|Guided treatment improves outcome of patients with enterocutaneous fistulas.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 22669399 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of guided treatment of patients with an enterocutaneous fistula and to evaluate the effect of prolonged period of convalescence on outcome.
METHODS: All consecutive patients with an enterocutaneous fistula treated between 2006 and 2010 were included in this study. Patient information was gathered prospectively. Treatment of patients focused on sepsis control, optimization of nutritional status, wound care, establishing the anatomy of the fistula, timing of surgery, and surgical principles. Outcome included spontaneous and surgical closure, mortality, and postoperative recurrence. The relationship between period of convalescence and recurrence rate was determined by combining the present prospective cohort with a historical cohort from our group.
RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, 79 patients underwent focused treatment for enterocutaneous fistula. Cox regression analysis showed that period of convalescence related significantly with recurrence of the fistula (hazard ratio 0.99; 95 % confidence interval 0.98-0.999; p = 0.04). Spontaneous closure occurred in 23 (29 %) patients after a median period of convalescence of 39 (range 7-163) days. Forty-nine patients underwent operative repair after median period of 101 (range 7-374) days and achieved closure in 47 (96 %). Overall, eight patients (10 %) died.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolonging period of convalescence for patients with enterocutaneous fistulas improves spontaneous closure and reduces recurrence rate.
|Ruben G J Visschers; Wim G van Gemert; Bjorn Winkens; Peter B Soeters; Steven W M Olde Damink|
Related Documents :
|22581409 - Bladder capacity on preoperative urodynamics may impact outcomes on transobturator male...
22300559 - Sexual function and the use of medical devices or drugs to optimize potency after prost...
22698379 - Clinical experience with oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in adult patients with u...
11552059 - Overview of cochrane thrombolysis meta-analysis.
19032759 - B-type natriuretic peptide is a long-term predictor of all-cause mortality, whereas hig...
22300649 - Addition of plasma exchange to glucocorticosteroids for the treatment of severe henoch-...
18337129 - The feasibility of characterizing the spatial distribution of cartilage t(2) using text...
20485039 - Late growth period orthopedic therapy versus bimaxillary surgery for correction of skel...
18363449 - Interventions for acute mood episodes in patients with bipolar disorder.
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't|
|Title: World journal of surgery Volume: 36 ISSN: 1432-2323 ISO Abbreviation: World J Surg Publication Date: 2012 Oct|
|Created Date: 2012-10-11 Completed Date: 2013-04-01 Revised Date: 2013-07-12|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 7704052 Medline TA: World J Surg Country: United States|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 2341-8 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology & Metabolism, Maastricht University, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Aged, 80 and over
Intestinal Fistula / surgery*
Surgical Procedures, Operative / methods
Journal ID (nlm-ta): World J Surg
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): World J Surg
Publisher: Springer-Verlag, New York
© The Author(s) 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 6 Month: 6 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 6 Month: 6 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Month: 10 Year: 2012
Volume: 36 Issue: 10
First Page: 2341 Last Page: 2348
PubMed Id: 22669399
Publisher Id: 1663
|Guided Treatment Improves Outcome of Patients with Enterocutaneous Fistulas|
|Ruben G. J. Visschers1||
|Wim G. van Gemert1|
|Peter B. Soeters1|
|Steven W. M. Olde Damink13|
1Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology & Metabolism, Maastricht University, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
2Department of Methodology and Statistics and The School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands
3Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, and University College London, Gower Street, London, WC 1E 6BT UK
The treatment of patients with enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) has proven to be extremely difficult throughout the past decades [1–6]. A previous report by the surgical department of the Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC) showed that guided treatment of a consecutive series of 135 patients resulted in favorable outcome . Adherence to this guideline resulted in a closure rate of 87 %, mortality rate of 10 % , and a satisfactory quality of life . A low preoperative albumin concentration (<25 g/L) was related to increased postoperative mortality, and sepsis was the main cause of death . It was noticed that the restorative operation occasionally occurred before the predefined target period of convalescence of 6 weeks . Reasons for nonadherence to the protocol were not always possible to obtain because of the retrospective nature of our study. In an editorial comment, it was suggested that prolonging the duration of convalescence may result in increased spontaneous closure rate .
The importance of the length of convalescence has been stipulated in earlier reports. Many specialized institutes adhere to a minimal period ranging from 6 weeks to 6 months [3, 4, 9]. Nevertheless, the most optimal interval between the occurrence of the fistula and reoperation has not been convincingly established [10, 11].
The MUMC has continued guided treatment of patients with an ECF. Based on our own data , we specifically adhered to a minimal period of convalescence of 6 weeks, aimed to operate on patients with an albumin concentration >25 g/L, and treated sepsis more aggressively. We hypothesized that this would lead to improved spontaneous closure and postoperative outcome, and reduce mortality in patients with an ECF. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of the refined treatment guideline in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with an ECF. We registered reasons for nonadherence to the protocol. We studied the effect of period of convalescence on recurrence rate and postoperative mortality by using our retrospective  and current prospective cohort of ECF patients. The effects of the guideline on recurrence rate, spontaneous and operative closure, and mortality was evaluated and compared with the previous patient series .
The MUMC is a tertiary referral center for patients with an ECF. All patients with an ECF consecutively treated at our institute between 2006 and 2010 were prospectively monitored. Patients with esophageal, gastroduodenal, pancreatic, biliary, and perianal fistulas were excluded. Patients underwent guided treatment focusing on the control of sepsis, optimization of nutritional status, wound care, establishing fistula anatomy, timing of surgery, and surgical strategy (SOWATS-protocol) as described in detail previously (Table 1) . The most important adjustments from our previous retrospective evaluation included strict adherence to a minimal period of convalescence of 6 weeks, possibly allowing spontaneous closure in more patients, with the goal to perform surgery strictly when albumin levels are >25 g/L, and increased focus on controlling sepsis, because this was the main cause of death. Daily care and follow-up was guided by two surgeons (WG and SOD), a dietician, and a clinical nurse specialist. Patients were followed until March 2010 or death . Patients were considered fit for restorative surgery when sepsis was controlled, adequate nutrition provided, edema resolved, and when serum albumin concentration was at least >25 g/L with normalizing leukocyte count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (previously described in detail ). Sepsis was defined as fever, increased inflammatory parameters, decreased albumin concentration, positive fluid balance, edema, or organ failure in combination with suspected or documented infection .
Baseline variables were recorded, including age at the start of treatment (younger or older than 60 years), sex, primary disease (malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease or a miscellaneous group), cause (spontaneous or postsurgical), anatomy (small or large intestine), and output of the ECF (< or >500 mL/day), abdominal wall status (closed or defect), occurrence of a septic episode (yes or no), parenteral nutrition (PN: yes or no), and albumin concentration before restorative surgery (< or >25 g/L). Information about the restorative operation comprised duration of surgery (minutes), surgical technique (resection or no resection), and resorbable mesh insertion (yes or no). In case of closure of the abdominal wall with a double layer Vicryl mesh was used.
The primary endpoint was recurrence of the ECF after the restorative operation, defined as renewed post-restorative connection between the intestine and the skin that did not close spontaneously. Secondary endpoints included spontaneous and surgical closure and mortality. Results of this prospective patient series were compared with our previously described historical cohort. Both patient series were combined to study the relationship between period of convalescence and recurrence and mortality. Postoperative complications were scored according to the classification by Dindo et al. , reporting the highest score for each patient.
Differences were analyzed with the χ2 test for dichotomous parameters and analysed with the Mann–Whitney U test or Student’s t test, where appropriate, for continuous variables. The association between the duration of convalescence and recurrence of the ECF after elective surgery and postoperative mortality was determined with Cox proportional hazard analysis combining the prospective and historical patient cohort but still correct for database, i.e., differences between these prospective patient series and historical cohort. Proportional hazard assumption was checked with Schoenfeld residuals. Variables were checked for confounding and confirmed when more than a 10 % change of the hazard ratio occurred . Two-tailed p values ≤0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 15; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
In total, 79 patients were consecutively treated for ECF at the MUMC between 2006 and 2010 (Fig. 1; Table 2). Patients were followed until March 2010 or death with a median of 24 (range 2–55) months. Forty-three (54 %) patients were referred from other hospitals. The median age of the patients was 59 (range 22–81) years, and 44 (56 %) patients were male. The population mainly consisted of patients with malignancy (n = 32, 41 %) or inflammatory bowel disease (n = 14, 18 %). The majority of patients developed the ECF after abdominal surgery (n = 68, 86 %). The present prospective series consisted of more patients with malignancy, more referrals, more low-output fistulas, and more patients receiving parenteral nutrition compared with the historical patient series (Table 2).
The historical and prospective patient series were combined to analyze the relationship between duration of convalescence and outcome. Between 1990 and 2010, 214 patients were treated with an ECF. In total, 148 patients were operated electively after a median of 72 (range 4–374) days. Twenty-four patients (16 %) developed a recurrent fistula after elective surgery (Table 3). These patients had been operated after a median duration of convalescence of 53 (range 7–302) days, which was significantly lower than patients without a recurrence (median, 81 (range 4–374) days; p = 0.033). Recurrences developed after a median of 14 (range 2–319) days after closure of the first ECF (Fig. 1). Cox regression analysis showed that period of convalescence related significantly with recurrence of the ECF (hazard ratio (HR) 0.99; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.98–0.999; p = 0.04; Table 3). There were no confounding variables. Eleven patients (7.4 %) died postoperatively. Duration of convalescence was not related to postoperative mortality (HR 1.007; 95 % CI 0.996–1.014; p = 0.242). Costs were not higher with increased period of convalescence but did relate to recurrence. Patients with a recurrent fistula had a prolonged need for parenteral nutrition, increased number of diagnostic procedures, and operative interventions, which resulted in increased costs of total treatment €71,904 (standard error (SE) €9,274) versus €48,964 (SE €5,776) for patients with nonrecurrent ECF (p = 0.008).
Conservative treatment of the ECF was first designed to stabilize the patient by controlling sepsis, providing adequate nutritional support, and proper wound care.
Sepsis was diagnosed in 38 (48 %) patients, usually heralding the development of ECF. CT imaging proved the presence of an intra-abdominal abscess as the primary focus in 26 of these patients. Radiologically guided drainage was possible in 11 of these patients, whereas 15 patients required operative drainage. A central venous line infection was considered the primary source of sepsis in six patients and consequently needed replacement. Six patients had already developed abdominal sepsis in the referring hospital and received treatment there. Sepsis was controlled in almost all patients (92 %) except three who died due to uncontrollable sepsis despite CT-guided (n = 2) and operative drainage (n = 1). Additionally, 14 patients had no signs of sepsis but did have an intra-abdominal abscess of whom 13 underwent radiological drainage and 1 patient required surgical drainage. Eight patients were admitted to the intensive care for a median of 3 (range 1–60) days.
PN was supplemented from the onset of the ECF in 64 (81 %) patients for a median of 39 (range 7–230) days and a total of 2,888 PN days. Patients received omega-6 long chain fatty acids (Intralipid® 20 %, Fresenius Kabi N. V., Utrecht, NL) as standard lipid emulsion. In all cases, a tunneled double-lumen Hickman was preferably inserted into the internal jugular or subclavian vein.
A specialized nurse delivered wound care, particularly in patients with a high-output ECF and/or abdominal wall defect. A wound manager or fistula bag was used to collect fistula fluid in 33 patients. A drain with low suction residing in a wound manager achieved adequate wound care in 28 patients. A drain inserted into the fistula tract immediately removed the fistula fluid in 11 patients. Gauzes sufficed to collect fistula fluid in seven patients with low output ECFs and a closed abdominal wall.
Various techniques were used to diagnose the ECF and to specify the anatomical origin. In some patients, the intestine already could be partially observed in the abdominal wound or macroscopic analysis of fistula fluid was possible. Bilirubin and amylase concentrations in wound fluid were measured in 17 patients, radiological examination was performed in 24, and a combination of both was used in 38 patients. In ten of the aforementioned, the ECF was diagnosed after oral ingestion of methylene blue. In 14 patients, radiological examination was performed by fistulography and CT imaging in the other 48. Radiological imaging of the ECF and abdomen occurred in almost all patients undergoing a restorative operation (n = 45, 92 %), all ultimately by computed tomography.
Because of the high risk of postoperative complications, as shown after previous intra-abdominal operations, we refrained from performing a restorative operation in one patient, allowing the ECF to persist. An indwelling drain made the ECF properly manageable for this patient. Ultimately, conservative management achieved spontaneous closure in 23 (29 %) patients (compared with 19 patients (16 %) in the previous series, p = 0.023) after a median period of convalescence of 39 (range 7–163) days (Fig. 1) compared with median of 18 (range 7–49) days; p = 0.007). Conservative closure was achieved predominantly in patients with a closed abdominal wall and/or large bowel ECF.
Spontaneous closure was considered unlikely in 49 (62 %) patients (with abdominal wall defect and/or small bowel fistula). These patients underwent a restorative procedure after a median period of 101 (range 7–374) days (compared with a median of 53 (range 4–270) days in the historical group, p < 0.001; Fig. 1). One patient had to be operated on before the predefined target period of 6 weeks because of fecal peritonitis and uncontrollable sepsis (compared with 33 patients of 107 from the historical series, p < 0.001). Nine patients were operated on with an albumin concentration <25 g/L. In six of these patients, albumin concentration was stable for several weeks without any signs of sepsis. However, these patients were not thought to improve any further but were considered to be at risk of developing sepsis or becoming malnourished even further. Three patients with low preoperative albumin required emergency surgery because of fecal peritonitis (n = 2) and volvulus (n = 1). All patients with a low preoperative albumin concentration survived with successful closure of the ECF.
All patients underwent a one-stage restorative operation predominantly performed by the same team of surgeons (WG and SOD). The median duration of surgery was 260 (range 60–690) minutes. A complete adhesiolysis was performed in all patients. A fistulectomy with intestinal minimal segment resection (<5 cm) was performed in 15 patients, and an additional intestinal resection was performed in 34. Twenty-two patients received an absorbable mesh to close the abdominal wall. It was always possible to cover the anastomosis with healthy matrix (i.e., omentum and/or loops of bowel). An intra-abdominal drain was always left in situ temporarily (less than 48 h), and skin was always closed.
Eleven patients showed new signs of a fistula after a median of 8 (range 2–319) days after closure of the ECF, which resolved spontaneously in three. All eight (16 %) patients in whom the ECF recurred (similar percentage to historic control) were operated on again. Thereafter, four patients developed another ECF. One patient with severe Crohn’s disease developed three recurrences after which an enterectomy could not be avoided despite optimal medical treatment. Ultimately, the ECF remained closed in 47 (96 %) patients who underwent surgical restoration, leading to overall closure in 70 (89 %) patients.
Thirty-seven (76 %) patients developed a postoperative complication. Thirteen patients (26 %) only required medical or radiologically guided treatment, whereas 24 patients (49 %) required surgical intervention and/or needed intensive care. Two patients had a functional short bowel and remained dependant on PN after treatment.
Six (8 %) patients died during conservative treatment as a result of progressive sarcoma, Merkel cell tumor, cardiogenic shock (occluded coronary arteries), pancreatitis, and a complicated course after sepsis with pulmonary embolism and concurrent vascular insufficiency resulting in weaning problems and cachexia. The sixth patient suffered from cystic fibrosis and was initially treated for sepsis in our center but died after referral to a transplantation center due to uncontrollable sepsis. One patient required an emergency operation on day 120 because of an occlusion of the superior and inferior mesenteric artery and died 2 days postoperatively. One patient died in another hospital as a result of a pulmonary embolism 18 months after development of the second recurrence. Thus, two patients (4 %) died postoperatively, amounting to an overall mortality of the initial cohort of 10 %. In-hospital mortality was 6 (8 %) and 1-year mortality was 7 (9 %).
Adherence to a treatment guideline for patients with an ECF can lead to favorable outcome. Yet, considering these data, it appears that it is sometimes difficult to adhere to the protocol, e.g., when acute medical treatment is required, which stresses the importance of individual patient assessment. Patience before embarking on surgery allows increased spontaneous closure. Recurrence rate and mortality did not change significantly over time. However, postponing surgical treatment and allowing improvement of patient’s health status improves postoperative outcome as evidenced by a reduction in recurrence rate.
Low preoperative albumin concentrations have been associated with increased mortality [4, 6, 15]. Therefore, our goal was to operate on patients when albumin concentration was <25 g/L. However, three patients required an emergency operation because of acute sepsis as a result of fecal peritonitis. More importantly, six patients underwent a restorative operation with low albumin concentration without acute indication. Yet, these patients suffered from malignancies or severe Crohn’s disease, which impeded full recovery of their health status, including increase of albumin level [16, 17]. Therefore, these patients were considered at risk of developing infectious complications and becoming malnourished, despite optimal treatment. Consequently, the window of opportunity to operate on these patients was considered small, and ultimately, after a period of convalescence of 6 weeks, patients underwent a successful restorative operation.
The prospective series includes more patients with malignancy, more small-bowel fistulas, more patients receiving PN, and fewer patients with a high output fistula compared with our previous report. It must be considered that these changes have contributed to the differences in outcome as well. Unfortunately, this cohort is too small to perform a multivariable analysis.
Evaluation of patients with an ECF treated at the MUMC between 1990 and 2005 showed that we not always adhered to the minimal period of convalescence of 6 weeks, leaving less chance for spontaneous closure [4, 8]. It has become clear that spontaneous closure most likely occurs in a closed abdominal wall, warranting prolongation of the period of convalescence in these patients [4, 18, 19]. This prolongation has allowed the period during which spontaneous closure could occur to double, successfully increasing the spontaneous closure rate from 16 to 29 %. One should primarily aim for spontaneous closure of the ECF, thus avoiding surgery. This occurs most likely in patients with a closed abdomen, low output ECF, and an uncomplicated disease course [3, 4, 20].
Postoperative mortality was 4 % and compared well with most recent results reported by other specialist units [21, 22]. In contrast to what we expected, overall mortality rate remained 10 %, indicating a shift from postoperative to preoperative deaths. This suggests that preoperative selection criteria have been adequate but that there is a group of patients who ultimately succumb to the combined stress of their primary disease and ECF, and in whom a restorative operation will offer no solution, neither early nor late. This would imply that we are reaching the limits of our possibilities to cure certain patients with an ECF. Although the number of patients studied is small, it can be suggested that a more aggressive approach to abdominal sepsis as shown in this prospective series results in adequate control. Subsequently 3 of 8 patients died from sepsis, whereas it had been 10 of 13 in the historical series. Future studies should put more emphasis on the variables related with development of the ECF, providing possible options for prevention.
Because of the difficulty and high risk of operative treatment of the ECF, nonoperative options have been explored to achieve definitive closure. Although some have advocated the use of a vacuum-assisted closure device for open abdominal treatment of ECF , it has been suggested recently by Fisher that this technique can be counterproductive, because it might induce new fistulas that seem to have a higher mortality . The use of low-vacuum suction devices, as used for patients in the present study, offers a good tool to collect fistula fluid, although it did not induce spontaneous closure, nor did we see renewed fistulization. Fibrin glue has been introduced for the treatment of perianal fistulas. Although it is minimally invasive and easy to use, it is associated with a high recurrence rate in patients with perianal fistulas . Avalos-Gonzalez et al.  studied a fibrin sealant in patients with low-output gastrointestinal fistulas, showing increased closure time without increase in spontaneous closure, although additional studies remain imperative. Somatostin and its analogues have shown no significant increase in spontaneous closure [27, 28]. To conclude, the use of a TNF-alpha inhibitor, infliximab, also has been shown to be advantageous for closure ECFs in patients with Crohn’s disease . The effect of this drug in non-Crohn’s ECF remains to be determined.
In conclusion, standardized treatment of ECF patients achieves good results. Prolongation of the period of convalescence is associated with increased spontaneous closure and a reduced recurrence rate after surgery. Although overall mortality has remained stable, postoperative mortality seems to be reduced, implying an improved preoperative screening. Future studies should focus on the prevention of fistula development.
The authors thank Mrs. Christel Claessen (nutrition nurse) and Mrs. Esther van den Hogen, MSc (dietician), both working at the Maastricht University Medical Centre, for their dedicated care for the ECF patients. Steven W. M. Olde Damink and Ruben G. J. Visschers were supported by grants from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZONMW Clinical Fellow nr 907-06-177 and ZONMW AGIKO nr 920-03-537, respectively).
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
|1..||Scott NA,Leinhardt DJ,O’Hanrahan T,et al. Spectrum of intestinal failure in a specialised unitLancetYear: 199133747147310.1016/0140-6736(91)93403-V1671480|
|2..||Soeters PB,Ebeid AM,Fischer JE. Review of 404 patients with gastrointestinal fistulas. Impact of parenteral nutritionAnn SurgYear: 197919018920210.1097/00000658-197908000-00012111638|
|3..||Mawdsley JE,Hollington P,Bassett P,et al. An analysis of predictive factors for healing and mortality in patients with enterocutaneous fistulasAliment Pharmacol TherYear: 2008281111112110.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03819.x18671774|
|4..||Visschers RG,Olde Damink SW,Winkens B,et al. Treatment strategies in 135 consecutive patients with enterocutaneous fistulasWorld J SurgYear: 20083244545310.1007/s00268-007-9371-118175171|
|5..||Chamberlain RS,Kaufman HL,Danforth DN. Enterocutaneous fistula in cancer patients: etiology, management, outcome, and impact on further treatmentAm SurgYear: 199864120412119843347|
|6..||Lu CY,Wu DC,Wu IC,et al. Serum albumin level in the management of postoperative enteric fistula for gastrointestinal cancer patientsJ Investig SurgYear: 200821253210.1080/0894193070183395918197531|
|7..||Visschers RG,Olde Damink SW,Bekkum M,et al. Health-related quality of life in patients treated for enterocutaneous fistulaBr J SurgYear: 2008951280128610.1002/bjs.632618763244|
|8..||Schein M. What’s new in postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas?World J SurgYear: 20083233633810.1007/s00268-007-9411-x18235985|
|9..||Martinez JL,Luque-de-Leon E,Mier J,et al. Systematic management of postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas: factors related to outcomesWorld J SurgYear: 20083243644310.1007/s00268-007-9304-z18057983|
|10..||Lynch AC,Delaney CP,Senagore AJ,et al. Clinical outcome and factors predictive of recurrence after enterocutaneous fistula surgeryAnn SurgYear: 200424082583110.1097/01.sla.0000143895.17811.e315492564|
|11..||Brenner M,Clayton JL,Tillou A,et al. Risk factors for recurrence after repair of enterocutaneous fistulaArch SurgYear: 200914450050510.1001/archsurg.2009.6619528379|
|12..||Levy MM,Fink MP,Marshall JC,et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conferenceCrit Care MedYear: 2003311250125610.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B12682500|
|13..||Dindo D,Demartines N,Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a surveyAnn SurgYear: 200424020521310.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae15273542|
|14..||Maldonado G,Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategiesAm J EpidemiolYear: 19931389239368256780|
|15..||Altomare DF,Serio G,Pannarale OC,et al. Prediction of mortality by logistic regression analysis in patients with postoperative enterocutaneous fistulaeBr J SurgYear: 19907745045310.1002/bjs.18007704282340398|
|16..||Cellier C,Sahmoud T,Froguel E,et al. Correlations between clinical activity, endoscopic severity, and biological parameters in colonic or ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. A prospective multicentre study of 121 cases. The Groupe d’Etudes Therapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires DigestivesGutYear: 19943523123510.1136/gut.35.2.2317508411|
|17..||Ishizuka M,Nagata H,Takagi K,et al. Inflammation-based prognostic score is a novel predictor of postoperative outcome in patients with colorectal cancerAnn SurgYear: 20072461047105110.1097/SLA.0b013e318145417118043109|
|18..||Sitges-Serra A,Jaurrieta E,Sitges-Creus A. Management of postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas: the roles of parenteral nutrition and surgeryBr J SurgYear: 19826914715010.1002/bjs.18006903106802216|
|19..||Schein M,Decker GA. Postoperative external alimentary tract fistulasAm J SurgYear: 199116143543810.1016/0002-9610(91)91107-T1827960|
|20..||Campos AC,Andrade DF,Campos GM,et al. A multivariate model to determine prognostic factors in gastrointestinal fistulasJ Am Coll SurgYear: 199918848349010.1016/S1072-7515(99)00038-110235575|
|21..||Connolly PT,Teubner A,Lees NP,et al. Outcome of reconstructive surgery for intestinal fistula in the open abdomenAnn SurgYear: 200824744044410.1097/SLA.0b013e3181612c9918376187|
|22..||Datta V,Engledow A,Chan S,et al. The management of enterocutaneous fistula in a regional unit in the United Kingdom: a prospective studyDis Colon RectumYear: 20105319219910.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b4c34a20087095|
|23..||Goverman J,Yelon JA,Platz JJ,et al. The “Fistula VAC”: a technique for management of enterocutaneous fistulae arising within the open abdomen: report of 5 casesJ TraumaYear: 20066042843110.1097/01.ta.0000203588.66012.c416508512|
|24..||Fischer JE. A cautionary note: the use of vacuum-assisted closure systems in the treatment of gastrointestinal cutaneous fistula may be associated with higher mortality from subsequent fistula developmentAm J SurgYear: 20081961210.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.00118355795|
|25..||Hagen SJ,Baeten CG,Soeters PB,Gemert WG. Staged mucosal advancement flap versus staged fibrin sealant in the treatment of complex perianal fistulasGastroenterol Res PractYear: 2011201118635021808642|
|26..||Avalos-Gonzalez J,Portilla-deBuen E,Leal-Cortes CA,et al. Reduction of the closure time of postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas with fibrin sealantWorld J GastroenterolYear: 2010162793280010.3748/wjg.v16.i22.279320533600|
|27..||Gayral F,Campion JP,Regimbeau JM,et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the efficacy of lanreotide 30 mg PR in the treatment of pancreatic and enterocutaneous fistulaeAnn SurgYear: 200925087287710.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2489f19953707|
|28..||Sancho JJ,Costanzo J,Nubiola P,et al. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of early octreotide in patients with postoperative enterocutaneous fistulaBr J SurgYear: 19958263864110.1002/bjs.18008205217613936|
|29..||Present DH,Rutgeerts P,Targan S,et al. Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s diseaseN Engl J MedYear: 19993401398140510.1056/NEJM19990506340180410228190|
[Figure ID: Fig1]
Flow chart of patients treated for their ECF. *Deceased 2 days after operative closure of the ECF, $deceased 18 months after development of the third ECF, †enterectomy and stoma of proximal jejunum
Treatment strategy in patients with an enterocutaneous fistula
|Sepsis control||Signs of sepsis|
|Radiological drainage of abscess|
|Relaparotomy on demand (minimally) invasive|
|Consider other infectious foci; intravenous line, urinary tract, pulmonary|
|Optimization of nutritional status||Rehydration and electrolyte supplementation|
|Enteral nutrition is preferred|
|Parenteral nutrition to meet caloric requirements, small bowel ECF|
|Allow 500 mL/day clear liquids orally|
|Wound care||Gauzes for low output ECF|
|Collect ECF fluid with bag (wound manager/fistula bag), pastes to protect the skin|
|Draining excessive ECF fluid with sump-suction|
|Proton pump inhibitors|
|Anatomy of the ECF||Macroscopic|
|Biochemical analysis of ECF fluid (bilirubin and amylase)|
|Preoperatively; fistulography or contrast computed tomography: length of intestine and localization of origin of ECF, stenosis, obstruction and fluid collection|
|Timing of surgery||Clinically stable (above), psychologically willing to undergo surgery|
|Albumin >25 g/L|
|Period of convalescence >6 weeks|
|Surgical strategy||One-stage procedure|
|Wedge excision or intestinal resection|
|Limit number of anastomoses to minimum|
|Cover sutures with healthy viable tissue|
|Keep away from compromised area|
Characteristics of patients ECF
|n (%)||n (%)|
|<60||37 (47)||67 (50)||0.78|
|≥60||42 (53)||68 (50)|
|Male||35 (44)||65 (48)||0.67|
|Female||44 (56)||70 (52)|
|Malignancy||32 (41)||30 (22)||0.01|
|IBD||14 (18)||24 (18)|
|Other||33 (42)||81 (60)|
|Source of referral|
|MUMC||36 (46)||82 (61)||0.03|
|Other hospital||43 (54)||53 (39)|
|Cause of fistula|
|Spontaneous||11 (14)||16 (12)||0.62|
|Postoperative||68 (86)||119 (88)|
|Anatomy of fistula†|
|Small bowel||67 (85)||104 (80)||0.46|
|Large bowel||12 (15)||26 (20)|
|Output of fistula (mL/day)†|
|<500||54 (68)||56 (48)||0.005|
|≥500||25 (32)||61 (52)|
|Closed||46 (58)||82 (61)||0.77|
|Defect||33 (42)||53 (39)|
|No||41 (52)||62 (46)||0.48|
|Yes||38 (48)||73 (54)|
|No||15 (19)||53 (39)||0.002|
|Yes||64 (81)||82 (61)|
|Preoperative albumin (g/L)a|
|<25||9 (18)||25 (29)||0.22|
|≥25||40 (82)||62 (71)|
aDetermined in 49 patients undergoing a restorative operation in the prospective series and 97 in the historical series
†Numbers do not add up to total values as a result of missing values
Cox regression analysis of recurrence rate of the enterocutaneous fistula
|Characteristic||Total||Patients with recurrence (%)||HR (95 % CI)||p Value|
|≥60||76||12 (16)||0.879 (0.394–1.963)|
|Male||67||8 (12)||0.532 (0.227–1.247)|
|IBD||27||5 (19)||0.916 (0.4–2.775)||0.92|
|Other||79||12 (15)||0.683 (0.397–4.094)||0.68|
|Cause of fistula|
|Postoperative||128||23 (18)||4.184 (0.565–30.989)|
|Source of referral|
|Other hospital||72||12 (17)||1||0.98|
|MUMC||76||12 (18)||0.989 (0.443–2.207)|
|Anatomy of fistulaa|
|Small bowel||120||20 (17)||1||0.81|
|Large bowel||26||4 (15)||1.144 (0.384–3.409)|
|Output of fistula (mL/day)a|
|≥500||60||11 (18)||1.807 (0.724–4.509)|
|Defect||68||13 (19)||1.395 (0.624–3.118)|
|Yes||70||12 (17)||1.335 (0.592–3.008)|
|Yes||87||16 (18)||1.146 (0.483–2.716)|
|Preoperative albumin (g/L)a|
|≥25||99||13 (13)||0.467 (0.183–1.187)|
|Period of convalescence (days)|
Univariate Cox regression analysis
IBD inflammatory bowel disease
aNumbers do not add up to total values as a result of missing values
Previous Document: Microsatellite Instability Is Associated With a Better Prognosis for Gastric Cancer Patients After C...
Next Document: Wound Healing after Open Appendectomies in Adult Patients: A Prospective, Randomised Trial Comparing...