| Further thoughts on double effect: some preliminary responses. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 11642952 Owner: KIE Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Since the papers in this issue by Alan Donagan, Don Marquis, William Nelson and Warren Quinn raise complex and challenging questions about almost every aspect of my "Who is Entitled to Double Effect", I cannot, in the present context, provide more than preliminary responses to some of the more important issues they raise in the hope that this might contribute to further clarification of the doctrine of double effect (DDE). |
| | |
Authors:
|
Joseph Boyle |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: The Journal of medicine and philosophy Volume: 16 ISSN: 0360-5310 ISO Abbreviation: J Med Philos Publication Date: 1991 Oct |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 1992-02-27 Completed Date: 1992-02-27 Revised Date: 2008-11-21 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 7610512 Medline TA: J Med Philos Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 565-70 Citation Subset: E |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Bioethical Issues Bioethics* Decision Making Double Effect Principle* Ethical Analysis* Ethical Theory* Ethics* Humans Intention* Motivation* Wounds and Injuries |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Reply to Boyle's "Who is entitled to double effect?
Next Document: Protection of research subjects: do special rules apply in epidemiology?