Document Detail

Free sugar profile in cycads.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  25339967     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The sugars fructose, glucose, maltose, and sucrose were quantified in seven tissues of Zamia muricata Willd. to determine their distribution throughout various organs of a model cycad species, and in lateral structural roots of 18 cycad species to determine the variation in sugar concentration and composition among species representing every cycad genus. Taproot and lateral structural roots contained more sugars than leaf, stem, female strobilus, or coralloid roots. For example, taproot sugar concentration was 6.4-fold greater than stem sugar concentration. The dominant root sugars were glucose and fructose, and the only detected stem sugar was sucrose. Sucrose also dominated the sugar profile for leaflet and coralloid root tissue, and fructose was the dominant sugar in female strobilus tissue. Maltose was a minor constituent of taproot, leaflet, and female strobilus tissue, but absent in other tissues. The concentration of total free sugars and each of the four sugars did not differ among genera or families. Stoichiometric relationships among the sugars, such as the quotient hexoses/disaccharides, differed among organs and families. Although anecdotal reports on cycad starch have been abundant due to its historical use as human food and the voluminous medical research invested into cycad neurotoxins, this is the first report on the sugar component of the non-structural carbohydrate profile of cycads. Fructose, glucose, and sucrose are abundant in cycad tissues, with their relative abundance highly contrasting among organs. Their importance as forms of carbon storage, messengers of information, or regulators of cycad metabolism have not been determined to date.
Authors:
Thomas E Marler; Anders J Lindström
Related Documents :
21993797 - Increased plant volatile production affects oviposition, but not larval development, in...
22148267 - Deposition of brominated flame retardants to the devon ice cap, nunavut, canada.
21797077 - Clergymen abiding in the fields: the making of the naturalist observer in eighteenth-ce...
25350157 - Denitrification versus respiratory ammonification: environmental controls of two compet...
25373187 - Variation between ethiopian and north american barley varieties ( hordeum vulgare) in r...
23220197 - Traditional knowledge on medicinal and foodplants used in val san giacomo (sondrio, ita...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2014-10-07
Journal Detail:
Title:  Frontiers in plant science     Volume:  5     ISSN:  1664-462X     ISO Abbreviation:  Front Plant Sci     Publication Date:  2014  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-10-23     Completed Date:  2014-10-23     Revised Date:  2014-10-25    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101568200     Medline TA:  Front Plant Sci     Country:  Switzerland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  526     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Front Plant Sci
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Front Plant Sci
Journal ID (publisher-id): Front. Plant Sci.
ISSN: 1664-462X
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2014 Marler and Lindström.
open-access:
Received Day: 01 Month: 8 Year: 2014
Accepted Day: 17 Month: 9 Year: 2014
Electronic publication date: Day: 07 Month: 10 Year: 2014
collection publication date: Year: 2014
Volume: 5E-location ID: 526
PubMed Id: 25339967
ID: 4188140
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00526

Free sugar profile in cycads
Thomas E. Marler1*
Anders J. Lindström2
1Western Pacific Tropical Research Center, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of GuamMangilao, Guam
2Nong Nooch Tropical Botanical GardenChonburi, Thailand
[edited-by] Edited by: Paul Christiaan Struik, Wageningen University, Netherlands
[edited-by] Reviewed by: Grama Nanjappa Dhanapal, University of Agricultural Sciences, India; Johann Rohwer, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Correspondence: *Correspondence: Thomas E. Marler, Western Pacific Tropical Research Center, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Guam, UOG Station, Mangilao, 96923, Guam e-mail: tmarler@uguam.uog.edu
[other] This article was submitted to Crop Science and Horticulture, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.

INTRODUCTION

Non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) reserves can be mobilized and deployed to support plant metabolism and growth when current photosynthates are insufficient. This may occur following severe defoliation from events such as herbivory, fire, or tropical cyclone damage, when initial regrowth of foliage and continued maintenance of stem and root tissue depends on stored carbohydrates. A plant’s NSC pool is comprised of low molecular weight sugars (the most abundant free sugars in plants are the disaccharides sucrose and maltose, and the monosaccharides glucose and fructose) plus starch (Chapin et al., 1990). Because of their role in plant resilience in times of stress, they comprise a functional trait that can explain species differences in growth and survival. Therefore, knowledge of the quantity of various NSCs and the relationships among them within various plant organs can improve our understanding of specific growth characteristics and plant responses to seasons and stresses.

Cycads are ancient gymnosperms represented by extant taxa that have retained many primitive features. Their perseverance and ancestral history provides researchers the rare opportunity to gain insight into various aspects of plant evolution and biology (Brenner et al., 2003). The study of cycad taxonomy has received considerable attention, and the result is a description of 300+ species among 10 genera and three families (Osborne et al., 2012). In contrast, the study of cycad horticulture and physiology has been minimal despite the fact that more practical research may shed light on what has enabled persistence of this plant group throughout 100s of millions of years (Norstog and Nicholls, 1997). Moreover, cycads represent the most threatened group of plants worldwide (Hoffmann et al., 2010), so gaining further knowledge regarding all aspects of cycad biology is urgent, and may improve horticultural protocols and aid in developing and implementing successful conservation strategies. Although NSCs undoubtedly play a major role in cycad growth and development, they have not been extensively studied for any cycad species. Because the structural components of cycad stems and roots are primarily living tissue and they have no true wood (Norstog and Nicholls, 1997), reports on NSC relations of woody trees (e.g., Loescher et al., 1990; Nzima et al., 1997) are not reliable for predicting NSC relations of cycads. Furthermore, plants show lineage-specific differences in metabolite composition, but the extent to which the portions of the metabolome can reconcile with cycad taxonomy is unknown.

Our current understanding of the carbohydrate relations of cycad plants is unmistakably incomplete. This work was designed as an initial study to determine the quantity and stoichiometry of four common free sugars among representatives of every described cycad genus, and among various tissues throughout one representative cycad species. We included 18 cycad species growing in a common garden environment. In addition to providing the first look at the distribution and profile of cycad sugars, we addressed several questions. (1) Since the cycad taproot is essentially an extension of the non-woody pachycaulis cycad stem, would stem and taproot tissue exhibit similar amounts and stoichiometry of sugars? (2) Would the tissues with specialized functions such as leaves, strobili, and coralloid roots exhibit amounts and proportional relations of the sugars inconsistent with the structural/storage tissues? (3) Would sucrose dominate the sugar profile in coralloid roots, where cycad endosymbionts carry out nitrogen fixation, in accordance with its dominance in legume nodules?


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plants representing 18 species of cycads were sampled from the living collection at the Nong Nooch Tropical Botanical Garden in Chonburi, Thailand. The plants representing many of the species were too valuable to sacrifice for destructive analysis. We therefore evaluated a suitable tissue that could be collected without harming the plants. Sampling leaf tissue would have inflicted the least disturbance to the plants, but we desired the use of storage tissues so leaves were not appropriate for our goals. Stem tissue would have met our goal of storage tissue, but physical damage to a portion of stem tissue elicits extensive secondary damage to cycad stems (Fisher et al., 2009; Marler et al., 2010). Therefore, we could not use stem tissue for the survey. Lateral structural roots were selected as the tissue for analysis, as excision of lateral roots rarely leads to subsequent growth or health problems for cycad plants in horticultural settings. Lateral root tissue was collected from two species for each genus except for the mono-specific Microcycas calocoma (Miq.) A. DC. and Stangeria eriopus (Kunze) Baill. The species representing the other eight genera were Bowenia spectabilis Hook. ex Hook.f., Bowenia serrulata (W.Bull) Chamb., Ceratozamia robusta Miq., Ceratozamia miqueliana H.Wendl., Cycas machonochiei Chirgwin and K.D. Hill, Cycas riuminiana Porte ex Regel, Dioon sonorense (De Luca, Sabato, and Vázq.Torres) J. Chemnick, T.J. Gregory, and S. Salas-Mor., Dioon spinulosum Dyer ex Eichl., Encephalartos mackenziei L.E. Newton, Encephalartos laurentianus De Wild., Lepidozamia peroffskyana Regel, Lepidozamia hopei (W.Hill) Regel, Macrozamia macdonnellii (F. Muell. ex Miq.) A. DC., Macrozamia mountperriensis F. M. Bailey, Zamia encephalartoides D. W. Stev., and Zamia muricata. Species habitat characteristics and plant size were documented (Table 1).

Female Zamia muricata plants were destroyed to use as the model species to determine the general distribution of sugars among various tissues and organs. The plants were 4 years old, supporting female strobili of 8–10 months old. Tissue samples were collected on 19 March 2010 from taproots, lateral structural roots, coralloid roots, stems, petioles, leaflets, and strobili then lyophilized.

Soluble sugar extraction was conducted with hot-water extraction with acetonitrile (80°C; Schloter et al., 2005). The concentrations of sucrose, fructose, glucose, and maltose were determined by HPLC-RI (Thermo Scientific RI-150, AS3000 autosampler, P2000 pump). Our direct and calculated response variables were concentration of the four sugars and total free sugars (sum of the four sugars). In addition, we evaluated the sugar stoichiometry of each tissue category, genus, or family by calculating the quotients among the three dominant sugars: glucose/fructose, glucose/sucrose, and fructose/sucrose. Finally, we determined the relative immediate carbohydrate availability with the quotient hexoses/disaccharides where the hexose content was the sum of glucose and fructose, and the disaccharide content was the sum of sucrose and maltose.

For comparison among tissue categories of Zamia muricata plants or among genera or family for the phylogenetic analysis, a one-way ANOVA was performed using Proc GLM function in SAS with Type III P-value to determine significance. Means separation when significant was conducted employing the Least Significant Difference test.


RESULTS
SUGAR PROFILES AMONG Zamia muricata ORGANS

Total sugar concentration exhibited a 6.4-fold difference (F6,14 = 192.39; P < 0.0001) among the tissue categories (Figure 1). Total sugars ranged from 39 mg⋅g-1 for stem tissue to 247 mg⋅g-1 for taproot tissue. The sugar concentration in taproot and lateral structural root tissues greatly exceeded that in all other tissue categories. Fructose concentration varied among the tissue categories (F6,14 = 226.86; P < 0.0001). Fructose was not detected in stem tissue, and ranged from 22 to 108 mg⋅g-1 in accordance with coralloid root < leaflet ≤ petiole < strobilus ≤ lateral root < taproot. Glucose concentration exhibited variation among the tissue categories (F6,14 = 81.73; P < 0.0001). Glucose was not detected in stem or coralloid root tissue, and ranged from 11 to 120 mg⋅g-1 throughout the range of leaflet ≤ strobilus < petiole < lateral root < taproot tissues. Sucrose concentration was present in every tissue category yet the range was more constricted than for fructose or glucose. Sucrose concentration varied among the tissue categories (F6,14 = 26.56; P < 0.0001), ranging from 12 to 87 mg⋅g-1 in the order taproot < strobilus ≤ petiole ≤ coralloid root ≤ stem < lateral root < leaflet. Mean maltose concentration was 2.7 mg⋅g-1, and maltose did not differ among the tissue categories (F6,14 = 2.26; P < 0.0985).

Glucose and fructose were the dominant sugars in taproots, lateral structural roots, and petioles (Figures 2 and 3). Sucrose represented about 60% of the sugars in leaflets and coralloid roots (Figures 2 and 3), and was the only sugar detected in stems. Female strobilus tissue was the only tissue in which fructose dominated the sugar profile (Figure 2). Sugar diversity was greatest in taproot, leaflet, and strobilus tissues, as these were the only tissues in which all four sugars were detected. Stem tissue was the tissue exhibiting the least diversity in free sugars, as it was the only tissue within which three of the sugars were not detectable.

The quotient glucose/fructose exhibited minimal but significant differences (F6,14 = 64.6; P < 0.0001) among the tissue categories. Glucose/fructose was <0.3 for coralloid root, female strobilus, and leaflet tissue; and was >1.0 for stem, petiole, lateral root, and taproot tissue. The quotient glucose/sucrose exhibited substantial range (F6,14 = 13.61; P < 0.0001), with glucose/sucrose in taproot tissue being 10.4 and glucose/sucrose of all other tissue categories being <2.2. The quotient fructose/sucrose differed among the tissue categories (F6,14 = 5.12; P < 0.0056); and was <1.7 for all tissue categories except for strobilus (6.2) and taproot (9.4). The quotient hexoses/disaccharides significantly differed among the organs (F6,14 = 44.89; P < 0.0056). This quotient was close to nil for stem, coralloid root, and leaflet tissues; from 3.3 to 3.5 for petiole, lateral root, and strobilus tissue; and 12.2 for taproot tissue.

SUGAR PROFILES OF STRUCTURAL LATERAL ROOTS AMONG GENERA AND FAMILIES

Total sugar concentration of lateral structural roots exhibited an overall mean of 79.0 mg⋅g-1 and did not differ among the 10 genera (P < 0.3404) or among the three families (P < 0.2073). The total sugar content for these 18 species was fairly evenly split among glucose, sucrose, and fructose fractions (Figure 4), and concentration of each of these sugars did not differ among the genera or families. Maltose was a minor component of the lateral root NSC profile, as it was not detected in lateral structural roots of seven genera or one family. Maltose concentration exhibited an overall mean of <10% of that for each of the three dominant sugars (Figure 4).

The stoichiometry of these sugars exhibited variables with greater diversity than concentration of each sugar. The quotient glucose/fructose was not influenced by genus (P < 0.5676) but differed among families (P < 0.0307); and was 0.4 ± 0.2 for Zamiaceae, 1.3 ± 0.3 for Cycadaceae, and 1.7 ± 0.4 for Stangeriaceae. Similarly, glucose/sucrose did not differ among genera (P < 0.1366) but differed among families (P < 0.0087); exhibiting 0.2 ± 0.2 for Cycadaceae, 0.6 ± 0.3 for Zamiaceae, and 4.4 ± 2.3 for Stangeriaceae. Fructose/sucrose differed among genera (P < 0.0028) and families (P < 0.0123). Fructose/sucrose was 0.1 ± 0.1 for Cycadaceae, 1.0 ± 0.2 for Zamiaceae, and 2.3 ± 0.7 for Stangeriaceae. The quotient hexoses/disaccharides was not influenced by genera (P < 0.1658) but significantly differed among families (P < 0.0081). This quotient was 0.4 ± 0.4 for Cycadaceae, 1.4 ± 0.3 for Zamiaceae, and 6.5 ± 3.2 for Stangeriaceae.


DISCUSSION

Cycad plants are known for long-term survival and resilience (Norstog and Nicholls, 1997), and NSC storage traits may partly explain their ability to cope with ephemeral biotic and abiotic stress. Much has been written about the abundance of starch in cycad tissues (Whiting, 1963; Norstog and Nicholls, 1997; Whitelock, 2002; Williams, 2012). However, the soluble sugar component of NSC relations of cycads has not been reported until now.

The cycad taproot is essentially an extension of the non-woody pachycaulis cycad stem (Marler et al., 2010), so we asked if stem and taproot tissue would exhibit similar amounts of sugars and relationships among sugars. The large storage tissues of stems and taproots of Zamia muricata as a representative cycad species were highly contrasting in their sugar relations. In fact, taproots and stems defined the absolute extreme limits of the sugar concentration range when all tissue categories were compared. Taproots contained the greatest while stems contained the least concentration of sugars. Moreover, taproot tissues were highly diverse in sugar type, as all four sugars were represented; while sucrose alone defined the stem tissue sugar signature. Taproots contained more fructose and glucose than any other tissue, yet exhibited less sucrose than all other tissue categories. The sugar profile in stem tissue was highly contrasting from that in taproot tissue. Both organs are primarily comprised of living parenchyma tissue with vascular tissue interspersed throughout. They are essentially the same diameter at the stem-root transition, and are sometimes difficult to distinguish based on external morphology. In stems, the vascular tissue is arranged in organized cylinders, whereas in taproots the vascular tissue is organized in scattered bundles, but in both organs living parenchyma is the major substrate throughout and true wood is absent (Marler et al., 2010). We expected the free sugar characteristics to be similar for these two organ sections that collectively comprise the cycad caudex (Marler et al., 2010), signifying that both would be efficient at NSC storage and serve as potential sites of rapid carbon deployment in times of primary growth. Our results indicated that structural roots alone may be the dominant site of readily available NSC reserves. We note, however, that a full understanding of the respective roles of stem and root source-sink relations will require simultaneous measurement of starch and sugars before, during, and following the ephemeral sink stage of an expensive leaf or strobilus episodic event.

We asked if the tissues with specialized functions such as leaves, strobili, and coralloid roots would exhibit amounts and ratios of the sugars inconsistent with the structural/storage tissues. Indeed, female strobilus tissue was the only tissue type where fructose dominated the sugar profile. Fructose appears to be important in maintenance of Zamia muricata female reproductive tissues. The female strobilus was also one of only three tissue categories that exhibited detectable levels of all four sugars. Carbon is generally transported from source to sink organs in higher plants as sucrose (Zimmermann and Ziegler, 1975; ap Rees, 1984). If cycad petioles serve primarily to position leaflet tissues for maximum photosynthesis and as conduits for exported and imported materials, we predicted that the sugars in petiole tissue would primarily be comprised of the sucrose that is exported from leaflet tissue. This was not the case, as glucose and fructose concentrations exceeded those of sucrose in petiole tissue. Perhaps cycad petioles serve a NSC buffering role where various sugars are available for metabolism of nearby leaf or meristem tissues. We also should not discount the possibility that substantial photosynthesis occurs in green petiole tissues, leading to the documented soluble sugar richness. To our knowledge, no measurements of petiole or rachis photosynthesis have been made for any cycad species. Coralloid root structures were positioned directly on large lateral roots, yet the sugar relations were highly contrasting between the two root types. First, glucose concentration in lateral roots was substantial in relation to other tissue categories and in relation to other sugars in lateral roots, yet glucose was not detected in coralloid roots. Second, total sugar concentration of coralloid roots was only 26% of that for lateral roots.

Sucrose is the major sugar represented in legume root nodules that have been studied (Streeter, 1991; Vikman and Vessey, 1993). Hence, whether sucrose would dominate the sugar profile in cycad coralloid roots was of interest. The results with Zamia muricata coralloid roots hosting nitrogen-fixing endosymbionts conformed to this legume characteristic, as more than 60% of the sugar profile was represented by sucrose. Cycad-cyanobacteria mutualism occurs in this specialized cycad structure (Grove et al., 1980; Lindblad, 1990; Norstog and Nicholls, 1997; Rai et al., 2000), and the relative abundance of sucrose may indicate its importance in the signaling system that enables success of the mutualism. Further investigations are needed to characterize the role of the endosymbiont as a regulator of coralloid root carbohydrate metabolism (e.g., Rasmussen et al., 2012), a concept that also applies to mycorrhizal relations in cycad roots. Sucrose is synthesized by cyanobacteria, and genes coding for biosynthetic and degradative enzymes have been cloned from cyanobacteria (Lunn, 2002). These traits present unique opportunities to study the carbon metabolism of the coralloid root structure, as both organisms involved in the unique symbiosis are equipped with the tools to catabolize sucrose.

Contemporary cycads represent an ancient lineage of land plants that have commanded the attention of evolutionary biologists (Willis and McElwain, 2002). Resolving the phylogeny of the Cycadales has been challenging (Crisp and Cook, 2011; Nagalingum et al., 2011; Martinez et al., 2012). The Cycadaceae family diverged from the other families as a sister clade in the Triassic or early Jurassic, yet most of the speciation among the three families has occurred in the relatively recent Cenozoic (Nagalingum et al., 2011). We expected to find a diversity in free sugar relations that would align with phylogeny, so the lack of significant differences among the genera and families for most of our response variables indicates remarkable stability in sugar relations among highly contrasting clades that diverged long ago.

The doubt arises as to whether the relationship of each sugar to the other sugars would exhibit variations among genera and families. All cycad genera were expected to contain an abundance of free sugars in structural root tissues due to the abundance of parenchyma in the non-woody construction of all cycad structural tissues (Norstog and Nicholls, 1997). Therefore the stoichiometric relationships among the sugars were expected to exhibit greater variation among the genera than total sugar concentration. Present results confirmed this prediction as the differences in total sugar concentration exhibited no relationship with genus or family. But the quotient hexoses/disaccharides exhibited a significant 22-fold difference among the 10 genera and a significant 17-fold difference among the three families, with the Cycadaceae being much lower than the other families comprising the sister clade.

This study adds to several earlier reports on cycad saccharides (Stephen and De Bruyn, 1967; Siniscalco-Gigliano, 1980, 1990; Moretti et al., 1981; De Luca et al., 1982). Most of the earlier studies were restricted to mucilage chemistry. Moreover, the relationship of cycad taxonomy and secondary metabolites has been discussed [see Richardson (1990) for review], and the collective reports are difficult to interpret. However, many improvements in analytical methods and refining of cycad phylogeny have occurred since these earlier publications.

The present work did not address relevant enzymes or their activities. The regulation of sucrose metabolism by these enzymes has become a central issue in understanding plant carbon relations (Koch, 2004). The biosynthetic enzyme sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS) plays a major role in controlling sucrose relations (Huber and Huber, 1996). Protein phosphorylation is an essential mechanism controlling SPS activity (Winter and Huber, 2000). Variations in phosphorylation may explain some of the observed differences in Zamia photosynthetic and storage organs in the present study. The degradative enzyme sucrose synthase (SUS) participates in starch and sucrose metabolism (Cardini et al., 1955). It catalyzes the reactions that convert fructose and glucose into sucrose, but its functional implications extend well beyond catabolism (Subbaiah et al., 2007). The invertases also cleave sucrose, but the products of the reaction differ from those of SUS and invertase-catalyzed hydrolysis generally has been associated with cell expansion (Winter and Huber, 2000; Koch, 2004).

APPLICATIONS

Why study cycad sugars? Storage of NSCs enhances plant survival by enabling plants to cope with periods of biotic and abiotic stress. An awareness of NSC relations is therefore needed to fully understand plant susceptibility to and recovery from severe stresses such as drought (Galiano et al., 2011; Muller et al., 2011; Rogiers et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2013; Mitchell et al., 2013), shade (Myers and Kitajima, 2007), fire (Schutz et al., 2009; Wigley et al., 2009), nutrient deficiency (Singh and Sale, 1997; Lei and Liu, 2011; Rellán-Álvarez et al., 2011), pathogens (Angay et al., 2014; Tauzin and Giardina, 2014), and herbivory (Caldwell et al., 1981; Rodgers et al., 1995). Research into all facets of cycad physiology has been minimal to date (Norstog and Nicholls, 1997). Clearly, further research on the impact of biotic and abiotic stresses to cycad populations would benefit from the inclusion of NSC relations and their role as messengers of information. In particular, this is needed to evaluate multiple competing hypotheses that may explain mortality following terminal stress conditions (Fajardo et al., 2011; Adams et al., 2013; Galvez et al., 2013; Keunen et al., 2013; Mitchell et al., 2013).

Brenner et al. (2003) state that physiological roles for cycad metabolites should be investigated and suggested endogenous signaling compounds as a potential line of research. In that light, following are examples that may inform continued cycad NSC research. Efficient regulation of carbon metabolism can give an evolutionary advantage to plants (Feugier and Satake, 2013) and sugars directly regulate various physiological and developmental events as signaling molecules (Rolland et al., 2006; Tognetti et al., 2013). There is growing evidence that sugars exert a regulatory influence over senescence (O’Grady et al., 2013; Thomas, 2013). Sucrose is a direct signal during regulation of fruit ripening (Jia et al., 2013). It also controls the expression of genes involved in starch or fructan synthesis (Cairns and Pollock, 1988; Müller-Röber et al., 1990) and those involved in photosynthesis (Sheen, 1990; Krapp et al., 1991; Van Oosten and Besford, 1994). Similarly, sucrose or glucose alone can replace light as the trigger to up-regulate nitrate reductase gene expression (Cheng et al., 1992). Price et al. (2004) reported that almost a thousand Arabidopsis genes were up- or down-regulated by glucose [see Halford et al. (2011) for related review]. Moreover, Matsoukas et al. (2013) report that the interplay between starch and sugars is involved in inciting the transition from juvenile to adult phases in Arabidopsis. Recent evidence illuminates that sugars play a central role as the initial regulator of apical dominance rather than auxins as indicated by conventional wisdom (Mason et al., 2014; Van den Ende, 2014).

Relations among starch and various sugars can change with organ development and with season (Boldingh et al., 2000). For example, Nzima et al. (1997) reported that pistachio trees that begin the growing season with greater NSCs produce copious fruit loads, then end the season with less NSC reserves than trees that produce less fruit load. Similarly, initial growth and early yield of strawberry transplants were correlated with pre-transplant carbohydrate status (Kirschbaum et al., 1998; Palha et al., 2002). If similar relations apply to cycads, then success of transplanting or sucker removal for propagation may be influenced by timing of the operation in relation to recent plant developmental and seasonal events that directly influence ephemeral availability of NSCs.

Cycad growth and development is characterized by episodes of rapid leaf or strobilus expansion, followed by longer periods of “rest” during which no apparent primary growth occurs (Marler and Dongol, 2011). This form of plant behavior may be regulated by stored carbon reserves, as endogenous NSCs have been linked to the control of episodic growth in other species (Kuehny et al., 1997; Li et al., 1998). The number of leaf flushes per year and the interval between successive organ expansion events are highly contrasting among cycad species, even when grown in a common garden set up.

The assimilation products produced by photosynthesis are resource revenues that may serve as inputs to resource budget models that inform timing and magnitude of plant reproduction (Isagi et al., 1997). Indeed, the cost of reproduction has been demonstrated for cycads by documenting frequency of reproductive episodes, and the costs associated with production of a female strobili is consistently greater than with production of a male strobili (Clark and Clark, 1987, 1988; Ornduff, 1987; Clark et al., 1992; Marler, 2010). Mechanisms that control these differences may be explained by NSC depletion during and NSC recovery following a growth episode. Therefore, studies that determine pools of NSCs in cycad roots and stems before a leaf or strobilus growth event versus immediately following full expansion of that event would improve our understanding of which organs and their stored metabolites are involved in supporting the considerable biomass additions involved in cycad plant growth events.

Observations of cycad plant mortality following the development of a strobilus are common, especially when this occurs on young or undersized female plants (personal observations), providing indirect evidence of carbon starvation as a result of strobilus development. Therefore, a more thorough understanding of which metabolites and organs are involved as sources may aid in understanding this unfortunate feature of cycad growth and development, and lead to ex situ management decisions that may mitigate these outcomes.

Maltose is the disaccharide that emerges from the breakdown of starch (Lloyd et al., 2005). Maltose has been proposed to confer protection against degradation of PSII, and the suppression of maltose production results in decreased PSII photochemical efficiency (Kaplan and Guy, 2005). The modest maltose levels in leaflets and female strobili, which were presumed to be photosynthetic, may serve this function.


CONCLUSION

The implications of this initial look at free sugars in cycads are far-reaching and provide novel insights. The diversity of free sugars and their elevated concentrations in cycad roots illuminates a sharp contrast to the paucity in sugar diversity and muted concentration in the pachycaulis stems. The stoichiometry of free sugars was more influenced by phylogeny than was absolute concentrations. For example, hexoses/disaccharides of Cycadaceae was a fraction of that for the other families collectively representing a sister clade. These traits may be of importance to ecologists for understanding plant behavior in natural habitats, and to conservationists of rare taxa for informing horticultural management decisions. The present work leaves several unresolved issues for future work. For example, the influence of sink activity of primary growth episodes on pools of free sugars among storage organs is unknown. The influence of free sugar pools on biotic and abiotic stress relations is also unknown for any cycad species. The role of free sugars in plant signaling represents a research priority that is yet to be explored (Tognetti et al., 2013), and the study of cycad sugar relations may add greatly to this agenda. At least one cycad species has been shown to possess crassulacean acid metabolism in leaf photosynthesis (Vovides et al., 2002), and the antiquity of cycads may offer a unique look at evolution of carbon concentrating mechanisms in plants (Raven et al., 2008; Reinert and Blankenship, 2010). The role of relevant enzymes in sucrose metabolism were not addressed in this study. The underlying physiological reasons for the observed sugar profiles may be more fully understood with direct research on enzyme activities in addition to metabolite levels. Finally, functional aspects of NSCs in cycads may be more fully understood by studying ecological correlates among species grouped by ecotype rather than by studying phylogenetic patterns among species grouped by taxonomy.


Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We thank George Fernandez for statistical analyses and Kasetsart University Department of Biochemistry for use of freeze-dryer. Support provided by Mr. Kampon Tansacha, Director of Nong Nooch Tropical Botanical Garden, and Western Pacific Tropical Research Center.


REFERENCES
Adams H. D.,Germino M. J.,Breshears D. D.,Barron-Gafford G. A.,Guardiola-Claramonte M.,Zou C. B.,et al. (Year: 2013). Nonstructural leaf carbohydrate dynamics of Pinus edulis during drought-induced tree mortality reveal role for carbon metabolism in mortality mechanism.New Phytol.1971142–115110.1111/nph.1210223311898
Angay O.,Fleischmann F.,Recht S.,Herrmann S.,Matyssek R.,Oßwald W.,et al. (Year: 2014). Sweets for the foe – effects of nonstructural carbohydrates on the susceptibility of Quercus robur against Phytophthora quercina.New Phytol.2031282–129010.1111/nph.1287624902781
ap Rees T.. (Year: 1984). “Sucrose metabolism,” inStorage Carbohydrates in Vascular Plants ?ed.Lewis D. H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 53–73
Boldingh H.,Smith G. S.,Klages K.. (Year: 2000). Seasonal concentrations of non-structural carbohydrates of five Actinidia species in fruit, leaf and fine root tissue.Ann. Bot.85469–47610.1006/anbo.1999.1094
Brenner E. D.,Stevenson D. W.,Twigg R. W.. (Year: 2003). Cycads: evolutionary innovations and the role of plant-derived neurotoxins.Trends Plant Sci.8446–45210.1016/S1360-1385(03)00190-013678912
Cairns A. J.,Pollock C. J.. (Year: 1988). Fructan biosynthesis in excised leaves of Lolium temulentum.New Phytol.721269–1280
Caldwell M. M.,Richards J. H.,Johnson D. A.,Nowak R. S.,Dzurec R. S.. (Year: 1981). Coping with herbivory: photosynthetic capacity and resource allocation in two semiarid Agropyron bunchgrasses.Oecologia5014–2410.1007/BF00378790
Cardini C. E.,Leloir L. F.,Chiriboga J.. (Year: 1955). The biosynthesis of sucrose.J. Biol. Chem.214149–15514367373
Chapin F. S.,Schulze E.-D.,Mooney H. A.. (Year: 1990). The ecology and economics of storage in plants.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.21423–44710.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002231
Cheng C.-L.,Acedo G. N.,Cristinsin M.,Conkling M. A.. (Year: 1992). Sucrose mimics the light induction of Arabidopsis nitrate reductase gene transcription.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.891861–186410.1073/pnas.89.5.18611542684
Clark D. A.,Clark D. B.. (Year: 1987). Temporal and environmental patterns of reproduction in Zamia skinneri, a tropical rain forest cycad.J. Ecol.75135–14910.2307/2260540
Clark D. B.,Clark D. A.. (Year: 1988). Leaf production and the cost of reproduction in the neotropical rain forest cycad, Zamia skinneri.J. Ecol.761153–116310.2307/2260640
Clark D. B.,Clark D. A.,Grayum M. H.. (Year: 1992). Leaf demography of a neotropical rain forest cycad, Zamia skinneri (Zamiaceae).Am. J. Bot.7928–3310.2307/2445193
Crisp M. D.,Cook L. G.. (Year: 2011). Cenozoic extinctions account for the low diversity of extant gymnosperms compared with angiosperms.New Phytol.192997–100910.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03862.x21895664
De Luca P.,Moretti A.,Sabato S.,Siniscalco-Gigliano G.. (Year: 1982). A comparative study of cycad mucilages.Phytochemistry211609–161110.1016/S0031-9422(82)85026-7
Fajardo A.,Piper F. I.,Cavieres L. A.. (Year: 2011). Distinguishing local from global climate influences in the variation of carbon status with altitude in a tree line species.Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.20307–31810.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00598.x
Feugier F. G.,Satake A.. (Year: 2013). Dynamical feedback between circadian clock and sucrose availability explains adaptive response of starch metabolism to various photoperiods.Front. Plant Sci.3:30510.3389/fpls.2012.00305
Fisher J. B.,Lindström A.,Marler T.. (Year: 2009). Tissue responses and solution movement after stem wounding in six Cycas species.HortScience44848–851
Galiano L.,Martínez-Vilalta J.,Lloret F.. (Year: 2011). Carbon reserves and canopy defoliation determine recovery of Scots pine 4 yr after a drought episode.New Phytol.190750–75910.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03628.x21261625
Galvez D. A.,Landhäusser S. M.,Tyree M. T.. (Year: 2013). Low root reserve accumulation during drought may lead to winter mortality in poplar seedlings.New Phytol.198139–14810.1111/nph.1212923347066
Grove T. S.,O’Connell A. M.,Malajczuk N.. (Year: 1980). Effects of fire on the growth, nutrient content, and rate of nitrogen fixation of the cycad Macrozamia riedlei.Aust. J. Bot.28271–28110.1071/BT9800271
Halford N. G.,Curtis T. Y.,Muttucamaru N.,Postles J.,Mottram D. S.. (Year: 2011). Sugars in crop plants.Ann. Appl. Biol.1581–2510.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00443.x
Hoffmann M.,Hilton-Taylor C.,Angulo A.,Böhm M.,Brooks T. M.,Butchart S. H. M.,et al. (Year: 2010). The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates.Science3301503–150910.1126/science.119444220978281
Huber S. C.,Huber J. L.. (Year: 1996). Role and regulation of sucrose-phosphate synthase in higher plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.47431–44410.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.43115012296
Isagi Y.,Sugimura K.,Sumida A.,Ito H.. (Year: 1997). How does masting happen and synchronize?J. Theor. Biol.187231–23910.1006/jtbi.1997.0442
Jia H.,Wang Y.,Sun M.,Li B.,Han Y.,Zhao Y.,et al. (Year: 2013). Sucrose functions as a signal involved in the regulation of strawberry fruit development and ripening.New Phytol.198453–46510.1111/nph.1217623425297
Kaplan F.,Guy C. L.. (Year: 2005). RNA interference of Arabidopsis beta-amylase8 prevents maltose accumulation upon cold shock and increases sensitivity of PSII photochemical efficiency to freezing stress.Plant J.44730–74310.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02565.x16297066
Keunen E.,Peshev D.,Vangronsveld J.,Van den Ende W.,Cuypers A.. (Year: 2013). Plant sugars are crucial players in the oxidative challenge during abiotic stress: extending the traditional concept.Plant Cell Environ.361242–125510.1111/pce.12061
Kirschbaum D. S.,Cantliffe D. J.,Darnell R. L.,Bish E. B.,Chandler C. K.. (Year: 1998). Propagation site latitude influences initial carbohydrate concentration and partitioning, growth, and fruiting of ‘Sweet Charlie’ strawberry (Fragaria × Ananassa Duch.) transplants grown in Florida.Annu. Fla. State Hort. Soc.11193–96
Koch K.. (Year: 2004). Sucrose metabolism: regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.7235–24610.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.01415134743
Krapp A.,Quick W. P.,Stitt M.. (Year: 1991). There is a dramatic loss of Rubisco, other Calvin cycle enzymes and chlorophyll when glucose is supplied to mature spinach leaves via transpiration stream.Planta18658–6910.1007/BF0020149824186575
Kuehny J. S.,Miller W. B.,Decoteau D. R.. (Year: 1997). Changes in carbohydrate and nitrogen relationships during episodic growth of Ligustrum japonicum Thunb.J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.122634–641
Lei M.,Liu D.. (Year: 2011). Sucrose regulates plant responses to deficiencies in multiple nutrients.Plant Signal. Behav.61247–124910.4161/psb.6.8.1637821701258
Li R.,Werger M. J. A.,During H. J.,Zhong Z. C.. (Year: 1998). Carbon and nutrient dynamics in relation to growth rhythm in the giant bamboo Phyllostachys pubescens.Plant Soil201113–12310.1023/A:1004322812651
Lindblad P.. (Year: 1990). Nitrogen and carbon metabolism in coralloid roots of cycads.Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard.57104–113
Liu Y.-H.,Offler C. E.,Ruan Y.-L.. (Year: 2013). Regulation of fruit and seed response to heat and drought by sugars as nutrients and signals.Front. Plant Sci.4:28210.3389/fpls.2013.00282
Lloyd J. R.,Kossmann J.,Ritte G.. (Year: 2005). Leaf starch degradation comes out of the shadows.Trends Plant Sci.10130–13710.1016/j.tplants.2005.01.00115749471
Loescher W. H.,McCamant T.,Keller J. D.. (Year: 1990). Carbohydrates reserves, translocation, and storage in woody plant roots.HortScience25274–281
Lunn J. E.. (Year: 2002). Evolution of sucrose synthesis.Plant Physiol.1281490–150010.1104/pp.01089811950997
Marler T. E.. (Year: 2010). Cycad mutualist offers more than pollen transport.Am. J. Bot.97841–84510.3732/ajb.090025121622449
Marler T. E.,Dongol N.. (Year: 2011). Models to describe Cycas micronesica leaf and strobili development.HortScience461333–1337
Marler T. E.,Lindström A.,Fisher J. B.. (Year: 2010). Stem tissue dimensions correlate with ease of horticultural management for six Cycas species.HortScience451293–1296
Martinez L. C. A.,Artabe A. E.,Bodnar J.. (Year: 2012). A new cycad stem from the Cretaceous in Argentina and its phylogenetic relationships with other cycadales.Bot. J. Linn. Soc.170436–45810.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01300.x
Mason M. G.,Ross J. J.,Babst B. A.,Wienclaw B. N.,Beveridge C. A.. (Year: 2014). Sugar demand, not auxin, is the initial regulator of apical dominance.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1116092–609710.1073/pnas.132204511124711430
Matsoukas I. G.,Massiah A. J.,Thomas B.. (Year: 2013). Starch metabolism and antiflorigenic signals modulate the juvenile-to-adult phase transition in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell Environ.361802–181110.1111/pce.1208823452177
Mitchell P. J.,O’Grady A. P.,Tissue D. T.,White D. A.,Ottenschlaeger M. L.,Pinkard E. A.. (Year: 2013). Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality.New Phytol.197862–87210.1111/nph.1206423228042
Moretti A.,Sabato S.,Siniscalco-Gigliano G.. (Year: 1981). Monosaccharide composition of the mucilages in Encephalartos Lehm. (Zamiaceae).G. Bot. Ital.115291–29710.1080/11263508109427986
Muller B.,Pantin F.,Génard M.,Turc O.,Freixes S.,Piques M.,et al. (Year: 2011). Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationship between C and growth in sink organs.J. Exp. Bot.621715–172910.1093/jxb/erq43821239376
Müller-Röber B. T.,Kossman J.,Hannah L. C.,Willmitzer L.,Sonnewald U.. (Year: 1990). “ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase genes from potato: mode of RNA expression and its relation to starch synthesis,” inPhloem Transport and Assimilate CompartmentationedsBonnemain J.-L.,Delrot S.,Lucas W. J.,Dainty J. (Nantes: Ouest) 204–208
Myers J. A.,Kitajima K.. (Year: 2007). Carbohydrate storage enhances seedling shade and stress tolerance in a neotropical forest.J. Ecol.95383–39510.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01207.x
Nagalingum N. S.,Marshall C. R.,Quental T. B.,Rai H. S.,Little D. P.,Matthews S.. (Year: 2011). Recent synchronous radiation of a living fossil.Science334796–79910.1126/science.120992622021670
Norstog K. J.,Nicholls T. J.. (Year: 1997). The Biology of the Cycads.New York, NY: Cornell University Press
Nzima M. D. S.,Martin G. C.,Nishijima C.. (Year: 1997). Seasonal changes in total nonstructural carbohydrates within branches and roots of naturally “off” and “on” ‘Kerman’ pistachio trees.J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.122856–862
O’Grady A. P.,Mitchell P. J. M.,Pinkard E. A.,Tissue D. T.. (Year: 2013). Thirsty roots and hungry leaves: unravelling the roles of carbon and water dynamics in tree mortality.New Phytol.200294–29710.1111/nph.1245124050630
Ornduff R.. (Year: 1987). Sex ratios and coning frequency of the cycad Zamila pumila L. (Zamiaceae) in the Dominican Republic.Biotropica19361–36410.2307/2388634
Osborne R.,Calonje M.,Hill K.,Stanberg L.,Stevenson D. W.. (Year: 2012). The world list of cycads.Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard.106480–508
Palha M. G. S.,Taylor D. R.,Monteiro A. A.. (Year: 2002). The effect of digging date and chilling history on root carbohydrate content and cropping of ‘Chandler’ and ‘Douglas’ strawberries in Portugal.Acta Hortic.567511–514
Price J.,Laxmi A.,St Martin S. K.,Jang J. C.. (Year: 2004). Global transcription profiling reveals multiple sugar signal transduction mechanisms in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell162128–215010.1105/tpc.104.02261615273295
Rai A. N.,Söderbäck E.,Bergman B.. (Year: 2000). Cyanobacterium-plant symbioses.New Phytol.147449–48110.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00720.x
Rasmussen S.,Liu Q.,Parsons A. J.,Xue H.,Sinclair B.,Newman J. A.. (Year: 2012). Grass-endophyte interactions: a note on the role of monosaccharide transport in the Neotyphodium lolii-Lolium perenne symbiosis.New Phytol.1967–1210.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04250.x22803786
Raven J. A.,Cockell C. S.,de la Rocha C. L.. (Year: 2008). The evolution of inorganic carbon concentrating mechanisms in photosynthesis.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.3632641–265010.1098/rstb.2008.002018487130
Reinert R.,Blankenship R. E.. (Year: 2010). Evolutionary aspects of crassulacean acid metabolism.Oecol. Aust.14359–36810.4257/oeco.2010.1402.02
Rellán-Álvarez R.,El-Jendoubi H.,Wohlgemuth G.,Abadía A.,Fiehn O.,Abadía J.,et al. (Year: 2011). Metabolite profile changes in xylem sap and leaf extracts of strategy I plants in response to iron deficiency and resupply.Front. Plant Sci.2:6610.3389/fpls.2011.00066
Richardson P. M.. (Year: 1990). Flavonoid chemistry and the taxonomy of cycads.Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard.57132–141
Rodgers H. L.,Brakke M. P.,Ewel J. J.. (Year: 1995). Shoot damage effects on starch reserves of Cedrela odorata.Biotropica2771–7710.2307/2388904
Rogiers S. Y.,Holzapfel B. P.,Smith J. P.. (Year: 2011). Sugar accumulation in roots of two grape varieties with contrasting response to water stress.Ann. Appl. Biol.159399–41310.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00505.x
Rolland F.,Baena-Gonzalez E.,Sheen J.. (Year: 2006). Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.57675–70910.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.10544116669778
Schloter M.,Winkler J. B.,Aneja M.,Koch N.,Fleischmann F.,Pritsch K.,et al. (Year: 2005). Short term effects of ozone on the plant-rhizosphere-bulk soil system of young beech trees.Plant Biol. (Stuttg.)7728–73610.1055/s-2005-87298716388477
Schutz A. E. N.,Bond W. J.,Cramer M. D.. (Year: 2009). Juggling carbon: allocation patterns of a dominant tree in a fire-prone savanna.Oecologia160235–24610.1007/s00442-009-1293-119214583
Sheen J.. (Year: 1990). Metabolic repression of transcription in higher plants.Plant Cell21027–103810.1105/tpc.2.10.10272136626
Singh D. K.,Sale P. W. G.. (Year: 1997). Defoliation frequency and the response by white clover to increasing phosphorus supply 2: non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in plant parts.Aust. J. Agric. Res.48119–12410.1071/A96052
Siniscalco-Gigliano G.. (Year: 1980). Analisi gascromatografica dei monosaccaridi delle mucillagini di Encephalartos longifolius Lehm. (Zamiaceae).Delpinoa2163–70
Siniscalco-Gigliano G.. (Year: 1990). Chemotaxonomic significance of MAM glycosides and mucilages in cycads.Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard.57123–131
Stephen A. M.,De Bruyn D. C.. (Year: 1967). The gum exudates of Encephalartos longifolius Lehm. (female) (family Cycadaceae).Carbohydr. Res.5256–26510.1016/S0008-6215(00)80499-1
Streeter J. G.. (Year: 1991). Transport and metabolism of carbon and nitrogen in legume nodules.Adv. Bot. Res.18129–18710.1016/S0065-2296(08)60022-1
Subbaiah C. C.,Huber S. C.,Sachs M. M.,Rhoads D.. (Year: 2007). Sucrose synthase: expanding protein function.Plant Signal. Behav.228–2910.4161/psb.2.1.364619704804
Tauzin A. S.,Giardina T.. (Year: 2014). Sucrose and invertases, a part of the plant defense response to the biotic stresses.Front. Plant Sci.5:29310.3389/fpls.2014.00293
Thomas H.. (Year: 2013). Senescence, ageing and death of the whole plant.New Phytol.197696–71110.1111/nph.1204723176101
Tognetti J. A.,Pontis H. G.,Martínez-Noël G. M. A.. (Year: 2013). Sucrose signaling in plants: a world yet to be explored.Plant Signal. Behav.8e23316.10.4161/psb.23316
Van den Ende W.. (Year: 2014). Sugars take a central position in plant growth, development and, stress responses. A focus on apical dominance.Front. Plant Sci.5:31310.3389/fpls.2014.00313
Van Oosten J. J.,Besford R. T.. (Year: 1994). Sugar feeding mimics effect of acclimation to high CO2-rapid down-regulation of Rubisco small subunit transcripts but not of the large subunit transcripts.J. Plant Physiol.143306–31210.1016/S0176-1617(11)81636-6
Vikman P. Å.,Vessey J. K.. (Year: 1993). Gas-exchange activity, carbohydrate status, and protein turnover in root nodule subpopulations of field pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Century).Plant Soil15131–3810.1007/BF00010783
Vovides A. P.,Etherington J. R.,Dresser P. Q.,Groenhof A.,Iglesias C.,Ramirez J. F.. (Year: 2002). Bot. J. Linn. Soc.138155–16210.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.138002155.x
Whitelock L. M.. (Year: 2002). The Cycads.Portland: Timber Press
Whiting M. G.. (Year: 1963). Toxicity of cycads.Econ. Bot.17271–30210.1007/BF02860136
Wigley B. J.,Cramer M. D.,Bond W. J.. (Year: 2009). Sapling survival in a frequently burnt savanna: mobilization of carbon reserves in Acacia karroo.Plant Ecol.2031–1110.1007/s11258-008-9495-x
Williams C.. (Year: 2012). Medicinal Plants in Australia. Vol. 3. Plants, Potions and Poisons. Kenthurst: Rosenberg Publishing
Willis K. J.,McElwain J. C.. (Year: 2002). The Evolution of Plants.Oxford: Oxford University Press
Winter H.,Huber S. C.. (Year: 2000). Regulation of sucrose metabolism in higher plants: localization and regulation of activity of key enzymes.Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.35253–28910.1080/1040923000898416511005202
Zimmermann M. H.,Ziegler H.. (Year: 1975). “Transport in plants. I. Phloem transport,” in New SeriesVol. 1Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology,edsZimmermann M. H.,Milburn J. A. (Berlin: Springer) 480–503

Figures

[Figure ID: F1]
FIGURE 1 

The influence of tissue of reproductive 4-year-old female Zamia muricata plants on total sugar concentration among seven types of tissue. Means with same letter are not different. P < 0.0001.



[Figure ID: F2]
FIGURE 2 

Per cent of glucose, fructose, sucrose, or maltose comprising total sugar content for female strobilus (A), petiole (B), or leaflet (C) tissue of Zamia muricata plants.



[Figure ID: F3]
FIGURE 3 

Per cent of glucose, fructose, sucrose, or maltose comprising total sugar content for taproot (A), lateral structural root (B), or coralloid root (C) tissue of Zamia muricata plants.



[Figure ID: F4]
FIGURE 4 

Mean sugar concentration of lateral structural roots of 18 cycad species. Mean ± SE.



Tables
[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Characteristics of 18 cycad species growing at Nong Nooch Tropical Botanical Garden, Pattaya, Thailand.


Species Family Stem height (cm) Stem diameter (cm) Native habitat
Cycas machonochiei Cycadaceae 36 19 Tropical
Cycas riuminiana Cycadaceae 124 37 Tropical, wet forest
Dioon sonorense Zamiaceae 22 32 High elevation desert
Dioon spinulosum Zamiaceae 64 24 Lowland tropical rainforest, wet
Ceratozamia robusta Zamiaceae 35 31 Lowland tropical rainforest, wet
Ceratozamia miqueliana Zamiaceae 20 36 Dense rainforest, hot wet summers
Microcycas calocoma Zamiaceae 147 37 Lowland, deciduous forest, dry
Zamia encephalartoides Zamiaceae 39 24 Full sun, hot, montane dry
Zamia muricata Zamiaceae 9 8 Understory, montane forest, wet
Stangeria eriopus Stangeriaceae 16 13 Understory, shade, deciduous forest, dry
Lepidozamia perrofskyana Zamiaceae 72 32 Understory, shade, Lowland rainforest, wet
Lepidozamia hopei Zamiaceae 89 32 Understory, shade, tropical rainforest, wet
Encephalartos mackenziei Zamiaceae 44 42 Full sun, hot, dry
Encephalartos laurentianus Zamiaceae 90 66 Understory, dense forest, wet
Macrozamia macdonnellii Zamiaceae 31 36 Desert, barren rocky slopes
Macrozamia mountperriensis Zamiaceae 15 20 Subtropical, hot wet summers
Bowenia spectabilis Stangeriaceae 18 27 Lowland tropical rainforest, wet
Bowenia serrulata Stangeriaceae 12 12 Understory, shade, tropical rainforest, wet
  —Stem dimensions are for above-ground portions only..


Article Categories:
  • Plant Science
    • Original Research Article

Keywords: accumulation, carbon allocation, cycads, fructose, glucose, maltose, non-structural carbohydrate, sucrose.

Previous Document:  Beneficial soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis (GB03) augments salt tolerance of white clover.
Next Document:  Phosphorus limits Eucalyptus grandis seedling growth in an unburnt rain forest soil.