenation. This may prevent the evolution of a tissue 'oxygen debt' and hence reduce the incidence of complications and organ dysfunction . This theory is consistent with the findings of a number of studies demonstrating that impaired tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation are associated with subsequent post-operative complications [20-24]. In patients with severe sepsis, there is some evidence to suggest that abnormalities of microvascular flow may cause tissue hypoxia [25,26], while the use of vasoactive drug therapy has been shown to improve both tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation in this group [27-29]. Importantly, dopexamine, the agent most often used in trials of perioperative cardiac output-guided therapies, has a combination of vasodilator and mild inotropic actions, which may enhance microvascular flow and improve outcomes . The findings of recent systematic reviews suggest that cardiac output guided haemodynamic therapy may have particular beneficial effects on splanchnic perfusion and renal function [30,31]. It is also possible that perioperative haemodynamic optimisation could favourably influence the systemic inflammatory response to tissue injury associated with surgery, thereby reducing the incidence and severity of complications and organ dysfunction.
Clearly, the hypothesis that perioperative cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapies result in improved tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation is plausible but, after many years, still remains untested. It is also uncertain whether low-dose inotropic therapy offers incremental benefit over the use of fluid alone to achieve cardiac output-related end-points. A detailed understanding of the physiological effects of haemodynamic therapies is therefore necessary to provide a rational basis from which to adapt and refine their use in clinical practice. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of stroke volume-guided intravenous fluid therapy with and without low-dose dopexamine on tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation and systemic markers of inflammation in patients admitted to critical care following major gastrointestinal surgery.
Patients scheduled for admission to critical care following major elective gastrointestinal surgery were eligible for recruitment. Exclusion criteria were refusal of consent, pregnancy, patients receiving palliative treatment only and acute arrhythmias or myocardial ischaemia prior to enrolment. In addition, patients receiving lithium therapy or those with a body mass less than 40 kg were excluded because lithium indicator dilution measurement of cardiac output is not licensed in such patients. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and Medical and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (UK). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to surgery. Participants were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups by computer-generated random sequence in blocks of nine. Groups were stratified according to surgical procedure (upper gastrointestinal surgery, lower gastrointestinal surgery and pancreatic surgery involving the gut). Study group allocations were placed in serially numbered opaque envelopes.
General anaesthesia was standardised and included intravenous fentanyl, propofol and atracurium for induction of anaesthesia and maintenance with inhaled isoflurane in oxygen-enriched air and epidural analgesia. Clinical staff administered intravenous fluids, blood products and, if required, vasoactive drugs in order to maintain routine physiological, haematological and biochemical parameters within normal ranges as follows: pulse rate (60 to 100 bpm), mean arterial pressure (60 to 100 mmHg), central venous pressure (CVP) (6 to 12 mmHg), urine output (> 25 ml/hr), haemoglobin (> 8 g/dl), SpO2 (> 94%), temperature (36 to 37°C), serum base excess (-2 to +2 mmol/l) and partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2; 35 to 45 mmHg). Cardiac output monitoring was not used during surgery. Following surgery, all patients were admitted to critical care. For the eight-hour intervention period, either a doctor (SJ) or nurse (AVS, SLA) administered one of three allocated haemodynamic protocols as described below. These protocols are similar to those used in a previous trial .
Intravenous lactated Ringer's solution was administered at 1 ml/kg/hr for maintenance requirements. Patients received additional 250 ml fluid challenges with intravenous colloid solution (Gelofusine, BBraun, Melsungen, Germany) to achieve an optimal value of CVP. Colloid solution was administered in one or more rapid boluses to achieve a sustained rise in CVP of at least 2 mmHg for 20 minutes or more. If CVP decreased, fluid challenges were repeated to establish whether the patient was fluid responsive.
Intravenous lactated Ringer's solution was administered at 1 ml/kg/hr. Patients received additional 250 ml fluid challenges with intravenous colloid solution to achieve an optimal value of stroke volume. Colloid solution was administered in one or more rapid boluses to identify whether the patient was fluid responsive. A stroke volume response to fluid was defined as a sustained rise in stroke volume of at least 10% for 20 minutes or more. When a patient was identified as stroke volume responsive to fluid, further 250 ml boluses of fluid were administered until a plateau value was achieved. If stroke volume decreased, fluid challenges were repeated to establish whether the patient was fluid responsive.
Intravenous lactated Ringer's solution was administered at 1 ml/kg/hr. Patients received additional fluid challenges with colloid solution to achieve an optimal value of stroke volume in an identical fashion to patients in the SV group. In addition, a continuous intravenous infusion of dopexamine was administered at 0.5 μg/kg/min (Cephalon, Welwyn Garden City, UK). This infusion rate was not adjusted to achieve a specific value for cardiac output or DO2 index (DO2I) but was decreased or discontinued in patients with evidence of myocardial ischaemia or tachycardia (> 100 bpm or increase > 20% from baseline value, whichever was greater).
Only the member of the research team who delivered the intervention was aware of the study group allocation. Cardiac output data were made available to clinical staff only on specific request. The reasons for this and any subsequent changes in treatment were documented by research staff. Dummy infusions were used in patients not allocated to receive dopexamine. All other management decisions were taken by clinical staff.
Sublingual microvascular flow was evaluated before surgery and at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours immediately after surgery using sidestream darkfield (SDF) imaging with a ×5 objective lens (Microscan, Microvision Medical, Amsterdam, Netherlands) . Image acquisition and subsequent analysis was performed according to published consensus criteria . SDF images were obtained from at least three sublingual areas at each time point giving a total of twelve quadrants for analysis. Vessel density was calculated by inserting a grid of three equidistant horizontal and three equidistant vertical lines over the image. Vessel density is equal to the number of vessels crossing these lines divided by their total length. Flow was then categorised as present, intermittent or absent to calculate the proportion of perfused vessels and thus the perfused vessel density. Microvascular Flow Index (MFI) was calculated after dividing each image into four equal quadrants. Quantification of flow was determined using an ordinal scale (0: no flow, 1: intermittent flow, 2: sluggish flow, 3: normal flow) for small (< 20 μm) and large (> 20 μm) vessels. MFI is the average score of all quadrants for a given category of vessel size at a given time point. Analysis of the videos was performed by two observers (AVS and SLA). The Kappa coefficient (κ) for inter-observer variability in SDF image analysis was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.81). Baseline sublingual large vessel MFI (> 20 μm) was 3.0 (3.0 to 3.0) in all groups suggesting good quality image capture unaffected by pressure artefact.
Cutaneous red blood cell flux was measured before surgery and at 0, 4 and 8 hours after surgery at two sites on the forearm by laser Doppler flowmetry (Moorlab, Moor Instruments, Axminster, UK). Baseline red cell flux on the forearm was measured and following this, the post-occlusive hyperaemic response was examined by inflating a cuff around the upper arm to 20 mmHg above systolic pressure for three minutes and measuring the changes in red cell flux on releasing the pressure in the cuff. The difference between baseline flux and peak hyperaemia was then evaluated at each time point. Cutaneous tissue oxygen partial pressure (PtO2) was measured before surgery and at hour 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours after surgery at two sites on the abdominal wall using a Clark electrode (TCM400, Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). PtO2 probes warm the skin to 44°C minimising artefact due to local vasoconstriction.
Arterial and central venous blood samples were taken at hour 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 after surgery from indwelling catheters for analysis of arterial haemoglobin saturation with oxygen, ScvO2, base deficit and serum lactate (ABL600, Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Serum samples were obtained from all patients following induction of anaesthesia but prior to surgery. Further serum samples were obtained immediately following surgery, at the end of the intervention period and 24 hours after the end of surgery. These samples were centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 minutes and stored at -80°C. Subsequent analysis of IL1 beta, IL6, IL8, and TNFα was performed using a multi-array electro-chemiluminescence technique (SECTOR Imager 2400, Mesoscale Discovery, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA). Levels of soluble inter-cellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) were quantified using a similar technique.
Clinical outcomes data for each patient were collected by a member of the research team who was unaware of study group allocation and then verified by the senior investigator who was also unaware of the study group allocation. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and on day seven after surgery from serum creatinine, age, race and gender using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation . Patients were prospectively followed for 28 days for pre-defined in-hospital complications, including acute kidney injury within seven days , mortality and duration of hospital stay.
Assuming a 5% type I error rate and an 80% type II error rate, it was calculated that 45 patients would be required in each group to detect a 10 mmHg difference in PtO2 between each of the intervention groups and the control group. Trends in physiological variables over time within groups were tested using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Friedmann test. Differences in physiological variables between groups were tested using two-way repeated measures ANOVA, the t test and one-way ANOVA with post hoc t-test with Bonferroni correction. Categorical variables were tested with the Chi squared or Fisher's exact tests. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA). Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis including all randomised patients. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) where normally distributed or median (interquartile range) where not normally distributed.
Between December 2007 and February 2009, 135 patients were recruited (Figure 1). Baseline patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Despite the different haemodynamic treatment algorithms, patients in the three groups received similar volumes of fluid during and after surgery and there were no differences in vasopressor requirements (Table 2). The number of patients who received transfused blood during and after surgery was similar between the groups as was the volume of blood transfused (CVP group: 19 patients, 870 (580 to 1408) ml; SV group: 12 patients, 561 (398 to 580) ml; SV & DPX group: 15 patients, 580 (300 to 877) ml; P = 0.11). One patient randomised to the SV & DPX group developed myocardial ischaemia during surgery and, in accordance with the study protocol, did not receive dopexamine. In five patients the dose of dopexamine was reduced because of an increase in heart rate and in one patient, dopexamine was subsequently discontinued. On only one occasion, a clinician asked to view a patient's cardiac output data because of concern that poor cardiac function might have been complicated by pulmonary oedema. This information did not prompt any changes in treatment. No patients received additional inotropic therapy during the intervention period.
Stroke volume-guided fluid therapy with dopexamine infusion was associated with significant increases in heart rate, cardiac index, DO2 and ScvO2. Stroke volume-guided fluid therapy alone was associated with much smaller increases in cardiac index and DO2 and no change in heart rate or ScvO2 (Figure 2 and Table 3). In all three groups, microvascular flow was impaired at baseline (Table 4). In the SV & DPX group, sublingual microvascular flow significantly improved during the eight-hour study period (Figure 3 and Table 4). Sublingual microvascular flow remained constant in the SV group but deteriorated in the control group (Figure 3). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in the cutaneous hyperaemic response in the SV & DPX group, whereas this variable remained unchanged in the SV group and deteriorated in the control group (Figure 3). In all three groups, cutaneous PtO2 initially increased after surgery. This improvement was sustained in the SV & DPX group but decreased towards baseline in the CVP and SV groups (Figure 4).
There were no significant differences in overall complication rates, critical care free days or duration of hospital stay, although the pattern of mortality was consistent with a beneficial effect of stroke volume-guided haemodynamic therapy (Table 5). During the first seven days after surgery, eGFR increased significantly in the SV & DPX group but not in the SV or the CVP group (SV & DPX group 21  ml/min, P = 0.001; SV group 10  ml/min, P = 0.09; CVP group 2  ml/min; P = 0.73). Consequently, a post hoc analysis of the predefined renal outcome was performed. Fewer patients developed acute kidney injury in the pooled SV and SV & DPX groups within seven days of surgery (P = 0.03; Table 5). Despite improvements in tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation in the SV and SV & DPX groups, there were no differences between the groups in terms of the serum inflammatory markers IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα and ICAM-1 within 24 hours of surgery (Figure 5).
This is the first study to substantiate the theory that cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy can improve tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Our principal finding is that a treatment algorithm incorporating stroke volume-guided fluid therapy and a low-dose dopexamine infusion increased global DO2 and ScvO2 in association with significant improvements in sublingual and cutaneous microvascular flow and cutaneous tissue oxygenation. Stroke volume-guided fluid therapy alone was associated with more modest improvements in global haemodynamics and microvascular flow. There were, however, no differences in circulating markers of the inflammatory response to surgery between treatment groups.
This randomised controlled trial used physiological end-points and was not designed to identify differences in clinical outcomes although a post hoc analysis did identify a possible improvement in renal outcomes (eGFR and incidence of acute kidney injury) associated with stroke volume-guided therapy. This finding is consistent with a recent meta-analysis suggesting that haemodynamic optimisation protects renal function in surgical patients . There was no reduction in overall complication rates in the intervention groups and the small difference in hospital mortality, although consistent with improved outcome was not significant. To achieve 80% power to detect a 25% reduction in the relative risk of complications would require a minimum of 150 patients in each of the three treatment groups.
In common with all trials of complex interventions, it was not possible to fully blind clinical staff to study group allocation. We did, however, conceal study group allocation from all investigators apart from the member of the research team delivering the intervention. This included concealment of cardiac output data and the use of dummy infusions. All complications, including acute kidney injury, were assessed according to prospectively defined criteria and verified by the principal investigator who was unaware of study group allocation. Lastly our stratified randomisation procedure ensured that the three groups were comparable.
The importance of using cardiac output-derived data to guide a carefully prescribed and consistently applied clinical intervention is illustrated by the findings of a previous multi-centre randomised trial in which perioperative pulmonary artery catheterisation, in the absence of improved haemodynamics, failed to influence outcome . In the study reported here, three clinically relevant treatment algorithms were strictly implemented by members of the research team throughout the eight-hour intervention period. Perhaps as a consequence, unlike most previous studies, the total volumes of intravenous fluid administered were similar between the groups [12-18]. This suggests a high standard of care for all patients that may have limited the apparent treatment effect of stroke volume-guided fluid therapy. Interestingly, the findings of one previous trial suggest that, even where median fluid administration is similar between groups, cardiac output-guided fluid therapy may be associated with improved clinical outcomes .
The relation between derangements in cardiac output-related variables and complications following major surgery is well described [9-11]. The findings of some, but not all clinical trials and a number of meta-analyses suggest that cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy can improve post-operative outcomes [12-18,30,31]. It has long been assumed that the potential benefits of 'flow guided' peri-operative haemodynamic therapy relate to improved tissue perfusion and oxygenation. A number of studies have highlighted the significance of impaired tissue microvascular flow in the pathogenesis of post-operative complications [21-24]. In this context, it is interesting to note that the use of high concentrations of inspired oxygen did not affect the incidence of post-operative wound infection or pneumonia in a recent large clinical trial . In the current study, the use of a fixed low-dose inotrope infusion coupled with stroke volume-guided fluid therapy resulted in increases in heart rate and, to a lesser extent, stroke volume which in turn increased DO2 and ScvO2 to values previously associated with improved clinical outcomes [9-11]. We show for the first time that such increases in global haemodynamics are associated with improvements in tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation, thus validating the study's hypothesis. Although stroke volume-guided intravenous colloid therapy led to much smaller increases in cardiac index and DO2, with no change in heart rate or ScvO2, microvascular flow was better maintained than in the CVP-guided therapy group. The incremental effects of low dose dopexamine on both microvascular flow and tissue oxygenation are likely to relate to the β2-adrenoceptor-mediated inotropic and vasodilator actions of this agent. It is therefore possible that changes in microvascular flow relate to direct effects on the microcirculation as well as global cardiac output.
Interestingly, in a recent randomised trial, low-dose nitroglycerin had no effect on sublingual microvascular flow in resuscitated patients with severe sepsis . These contrasting findings may reflect differences in the nature and timing of the intervention as well as the patient population and smaller sample size. In contrast, the use of vasopressor and inotropic agents has been shown to improve both tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation in patients with severe sepsis [28,29], although these effects were not demonstrated in all such investigations [40,41]. While, these studies do suggest potential effects of vasoactive drugs on microvascular flow, the current study is the first to investigate the effects of the use of cardiac output-based end-points on tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation.
The simultaneous use of three different modalities to assess different aspects of tissue microvascular function was an important strength of this investigation. SDF imaging is a non-invasive technique that provides a real-time video image of the intact microcirculation. However, this technique is limited by semi-quantitative analysis and the fact that it can only be used to image the microcirculation under mucosal surfaces. Laser Doppler flowmetry is a technique based on the Doppler shift of reflected laser light from moving red blood cells. This method cannot distinguish the size or type of microvessel, direction of flow or heterogeneity of flow, all of which may be important in critically ill or high-risk surgical patients. These limitations can be addressed through the measurement of post-occlusion reactive hyperaemia, which provides a reproducible assessment of endothelium-dependant microvascular response . The cutaneous Clarke electrode measures the local partial pressure of oxygen by a polarographic method. If tissue perfusion decreases while partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) remains constant, cutaneous PtO2 will decrease thus linking peripheral perfusion and tissue oxygenation . The consistent patterns of change identified with each of the three modalities is therefore of particular importance. However, these methods have been used to assess quite different aspects of microvascular function and cannot be directly compared. We have presented the changes in microvascular flow in terms of change from the baseline values. While differences are less apparent on analysis of absolute values, the consistency of the changes we observed between three distinct measures of tissue perfusion strongly suggests that these findings are robust.
A treatment algorithm incorporating stroke volume-guided fluid therapy plus low-dose dopexamine infusion was associated with significant improvements in microvascular flow and tissue oxygenation but no change in the inflammatory response to surgery. These physiological changes may explain the beneficial effects of cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy demonstrated in previous clinical trials. Our findings strongly support the need for large multi-centre trials to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy. Several such trials are now under way in patients with severe sepsis, those undergoing major surgery and in potential organ donors.
• Peri-operative haemodynamic therapies guided by cardiac output monitoring have been associated with improved clinical outcomes in small clinical trials.
• The mechanism of therapeutic benefit is believed to relate to improved tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery but this theory has not previously been tested.
• In this study, stroke volume-guided fluid therapy and low-dose dopexamine infusion was associated with improvements in tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation but clinical outcomes were similar between groups.
• These findings may explain the improved clinical outcomes reported in previous studies. Large randomised trials are now required to confirm the clinical benefits of this treatment approach.
ANOVA: analysis of variance; CVP: central venous pressure; DO2: oxygen delivery; DO2I: oxygen delivery index; DPX: dopexamine; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ICAM-1: inter-cellular adhesion molecule 1; IL: interleukin; MFI: microvascular flow index; PaCO2: partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide; PaO2: partial pressure of arterial oxygen; PtO2: tissue oxygen partial pressure; SaO2: arterial haemoglobin saturation with oxygen; ScvO2: central venous haemoglobin saturation with oxygen; SpO2: arterial haemoglobin saturation; SV: stroke volume; SvO2: mixed venous haemoglobin saturation with oxygen; SDF: sidestream darkfield imaging; TNF: tumour necrosis factor.
RP has received a research grant and equipment loans from LiDCO Ltd and honoraria from BBraun, Edwards Lifesciences, Covidien and Pulsion Medical Systems. SJ, CH and RP are named inventors on a lapsed patent application relating to the peri-operative use of dopexamine.
RP formulated the hypothesis and developed the protocol with CH and DW. The investigation was performed by SJ, AVS and SLA, at The Royal London Hospital, UK. SJ, RP, DW and CH assisted in the data analysis. The manuscript was drafted by SJ and RP. All authors read and approved the final version.
RP is a National Institute for Health Research (UK) Clinician Scientist. This study was supported by research grants from Circassia Holdings Ltd, Barts and The London Charity, Cephalon UK Ltd and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Cardiac output monitoring equipment was provided on loan by LiDCO Ltd.
|Cullinane M,Gray AJ,Hargraves CM,Lansdown M,Martin IC,Schubert M,The 2003 Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Peri-Operative DeathsYear: 2003London: NCEPOD|
|Jhanji S,Thomas B,Ely A,Watson D,Hinds CJ,Pearse RM,Mortality and utilisation of critical care resources amongst high-risk surgical patients in a large NHS trustAnaesthesiaYear: 20086369570010.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05560.x18489613|
|Pearse RM,Harrison DA,James P,Watson D,Hinds C,Rhodes A,Grounds RM,Bennett ED,Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United KingdomCrit CareYear: 200610R8110.1186/cc492816749940|
|Weiser TG,Regenbogen SE,Thompson KD,Haynes AB,Lipsitz SR,Berry WR,Gawande AA,An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available dataLancetYear: 200837213914410.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-818582931|
|Jencks SF,Williams MV,Coleman EA,Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service programN Engl J MedYear: 20093601418142810.1056/NEJMsa080356319339721|
|Head J,Ferrie JE,Alexanderson K,Westerlund H,Vahtera J,Kivimaki M,Diagnosis-specific sickness absence as a predictor of mortality: the Whitehall II prospective cohort studyBMJYear: 2008337a146910.1136/bmj.a146918832415|
|Khuri SF,Henderson WG,DePalma RG,Mosca C,Healey NA,Kumbhani DJ,Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complicationsAnn SurgYear: 200524232634116135919|
|Ghaferi AA,Birkmeyer JD,Dimick JB,Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgeryN Engl J MedYear: 20093611368137510.1056/NEJMsa090304819797283|
|Clowes GH,Del Guercio LR,Circulatory response to trauma of surgical operationsMetabolismYear: 196096781|
|Pearse RM,Dawson D,Fawcett J,Rhodes A,Grounds RM,Bennett ED,Changes in central venous saturation after major surgery, and association with outcomeCrit CareYear: 20059R694R69910.1186/cc388816356220|
|Shoemaker WC,Montgomery ES,Kaplan E,Elwyn DH,Physiologic patterns in surviving and nonsurviving shock patients. Use of sequential cardiorespiratory variables in defining criteria for therapeutic goals and early warning of deathArch SurgYear: 19731066306364701410|
|Pearse RM,Belsey JD,Cole JN,Bennett ED,Effect of dopexamine infusion on mortality following major surgery: individual patient data meta-regression analysis of published clinical trialsCrit Care MedYear: 2008361323132910.1097/CCM.0b013e31816a091b18379261|
|Boyd O,Grounds RM,Bennett ED,A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patientsJAMAYear: 19932702699270710.1001/jama.270.22.26997907668|
|Gan TJ,Soppitt A,Maroof M,el-Moalem H,Robertson KM,Moretti E,Dwane P,Glass PS,Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgeryAnesthesiologyYear: 20029782082610.1097/00000542-200210000-0001212357146|
|McKendry M,McGloin H,Saberi D,Caudwell L,Brady AR,Singer M,Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgeryBMJYear: 200432925810.1136/bmj.38156.767118.7C15242867|
|Pearse RM,Dawson D,Fawcett J,Rhodes A,Grounds RM,Bennett ED,Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trialCrit CareYear: 20059R687R69310.1186/cc388716356219|
|Shoemaker WC,Appel PL,Kram HB,Waxman K,Lee TS,Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patientsChestYear: 1988941176118610.1378/chest.94.6.11763191758|
|Wilson J,Woods I,Fawcett J,Whall R,Dibb W,Morris C,McManus E,Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen deliveryBMJYear: 19993181099110310213716|
|Shoemaker WC,Appel PL,Kram HB,Role of oxygen debt in the development of organ failure sepsis, and death in high-risk surgical patientsChestYear: 199210220821510.1378/chest.102.1.2081623755|
|Hopf HW,Hunt TK,West JM,Blomquist P,Goodson WH,Jensen JA,Jonsson K,Paty PB,Rabkin JM,Upton RA,von Smitten K,Whitney JD,Wound tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of wound infection in surgical patientsArch SurgYear: 199713299710049301613|
|Jhanji S,Lee C,Watson D,Hinds C,Pearse RM,Microvascular flow and tissue oxygenation after major abdominal surgery: association with post-operative complicationsIntensive Care MedYear: 20093567167710.1007/s00134-008-1325-z18936911|
|Miyazaki T,Kuwano H,Kato H,Yoshikawa M,Ojima H,Tsukada K,Predictive value of blood flow in the gastric tube in anastomotic insufficiency after thoracic esophagectomyWorld J SurgYear: 2002261319132310.1007/s00268-002-6366-912297918|
|Pierie JP,De Graaf PW,Poen H,Van der Tweel I,Obertop H,Impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetryEur J SurgYear: 19941605996037858044|
|Vignali A,Gianotti L,Braga M,Radaelli G,Malvezzi L,Di Carlo V,Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leakDis Colon RectumYear: 200043768210.1007/BF0223724810813128|
|Ellis CG,Bateman RM,Sharpe MD,Sibbald WJ,Gill R,Effect of a maldistribution of microvascular blood flow on capillary O(2) extraction in sepsisAm J Physiol Heart Circ PhysiolYear: 2002282H15616411748059|
|Goldman D,Bateman RM,Ellis CG,Effect of decreased O2 supply on skeletal muscle oxygenation and O2 consumption during sepsis: role of heterogeneous capillary spacing and blood flowAm J Physiol Heart Circ PhysiolYear: 2006290H2277228510.1152/ajpheart.00547.200516399873|
|Spanos A,Jhanji S,Vivian-Smith A,Harris T,Pearse RM,Early microvascular changes in sepsis and severe sepsisShock3338739110.1097/SHK.0b013e3181c6be0419851124|
|De Backer D,Creteur J,Dubois MJ,Sakr Y,Koch M,Verdant C,Vincent JL,The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effectsCrit Care MedYear: 20063440340810.1097/01.CCM.0000198107.61493.5A16424721|
|Jhanji S,Stirling S,Patel N,Hinds CJ,Pearse RM,The effect of increasing doses of norepinephrine on tissue oxygenation and microvascular flow in patients with septic shockCrit Care MedYear: 2009371961196610.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a00a1c19384212|
|Giglio MT,Marucci M,Testini M,Brienza N,Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsBr J AnaesthYear: 200910363764610.1093/bja/aep27919837807|
|Brienza N,Giglio MT,Marucci M,Fiore T,Does perioperative hemodynamic optimization protect renal function in surgical patients? A meta-analytic studyCrit Care MedYear: 2009372079209010.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a00a4319384211|
|Boerma EC,Mathura KR,van der Voort PH,Spronk PE,Ince C,Quantifying bedside-derived imaging of microcirculatory abnormalities in septic patients: a prospective validation studyCrit CareYear: 20059R60160610.1186/cc380916280059|
|De Backer D,Hollenberg S,Boerma C,Goedhart P,Buchele G,Ospina-Tascon G,Dobbe I,Ince C,How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conferenceCrit CareYear: 200711R10110.1186/cc611817845716|
|Levey AS,Bosch JP,Lewis JB,Greene T,Rogers N,Roth D,A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study GroupAnn Intern MedYear: 199913046147010075613|
|Mehta RL,Kellum JA,Shah SV,Molitoris BA,Ronco C,Warnock DG,Levin A,Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injuryCrit CareYear: 200711R3110.1186/cc571317331245|
|Sandham JD,Hull RD,Brant RF,Knox L,Pineo GF,Doig CJ,Laporta DP,Viner S,Passerini L,Devitt H,Kirby A,Jacka M,A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patientsN Engl J MedYear: 200334851410.1056/NEJMoa02110812510037|
|Noblett SE,Snowden CP,Shenton BK,Horgan AF,Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resectionBr J SurgYear: 2006931069107610.1002/bjs.545416888706|
|Meyhoff CS,Wetterslev J,Jorgensen LN,Henneberg SW,Hogdall C,Lundvall L,Svendsen PE,Mollerup H,Lunn TH,Simonsen I,Martinsen KR,Pulawska T,Bundgaard L,Bugge L,Hansen EG,Riber C,Gocht-Jensen P,Walker LR,Bendtsen A,Johansson G,Skovgaard N,Helto K,Poukinski A,Korshin A,Walli A,Bulut M,Carlsson PS,Rodt SA,Lundbech LB,Rask H,et al. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trialJAMAYear: 20093021543155010.1001/jama.2009.145219826023|
|Boerma EC,Koopmans M,Konijn A,Kaiferova K,Bakker AJ,van Roon EN,Buter H,Bruins N,Egbers PH,Gerritsen RT,Koetsier PM,Kingma WP,Kuiper MA,Ince C,Effects of nitroglycerin on sublingual microcirculatory blood flow in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock after a strict resuscitation protocol: a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trialCrit Care Med389310010.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b02fc119730258|
|LeDoux D,Astiz ME,Carpati CM,Rackow EC,Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue perfusion in septic shockCrit Care MedYear: 2000282729273210.1097/00003246-200008000-0000710966242|
|Dubin A,Pozo MO,Casabella CA,Palizas F Jr,Murias G,Moseinco MC,Kanoore Edul VS,Palizas F,Estenssoro E,Ince C,Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective studyCrit CareYear: 200913R9210.1186/cc792219534818|
|Cracowski JL,Minson CT,Salvat-Melis M,Halliwill JR,Methodological issues in the assessment of skin microvascular endothelial function in humansTrends Pharmacol SciYear: 20062750350810.1016/j.tips.2006.07.00816876881|
|Lima A,Bakker J,Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusionIntensive Care MedYear: 2005311316132610.1007/s00134-005-2790-216170543|
Patient characteristics at baseline
n = 45
n = 45
|SV & DPX group
n = 45
|Age (years)||70 (64-78)||68 (59-77)||65 (59-74)|
|Male (%)||30 (67%)||31 (69%)||28 (62%)|
|ASA score||2 (2-3)||2 (2-3)||2 (2-3)|
|Upper gastrointestinal surgery (%)||18 (40%)||18 (40%)||18 (40%)|
|Pancreatic surgery involving gut (%)||18 (40%)||18 (40%)||18 (40%)|
|Lower gastrointestinal surgery (%)||9 (20%)||9 (20%)||9 (20%)|
Data presented as median (IQR) or absolute values (%). ASA, American society of anesthesiologists; CVP, central venous pressure; DPX, dopexamine; SV, stroke volume.
Volume of intravenous fluid administered and use of vasopressor therapy in the three groups
n = 45
n = 45
|SV & DPX group
n = 45
|Intravenous crystalloid during surgery (ml)||3595 (1354)||4057 (1495)||4159 (1393)||0.15|
|Intravenous colloid during surgery (ml)||756 (815)||835 (688)||709 (559)||0.69|
|Intravenous crystalloid during study period (ml)||639 (281)||652 (237)||626 (250)||0.98|
|Intravenous colloid during study period (ml)||1104 (553)||1227 (555)||1307 (549)||0.22|
|Patients receiving vasopressor therapy (%)||7 (16%)||8 (18%)||5 (11%)||0.82|
Data presented as mean (standard deviation) or absolute values (%). CVP, central venous pressure; DPX, dopexamine; SV, stroke volume.
Cardiovascular physiology for the three treatment groups during eight hour study period
|Group||Hour 0||Hour 2||Hour 4||Hour 6||Hour 8|
|CVP||74 (13)||76 (14)||76 (14)||76 (15)||76 (15)|
|SV||77 (19)||76 (17)||80 (19)||79 (17)||78 (17)|
|§ SV & DPX||77 (11)||86 (12)||91 (12)||93 (13)||92 (12)|
|Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)||CVP||80 (22)||79 (20)||79 (15)||79 (15)||77 (14)|
|SV||76 (15)||81 (15)||83 (14)||79 (14)||77 (14)|
|† SV & DPX||80 (18)||83 (17)||84 (13)||77 (13)||74 (12)|
|Central venous pressure (mmHg)||‡ CVP||6 (5)||7 (5)||7 (5)||8 (5)||8 (5)|
|* SV||4 (5)||6(4)||6 (5)||7 (4)||7 (5)|
|† SV & DPX||5 (4)||7 (4)||7 (4)||8 (6)||8 (5)|
|CVP||3.5 (1.1)||3.5 (0.9)||3.5 (0.9)||3.5 (0.9)||3.4 (0.9)|
|‡ SV||3.2 (0.9)||3.5 (0.9)||3.7 (1.0)||3.7 (1.0)||3.6 (1.0)|
|§ SV & DPX||3.3 (0.8)||4.0 (0.9)||4.3 (1.0)||4.3 (0.9)||4.4 (1.1)|
Oxygen delivery index
|CVP||477 (146)||490 (144)||480 (152)||468 (168)||467 (159)|
|† SV||449 (145)||492 (160)||495 (147)||499 (165)||484 (150)|
|§ SV & DPX||498 (157)||594 (167)||635 (198)||631 (174)||614 (209)|
|CVP||80 (23)||86 (25)||84 (24)||82 (21)||81 (21)|
|‡ SV||78 (23)||85 (22)||84 (22)||85 (22)||83 (22)|
|‡ SV & DPX||80 (23)||88 (24)||90 (24)||89 (23)||88 (26)|
|† CVP||1.4 (1.0-2.1)||1.1 (0.9-1.6)||1.1 (0.9-1.8)||1.2 (0.9-1.8)||1.2 (0.9-1.8)|
|* SV||1.4 (0.9-2.7)||1.3 (0.9-2.2)||1.3 (0.8-2.4)||1.2 (0.8-1.9)||1.2 (0.8-1.8)|
|SV & DPX||1.9 (1.3-2.8)||1.7 (1.0-2.4)||1.9 (1.0-2.9)||1.9 (1.0-3.1)||1.7 (1.1-2.4)|
|CVP||-1.9 (2.6)||-2.2 (2.7)||-1.7 (2.8)||-1.7 (2.9)||-1.6 (2.6)|
|* SV||-2.2 (2.4)||-2.1 (2.8)||-1.6 (3.1)||-1.0 (2.2)||-1.0 (2.3)|
|‡ SV & DPX||-2.2 (2.1)||-2.3 (2.4)||-2.2 (2.4)||-1.9 (2.3)||-1.4 (2.4)|
Data presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range). Significant changes over time signified by † (P < 0.05), ‡ (P < 0.01), * (P < 0.001) and § (P < 0.0001). CVP, central venous pressure; DPX, dopexamine; SV, stroke volume.
Sublingual microvascular flow for small vessels (< 20 μm) during eight hour study period
|Hour 0||Hour 2||Hour 4||Hour 6||Hour 8|
|Microvascular Flow Index||CVP||2.5 (0.3)||2.5 (0.7)||2.6 (0.4)||2.6 (0.4)||2.5 (0.5)|
|SV||2.5 (0.4)||2.5 (0.5)||2.6 (0.4)||2.7 (0.3)||2.6 (0.4)|
|† SV & DPX||2.5 (0.4)||2.4 (0.5)||2.5 (0.4)||2.7 (0.3)||2.5 (0.4)|
Perfused vessel density
|‡ CVP||6.1 (2.4)||6.1 (1.7)||5.8 (2.0)||5.8 (1.9)||5.3 (1.8)|
|SV||5.8 (2.5)||5.7 (2.6)||5.7 (1.9)||5.7 (1.9)||6.2 (3.0)|
|† SV & DPX||5.8 (2.4)||5.5 (2.4)||5.9 (2.8)||6.2 (1.8)||6.3 (3.0)|
|Proportion of perfused vessels||CVP||0.83 (0.14)||0.83 (0.12)||0.81 (0.14)||0.82 (0.18)||0.81 (0.18)|
|SV||0.80 (0.15)||0.80 (0.21)||0.82 (0.17)||0.84 (0.13)||0.80 (0.19)|
|SV & DPX||0.81 (0.16)||0.77 (0.14)||0.81 (0.15)||0.85 (0.12)||0.87 (0.17)|
|† SV & DPX||0.27
Data presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range). Significant changes over time signified by † (P < 0.05), ‡ (P < 0.01). CVP, central venous pressure; DPX, dopexamine; SV, stroke volume.
Clinical outcomes in the three intervention groups
n = 45
n = 45
|SV & DPX group
n = 45
(number of patients, %)
|30 (67%)||26 (58%)||31 (69%)||0.51|
|Cardiac complications (number of patients, %)||4 (9%)||3 (7%)||3 (7%)||0.90|
|Infectious complications (number of patients, %)||29 (64%)||24 (53%)||28 (62%)||0.52|
|Other complications (number of patients, %)||10 (22%)||14 (31%)||12 (27%)||0.63|
|Acute kidney injury within 7 days of surgery||10 (22%)||3 (7%)||4 (9%)||0.055*|
|Critical care free days within 28 days of surgery||24 (21-26)||24 (21-26)||26 (21-27)||0.45|
|Duration of hospital stay (days)||15 (10-26)||14 (11-26)||16 (11-28)||0.73|
|Hospital mortality (%)||6 (13%)||5 (11%)||4 (9%)||0.45|
Data presented as median (interquartile range) or absolute values (%). Note: A number of patients developed more than one complication. Acute kidney injury at seven days not included in 28 day complication outcome.
*Significant difference in incidence of acute kidney injury between pooled SV and SV & DPX groups and the CVP group (P = 0.03, post hoc analysis). CVP, central venous pressure; DPX, dopexamine; SV, stroke volume.
Previous Document: Achievements and challenges in bioartificial kidney development.
Next Document: First nationwide survey on cardiovascular risk factors in Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX).