Document Detail


Fetal movement monitoring: how are we doing as educators?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23343793     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Objective: When decreased fetal movement is noticed, delay in seeking care is associated with poor perinatal outcomes, including stillbirth. Health care providers are responsible for educating women about normal fetal movement and the appropriate actions they should take if it decreases. This study aimed to demonstrate our pregnant population's understanding of normal fetal movement and responses to decreased fetal movement, and to potentially guide educational interventions to improve perinatal outcomes. Methods: We surveyed 304 pregnant women (over 26 weeks' gestation) during clinic visits at the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS. Information collected in the survey included demographics, knowledge about normal fetal movement, monitoring techniques, and response to decreased fetal movement. Results: Eighteen percent of women (55/298) demonstrated knowledge of normal fetal movement and fetal monitoring, indicating that they would seek assessment promptly if they experienced decreased fetal movement. Although 54.7% of participants (164/300) would contact a health care professional if they noticed decreased fetal movement, approximately two thirds of participants were unable to describe normal fetal movement or monitoring techniques. Almost 30% of participants (90/304) did not identify daily fetal movement as normal, and 37.5% (114/304) reported it may be normal for fetal movement to stop around their due date. Written and verbal communication regarding fetal movement from a health care provider significantly increased the likelihood of appropriate intended self-management in the context of decreased fetal movement. Conclusion: Education influences the anticipated behaviour of pregnant women regarding decreased fetal movement. Specific areas of misinformation which may guide future education strategies are identified. There is room for improvement in this area of patient education.
Authors:
Anne M L Berndl; Colleen M O'Connell; N Lynne McLeod
Related Documents :
20844003 - Progesterone increases systemic and local uterine proportions of cd4+cd25+ treg cells d...
2159093 - The pituitary gland in pregnancy: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of ...
9046213 - A recent case of congenital malaria in singapore.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstétrique et gynécologie du Canada : JOGC     Volume:  35     ISSN:  1701-2163     ISO Abbreviation:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-24     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101126664     Medline TA:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can     Country:  Canada    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  22-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax NS.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Validation of the Distress Thermometer in a Swedish population of oncology patients; accuracy of cha...
Next Document:  Measuring quality in maternal-newborn care: developing a clinical dashboard.