Document Detail

Fate of subpulmonary homograft conduits: determinants of late homograft failure.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9535436     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1971 and 1993, 656 conduits were placed in the subpulmonary position. Patients receiving heterografts or valveless conduits and patients dying within 90 days of insertion were excluded; thus 405 homograft conduits were studied. There were 293 aortic homografts, 94 pulmonary, and 18 of unknown type. The end point of conduit failure was defined by conduit replacement for whatever reason, balloon dilation of the conduit, or death of the patient with the conduit in place. The following factors were analyzed: aortic versus pulmonary homograft, antibiotic preservation versus cryopreservation, ABO and Rh compatibility, type of material used for conduit extension, age at operation, size of the conduit, diagnosis, and reoperations. Conduit number (1 to 405) in the series was included in the multivariable model. RESULTS: First conduits and conduits inserted earlier in the series appeared to last longer than second and subsequent conduits and those inserted later in the series (p = 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). Overall survival of conduits at 5, 10, and 15 years was 84% (95% CL, 80% to 88%), 58% (95% CL, 50% to 66%), and 31% (95% CL, 19% to 43%). Corresponding figures for the first conduits were 88% (95% CL, 84% to 92%), 65% (95% CL, 56% to 73%), and 34% (95% CL, 20% to 47%). The longest surviving homograft conduit in our series lasted 22.7 years. Regarded univariately, reoperation (redo worse), order number (recent worse), type of conduit (pulmonary worse than aortic), preservation (cryopreserved worse than antibiotic preserved), and age at operation (older patients worse) were statistically significant. However, in multivariable analysis, including all the above in the model, only reoperation and order number had significant predictive power. When patient survival was considered, patients operated on more recently survived longer despite the fact that their conduits were being replaced earlier. Overall, survival of patients at 5 and 15 years was 95% (95% CL, 93% to 98%) and 85% (95% CL, 77% to 92%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary and aortic homografts, both cryopreserved and preserved in nutrient antibiotic solution, give similar results. All conduits will probably have to be replaced during the lifetime of the patient. In view of the worse performance of replacement conduits, techniques of repair that avoid the use of conduits should be further explored. Despite gradual deterioration of homograft conduits, they remain an important tool in the correction of many complex lesions with excellent 15-year patient survival.
J Stark; C Bull; M Stajevic; M Jothi; M Elliott; M de Leval
Related Documents :
10872696 - Management of extensive lesions of the aortic arch: review of 42 consecutive cases.
7818056 - Thrombelastographic patterns following abdominal aortic surgery.
12940696 - Recoarctation and patients' freedom from re-intervention--a study of patients undergoin...
18346906 - Optimal initial treatment and clinical outcome of type a aortic intramural hematoma: a ...
12730816 - Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective thoracic surgery: cefuroxime versus cefepime.
12042726 - Endoluminal stent grafting of the thoracic aorta: initial experience with the gore excl...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery     Volume:  115     ISSN:  0022-5223     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.     Publication Date:  1998 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-04-16     Completed Date:  1998-04-16     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376343     Medline TA:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  506-14; discussion 514-6     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Age Factors
Blood Vessel Prosthesis*
Child, Preschool
Heart Defects, Congenital / surgery*
Infant, Newborn
Multivariate Analysis
Prosthesis Failure
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Transplantation, Homologous
Treatment Outcome

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Arrhythmias and thromboembolic complications after the extracardiac Fontan operation.
Next Document:  Dilutional and modified ultrafiltration reduces pulmonary hypertension after operations for congenit...