|General considerations on posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations (clinics, imaging and therapy). Actual concepts and literature review.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 20302194 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|The posterior fossa arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is uncommon and different from other intracranial AVM in its natural history, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and other features. Authors present a review of the actual procedures of diagnosis and treatment in the field of infratentorial cerebral arterio-venous malformations, based on the actual literature data. Pre-therapeutic considerations, such as clinical presentation and diagnostic evaluation, are initially discussed because they are crucial in choosing the optimal treatment. Posterior fossa AVMs merit multimodality intervention when feasible in most cases because of their higher risk of rupture and higher potential of morbidity and mortality. In addition, we present two significant cases treated in our department.|
|Angela Neacsu; A V Ciurea|
Related Documents :
|21392004 - So-called spontaneous human combustion.
20587374 - The pancreatic stump after pancreatoduodenectomy: the "achille's heel" revisited...
8960084 - Schistosomiasis as a cause of rectovaginal fistula: a brief case report.
6784464 - Alternate bleeding sites in suspected graft-enteric fistula.
22877834 - Intraosseous access in the prehospital setting: literature review.
7358384 - Tertiary trisomy (22q11q),47,+der(22),t(11;22).
|Type: Journal Article; Review|
|Title: Journal of medicine and life Volume: 3 ISSN: 1844-122X ISO Abbreviation: J Med Life Publication Date: 2010 Jan-Mar|
|Created Date: 2010-03-22 Completed Date: 2010-04-08 Revised Date: 2013-05-29|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101477617 Medline TA: J Med Life Country: Romania|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 26-35 Citation Subset: IM|
|1st Neurosurgical Clinic, Bagdasar-Arseni Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Cranial Fossa, Posterior
Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations / diagnosis, therapy*
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Med Life
Journal ID (publisher-id): JMedLife
Publisher: Carol Davila University Press, Romania
©Carol Davila University Press
Received Day: 01 Month: 10 Year: 2009
Accepted Day: 10 Month: 1 Year: 2010
Print publication date: Day: 15 Month: 2 Year: 2010
Electronic publication date: Day: 25 Month: 2 Year: 2010
Volume: 3 Issue: 1
First Page: 26 Last Page: 35
PubMed Id: 20302194
Publisher Id: JMedLife-03-26
|General considerations on posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations (clinics, imaging and therapy)|
|1st Neurosurgical Clinic, ‘Bagdasar–Arseni’ Clinical Hospital, BucharestRomania
|Correspondence: Correspondence to:: A. V. Ciurea, M.D Ph.D,
10–12 Berceni Street, District 4, Bucharest, Romania
Clingenstein  first reported Infratentorial arteriovenous malformations as a clinical entity in 1908, and, Olivecrona and Rives have reported the first successful resection of a posterior fossa AVM in 1932 [24 ].
Although relatively rare lesions, infratentorial AVMs caused a great interest within the neurosurgical community. Significant efforts have been made for a better understanding of anatomic and hemodynamic complexity of these lesions, to facilitate more effective treatment strategies.
Despite the marked emergence of microsurgical techniques, which have become more refined in the last half century, excision of posterior fossa AVMs is a formidable quest. The difficulty of treatment of these lesions, in terms of surgery, lies in the need for preservation of critical neurovascular structures within or around the brainstem and cerebrum, and the need for preservation of cranial nerve and deep brainstem nuclei, plus technical difficulties caused by the narrow surgical corridor, especially for deep lesions [28, 31,35]. Accumulating experience with the treatment of posterior fossa AVMs and the incorporation of multimodality approaches, including radiosurgery, endovascular therapy, and improved microsurgical techniques, have significantly contributed to continuously improving outcomes [23,34].
Success of treatment mainly depends on advanced medical technology, namely: digital subtraction angiography, MRI angiography, neuroradiologic interventional procedures, intraoperative monitoring, neuronavigation, neuroanesthesia, with controlled hypothermia, the use of neurosurgical microinstruments, and the existence of a radiosurgical department.
Natural History. Posterior fossa AVMs account for only 5–7% of all intracranial AVMs. With the advances of modern neuroimaging, the frequency rate of posterior fossa AVMs grew to 10–15% [1,2 ,6,7]. The incidence of posterior fossa AVMs at autopsy is even higher, reaching 20% of all intracranial AVMs.
Infratentorial AVMs may be located within cerebellum, brainstem or both. McCormick  has published a study of 104 cases of infratentorial AVMs, in which 69 were located within the brainstem, most commonly in the ponts. Batjer and Samson  showed that two thirds of the posterior fossa AVMs are located within the cerebellum, 20% in the brainstem and 20% in both cerebellum and brainstem.
Bleeding is the most common form of presentation of posterior fossa AVMs [3,10, 21,38]. In most clinical series the incidence of subarachnoid or intraparenchimatal bleeding was reported to be between 75 and 92% [13,25 ,26]. Recent studies have suggested that brainstem AVMs presentation is less common with bleeding than cerebellum AVMs. Accumulating data have demonstrated an independent association of infratentorial AVM location and hemorrhagic presentation [13,26, 41]. This is alarming in light of the considerably greater morbidity and mortality associated with posterior fossa AVM rupture . Fortunately, with accumulating surgical experience and the cultivation of multimodality AVM therapy, therapeutic success continues to improve . Posterior fossa AVMs were frequently associated with aneurysms (25%) on the feeding arterial pedicles of the nidus and were often the cause of hemorrhage [20,22, 39].
Progressive neurological deficits (including those secondary to mass effect, ischemia, and hydrocephalus) were the second most common mode of presentation [37 ]. Cranial nerve palsies, often affecting the trigeminal nerve, have been associated with lesions of the cerebellopontine angle and brain stem . Headache, a relatively non–specific symptom, can occur in as many as 10% of the patients diagnosed with unruptured AVMs . At the time of detection, at least 15% of people affected by AVMs are asymptomatic . The incidence of asymptomatic posterior fossa AVMs may rise in the future with the increasing use of advanced neuroimaging modalities for nonspecific symptomatology 
Complete neuroradiological evaluation of AVMs includes cerebral computer tomography (CT) with contrast administration, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and angio–MRI, cerebral angiography with substraction.
Because the posterior fossa AVMs present with acute symptoms, the initial diagnostic test is usually computer tomography (CT) scan. Brain CT–scan is a first diagnostic neuroimaging of either the AVM itself, of intraparenchimatal hematoma secondary to malformation rupture, or subarachnoid or intraventricular bleeding. Brain CT–scan, with or without contrast is the screening procedure of unruptured posterior fossa AVMs: grouped serpentine veins and dilated arteries, and, sometimes, large drainage veins may be revealed, elements that highly suggest the diagnosis of AVM. CT–scan may provide information regarding location, extent and size of the AVM, but the value of CT–scan is limited regarding diagnosis and anatomical evaluation of AVM, when compared to angiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with angio–MRI allows specific diagnosis in most cases with AVMs. Information provided by MRI exam supplement those provided by angiography, improving the tridimensional definition of AVM.
Angio–MRI allows multiplanar evaluation of the AVM, but does not identify all feeding arteries and drainage veins of the complex AVMs . In order to identify feeding arteries, selective arterial angio–MRI for a single arterial branch can be used to evaluate drainage veins MRI venography. Moreover, sensory ‘phase contrast ’ technique may be associated and can be used to reveal slow flow. Angio–IRM is useful (together with conventional MRI, which more accurately reveals the AVM topography) in planning surgical treatment, embolization or irradiation with gamma–knife of the AVM, however, it is insufficient.
Posterior fossa AVM functional MRI , helps to a more precise delineation of target volume for radiosurgery (although it is more useful in supratentorial lesions compared to subtentorial ones). Functional MRI also allows study of brain functions reorganization and postoperative recovery.
Gold–standard diagnosis is represented by angiography, and if necessary, stereo–angiography. It is the most useful and sensitive method to identify and evaluate the AVMs (provides the richest information regarding nidus characteristics, feeding and drainage vessels), and to highlight the operatory planning of the AVM. All patients must undergo formal six–vessel catheter angiography for accurate characterization of the anatomy and hemodynamics of the AVM. In particular, all feeding arteries and draining veins must be diligently identified preoperatively, in the preparation for a complete resection. High– resolution magnification studies are required for both VAs, both internal carotid arteries, and both external carotid arteries, because approximately 10% of infratentorial AVMs are fed by one or both external carotid arteries [27, 31,32]. No other investigation cannot replace conventional DSA angiography in therapeutic decision.
Optionally, exploration of cerebral hemodynamics can be done by: positron emission tomography (PET) or SPECT.
Intraoperative ultrasonography is useful to highlight any remaining portion of the AVM, but also to test the functionality of the remaining blood circulation after cliping.
The main goal of treatment is complete cure of the lesion and prevents the risk of bleeding with restoring normal brain flow. It is considered that the complete absence of AVM on postoperative angiography eliminates the risk of secondary hemorrhage.
The choice of treatment for patients should consider risks attendant to each therapeutic option, as well as the natural history of the individual patient [18 ]. Current treatment methods include radiosurgery, open surgery, endovascular embolization and combination of them. Occasionally, patients with asymptomatic AVMs may not be treated but should be followed clinically on an annual or semiannual basis [34 ]. Treatment should be individualized for each patient and should be undergone by a multidisciplinary team.
Most neurosurgeons prefer to leave the small, unruptured malformations, located in eloquent areas or in elderly patients, for radiosurgery. AVMs under 3 cm in diameter, located in non– eloquent areas are fit for surgery. Small, ruptured AVMs, located in eloquent areas, which have caused neurological deficits, are treated with open surgery.
Surgery for medium and large AVMs depends on a series of objective factors mentioned above but also on subjective factors (department's tradition, neurosurgeon's experience, family desire, etc.)
Ruptured AVMs with hematomas, prone to causing brain herniation, require emergent surgery, as a first step, in order to evacuate the hematoma, the angiography and the curative surgery are done later.
Patients with major deficits, which occurred after rupture of malformations, but without imminent herniation can be treated conservatively, until neurological stabilizing, followed by reevaluation and surgery.
Patients with large, unruptured, oligosymptomatic AVMs, located in eloquent areas, carrying particularly high–risk for surgery are treated conservatively and followed–up.
With the sole exception of very small AVMs, embolization is beneficial before surgical treatment of most AVMs in the posterior fossa.
Each of the above mentioned methods have several limitations:
- surgery cannot resolve deep anatomical lesions or patients presenting with altered neurological status.
- radiosurgery has a high rate of complications in AVMs larger than 3cm.
- embolization is not a radical cure, except for 5–10% of cases, but it can proceed in an open surgery in giant AVMs, or radiosurgery; it can treat AVM–associated aneurysms and arteriovenous fistulae from plexiform malformations.
Analysis of late results of different treatment combinations is demanding and requires long–term angiography: embolization carries the risk of revascularization and radiosurgery has a delayed action.
The next three steps must be rigorously taken when evaluating each case:
- Comparisons between treatment risks and risk required by the natural history of disease
- Evaluation of the patients' age, comorbidities, pregnancy in women, assessing the location of the lesion with extensive anatomical details including venous drainage, which are the guiding factors for therapy selection.
- Comparison of risk factors between different procedures or combinations of procedures.
Therapeutic decision requires a thorough knowledge of the risks and benefits of different options, in such a way that the patient receives the best choice.
Choosing the optimal treatment depends on the clinical condition, size, location and angio–architecture of the AVM, patient's age, comorbidities, and treatment possibilities of the team. The treatment method chosen must have a lower risk than the natural history of the disease, involving a bleeding rate of 6–15% per year for posterior fossa AVMs [3,8,9,11,42].
Angiography allows assessment of AVM's angio–architecture and hemodynamic situation entirely. Even medium AVMs (3–6 cm) can have multiple compartments requiring supraselective angiography necessary to adopt optimal intraoperative strategy.
It is important to specify: the presence of high flow, plexiform components, multiple feeding arteries, presence of lenticulostriat feeding arteries, which must be preserved during surgery, presence of aneurysms located into the nidus or on feeding arteries, venous drainage, which can sometimes flow extensively through the skull, endangering the craniotomy.
Martin–Spetzler scale  was adopted in 1986 and it is a widely used therapeutical decision–making tool which gives information about the risk assessment of postoperative neurological deficit in AMVs. [Table 1]
The grading of AVM is given by the sum of points assigned for size, eloquence and venous drainage.
The higher the malformation, the higher the intraoperative risks are, hyperperfusion syndromes occur more frequently and the risk of postoperative deterioration becomes more serious.
The risk of postoperative neurological deficits for small lesions is 5.1%, for medium AVMs is 21.5% and for large ones it reaches 40%. Deep venous drainage, adds a plus of 20% in permanent neurological deficits.
It is generally considered that patients with AVMs of grades Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ benefit from surgical resection and those with grades Ⅳ and Ⅴ have major risk of permanent neurological deficits. Grade Ⅵ patients are considered inoperable.
Arteriovenous malformations of the infratentorial space pose a unique technical challenge for neurovascular surgeons. Until recently, the surgical risk of resection of arteriovenous malformations in this location was considered unacceptable. However, despite the increasing experience and the refinements in surgical and anesthetic techniques, procedures once considered to court disaster can now be achieved with acceptable morbidity rates [4,21]. Successful removal of posterior fossa AVMs requires an intimate knowledge of the architecture of the malformations, the surrounding anatomical structures, and their involved relationships .
Because most posterior fossa AVMs present with intraparenchymal hemorrhage, the initial surgical focus is directed to hematoma removal and treatment of any acute mass effect or hydrocephalus, if it is present. When feasible, however, definitive resection of the AVM should be deferred for 4 to 6 weeks. In this manner, delayed extirpation often ensures sufficient time for brain swelling to diminish and the hematoma to liquefy, features that greatly facilitate ultimate AVM excision. Late treatment is also beneficial in that associated cerebral aneurysms, which might initially have been obscured by intraparenchymal hemorrhage on the first angiogram, and could later be clearly visualized after a brief period of quiescent. On rare occasions, a patient who needs early hematoma evacuation may require complete AVM resection during the same operation because of intraoperative hemorrhage. In such a situation, every effort is made to preserve all viable cerebellar tissue as well as alleviate any undue mass effect on the brainstem.
Basic principles for surgical treatment of posterior fossa AVMs are similar to those for treatment of AVMs with any other intracranial location . The principles of optimal patients positioning, adequate bony exposure, extensive dural opening, meticulous attention to sharp microdissection, and compulsive hemostasis are critically important during surgical resection of posterior fossa AVMs [4,16].
There are neurosurgeons who prefer to operate all types of AVMs. Most neurosurgeons recommend surgery with resection of infratentorial AVMs, as the treatment of choice (excluding patients with comorbidities, that increased surgical risk of patients over 70 years old), due to the high morbidity associated with bleeding in the posterior fossa [34,38]. With the help of modern microsurgical instruments, the modern means of neuroprotective neuroanesthesia (heart stopping and extracorporeal circulation, deep hypothermia with the central body temperature of 15 degrees Celsius for a maximum period of time of 50 minutes of work), MAV located in cerebellum, subarachnoid cisterns, and pial surfaces of the brainstem may be successfully treated surgically with excellent results in most cases.[27,34].However, in certain situations, resection carries an unacceptable risk of injury to the patient. Contraindications of surgical removal include brainstem AVMs that do not present to the pial surface, cerebellar AVMs that involve the deep cerebellar nuclei, poor neurological or medical condition of the patient, and advanced age. [Fig 1]
The goal of embolization is to permanently reduce the size of malformations and abnormal blood flow thereby, reducing the incidence of secondary bleeding, and favoring other curative procedures, surgical or radiosurgical, with minimum risks for the patient.
Current indications for embolization can be divided into presurgical embolization in large or giant cortical AVMs and embolization before radiosurgical intervention to reduce nidus size. In addition, palliative embolization may be used in large nonsurgical or nonradiosurgical AVMs in patients presenting with progressive neurological deficit secondary to high flow or venous hypertension.
Many posterior fossa AVMs can be treated with preoperative endovascular embolization to decrease the size and morphology of the AVM. Embolization is often completed in several stages to minimize the risk of breakthrough bleeding that can occur when a large volume of an AVM is embolized in a single session .
Except for very small AVMs, embolization before surgery is beneficial in the vast majority of posterior fossa AVMs. Technical progress in endovascular therapy allows relatively easy catheterization of feeding arteries, although the widespread use of aggressive embolization increased general mobidity [5,29]. In a series of 150 patients with embolization of intracranial AVMs, Wikholm et al. reported a mortality rate of 1.3% and a rate of severe and moderate complication of 6.7% and 15.3%, respectively .
Because embolization is an adjunct to surgical resection of the lesion, embolization should be primary focused on various large feeding arteries or arteries difficult to be found early during surgery. In large cerebellar AVMs the feeding arteries come from PICA. Preoperative embolization of these arteries was shown to lower blood flow through the nidus. Because PICA is relatively quickly exposed during surgery, proximal embolization of PICA is not needed, because of the high risk of cerebellum or brainstem stoke.
Feeding arteries from ventricular branches of AICA are difficult to expose during surgery in any posterior fossa approach, therefore preoperative embolization of these arteries is helpful.
Embolization of feeding arteries from SCA may be indicated if SCA is dilated by increasing blood flow and it is the source of significant feeding arteries. If feeding arteries from SCA are small, it is difficult or impossible to selectively catheterize these vessels. In these conditions, proximal embolization of SCA should be avoided because of the risk of cerebellar stroke. Feeding arteries from distal SCA can be addressed surgically adjacent to the nidus during surgical resection of the AVM. Venous drainage of the AVM in this location usually goes to the galenic system through precentral cerebellar veins, and preoperative embolization of branches from SCA may facilitate surgical dissection of the tentorial part of the cerebellum.
Preoperative embolization has no significant utility in the treatment of brainstem AVMs due to the risk of brainstem stroke.
Stereotactic radiosurgery has become an important treatment technique for the management of cerebral AVMs. The purpose of radiosurgery is to irradiate the blood vessels of the AVM to cause progressive luminal obliteration and thereby prevent hemorrhage.
Traditionally, radiosurgery is indicated for AVMs located in eloquent areas associated with high surgical morbidity, such as the basal nuclei and brainstem. The goal of radiosurgery obliteration of AVMs with nidus volume between 5 and 10 cubic cm. Complete obliteration is done in a latency of 1–3 years after radiosurgery in 80–85% of cases, while the patient is not protected from bleeding.
Massager et al  studied the results of 87 patients with brainstem AVMs treated with gamma knife and showed that 95% of patients have improved or remained neurologically stable, with an obliteration AVM rate of 63% in two years and 73% in three years. These results lead to the following guidelines: if the surgeon is experienced in AVM surgery, microsurgery is an excellent option for superficial, pial AVMs of the brainstem, while radiosurgery is the best treatment for deep brainstem malformations.[Fig 2, Fig 3, Fig 4]
AVMs are often treated by more than one treatment modality. This occurs in one of two fashions. It is done as either a planned maneuver, typically with embolization followed by surgical resection or radiosurgery, or as an unplanned maneuver where one treatment modality fails and a second treatment modality is necessary to obliterate the AVM. This can occur in situations such as residual AVM after subtotal surgical resection or resection of an AVM after incomplete radiosurgical treatment [14,23].
Endovascular embolization can be performed before surgical excision to reduce the difficulty of surgery, or before radiosurgery to bring the size of the lesion to the limits of the machine.
Radiosurgery may be used to eradicate small residual disease left after craniotomy (due to technical difficulty or involvement of eloquent structures).
Multidisciplinary teams will probably become increasingly important for optimal management of each individual patient. Such teams may include neurosurgeons, interventional neuroradiologists, and stereotactic radiation specialists. Continuing advances in microsurgical, neurointerventional, and radiosurgical techniques will affect treatment approaches.
Posterior fossa AVMs deserve multimodality intervention when feasible in most cases because of their higher risk of rupture and higher potential for morbidity and mortality. Surgical resection remains the gold standard of therapy for treating symptomatic posterior fossa AVMs because it has the advantage of immediately removing the risk of hemorrhage in comparison with other treatment modalities. Although modern surgical techniques allow removal of cerebellar and superficial brainstem AVMs with low rates of morbidity and mortality, AVMs located primarily in the brainstem parenchyma are currently best treated with radiosurgery. Except for very small AVMs, embolization before surgery is beneficial in the vast majority of posterior fossa AVMs.
|1.||Al–Shahi R,Warlow C. A systematic review of the frequency and prognosis of arteriovenous malformations of the brain in adults BrainYear: 20011241900192611571210|
|2.||Batjer H,Samson D. Arteriovenous malformations of the posterior fossa: clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation and surgical treatmentJ NeurosurgYear: 1986648498563701436|
|3.||da Costa LB,Thines L,Dehdashti AR,Wallace MC,Willinsky DS. Management and clinical outcome of posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations: report on a single–center 15–year experienceJ Neurol Neurosurg PsychiatryYear: 20098037637919028763|
|4.||David CA,Vishteh G. Surgical Approaches: Infratentorial and Brain Stem LesionsVascular Malformations of the Central Nervous SystemYear: 1999PhiladelphiaLippincott Williams and Wilkins|
|5.||Dion JE,Duckwiler GR. Progressive suppleness catheter: A new tool for superselective angiography and embolizationNeuroradiologyYear: 19891010681070|
|6.||Drake CG,Friedman AH,Peerless SJ. Posterior fossa arteriovenous malformationsJ NeurosurgYear: 1986648498563701436|
|7.||Fleetwood IG,Steinberg GK. Arteriovenous malformationsLancetYear: 200235986387311897302|
|8.||Graf CJ,Perret GE,Torner JC. Bleeding from cerebral arteriovenous malformations as part of their natural historyJ Neurosurg Year: 1983583313376827317|
|9.||Halim AX,Johnston ST,Singh V,McCulloch CE. Longitudinal risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with arteriovenous malformation of the brain within a defined populationStrokeYear: 2004351697170215166396|
|10.||Hernesniemi RJ,Dashti R,Juvela S. Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: a long–term follow–up study of risk of hemorrhage in 238 patientsNeurosurgeryYear: 20086382383119005371|
|11.||Itoyama Y,Uemura S,Ushio Y. Natural course of unoperated intracranial arteriovenous malformations: study of 50 casesJ NeurosurgYear: 1989718058092585069|
|12.||Kelly ME,Guzman R,Sinclair J. Multimodality treatment of posterior fossa arteriovenous malformationsJ NeurosurgYear: 20081081152116118518720|
|13.||Khaw AV,Mohr JP. Association of infratentorial brain arteriovenous malformations with hemorrhage at initial presentationStrokeYear: 20043566066314752127|
|14.||Lawton MT,Hamilton MG,Spetzler RF. Multimodality treatment of deep arteriovenous malformations: thalamus, basal ganglia, and brain stemNeurosurgeryYear: 19953729358587687|
|15.||Lehericy S,Sourour N. Functional MRI in Brain Arteriovenous MalformationsAdvanced Course Of EsnrYear: 19985762|
|16.||Marciano FF,Vishteh AG. Arteriovenous Malformations–Infratentorial, Operative NeurosurgeryYear: 2000Harcourt Publishers Limited 10931106|
|17.||Massanger N,Regis J,Kondziolka D. Gamma knife radiosurgery for brainstem arteriovenous malformations: Preliminary resultsJ Neurosurg Year: 200093102103|
|18.||Mattle HP,Schroth G,Seiler RW. Dilemmas in the management of patients with arteriovenous malformationsJ Neurol.Year: 20004791792811200683|
|19.||McCornick WF. Vascular malformations (angioma) of the brain: with special reference to those occurring in the posterior fossaJ NeurosurYear: 196828241251|
|20.||Meisel HJ. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations and associated aneurysms: Analysis of 305 cases from a series of 662 patientsNeurosurgeryYear: 20004679380210764251|
|21.||Nataf F. Hemorrhage In AVM: Clinical And Anatomic DataNeurochirurgieYear: 20014715816711404691|
|22.||Notermanf J. Arteriovenous malformations associated with multiple aneurysms in the posterior fossa: a case report with review of the literatureNeurosurgeryYear: 1987213873913313093|
|23.||Ogilvy O. Recommendations for Management of Intracranial AVMsCirculationYear: 20011032644265711382737|
|24.||Olivecrona H,Rives J. Arteriovenous aneurysms of the brain: Their diagnosis and treatmentArch Neurol PsychiatryYear: 194859567|
|25.||Omar M,Gross BA,Eddleman CS. Posterior fossa arteriovenous malformationsNeurosurg FocusYear: 200926E12|
|26.||Ondra SL. The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: a 24–year follow–up assessmentJ NeurosurgYear: 1990733873912384776|
|27.||O'Shaughnessy BA. Microsurgical Resection of Infratentorial Arteriovenous MalformationsNeurosurgical FocusYear: 200519|
|28.||Peerless SJ. Arteriovenous malformations of the posterior fossaNeurosurgery Update Ⅱ: Vascular, Spinal, Pediatric, and Functional NeurosurgeryYear: 1991New YorkMcGraw–Hill157168|
|29.||Purdy PD. Management of hemorrhagic complications from preoperative embolization of arteriovenous malformationsJ NeurosurgYear: 1991742052111988589|
|30.||Rustam A,Warlow C. A systematic review of the frequency and prognosis of arteriovenous malformations of the brain in adultsBrainYear: 20011241900192611571210|
|31.||Samson DS. Posterior fossa arteriovenous malformationsNeurovascular surgeryYear: 1995New YorkMcGrawȃHill10051015|
|32.||Samson DS. Technical features of the management of arteriovenous malformations of the brainsteam and cerebellumCerebrovascular DiseaseYear: 1997PhiladelphiaLippincott–Raven811821|
|33.||Simonetti L. MR Angiography in Arteriovenous MalformationsAdvanced Course Of EsnrYear: 19984956|
|34.||Sinclair J. Surgical management of posterior fossa arteriovenous malformationsNeurosurgeryYear: 200658189201|
|35.||Solomon RA. Management of arteriovenous malformations of the brain stemJ NeurosurgYear: 1986648578643701437|
|36.||Spetzler RF. A proposed grading system for AVM-sJ. NeurosurgYear: 1986654764833760956|
|37.||Stahl SM. The clinical and pathological spectrum of brainstem vascular malformations. Long-term course stimulates multiple sclerosisArch NeurolYear: 19803725297350897|
|38.||Symon l. Arteriovenous malformations of the posterior fossa: a report on 28 cases and review of the literatureBr J NeurosurgYear: 199597217328719826|
|39.||Thompson RC. The management of patients with arteriovenous malformations and associated intracranial aneurysmsNeurosurgeryYear: 1998432022129696071|
|40.||Wikholm G. Embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformationsNeurosurgeryYear: 1966394484598875474|
|41.||Wilkins RH. Natural history of intracranial vascular malformations: a reviewNeurosurgeryYear: 1985164214303885072|
|42.||Yamada S. Risk factors for subsequent hemorrhage in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformationsJ NeurosurgYear: 200710796597217977268|
|43.||Yasargil MG. MycrosurgeryYear: 1998New YorkThieme168203|
|Size of AVM||Points assigned|
|< 3 cm – small AVM||1|
|3–6 cm – medium AVM||2|
|> 6 cm – large AVM||3|
|Eloquent adjacent brain|
Keywords: arteriovenous malformation, infratentorial location, posterior fossa, multimodality treatment.
Previous Document: Prognostic factors in retroperitoneal fibrosis.
Next Document: Growth factors in orthopedic surgery.