Document Detail

Governing decentralization in health care under tough budget constraint: what can we learn from the Italian experience?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19058869     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
In many European countries, since the World War II, there has been a trend towards decentralization of health policy to lower levels of governments, while more recently there have been re-centralization processes. Whether re-centralization will be the new paradigm of European health policy or not is difficult to say. In the Italian National Health Service (SSN) decentralization raised two related questions that might be interesting for the international debate on decentralization in health care: (a) what sort of regulatory framework and institutional balances are required to govern decentralization in health care in a heterogeneous country under tough budget constraints? (b) how can it be ensured that the most advanced parts of the country remain committed to solidarity, supporting the weakest ones? To address these questions this article describes the recent trends in SSN funding and expenditure, it reviews the strategy adopted by the Italian government for governing the decentralization process and discusses the findings to draw policy conclusions. The main lessons emerging from this experience are that: (1) when the differences in administrative and policy skills, in socio-economic standards and social capital are wide, decentralization may lead to undesirable divergent evolution paths; (2) even in decentralized systems, the role of the Central government can be very important to contain health expenditure; (3) a strong governance of the Central government may help and not hinder the enforcement of decentralization; and (4) supporting the weakest Regions and maintaining inter-regional solidarity is hard but possible. In Italy, despite an increasing role of the Central government in steering the SSN, the pattern of regional decentralization of health sector decision making does not seem at risk. Nevertheless, the Italian case confirms the complexity of decentralization and re-centralization processes that sometimes can be paradoxically reinforcing each other.
Fabrizio Tediosi; Stefania Gabriele; Francesco Longo
Related Documents :
3278989 - Toward a transformation of health and aging policy.
20191439 - transnational solidarity? cross-border heath-care in the european union
10302859 - American health policy in the year 2000.
11307569 - "managing" the poor: neoliberalism, medicaid hmos and the triumph of consumerism among ...
10161819 - Federal health policy and group practices: the double-edged sword.
9153989 - 'health-for-all' in the twenty-first century: a global perspective.
16100929 - Diagnostic criteria and staging of hand-arm vibration syndrome in the united kingdom.
18322989 - Comparison of internal and external responsiveness of the generic medical outcome study...
22931069 - Epidemiology and etiology of substance use among american indians and alaska natives: r...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2008-12-05
Journal Detail:
Title:  Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)     Volume:  90     ISSN:  0168-8510     ISO Abbreviation:  Health Policy     Publication Date:  2009 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-04-13     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8409431     Medline TA:  Health Policy     Country:  Ireland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  303-12     Citation Subset:  H    
Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Survival of stress exposed Campylobacter jejuni in the murine macrophage J774 cell line.
Next Document:  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification in surgical resected Japanese lung cancer.