| Flexible specialist training compared with full-time training. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 10396436 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
The educational and training quality of flexible training posts compared very well and in some instances was better than that obtained in full-time training. The hours of work were fewer, but as a proportion not as small as is sometimes recognized by the Colleges and is comparable with many full-time training programmes in other European Union countries. |
| | |
Authors:
|
I Goldberg; E Paice |
Related Documents
:
|
20873906 - Effects of psychotherapy training and intervention use on session outcome. 7152836 - Training analyst selection: the need for criteria. 16304466 - Integrating the accreditation council for graduate medical education general competenci... 782226 - The training of paraprofessionals as behavior modifiers: a review. 9925156 - Optimizing vascular access: a team perspective using the national kidney foundation-dia... 17897516 - A systematic review of the methodological quality and outcomes of rcts to teach medical... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998) Volume: 60 ISSN: 1462-3935 ISO Abbreviation: Hosp Med Publication Date: 1999 Apr |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 1999-07-22 Completed Date: 1999-07-22 Revised Date: 2004-11-17 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9803882 Medline TA: Hosp Med Country: ENGLAND |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 286-90 Citation Subset: IM |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Curriculum
/
standards Education, Medical, Graduate / organization & administration*, standards Female Great Britain Humans Inservice Training Male Medical Staff, Hospital / education* Personnel Staffing and Scheduling Questionnaires |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Migraine: which triptan?
Next Document: Specialist registrar training in obstetrics and gynaecology: have we got it wrong?