Document Detail

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and atrial fibrillation: a nationwide population-based study.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23077642     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVES: Precise mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) are uncertain, but their association with esophageal disorders has been recently proposed. The association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the most common gastroesophageal disorder, and AF remains undetermined. We therefore aimed to investigate the association between GERD and later development of AF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with GERD were identified from the 1,000,000-person cohort dataset sampled from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. The study cohort comprised 29,688 newly diagnosed adult GERD patients; 29,597 randomly selected age-, gender-, comobidity-matched subjects comprised the comparison cohort. Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed as a means of comparing the AF-free survival rate for the two cohorts. During a maximum three years of follow-up, a total of 351 patients experienced AF, including 184 (0.62%) patients in the GERD cohort and 167 (0.56%) in the control group. The log-rank test showed that patients with GERD had significantly higher incidence of AF than those without GERD (p = 0.024). After Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis, GERD was independently associated with the increased risk of AF (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.61, p = 0.013).
CONCLUSION: GERD was independently associated with an increased risk of future AF in a nationwide population-based cohort.
Chin-Chou Huang; Wan-Leong Chan; Jiing-Chyuan Luo; Yu-Chun Chen; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Chia-Min Chung; Po-Hsun Huang; Shing-Jong Lin; Jaw-Wen Chen; Hsin-Bang Leu
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-10-15
Journal Detail:
Title:  PloS one     Volume:  7     ISSN:  1932-6203     ISO Abbreviation:  PLoS ONE     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-18     Completed Date:  2013-04-03     Revised Date:  2013-07-11    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101285081     Medline TA:  PLoS One     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  e47575     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Medical Research and Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Atrial Fibrillation* / complications,  epidemiology,  physiopathology
Gastroesophageal Reflux* / complications,  epidemiology,  physiopathology
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Taiwan / epidemiology

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS One
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): PLoS ONE
Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
Journal ID (pmc): plosone
ISSN: 1932-6203
Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, USA
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright: 2012 Huang et al
Received Day: 21 Month: 5 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 12 Month: 9 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 15 Month: 10 Year: 2012
Volume: 7 Issue: 10
E-location ID: e47575
PubMed Id: 23077642
ID: 3471851
Publisher Id: PONE-D-12-15063
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047575

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Population-Based Study Alternate Title:GERD and Atrial Fibrillation
Chin-Chou Huang1267
Wan-Leong Chan23
Jiing-Chyuan Luo410
Yu-Chun Chen11
Tzeng-Ji Chen59
Chia-Min Chung12
Po-Hsun Huang268
Shing-Jong Lin1268
Jaw-Wen Chen1267
Hsin-Bang Leu2368*
Thomas Bergeredit1 Role: Editor
1Department of Medical Research and Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
3Healthcare and Management Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
4Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
5Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
6Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
7Institute of Pharmacology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
8Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
9Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
10Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
11Department of Medical Research and Education, National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Yi-Lan, Taiwan, Republic of China
12Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
Correspondence: * E-mail:
[conflict] Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Contributed by footnote: Conceived and designed the experiments: CCH WLC JCL JWC HBL. Performed the experiments: CCH YCC TJC HBL. Analyzed the data: CCH CMC PHH JWC HBL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CCH YCC TJC HBL. Wrote the paper: CCH WLC SJL JWC HBL.


Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, and its incidence has risen rapidly in countries with rapidly aging populations [1]. AF may cause disability leading to heart failure, stroke, death, and impaired quality of life, highlighting the importance of the understanding of underlying mechanisms and treatment of AF in clinical practice. However, the precise mechanisms that cause AF are not completely understood. Because of frequent concurrence with other cardiovascular diseases, including coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, hypertension, and congestive heart failure, etiologies such as hemodynamic stress, atrial ischemia, and neurohumoral cascade activation have been proposed as related to AF. Furthermore, factors such as systemic inflammation [2], sleep apnea [3], alcohol use [4], and specific genetic mutations [5][7] have also been reported to be associated with the occurrence of AF.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastroesophageal disorders. Because of the close positioning of the esophagus and the atria and similar nerve innervations, it has been proposed that AF development could be associated with the occurrence of GERD [8][13]. However, the association between GERD and AF has been controversial and inconsistent due to limited sample sizes or cross-sectional study designs [14]. We therefore conducted a nationwide population-based study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance database to investigate the relationship between GERD and later development of AF using a prospective, nationwide, and case-cohort study design.

Materials and Methods

The National Health Insurance program in Taiwan has operated since 1995 and enrolls nearly all the inhabitants of the country (21,869,478 beneficiaries out of 22,520,776 inhabitants at the end of 2002) [15]. Thus National Health Insurance covers 99.5% of the population in Taiwan, and the insurance claims database is open to applicant use for medical research purposes. It is one the largest nationwide population-based databases in the world. Currently, the National Health Research Institute (NHRI) in Miaoli, Taiwan manages the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) and has published several dozen extracted datasets for researchers [16], [17]. The NHRI has released a cohort dataset composed of 1,000,000 randomly sampled people who were alive during 2000 and has collected all records on these individuals. These random samples have been confirmed by the NHRI to be representative of the Taiwanese population. In this cohort dataset, each patient's original identification number has been encrypted to protect privacy. But the encrypting procedure is consistent, so that the linkage of claims belonging to the same patient is feasible within the NHIRD. This study was exempt from full review by the Institutional Review Board in Taipei Veterans General Hospital, since the dataset used consisted of de-identified secondary data released to the public for research purposes. All data was analyzed anonymously.

Study Patients

We identified the patients with GERD from the 1,000,000-person sampled cohort dataset. The following patients were included: (1) patients who were 18 years old or older; (2) patients who were diagnosed with GERD (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 530.11 or 530.81). We excluded patients who had been diagnosed with GERD or arrhythmia before enrollment. The Bureau of National Health Insurance requires that GERD patients be diagnosed by either endoscopy or 24-hour pH-meter inspection before proton pump inhibitor (PPI) can be prescribed for treatment. The diagnoses of GERD are valid, and this criteria has been used in similar studies [14], [18]. A control group was selected from patients without a history of esophageal diseases or arrhythmia. Age and co-morbidities were matched in the two groups. Comorbidities included preexisting (in the year before treatment) hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and thyrotoxicosis.

Atrial Fibrillation Event Measurement

The endpoint of the study was occurrence of administrative claims with AF (ICD-9-CM code 427.31) as the main diagnosis during hospitalization or subsequent outpatient visits. Diagnosis of AF was confirmed by electrocardiography and Holter monitors for insurance claim purposes. The identification of AF by insurance claims data is valid and has been used in previous studies [19], [20].

Statistical Analysis

Microsoft SQL Server 2005 was used for data management and computing. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software (Version 15.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). All data were expressed as the frequency (percentage) or mean±standard deviation. We compared parametric continuous data for the case and control groups using unpaired Student's t-test. Categorical data between the two groups were compared with the Chi-square test and Yates' correction or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis for survival analysis, with the significance based on the log-rank test. Survival time was calculated from the date of GERD diagnosis to the date of AF diagnosis. Multiple regression analysis was carried out using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to evaluate the independent factors determining the occurrence of AF. Statistical significance was inferred at a two-sided p value of <0.05.


A total of 29,688 patients (mean age 50.99±16.61 years) with newly diagnosed GERD were identified from the 1,000,000-person sampled cohort dataset. Another 29,597 control subjects, matched for age and co-morbidities including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and thyrotoxicosis, except GERD, were enrolled as the control group. The demographic parameters of the study subjects are shown in Table 1.

During a maximum three years of follow-up, 184 (0.62%) of the patients with GERD experienced AF occurrence, while 167 subjects (0.56%) from the control group experienced the occurrence of AF. The log-rank test showed that patients with GERD had significantly higher incidence of AF than those without GERD (p = 0.024). Figure 1 exhibits the results of a Kaplan-Meier analysis. After Cox proportional-hazard model analysis, GERD was independently associated with increased risk of developing AF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–1.61, p = 0.013) (Table 2).

We further analyzed our patients according to whether or not PPIs were administered for GERD treatment. There were 12,862 patients who received PPIs and 16,826 patients who did not. GERD patients who received PPIs had increased risk of AF (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.15–1.86, p = 0.002). However, GERD patients who were not prescribed PPIs did not have increased risk of AF (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.86–1.51, p = 0.378) (Table 3).


Our current study has demonstrated that GERD was independently associated with an increased risk of AF in a nationwide population-based cohort, suggesting that GERD may play an important role in determining the future risk of developing AF.

GERD, characterized by acid regurgitation or heartburn, is the most common gastrointestinal diagnosis made during visits to outpatient clinics [21]. The annual prevalence rates of GERD in different populations vary between 0.8 and 40% [22][26] and continue to grow [26][28]. Because of the close positioning of the esophagus and the atria, a possible association between GERD and AF development has been proposed [8][13]. However, the association between GERD and AF has not been consistently demonstrated. Kunz et al. [9] first reported that the presence of GERD may increase the risk of AF by 39% (relative risk, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.33–1.45) in a small-scale population, suggesting a close association between AF and GERD. However, Bunch et al. [14] found an inverse relationship between the presence of GERD and AF in a random sample of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Our current study is the first national population-based epidemiological study to investigate the association between GERD and the risk of AF. We found that patients with GERD had significantly higher incidence of AF than those without GERD. Furthermore, GERD was independently associated with increased risk of developing AF.

Although the actual mechanism by which GERD leads to cardiac arrhythmia remains undetermined, certain observational evidence might offer possible explanatory mechanisms. First, GERD could induce vagal nerve stimulation [29], [30]. Accumulating evidence now suggests that the induction of AF may be related to vagal nerve overstimulation [31], [32] and vagal nerve-mediated parasympathetic stimulation [33]. Therefore, vagal nerve overstimulation, which has been observed in patients with GERD, may be responsible for the association between GERD and an increased risk of AF. Second, the precise mechanisms of AF are uncertain, but they have proven to be associated with inflammation [34]. The close anatomical relationship between the esophagus and the atria [35], in addition to the local inflammatory process observed in GERD [36], theoretically provide a mechanism by which GERD initiates AF via the close positioning of the esophagus and the atria. Third, GERD may induce an autoimmune response that contributes to AF [37]. Fourth, acid stimulation of the lower esophagus could cause a significant reduction in coronary blood flow in patients with coronary artery disease [38], and chronic atrial ischemia has been proposed to predispose individuals to AF [39]. Our current study is the first large-scale population-based study that demonstrates the association between GERD and an increased risk of AF. Subsequent in vivo or in vitro studies are needed to provide direct evidence of GERD's role in the pathogenesis of AF.

Several case series have reported a decrease of AF severity after GERD treatment [10][14]. Stollberger et al. [11] studied 18 patients with GERD and paroxysmal AF who complained of retrosternal and epigastric pain. After treatment with PPIs, the epigastric pain and inflammation as well as the AF attacks either stopped completely or decreased in frequency. Weigl et al. [12] demonstrated that PPI therapy led to a decrease in AF symptoms in 78% of cases with AF and reflux esophagitis. Furthermore, the decrease was so pronounced that the antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued in 28% of the patients. Gerson et al. [13] studied three patients with GERD who underwent simultaneous Holter and 24-hour pH monitoring. All of the patients showed a reduction in arrhythmia symptoms with acid suppression therapy. Gillinov et al. [10] reported a case of hiatal hernia. Paroxysmal AF returned to a normal sinus rhythm after GERD symptoms were relieved with a successful Nissen fundoplication. However, the significance of these reports is limited by their small sample sizes. In our current study, we have analyzed our patients according to whether or not PPIs were administered for GERD treatment, and we have found that patients who needed PPIs had a higher risk of developing AF in the future, suggesting that GERD patients with symptoms significant enough to need treatment tend to have higher risk of AF. However, there are some reports that PPIs may be proarrhythmic, which could interfere with this interpretation [40], [41]. The proarrhythmic effect of PPIs remains controversial [10][14], [40],[41]. Larger prospective studies or meta-analyses are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

The strength of our study is our use of a population-based dataset, which provides a large-sized sample of subjects and enables us to trace prospectively the association between GERD and AF. However, there are still some limitations in our study. First, the diagnoses of GERD are identified using the ICD-9 codes from the database, and its prevalence may be underestimated because only subjects seeking medical evaluation can be identified by our study. This study was conducted with Taiwan's NHI database, in which the diagnosis was supposed to be confirmed clinically by the individual physicians in charge [14], [18]. Second, subtypes of AF (paroxysmal, persistent or permanent) can not be classified because of the lack of specific ICD-9 codes. Third, personal information such as body mass index, glucose, lipid profiles, creatinine levels, alcohol use, and tobacco use are not available in the dataset. Fourth, the patients with hiatal hernia could not be identified in our database. Possible association between hiatal hernia and AF is an interesting question and worthy of future study, but it is outside the scope of the present paper. Finally, AF may be clinically silent and therefore underestimated. Our findings suggest that GERD may be associated with clinically significant AF. Studies designed to take clinically silent AF into account are still needed.


The present study demonstrates an association between GERD and future development of AF, suggesting GERD may play a significant role in determining future risk of AF occurrence.

1. Prystowsky EN,, Benson DW Jr,, Fuster V,, Hart RG,, Kay GN,, et al. (Year: 1996) Management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A Statement for Healthcare Professionals. From the Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology, American Heart Association. Circulation93: 1262–12778653857
2. Issac TT,, Dokainish H,, Lakkis NM, (Year: 2007) Role of inflammation in initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the published data. J Am Coll Cardiol50: 2021–202818021867
3. Gami AS,, Hodge DO,, Herges RM,, Olson EJ,, Nykodym J,, et al. (Year: 2007) Obstructive sleep apnea, obesity, and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol49: 565–57117276180
4. Mukamal KJ,, Tolstrup JS,, Friberg J,, Jensen G,, Grønbaek M, (Year: 2005) Alcohol consumption and risk of atrial fibrillation in men and women: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Circulation112: 1736–174216157768
5. Brugada R,, Tapscott T,, Czernuszewicz GZ,, Marian AJ,, Iglesias A,, et al. (Year: 1997) Identification of a genetic locus for familial atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med336: 905–9119070470
6. Chen YH,, Xu SJ,, Bendahhou S,, Wang XL,, Wang Y,, et al. (Year: 2003) KCNQ1 gain-of-function mutation in familial atrial fibrillation. Science299: 251–25412522251
7. Ellinor PT,, Shin JT,, Moore RK,, Yoerger DM,, MacRae CA, (Year: 2003) Locus for atrial fibrillation maps to chromosome 6q14–16. Circulation107: 2880–288312782570
8. Gordon J,, Saleem SM,, Ngaage DL,, Thorpe JA, (Year: 2002) Swallow syncope associated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg21: 587–59011888795
9. Kunz JS,, Hemann B,, Edwin Atwood J,, Jackson J,, Wu T,, et al. (Year: 2009) Is there a link between gastroesophageal reflux disease and atrial fibrillation? Clin Cardiol32: 584–58719911354
10. Gillinov AM,, Rice TW, (Year: 2004) Prandial atrial fibrillation: off-pump pulmonary vein isolation with hiatal hernia repair. Ann Thorac Surg78: 1836–183815511491
11. Stöllberger C,, Finsterer J, (Year: 2003) Treatment of esophagitis/vagitis-induced paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by proton-pump inhibitors. J Gastroenterol38: 110914673734
12. Weigl M,, Gschwantler M,, Gatterer E,, Finsterer J,, Stöllberger C, (Year: 2003) Reflux esophagitis in the pathogenesis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of a pilot study. South Med J96: 1128–113214632362
13. Gerson LB,, Friday K,, Triadafilopoulos G, (Year: 2006) Potential relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and atrial arrhythmias. J Clin Gastroenterol40: 828–83217016140
14. Bunch TJ,, Packer DL,, Jahangir A,, Locke GR,, Talley NJ,, et al. (Year: 2008) Long-term risk of atrial fibrillation with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophagitis. Am J Cardiol102: 1207–121118940293
15. Bureau of National Health Insurance (2002) 2001 National Health Insurance Annual Statistical Report. Taipei, Taiwan: Bureau of National Health Insurance.
16. Huang CC,, Chen YC,, Leu HB,, Chen TJ,, Lin SJ,, et al. (Year: 2010) Risk of adverse outcomes in Taiwan associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors in patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol105: 1705–170920538118
17. Huang CC,, Chan WL,, Chen YC,, Chen TJ,, Lin SJ,, et al. (Year: 2011) Angiotensin II receptor blockers and risk of cancer in patients with systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol107: 1028–103321256465
18. Chen KY,, Lou HY,, Lin HC,, Lee SH, (Year: 2009) Seasonal variation in the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med Sci338: 453–45819826247
19. Lee CH,, Liu PY,, Tsai LM,, Tsai WC,, Ho MT,, et al. (Year: 2007) Characteristics of hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation in Taiwan: a nationwide observation. Am J Med120: 819.e1–e717765053
20. Lin LJ,, Cheng MH,, Lee CH,, Wung DC,, Cheng CL,, et al. (Year: 2008) Compliance with antithrombotic prescribing guidelines for patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide descriptive study in Taiwan. Clin Ther30: 1726–173618840379
21. Shaheen NJ,, Hansen RA,, Morgan DR,, Gangarosa LM,, Ringel Y,, et al. (Year: 2006) The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006. Am J Gastroenterol101: 2128–213816848807
22. Spechler SJ, (Year: 1992) Epidemiology and natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Digestion51Suppl 1: 24–291397743
23. Dent J,, El-Serag HB,, Wallander MA,, Johansson S, (Year: 2005) Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut54: 710–71715831922
24. Chang CS,, Poon SK,, Lien HC,, Chen GH, (Year: 1997) The incidence of reflux esophagitis among the Chinese. Am J Gastroenterol92: 668–6719128320
25. Lee YC,, Wang HP,, Chiu HM,, Liao SC,, Huang SP,, et al. (Year: 2006) Comparative analysis between psychological and endoscopic profiles in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective study based on screening endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol21: 798–80416704526
26. Goh KL, (Year: 2004) Changing epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Asian-Pacific region: an overview. J Gastroenterol Hepatol19: S22–S2515324378
27. Fock KM,, Talley NJ,, Fass R,, Goh KL,, Katelaris P,, et al. (Year: 2008) Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update. J Gastroenterol Hepatol23: 8–2218171339
28. Ho KY,, Cheung TK,, Wong BC, (Year: 2006) Gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asian countries: Disorder of nature or nurture? J Gastroenterol Hepatol21: 1362–136516911677
29. Kollarik M,, Brozmanova M, (Year: 2009) Cough and gastroesophageal reflux: insights from animal models. Pulm Pharmacol Ther22: 130–13419138751
30. Dodds WJ,, Dent J,, Hogan WJ,, Helm JF,, Hauser R,, et al. (Year: 1982) Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med307: 1547–15527144836
31. Schauerte P,, Scherlag BJ,, Pitha J,, Scherlag MA,, Reynolds D,, et al. (Year: 2000) Catheter ablation of cardiac autonomic nerves for prevention of vagal atrial fibrillation. Circulation102: 2774–278011094046
32. Kanoupakis EM,, Manios EG,, Mavrakis HE,, Kaleboubas MD,, Parthenakis FI,, et al. (Year: 2000) Relation of autonomic modulation to recurrence of atrial fibrillation following cardioversion. Am J Cardiol86: 954–95811053706
33. Hou Y,, Scherlag BJ,, Lin J,, Zhang Y,, Lu Z,, et al. (Year: 2007) Ganglionated plexi modulate extrinsic cardiac autonomic nerve input: effects on sinus rate, atrioventricular conduction, refractoriness, and inducibility of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol50: 61–6817601547
34. Frustaci A,, Chimenti C,, Bellocci F,, Morgante E,, Russo MA,, et al. (Year: 1997) Histological substrate of atrial biopsies in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Circulation96: 1180–11849286947
35. Tsao HM,, Wu MH,, Higa S,, Lee KT,, Tai CT,, et al. (Year: 2005) Anatomic relationship of the esophagus and left atrium: implication for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Chest128: 2581–258716236927
36. Rieder F,, Cheng L,, Harnett KM,, Chak A,, Cooper GS,, et al. (Year: 2007) Gastroesophageal reflux disease-associated esophagitis induces endogenous cytokine production leading to motor abnormalities. Gastroenterology132: 154–16517241868
37. Maixent JM,, Paganelli F,, Scaglione J,, Lévy S, (Year: 1998) Antibodies against myosin in sera of patients with idiopathic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol9: 612–6179654226
38. Chauhan A,, Mullins PA,, Taylor G,, Petch MC,, Schofield PM, (Year: 1996) Cardiooesophageal reflex: a mechanism for ‘linked angina’ in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol27: 1621–16288636546
39. Nishida K,, Qi XY,, Wakili R,, Comtois P,, Chartier D,, et al. (Year: 2011) Mechanisms of atrial tachyarrhythmias associated with coronary artery occlusion in a chronic canine model. Circulation123: 137–14621200008
40. Marcus GM,, Smith LM,, Scheinman MM,, Badhwar N,, Lee RJ,, et al. (Year: 2010) Proton Pump Inhibitors are Associated with Focal Arrhythmias. The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management1: 85–89
41. Hoorn EJ,, van der Hoek J,, de Man RA,, Kuipers EJ,, Bolwerk C,, et al. (Year: 2010) A case series of proton pump inhibitor-induced hypomagnesemia. Am J Kidney Dis56: 112–11620189276


[Figure ID: pone-0047575-g001]
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047575.g001.
Figure 1  Kaplan-Meier curves of the freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) in the patients.

Group 1 included patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and group 2 included patients without GERD. There was a statistically significant difference between the two curves (log-rank test, p = 0.024).

[TableWrap ID: pone-0047575-t001] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047575.t001.
Table 1  Demographic data on patients with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Variables GERD (n = 29,688) Control (n = 29,597) p-value
Age (years) 50.99±16.61 50.85±16.85 0.311
Male 14,373 (48.41%) 14,333 (48.43%) 0.974
Hypertension 11,366 (38.28%) 11,324 (38.26%) 0.953
Diabetes mellitus 6,979 (23.51%) 6,931 (23.42%) 0.801
Hyperlipidemia 10,180 (34.29%) 10,137 (34.25%) 0.924
Congestive heart failure 2,003 (6.75%) 1,939 (6.55%) 0.347
Coronary artery disease 8,457 (28.49%) 8,402 (28.39%) 0.792
Ischemic stroke 2,489 (8.38%) 2,431 (8.21%) 0.457
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 13,287 (44.76%) 13,233 (44.71%) 0.914
Thyrotoxicosis 1,800 (6.06%) 1,745 (5.90%) 0.396

nt101GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease.

[TableWrap ID: pone-0047575-t002] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047575.t002.
Table 2  Independent predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation.
Variable All patients (n = 59,285) GERD (n = 29,688) Control (n = 29,597)
Yes 351 (0.59%) 184 (0.62%) 167 (0.56%)
No 58,934 (99.41%) 29,504 (99.38%) 29,430 (99.44%)
Crude HR (95% CI) 1.27 (1.03–1.57) 1.00
Adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.31 (1.06–1.61) 1.00

nt102AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; HR, hazard ratio.

nt103Adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and thyrotoxicosis.

[TableWrap ID: pone-0047575-t003] doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047575.t003.
Table 3  Independent predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease according to proton pump inhibitor use.
Variable Crude HR (95% CI) p-value Adjusted HR (95% CI) p-value
Yes (n = 12,862) 1.69 (1.33–2.14) <0.001 1.46 (1.15–1.86) 0.002
No (n = 16,826) 0.91 (0.68–1.20) 0.485 1.14 (0.86–1.51) 0.378

nt104CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PPIs, proton pump inhibitors.

nt105Adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and thyrotoxicosis.

Article Categories:
  • Research Article
Article Categories:
  • Biology
    • Anatomy and Physiology
      • Electrophysiology
    • Population Biology
      • Epidemiology
Article Categories:
  • Medicine
    • Anatomy and Physiology
      • Digestive System
        • Digestive Anatomy
        • Digestive Physiology
    • Cardiovascular
      • Arrhythmias
    • Epidemiology
      • Clinical Epidemiology
    • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
      • Esophagus

Previous Document:  Platelet-derived growth factor CC-mediated neuroprotection against HIV Tat involves TRPC-mediated in...
Next Document:  Association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 allelic variants and head and neck squamous cell cancinoma.