|Frequent coexistence of anti-topoisomerase I and anti-U1RNP autoantibodies in African American patients associated with mild skin involvement: a retrospective clinical study.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 21569292 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|INTRODUCTION: The presence of anti-topoisomerase I (topo I) antibodies is a classic scleroderma (SSc) marker presumably associated with a unique clinical subset. Here the clinical association of anti-topo I was reevaluated in unselected patients seen in a rheumatology clinic setting.
METHODS: Sera from the initial visit in a cohort of unselected rheumatology clinic patients (n = 1,966, including 434 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 119 SSc, 85 polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM)) were screened by radioimmunoprecipitation. Anti-topo I-positive sera were also tested with immunofluorescence and RNA immunoprecipitation.
RESULTS: Twenty-five (15 Caucasian, eight African American, two Latin) anti-topo I positive patients were identified, and all except one met the ACR SSc criteria. Coexistence of other SSc autoantibodies was not observed, except for anti-U1RNP in six cases. When anti-topo I alone versus anti-topo I + U1RNP groups were compared, African American (21% vs. 67%), overlap with SLE (0 vs. 50%; P = 0.009) or PM/DM (0 vs. 33%; P = 0.05) or elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK) (P = 0.07) were more common in the latter group. In comparison of anti-topo I-positive Caucasians versus African Americans, the latter more frequently had anti-U1RNP (13% vs. 50%), mild/no skin changes (14% vs. 63%; P = 0.03) and overlap with SLE (0 vs. 38%; P = 0.03) and PM/DM (0 vs. 25%; P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-topo I detected by immunoprecipitation in unselected rheumatology patients is highly specific for SSc. Anti-topo I coexisting with anti-U1RNP in African American patients is associated with a subset of SLE overlapping with SSc and PM/DM but without apparent sclerodermatous changes.
|Minoru Satoh; Malgorzata E Krzyszczak; Yi Li; Angela Ceribelli; Steven J Ross; Edward K L Chan; Mark S Segal; Michael R Bubb; Eric S Sobel; Westley H Reeves|
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Date: 2011-05-10|
|Title: Arthritis research & therapy Volume: 13 ISSN: 1478-6362 ISO Abbreviation: Arthritis Res. Ther. Publication Date: 2011|
|Created Date: 2011-11-15 Completed Date: 2012-03-13 Revised Date: 2013-06-30|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101154438 Medline TA: Arthritis Res Ther Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: R73 Citation Subset: IM|
|Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32610 USA. email@example.com|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
African Americans / ethnology*
Autoantibodies / blood, immunology
Biological Markers / blood
DNA Topoisomerases, Type I / immunology*
Dermatomyositis / ethnology, immunology
European Continental Ancestry Group / ethnology
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic / ethnology, immunology
RNA, Small Nuclear / immunology*
Scleroderma, Systemic / ethnology, immunology*
Severity of Illness Index
Skin Diseases / ethnology, immunology*
|M01R00082//PHS HHS; R01-AR40391/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS|
|0/Autoantibodies; 0/Biological Markers; 0/RNA, Small Nuclear; 0/U1 small nuclear RNA; EC 22.214.171.124/DNA Topoisomerases, Type I|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Arthritis Res Ther
Publisher: BioMed Central
Copyright ©2011 Satoh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 20 Month: 1 Year: 2011
Revision Received Day: 7 Month: 3 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 10 Month: 5 Year: 2011
Print publication date: Year: 2011
Electronic publication date: Day: 10 Month: 5 Year: 2011
Volume: 13 Issue: 3
First Page: R73 Last Page: R73
Publisher Id: ar3334
PubMed Id: 21569292
|Frequent coexistence of anti-topoisomerase I and anti-U1RNP autoantibodies in African American patients associated with mild skin involvement: a retrospective clinical study|
|Minoru Satoh12||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Malgorzata E Krzyszczak1||Email: email@example.com|
|Yi Li1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Angela Ceribelli3||Email: email@example.com|
|Steven J Ross13||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Edward KL Chan3||Email: email@example.com|
|Mark S Segal4||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Michael R Bubb1||Email: Michael.email@example.com|
|Eric S Sobel12||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Westley H Reeves12||Email: email@example.com|
1Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32610 USA
2Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32610 USA
3Department of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, 1395 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
4Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32610 USA
Autoantibodies to topoisomerase I (topo I, also known as Scl-70) is an established serologic marker of scleroderma (systemic sclerosis, SSc) and associated with diffuse scleroderma and severe interstitial lung disease (ILD) [1-3]. It is highly specific for SSc when tested with standard double immunodiffusion [4,5]; however, several studies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reported high prevalence of anti-topo I in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [6-9], causing confusion and controversies [10,11]. SSc could start from the Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), preceding the onset of SSc for many years, ILD, arthritis, and others . Because autoantibodies are usually produced before typical clinical manifestations, it would not be a surprise to find anti-topo I in undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), undiagnosed patients , or even in certain patients with SLE who are going to develop SSc later . The clinical association of anti-topo I was reevaluated based on radioimmunoprecipitation screening of sera from a cohort of unselected population in a rheumatology clinic that includes undiagnosed patients and patients with a wide variety of diagnoses in addition to established systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, such as SSc, SLE, polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
All 1,966 subjects enrolled in the University of Florida Center for Autoimmune Diseases (UFCAD) registry from 2000 to 2010 were studied. Diagnoses of the patients include 434 SLE, 85 PM/DM, 119 SSc, 35 RA, and 40 Sjögren syndrome (SS). Clinical findings of patients at each visit were evaluated and recorded by the rheumatologists at the Center, following the standard rheumatology clinic evaluation forms of the UFCAD. Diagnoses of patients were by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE [14,15], SSc , and RA , the revised European criteria by the American-European Consensus Group for SS , and the Bohan's criteria for PM/DM . Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)  is not classified separately, and SSc patients discussed in this report include patients who also fulfill criteria of other diagnoses (overlap syndrome). ILD was defined by chest radiograph and/or high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). This study meets and is in compliance with all ethical standards in medicine, and informed consent was obtained from all patients according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Autoantibodies in sera from the initial visit of each patient were screened by immunoprecipitation (IP) using [35S]-methionine-labeled K562 cell extract . RNA components of autoantigens were analyzed with silver staining (Silver Stain Plus; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). ACA were examined by immunofluorescence antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) using HEp-2 slides from INOVA Diagnostics (San Diego, CA) and a 1:80-diluted serum.
Prevalence of autoantibodies and clinical manifestation was compared by Fisher Exact test using Prism 5.0 for Macintosh (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Anti-topo I antibodies were detected in 25 (1.3%) of 1,966 subjects enrolled to University of Florida Center for Autoimmune Diseases. Prevalence of anti-topo I in the SSc cohort was 21% (25 of 119); 18% (15 of 85) in Caucasians, 31% (eight of 25) in African Americans, and 25% (two of eight) in Hispanics. An SSc patient of mixed ethnic background did not have anti-topo I. None of the anti-topo I-positive sera had other SSc-specific autoantibodies , including anti-RNA polymerase (RNAP) I/III, PM-Scl, or Ku by IP; ACA by immunofluorescence; or anti-U3RNP/fibrillarin or anti-Th/To by RNA analysis from IP. However, six of 25 anti-topo I-positive sera had coexisting anti-U1RNP antibodies, two with anti-Sm. Analysis of protein (Figure 1a, b) and RNA components (Figure 1c) by IP are shown.
Anti-topo I + U1RNP was common in African American (four (16%) of 25) but rare in Caucasian SSc (two (2%) of 85; P = 0.02 by the Fisher Exact test). In patients who fulfilled the ACR SLE criteria, anti-topo I was found in three (2%) of 153 in African American, all three cases with anti-U1RNP (two with anti-Sm) and as SLE-SSc overlap syndrome. None of 208 Caucasian or 44 Latin SLE had anti-topo I by IP. Thus, even in unselected patients at our rheumatology clinic, anti-topo I by IP is highly specific for SSc and SSc overlap syndrome.
Clinical manifestations of 19 patients with anti-topo I versus six patients with anti-topo I + U1RNP were compared (Table 1). All patients fulfilled the ACR SSc classification criteria except for a 48-year-old Caucasian woman with RP, ILD, and polyarthritis. No sclerodermatous changes were noted, and she may be considered systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma. The anti-topo I group was 68% Caucasian, whereas 67% of anti-topo I + U1RNP group was African American (P = 0.059). Two of the anti-topo I + U1RNP patients were also positive for anti-Sm (P = 0.05; Figure 1). Proximal scleroderma was common (79%) in anti-topo I group. In contrast, three (50%) of six anti-topo I + U1RNP patients had no sclerodermatous skin changes (P = 0.03). Overlap with SLE or PM/DM and elevation of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) were common in anti-topo I + U1RNP group (P = 0.009 for SLE, P = 0.07 for CPK, P = 0.05 for PM/DM; Table 1).
Clinical features of six cases of anti-topo I with anti-U1RNP are summarized (Table 2). In four African American patients, case 2 had diffuse cutaneous scleroderma (dcSSc) but the other three did not have sclerodermatous skin changes; they fulfilled ACR classification criteria for SSc based on pitting scars and ILD. Overlap of SSc with SLE or PM/DM was seen in three African American cases.
Clinical features of Caucasian versus African American patients with anti-topo I were compared (Table 3). In serology, four (50%) of eight of African Americans with anti-topo I had coexisting anti-U1RNP, two with anti-Sm, but this was only in two (13%) of 15 Caucasians. Proximal scleroderma was noted in 87% of Caucasians but only in 38% of African Americans (P = 0.03). Three of eight African American anti-topo I-positive patients did not have sclerodermatous changes, and two had sclerodactyly only (P = 0.03, no skin changes and sclerodactyly only combined). Overlap with SLE and elevated CPK (P = 0.03 versus Caucasians) and overlap with PM/DM (p = 0.05) were also common in African Americans.
Lack of skin changes, and overlap with SLE and PM/DM are common in African American patients with anti-topo I + U1RNP but not anti-topo I antibodies alone. These clinical features were not present in two cases of anti-topo I + U1RNP in Caucasians, suggesting that this clinical subset may be relatively unique to African Americans.
Anti-topo I is a highly specific disease marker of SSc when tested by immunodiffusion [4,5] or IP as in the present study. It can be occasionally found in undiagnosed patients such as UCTD  or RP , at least partially, because autoantibodies are usually produced before clinical manifestation . In one study, anti-topo I were tested by ELISA in 2,181 unselected individuals to find none was positive . All these data support the high specificity of anti-topo I for SSc.
Reports on high prevalence of anti-topo I in SLE by ELISA and its association with SLE activity and nephritis [8,9] challenged the general observation on SSc specificity of anti-topo I and triggered much confusion and many controversies [5,10,11]. When we tested 46 SLE sera (from Louisiana, not included in the present study) by a commercial anti-topo I ELISA, 41% were positive; however, only two of 19 were IP positive . In the study that had 32 (25%) of 128 prevalence of anti-topo I in SLE , only four of 32 ELISA positives were double immunodiffusion positive, and data supporting the specificity of ELISA were limited. Some also reported 13% to 29% prevalence of anti-topo I in SLE [6,7,9,25] whereas others reported low prevalence by ELISA [5,11]. Thus, the prevalence of anti-topo I in SLE appears to depend on the source of antigens or ELISA kits. In some studies [8-10], anti-topo I ELISA positives in SLE are detecting antibodies that are different from those detected by immunodiffusion and IP. False positives caused by anti-dsDNA/chromatin antibodies in SLE sera in ELISA for autoantibodies to DNA-binding proteins, such as Ku and replication protein A, are well documented [10,26]. Thus, the most likely explanation appears to be that anti-topo I ELISA positives in SLE are false positives caused by antibodies to DNA/chromatin. Because topo I is a nucleotide sequence nonspecific DNA-binding protein, one scenario is that serum DNA binds to topo I coated on plate, and this is followed by anti-DNA/chromatin antibodies binding to DNA. A second scenario is that preformed serum anti-DNA/chromatin immune complex can bind to topo I via its DNA component. It is also possible that anti-topo I ELISA positives in SLE in some studies reflect detection of low-affinity antibodies or antibodies other than IgG class because of secondary antibody specificity. Alternatively, certain ELISA antigens may contain impurities as unrelated antigens, or some SLE sera recognize denatured topo I epitopes not present in native molecules and thus appear unreactive (negative) in immunodiffusion or IP.
Anti-topo I antibodies are positive in 1% to 3% of SLE patients, even by reliable methods such as immunodiffusion . This may be explained by SLE-SSc overlap syndrome, not typical pure SLE [10,27], as shown in the present study. Thus, anti-topo I by immunodiffusion or IP is specific for SSc, and cautious interpretation is required for anti-topo I ELISA positive results in SLE.
SSc patients can be classified based on autoantibody specificities that are associated with unique clinical subsets . Coexistence of SSc-related autoantibodies is uncommon ; however, a combination of anti-topo I and anti-U1RNP appears to be an interesting and possibly clinically useful exception. In addition to cases reported mainly from Japan [27-29], frequent association of anti-topo I and anti-U1RNP in a large Japanese and American cohorts also was observed [1,2]. In one study, nine (12%) of 78 of anti-topo I-positive SSc had coexisting anti-U1RNP, and an additional three later developed anti-U1RNP . Three patients in this cohort also had anti-Sm antibodies . A study from Finland reported 12% of coexistence of anti-topo I and anti-U1RNP . Detection of anti-topo I in MCTD patients indicates coexisting anti-topo I and anti-U1RNP . Regarding the issue of race and coexistence of these two specificities in SSc, the prevalence was reported as 2% in Caucasian, 13% in African American, and 16% in Japanese in another U.S. cohort . The 50% prevalence of anti-U1RNP in anti-topo I-positive African Americans in the present study is higher than that in other studies to date. Furthermore, prevalence of diffuse scleroderma in African Americans was low versus that in the previous study . Three of four cases of anti-topo I + U1RNP-positive African American patients can be classified as SSc by using the ACR criteria based on the presence of pitting scars and ILD ; however, they lack sclerodermatous skin changes. Thus, this subset of patients might not be included in the studies that selected SSc patients based on diagnosis by physicians [2,32,33], sclerodactyly as a minimum requirement , or by using other SSc criteria . They can be easily classified as "SLE with ILD and RP" because this is the common pattern of presentation among anti-U1RNP-positive SLE or MCTD. This subset could also be real anti-topo I-positive SLE without features of SSc described in some literature . It may be clinically important to identify anti-topo I, in addition to anti-U1RNP, in these patients, because the former could be associated with severe ILD and scleroderma renal crisis [2,3].
Anti-topo I detected by IP in unselected rheumatology patients is highly specific for SSc. Anti-topo I and anti-U1RNP frequently coexist in African American patients, and they are associated with a subset of overlap syndrome of SLE, SSc, and PM/DM, characterized by RP, pitting scars, and ILD without sclerodermatous changes.
ACR: American College of Rheumatology; ANA: antinuclear antibodies; CPK: creatine phosphokinase; dcSSc: diffuse cutaneous scleroderma; HRCT: high-resolution computed tomography; ILD: interstitial lung disease; IP: immunoprecipitation; IRB: Institutional Review Board; MCTD: mixed connective tissue disease; PM/DM: polymyositis/dermatomyositis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; RNAP: RNA polymerase; RP: Raynaud's phenomenon; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; SS: Sjögren syndrome; SSc: systemic sclerosis: scleroderma; Topo I: topoisomerase I; UCTD: undifferentiated connective tissue disease; UFCAD: University of Florida Center for Autoimmune Diseases.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MS, MEK, YL, SJR, and EKLC carried out the immunoassays, and MS designed the study and performed the statistical analysis. MSS, MRB, ESS, and WHR enrolled patients for the study and maintained the database. MS, AC, and EKLC drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We thank Marlene Sarmiento, Annie Chan, and the UF GCRC staff for assistance with clinical data collection.
This study was supported by NIH grant R01-AR40391 and M01R00082 from the U.S. Public Health Service and by generous gifts from Lupus Link, Inc. (Daytona Beach, FL) and Mr. Lewis M. Schott to the University of Florida Center for Autoimmune Disease. Publication of this article was funded in part by the University of Florida Open-Access Publishing Fund.
|Kuwana M,Kaburaki J,Okano Y,Tojo T,Homma M,Clinical and prognostic associations based on serum antinuclear antibodies in Japanese patients with systemic sclerosisArthritis RheumYear: 199437758310.1002/art.17803701118129766|
|Kuwana M,Kaburaki J,Arnett FC,Howard RF,Medsger TA Jr,Wright TM,Influence of ethnic background on clinical and serologic features in patients with systemic sclerosis and anti-DNA topoisomerase I antibodyArthritis RheumYear: 19994246547410.1002/1529-0131(199904)42:3<465::AID-ANR11>3.0.CO;2-Y10088769|
|Steen VD,Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosisSemin Arthritis RheumYear: 200535354210.1016/j.semarthrit.2005.03.00516084222|
|Catoggio LJ,Bernstein RM,Black CM,Hughes GR,Maddison PJ,Serological markers in progressive systemic sclerosis: clinical correlationsAnn Rheum DisYear: 198342232710.1136/ard.42.1.236402991|
|Reveille JD,Solomon DH,Evidence-based guidelines for the use of immunologic tests: anticentromere, Scl-70, and nucleolar antibodiesArthritis RheumYear: 20034939941210.1002/art.1111312794797|
|Geisler C,Hoier-Madsen M,An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for autoantibodies against the nuclear protein Scl-70J Immunol MethodsYear: 19858021121910.1016/0022-1759(85)90022-53925022|
|al-Mekaimi A,Malaviya AN,Serebour F,Umamaheswaran I,Kumar R,al-Saeid K,Sharma PN,Serological characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus from a hospital-based rheumatology clinic in KuwaitLupusYear: 1997666867410.1177/0961203397006008089364426|
|Gussin HA,Ignat GP,Varga J,Teodorescu M,Anti-topoisomerase I (anti-Scl-70) antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis RheumYear: 20014437638310.1002/1529-0131(200102)44:2<376::AID-ANR56>3.0.CO;2-211229469|
|Hamidou MA,Audrain MA,Masseau A,Agard C,Moreau A,Anti-topoisomerase I antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus as a marker of severe nephritisClin RheumatolYear: 20062554254310.1007/s10067-005-0061-916525896|
|Satoh M,Chan EKL,Sobel ES,Kimpel DL,Yamasaki Y,Narain S,Mansoor R,Reeves WH,Clinical implication of autoantibodies in patients with systemic rheumatic diseasesExpert Rev Clin ImmunolYear: 2007372173810.1586/1744666X.3.5.72120477023|
|Mahler M,Silverman ED,Schulte-Pelkum J,Fritzler MJ,Anti-Scl-70 (topo-I) antibodies in SLE: myth or reality?Autoimmun RevYear: 2010975676010.1016/j.autrev.2010.06.0052060119820601198|
|Steen VD,The many faces of sclerodermaRheum Dis Clin North AmYear: 20083411510.1016/j.rdc.2007.12.00118329529|
|Katsumi S,Kobayashi N,Yamamoto Y,Miyagawa S,Shirai T,Development of systemic sclerosis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and topoisomerase I antibodyBr J DermatolYear: 20001421030103310.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03492.x10809868|
|Tan EM,Cohen AS,Fries JF,Masi AT,McShane DJ,Rothfield NF,Schaller JG,Talal N,Winchester RJ,The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis RheumYear: 1982251271127710.1002/art.17802511017138600|
|Hochberg MC,Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis RheumYear: 19974017259324032|
|Subcommittee for Scleroderma Criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria CommitteePreliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)Arthritis RheumYear: 19802358159010.1002/art.17802305107378088|
|Arnett FC,Edworthy SM,Bloch DA,McShane DJ,Fries JF,Cooper NS,Healey LA,Kaplan SR,Liang MH,Luthra HS,Medsger TAJ,Mitchell DM,Neustadt DH,Pinals RS,Schaller JG,Sharp JT,Wilder RL,Hunder GG,The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis RheumYear: 19883131532410.1002/art.17803103023358796|
|Vitali C,Bombardieri S,Jonsson R,Moutsopoulos HM,Alexander EL,Carsons SE,Daniels TE,Fox PC,Fox RI,Kassan SS,Pillemer SR,Talal N,Weisman MH,Classification criteria for Sjogren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus GroupAnn Rheum DisYear: 20026155455810.1136/ard.61.6.55412006334|
|Bohan A,Peter JB,Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts)N Engl J MedYear: 197529234434710.1056/NEJM1975021329207061090839|
|Sharp GC,MCTD: a concept which stood the test of timeLupusYear: 20021133333910.1191/0961203302lu220oa12139370|
|Satoh M,Ajmani AK,Ogasawara T,Langdon JJ,Hirakata M,Wang J,Reeves WH,Autoantibodies to RNA polymerase II are common in systemic lupus erythematosus and overlap syndrome: specific recognition of the phosphorylated (IIO) form by a subset of human seraJ Clin InvestYear: 1994941981198910.1172/JCI1175507962544|
|Vaz CC,Couto M,Medeiros D,Miranda L,Costa J,Nero P,Barros R,Santos MJ,Sousa E,Barcelos A,Ines L,Undifferentiated connective tissue disease: a seven-center cross-sectional study of 184 patientsClin RheumatolYear: 20092891592110.1007/s10067-009-1175-219390908|
|Arbuckle MR,McClain MT,Rubertone MV,Scofield RH,Dennis GJ,James JA,Harley JB,Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosusN Engl J MedYear: 20033491526153310.1056/NEJMoa02193314561795|
|Hayashi N,Koshiba M,Nishimura K,Sugiyama D,Nakamura T,Morinobu S,Kawano S,Kumagai S,Prevalence of disease-specific antinuclear antibodies in general population: estimates from annual physical examinations of residents of a small town over a 5-year periodMod RheumatolYear: 2008181536010.1007/s10165-008-0028-118283522|
|Tsay GJ,Fann RH,Hwang J,Specificity of anti-Scl-70 antibodies in scleroderma: increased sensitivity of detection using purified DNA topoisomerase I from calf thymusJ RheumatolYear: 199017131413192174971|
|Yamasaki Y,Narain S,Hernandez L,Barker T,Ikeda K,Segal MS,Richards HB,Chan EK,Reeves WH,Satoh M,Autoantibodies against the replication protein A complex in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune diseasesArthritis Res TherYear: 20068R111R12010.1186/ar200016846524|
|Kameda H,Kuwana M,Hama N,Kaburaki J,Homma M,Coexistence of serum anti-DNA topoisomerase I and anti-Sm antibodies: report of 3 casesJ RheumatolYear: 1997244004039035005|
|Mukai S,Sagawa A,Atsumi T,Jodo S,Amasaki Y,Nakabayashi T,Watanabe I,Fujisaku A,Nakagawa S,Three cases of anti-Scl-70 (topoisomerase I) antibody associated with central nervous system lupus without renal disorderJ RheumatolYear: 199320159415978164223|
|Sato S,Ihn H,Soma Y,Shimozuma M,Shishiba T,Takehara K,A case of systemic sclerosis with anticentromere, antitopoisomerase I, and anti-U1RNP antibodiesJ RheumatolYear: 199320196119638308786|
|Hietarinta M,Lassila O,Hietaharju A,Association of anti-U1RNP-and anti-Scl-70-antibodies with neurological manifestations in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)Scand J RheumatolYear: 199423646710.3109/030097494091030298165439|
|Cruz M,Mejia G,Lavalle C,Cortes JJ,Reyes PA,Antinuclear antibodies in scleroderma, mixed connective tissue disease and "primary" Raynaud's phenomenonClin RheumatolYear: 19887808610.1007/BF022840613261675|
|Okano Y,Medsger TA Jr,Autoantibody to Th ribonucleoprotein (nucleolar 7-2 RNA protein particle) in patients with systemic sclerosisArthritis RheumYear: 1990331822182810.1002/art.17803312101701994|
|Okano Y,Steen VD,Medsger TAJ,Autoantibody to U3 nucleolar ribonucleoprotein (fibrillarin) in patients with systemic sclerosisArthritis RheumYear: 1992359510010.1002/art.17803501141731817|
|Steen VD,Ziegler GL,Rodnan GP,Medsger TA Jr,Clinical and laboratory associations of anticentromere antibody in patients with progressive systemic sclerosisArthritis RheumYear: 19842712513110.1002/art.17802702026607734|
|LeRoy EC,Black C,Fleischmajer R,Jablonska S,Krieg T,Medsger TA Jr,Rowell N,Wollheim F,Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesisJ RheumatolYear: 1988152022053361530|
Clinical manifestations of anti-topo I in African American versus Caucasian patients
(n = 19)
|Topo I + U1RNP
(n = 6)
|Age (yr, mean ± SD)||55.10 ± 12.9||46.6 ± 8.6|
|No sclerodermatous changes||5%||50%||0.03|
|Overlap with SLE||0||50%||0.009|
|Overlap with PM/DM||0||33%||0.05|
CPK, creatine phosphokinase; ILD, interstitial lung disease. P values are with the Fisher Exact test.
Clinical characteristic of six cases with anti-topo I coexisting with anti-snRNPs autoantibodies
|Anti-snRNPs||Sm, U1RNP||Sm, U1RNP||U1RNP||U1RNP||U1RNP||U1RNP|
|Race||Afr Am||Afr Am||Afr Am||Afr Am||Caucasian||Caucasian|
|Type of skin involvement||No scl||dcSSc||No scl||No scl||dcSSc||dcSSc|
|SLE overlap/number of ACR criteria||Y
|PM/DM overlap||Elevated CPK||DM||PM|
Afr Am, African American; dcSSc, diffuse cutaneous scleroderma; F, female; ILD, interstitial lung disease; M, male; Y, present; N, not present; No Scl, no sclerodermatous skin changes; P, possible.
Clinical manifestations of African American versus Caucasian patients with anti-topo I
(n = 15)
(n = 8)
|Age (yr, mean ± SD)||56.5 ± 11.5||45.9 ± 13.2|
|No skin changes||7%||38%||0.03a|
|Overlap with SLE||0||38%||0.03|
|Overlap with PM/DM||0||25%||0.05|
aNo skin changes and sclerodactyly combined. CPK, creatine phosphokinase; ILD, interstitial lung disease. P values are with the Fisher Exact test.
Previous Document: Modulated contact frequencies at gene-rich loci support a statistical helix model for mammalian chro...
Next Document: Intussusception of the small bowel secondary to malignant metastases in two 80-year-old people: a ca...