Document Detail

Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20383599     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
BACKGROUND: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is an important option for colorectal cancer screening that should be available in order to achieve high population screening coverage. However, results from a national survey of clinical practice in 1999-2000 indicated that many primary care physicians used inadequate methods to implement FOBT screening and follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether methods to screen for fecal occult blood have improved, including the use of newer more sensitive stool tests.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional national survey of primary care physicians.
PARTICIPANTS: Participants consisted of 1,134 primary care physicians who reported ordering or performing FOBT in the 2006-2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practices for Cancer Screening.
MAIN MEASURES: Self-reported data on details of FOBT implementation and follow-up of positive results.
RESULTS: Most physicians report using standard guaiac tests; higher sensitivity guaiac tests and immunochemical tests were reported by only 22.0% and 8.9%, respectively. In-office testing, that is, testing of a single specimen collected during a digital rectal examination in the office, is still widely used although inappropriate for screening: 24.9% of physicians report using only in-office tests and another 52.9% report using both in-office and home tests. Recommendations improved for follow-up after a positive test: fewer physicians recommend repeating the FOBT (17.8%) or using tests other than colonoscopy for the diagnostic work-up (6.6%). Only 44.3% of physicians who use home tests have reminder systems to ensure test completion and return.
CONCLUSIONS: Many physicians continue to use inappropriate methods to screen for fecal occult blood. Intensified efforts to inform physicians of recommended technique and promote the use of tracking systems are needed.
Marion R Nadel; Zahava Berkowitz; Carrie N Klabunde; Robert A Smith; Steven S Coughlin; Mary C White
Related Documents :
19378449 - Acceptability of hepatitis c virus testing methods among injecting drug users.
6463799 - Early detection of colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood tests.
20535659 - Blood testing in sport: hematological profiling.
19102819 - Referral letters for 2-week wait suspected colorectal cancer do not allow a 'straight-t...
17083859 - A case of factitious subcutaneous emphysema.
2242119 - Is there a preference for different ways of performing faecal occult blood tests?
9627239 - Comparison of multi-test device skin testing and modified rast results.
24051129 - Transcriptome alterations in zebrafish embryos after exposure to environmental estrogen...
3723449 - An empirical assessment of the migraine personality type.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.     Date:  2010-04-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of general internal medicine     Volume:  25     ISSN:  1525-1497     ISO Abbreviation:  J Gen Intern Med     Publication Date:  2010 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-07-05     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8605834     Medline TA:  J Gen Intern Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  833-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS K55, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Grant Support
N02-PC-51308/PC/NCI NIH HHS; Y3-PC-5019-01/PC/NCI NIH HHS; Y3-PC-5019-02/PC/NCI NIH HHS; Y3-PC-6017-01/PC/NCI NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Color-encoded distance visualization of cranial nerve-vessel contacts.
Next Document:  Race differences in cardiac catheterization: the role of social contextual variables.