| Flower constancy in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera) depends on ecologically realistic rewards. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21430217 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
As first described by Aristotle, honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers show a strong tendency to visit flowers of only one type during a foraging trip. It is known that workers rapidly learn a flower colour when rewarded with artificial nectar (sucrose solution). However, some previous studies report that the degree of constancy after training is unaffected by reward quantity and quality when bees are tested in an array of artificial flowers of two easily distinguished colours, such as blue and yellow. One possible reason for this surprising result is that large reward volumes were compared. This is likely to mask the abilities of foragers to make adaptive decisions under more realistic conditions. To test this possibility, we offered untrained honey bee workers ecologically relevant rewards (0.5, 1 or 2 μl of 0.5 or 1 mol l(-1) sucrose solution) on one or two consecutive yellow or blue artificial flowers and then recorded which flowers the bees subsequently landed on in an array of 40 empty flowers. The results showed that an increase in all three factors (volume, concentration and number of rewards) significantly increased constancy (proportion of visits to flowers of the trained colour) and persistence (number of flowers visited) during the foraging bout. Constancy for the least rewarding situation was 75.9% compared with 98.6% for the most rewarding situation. These results clearly show that honey bee workers do become more constant to blue or yellow with increasing nectar rewards, provided that the rewards used are ecologically realistic. As the most rewarding conditions led to nearly 100% constancy, further reward increases during training would not have been able to further increase constancy. This explains why previous studies comparing large rewards found no effect of reward on constancy. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Christoph Grüter; Heather Moore; Nicola Firmin; Heikki Helanterä; Francis L W Ratnieks |
Related Documents
:
|
15763847 - What do medical students actually do on clinical rotations? 20433727 - Mentoring programs for medical students--a review of the pubmed literature 2000-2008. 20594367 - Attracting and retaining health workers in rural areas: investigating nurses' views on ... 9423217 - Graded check lists to assist undergraduate students in self-directed learning and asses... 20071727 - Adequacy of psychiatric training: a singaporean perspective. 17124627 - Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitiv... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: The Journal of experimental biology Volume: 214 ISSN: 1477-9145 ISO Abbreviation: J. Exp. Biol. Publication Date: 2011 Apr |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-03-24 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0243705 Medline TA: J Exp Biol Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 1397-402 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects, School of Life Sciences, John Maynard-Smith Building, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QG, UK. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Identification, tissue distribution and orexigenic activity of neuropeptide F (NPF) in penaeid shrim...
Next Document: Attenuated Bordetella pertussis Vaccine Candidate BPZE1 Promotes Human Dendritic Cell CCL21-Induced ...