Document Detail


Forearm compression by laparoscopic hand-assist devices.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15597655     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic hand-assist devices have facilitated the broad application and acceptance of laparoscopy in urology and other surgical fields. This study evaluated forearm compression by these devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five commercially available hand-assist devices were tested (Gelport, Intromit, PneumoSleeve, Handport, LapDisc). In three surgeons using a porcine model, compressive forces were measured along the paths of the median and ulnar nerves at the point of maximum proximal forearm circumference using FlexiForce A101 sensors. Glove size for all three surgeons was 7 1/2; however, the maximum forearm circumference ranged from 26 to 33 cm. The hand-assist devices were placed in pigs after skin and fascial incision (9 cm), and the insufflation pressure was set at 18 mm Hg. Surgeons subjectively rated the ease of device insertion and hand insertion, degree of forearm compression, and the development of paresthesias. RESULTS: The LapDisc was rated superior with regard to insertion. The Gelport was rated superior for hand insertion and removal; however, moderate to severe forearm compression and paresthesias were reported. The maximum forearm compression forces were highest with the LapDisc (97 mm Hg) and the Gelport (78 mm Hg) and lowest with the Handport (33 mm Hg). CONCLUSION: The choice of hand-assist device is dependent on its ease of use, efficacy at maintaining insufflation, and effect on the surgeon's performance and fatigue. The impact of forearm compression should be considered in the selection of the hand-assist device and in the development of new devices.
Authors:
Manoj Monga; Juan Premoli; Neil Skemp; William Durfee
Related Documents :
20621635 - Characterization of the mechanical properties of the coronary sinus for percutaneous tr...
25455885 - Controlled hydrostatic pressure stress downregulates the expression of ribosomal genes ...
8426405 - Intraluminal device pressures in 3-piece inflatable penile prostheses: the "pathophysio...
3724585 - Quantification and simulation of fluid-filled catheter/transducer systems.
18719235 - Hemodynamic impact of mitral prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary hypertension: an ...
15502385 - Acute effects of diltiazem on regional left ventricular diastolic filling dynamics in p...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Evaluation Studies; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of endourology / Endourological Society     Volume:  18     ISSN:  0892-7790     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Endourol.     Publication Date:  2004 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-12-15     Completed Date:  2005-02-22     Revised Date:  2005-11-29    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8807503     Medline TA:  J Endourol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  654-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Urologic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. endourol@yahoo.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animals
Equipment Design
Female
Forearm*
Humans
Laparoscopes / adverse effects*,  standards
Laparoscopy / methods*
Pressure
Sensation Disorders / etiology
Swine
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Endourol. 2005 Jul-Aug;19(6):753   [PMID:  16053371 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Hand-assisted laparoscopic devices: the second generation.
Next Document:  Comparison of laparoscopic radical renal surgery in morbidly obese and non-obese patients.