Document Detail

Flow targeted 3D steady-state free-precession coronary MR angiography: comparison of three different imaging approaches.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19858729     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
PURPOSE: To compare 3 different flow targeted magnetization preparation strategies for coronary MR angiography (cMRA), which allow selective visualization of the vessel lumen. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The right coronary artery of 10 healthy subjects was investigated on a 1.5 Tesla MR system (Gyroscan ACS-NT, Philips Healthcare, Best, NL). A navigator-gated and ECG-triggered 3D radial steady-state free-precession (SSFP) cMRA sequence with 3 different magnetization preparation schemes was performed referred to as projection SSFP (selective labeling of the aorta, subtraction of 2 data sets), LoReIn SSFP (double-inversion preparation, selective labeling of the aorta, 1 data set), and inflow SSFP (inversion preparation, selective labeling of the coronary artery, 1 data set). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the coronary artery and aorta, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the coronary artery and epicardial fat, vessel length and vessel sharpness were analyzed. RESULTS: All cMRA sequences were successfully obtained in all subjects. Both projection SSFP and LoReIn SSFP allowed for selective visualization of the coronary arteries with excellent background suppression. Scan time was doubled in projection SSFP because of the need for subtraction of 2 data sets. In inflow SSFP, background suppression was limited to the tissue included in the inversion volume. Projection SSFP (SNR(coro): 25.6 +/- 12.1; SNR(ao): 26.1 +/- 16.8; CNR(coro-fat): 22.0 +/- 11.7) and inflow SSFP (SNR(coro): 27.9 +/- 5.4; SNR(ao): 37.4 +/- 9.2; CNR(coro-fat): 24.9 +/- 4.8) yielded significantly increased SNR and CNR compared with LoReIn SSFP (SNR(coro): 12.3 +/- 5.4; SNR(ao): 11.8 +/- 5.8; CNR(coro-fat): 9.8 +/- 5.5; P < 0.05 for both). Longest visible vessel length was found with projection SSFP (79.5 mm +/- 18.9; P < 0.05 vs. LoReIn) whereas vessel sharpness was best in inflow SSFP (68.2% +/- 4.5%; P < 0.05 vs. LoReIn). Consistently good image quality was achieved using inflow SSFP likely because of the simple planning procedure and short scanning time. CONCLUSION: Three flow targeted cMRA approaches are presented, which provide selective visualization of the coronary vessel lumen and in addition blood flow information without the need of contrast agent administration. Inflow SSFP yielded highest SNR, CNR and vessel sharpness and may prove useful as a fast and efficient approach for assessing proximal and mid vessel coronary blood flow, whereas requiring less planning skills than projection SSFP or LoReIn SSFP.
Marcus Katoh; Elmar Spuentrup; Matthias Stuber; Arno Buecker; Warren J Manning; Rolf W Günther; Rene M Botnar
Related Documents :
21393579 - Assessing low levels of mechanical stress in aortic atherosclerotic lesions from apolip...
4362949 - Studies on the coronary dilator actions of some adenosine analogues.
6617169 - A graphic computerized system for reporting and analysis of coronary angiograms.
10832619 - 3d assessment of myocardial perfusion parameter combined with 3d reconstructed coronary...
7808039 - Mineralization (calcification) of coronary arteries.
7549279 - The detection of coronary ostial lesions by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogr...
16234669 - Microsurgical anatomy and quantitative analysis of the transtemporal-transchoroidal fis...
24674389 - Telocytes in human heart valves.
7430189 - Transplantation of the second toe to the hand. a preliminary report of sixteen cases.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Investigative radiology     Volume:  44     ISSN:  1536-0210     ISO Abbreviation:  Invest Radiol     Publication Date:  2009 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-04-12     Completed Date:  2010-07-22     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0045377     Medline TA:  Invest Radiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  757-62     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Coronary Vessels / anatomy & histology*,  physiology*
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
Magnetic Resonance Angiography / methods*
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Rheology / methods*
Sensitivity and Specificity

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  High-Resolution Steady State Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Are Intravascul...
Next Document:  Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Gadobutrol-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric Patients.