Document Detail


General practitioners and clinical guidelines: a survey of knowledge, use and beliefs.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  8917869     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are being developed for a variety of reasons. To date, there has been little investigation of the perspectives of those who are recommended to use them. AIM: The survey reported here set out to investigate how familiar general practitioners are with a range of published guidelines, to assess whether they have used them, and to describe their attitudes to the guidelines and the methods of implementing them. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 559 general practitioners in the North and Yorkshire region in March 1995. Questions were organized around the topics of: knowledge; use; practice change; beliefs; pressure felt to use the guidelines; and methods of implementation. Basic classificatory data on gender; year of qualification; partnership and fundholding status were also collected. RESULTS: Replies were received from 300 doctors (54%). Knowledge and use of the three selected guidelines varied, but was generally towards the 'high' end of the scale. Doctors showed a high degree of homogeneity in their attitudes to guidelines, which were generally positive. Only single-handed practitioners varied from this pattern of responses. Most of the pressure to use the guidelines was felt to come from the Department of Health, and the least pressure from patients. Doctors felt that the methods of implementation that involved them in educational events and discussion with colleagues were most likely to have an impact on them. CONCLUSION: General practitioners are receptive to guideline initiatives, and their views are in line with existing or proposed implementation strategies. More investigation of the concept of 'use' is needed.
Authors:
J Newton; D Knight; G Woolhead
Related Documents :
20086979 - Practice guidelines: a positive perspective.
16779019 - A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations.
19748089 - Embryo transfer practices in the united states: a survey of clinics registered with the...
17514559 - Clinical photography in wound management.
18284519 - Guidelines for the management of venous leg ulcers: a gap analysis.
11899139 - Guidelines for care of contact dermatitis.
17019189 - Anesthesia for tracheal and endobronchial interventions.
12214999 - Managerial and financial implications of major dairy farm expansions in michigan and wi...
23298199 - Prosthetic conformer as a pressure device in the prophylactic management of postsurgica...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners     Volume:  46     ISSN:  0960-1643     ISO Abbreviation:  Br J Gen Pract     Publication Date:  1996 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1996-12-10     Completed Date:  1996-12-10     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9005323     Medline TA:  Br J Gen Pract     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  513-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Division of Employment Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Attitude of Health Personnel
Family Practice*
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Practice Guidelines as Topic*
Questionnaires
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The effects of caring for a spouse with Parkinson's disease on social, psychological and physical we...
Next Document:  Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome.