Document Detail


Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15597014     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: The evaluation of coronary artery stents is a major limitation of cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). The development of flat-panel detector computed tomography (FPCT) with truly isotropic spatial resolution may overcome this limitation. Thus, we evaluated the use of FPCT in comparison to MSCT for the assessment of coronary artery stents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight different coronary artery stents with a diameter of 3 mm each were placed in a static chest phantom. The phantom was positioned in the CT gantry at angles of 0 degrees , 45 degrees , and 90 degrees toward the z-axis and examined with the prototype of a FPCT (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) and a commercially available 16-detector row MSCT (Sensation 16, Siemens). Slice thickness was 0.25 mm with FPCT whereas for MSCT, an effective slice thickness of 1 mm with a reconstruction increment of 0.5 mm was used. Image quality was assessed visually using a 5-point grading scale. Stent diameters were measured and compared using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: When compared with MSCT, artificial lumen reduction was significantly less using FPCT. On average the visible stent lumen was reduced by 16.1% with FPCT, whereas the mean of the lumen reduction was 47.2% with 16-detector row MSCT. Visible lumen diameter as well as image noise significantly increased using FPCT (P < 0.001). With FPCT delineation of the different stent struts became possible. CONCLUSION: FPCT proved to be superior when compared with 16-detector row MSCT for the in vitro assessment of coronary artery stents. Improved spatial resolution allows for a detailed assessment of the coronary artery stent lumen.
Authors:
Andreas H Mahnken; Tobias Seyfarth; Thomas Flohr; Christopher Herzog; Jochen Stahl; Sven Stanzel; Axel Kuettner; Joachim E Wildberger; Rolf W Günther
Related Documents :
16528184 - Retractable self-expandable stent for endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracrania...
18202484 - Endovascular treatment for central venous stenosis due to central vein catheterization ...
14553874 - Cost-effectiveness of bypass surgery versus stenting in patients with multivessel coron...
9247244 - Reoperation after pericardial patch tracheoplasty.
20210534 - Salvage techniques for sta-mca bypass.
7090984 - Protection of myocardium by the compensatory mechanism of coronary collaterals after to...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Investigative radiology     Volume:  40     ISSN:  0020-9996     ISO Abbreviation:  Invest Radiol     Publication Date:  2005 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-12-14     Completed Date:  2005-07-25     Revised Date:  2009-11-11    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0045377     Medline TA:  Invest Radiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  8-13     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany. mahnken@rad.rwth-aachen.de
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Coronary Angiography / instrumentation*
Coronary Vessels / surgery*
Phantoms, Imaging*
Stents*
Tomography, Spiral Computed / instrumentation*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Sensitive particle acoustic quantification (SPAQ): a new ultrasound-based approach for the quantific...
Next Document:  Minimally invasive close-chest method for creating reperfused or occlusive myocardial infarction in ...