Document Detail


Findings of a mixed transfemoral aortic valve implantation program using Edwards and CoreValve devices.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21190774     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Transfemoral implantation of an Edwards SAPIEN (ES) or Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) aortic valve prosthesis is an alternative to surgical replacement for patients with severe aortic stenosis and a high surgical risk. The study's aim was to compare results obtained with these two devices.
METHODS: Prospective observational study of transfemoral prosthesis implantation performed at our center.
RESULTS: Of the 76 patients (age 83 ± 6 years, 63% female, logistic EuroSCORE 18 ± 9) included, 50 were assigned the ES and 26 the MCV device. There was no difference between the groups in age, sex, functional class, valve area, associated conditions, or EuroSCORE. Implantation was successful in 84% of the ES group and 100% of the MCV group (P = .04). There were three cases of tamponade, two aortic dissections and one valve malposition in the ES group. The two groups had similar vascular access complication rates (26% vs. 23%; P=NS), but pacemaker need was greater with the MCV (10% vs. 39%; P = .003). Mortality rates at 30 days were 12% and 20% (P = NS) in the ES and MCV groups, respectively, and at 1 year, 24% and 20% (P = NS), respectively. After a follow-up of 367 ± 266 days in the ES group and 172 ± 159 days in the MCV group, three patients died. Clinical improvement was maintained in other patients and no echocardiographic changes were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality, the complication rate and medium-term outcomes were similar with the two devices. The only difference observed was a higher implantation success rate with the MCV, although at the expense of a greater frequency of atrioventricular block.
Authors:
Rosa Ana Hernández-Antolín; Eulogio García; Santiago Sandoval; Carlos Almería; Ana Cuadrado; Javier Serrano; Eduardo de Obeso; Raquel Del Valle; Camino Bañuelos; Fernando Alfonso; Fernando Guerrero; Jerónimo Heredia; Juan Carlos Martín Benítez; Juan Carlos García-Rubira; Enrique Rodríguez; Carlos Macaya
Related Documents :
8728574 - Do saline breast implants harbor microbes?
9623844 - Long-term advantages of permanent expandable implants in breast aesthetic surgery.
11413774 - Silicone breast implants: lessons from a saga.
17093874 - Augmentation mammaplasty: retrospective analysis of 210 cases.
21234634 - Effect of acid and laser etching on shear bond strength of conventional and resin-modif...
23987984 - Use of single-layer centrifugation with androcoll-c to enhance sperm quality in frozen-...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-12-16
Journal Detail:
Title:  Revista española de cardiología     Volume:  64     ISSN:  1579-2242     ISO Abbreviation:  Rev Esp Cardiol     Publication Date:  2011 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-01-10     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0404277     Medline TA:  Rev Esp Cardiol     Country:  Spain    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  35-42     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2010 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. rhernandez_antolin@hotmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Population-based study of out-of-hospital sudden cardiovascular death: incidence and causes of death...
Next Document:  Ultrasound study of the prevalence of plaque at the carina in lesions that affect the coronary bifur...