Document Detail

Fate of the peer review process at the ESA: long-term outcome of submitted studies over a 5-year period.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21037426     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the outcome of the peer review process of the European Surgical Association (ESA) and its contribution to Annals of Surgery.
BACKGROUND: The ESA was created in 1993 as an equivalent of the well-established American Surgical Association. Submitted abstracts and manuscripts were subjected to a stringent multistep peer review process to offer only the best studies for publication in the special issue of Annals of Surgery. A critical evaluation was felt necessary to identify factors that favored the acceptance of abstracts and manuscripts, respectively. The citations of the manuscripts published in Annals of Surgery and the outcome of the rejected studies were also researched.
METHODS: All submissions to the ESA between 2002 and 2007 were analyzed and followed over a period of 2 years. A database was established to identify factors favoring acceptance. A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify plagiarisms and the 2-year citations of all accepted manuscripts and later publications of the rejected studies in Annals of Surgery or elsewhere.
RESULTS: Altogether, 545 abstracts were submitted to the ESA during the study period. About one-third was accepted for presentation at the annual meeting, and, of those, 40% were published in Annals of Surgery. The majority of these studies originated from 4 European Countries. The only independent factors favoring presentation were randomized controlled trials and a sample size of more than 100 patients. All plagiarisms were identified before acceptance. Only 4% and 2% of the rejected abstracts and manuscripts, respectively, were published in higher impact factor journals than in Annals of Surgery. Twelve percent of the rejected manuscripts were eventually published in a later issue of Annals of Surgery, whereas more than two-thirds of the rejected studies appeared in a journal with a lower impact factor. The 2-year citations of the ESA manuscripts were in the range of all the other types of manuscripts published in Annals of Surgery. Only manuscripts originating from the American Surgical Association had slightly higher citations.
CONCLUSIONS: The ESA successfully spent its early years, providing high-quality manuscripts to Annals of Surgery. Only few rejected manuscripts reached higher-ranked journals. The focus should now turn toward stimulating other European countries to submit their best studies and attract more well-designed randomized controlled trials.
Dimitri A Raptis; Christian E Oberkofler; Dirk Gouma; O James Garden; Henri Bismuth; Toni Lerut; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Related Documents :
21317116 - Packing and postoperative rhinoplasty management: a survey report.
21167786 - Transcranial direct current stimulation in adolescent and adult rasmussen's encephalitis.
21400406 - Teleconferencing bridges two oceans and shrinks the surgical world.
21991746 - Difficult passage of the endotracheal tube and massive nasal bleeding during awake nasa...
9647366 - Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithia...
3276296 - To drain or not to drain in thyroid surgery. a controlled clinical study.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of surgery     Volume:  252     ISSN:  1528-1140     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann. Surg.     Publication Date:  2010 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-11-01     Completed Date:  2010-12-15     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372354     Medline TA:  Ann Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  715-25     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Abstracting and Indexing as Topic
Analysis of Variance
Congresses as Topic
General Surgery*
Logistic Models
Manuscripts as Topic*
Peer Review, Research*
Periodicals as Topic*
Publishing / statistics & numerical data*
Societies, Medical*
Statistics, Nonparametric

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Analysis of A to I editing of miRNA in macrophages exposed to Salmonella.
Next Document:  Novel and simple preoperative score predicting complications after liver resection in noncirrhotic p...