Document Detail


Farmers' practices, motivators and barriers for adoption of treatments of digital dermatitis in dairy farms.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23632105     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This study aimed to catalogue the digital dermatitis (DD) treatment practices used by French dairy farmers and to identify the motivators and barriers to the adoption of these treatments. A semi-structured survey was conducted involving 65 farmers in the main dairy production areas of France in the spring of 2009. The different treatment modalities implemented by farmers since the first diagnosis of DD in their herds were described. The reasons for adopting or abandoning these treatments were then investigated based on criteria of perceived effectiveness, labour, time, cost and toxicity related to their use. For individual treatments, farmers used 30 different products, applied through three different routes, for 1 to 21 consecutive days. For collective treatments, farmers used 31 products, applied through four different routes, at a rate ranging from once a day to once a year. Several products, especially antibiotics, were used without observing the manufacturer's instructions. The principal criteria for the adoption of a treatment was the perceived effectiveness in healing DD lesions and in limiting recurrence, while the principal barriers to adopting a treatment were the time and labour required for its application, followed by cost. Topical oxytetracycline treatments applied individually were used and adopted the most. They were perceived to be effective in healing DD lesions. However, these treatments were judged labour and time consuming, particularly when many animals had to be treated. Collective treatments combining formalin and copper sulphate often were applied topically using walk-though footbaths. These treatments often were judged to be insufficiently effective in healing DD lesions, difficult to implement, labour and time consuming and costly. The plethora of DD treatment practices and the misuse of some treatments could suggest that there is a lack of guidelines available to farmers on the optimal use and expected effectiveness of treatments. Clinical trials should be conducted to develop recommendations based on scientific rather than empirical data, and to identify the DD control measures which consume the least amount of time and labour.
Authors:
A Relun; R Guatteo; M M Auzanneau; N Bareille
Related Documents :
22316355 - Romiplostim: a review of its use in immune thrombocytopenia.
22813235 - Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with uncontrolled partia...
6584445 - Subgingival metronidazole in dialysis tubing and subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation i...
8410615 - Effect of therapy on periodontal infections.
2901815 - Premedication with oral slow release morphine in dental anaesthesia. a comparison with ...
8343245 - Use of alprazolam for relief of tinnitus. a double-blind study.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-5-1
Journal Detail:
Title:  Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1751-732X     ISO Abbreviation:  Animal     Publication Date:  2013 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-5-1     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101303270     Medline TA:  Animal     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  1-9     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
1 Department Welfare Health Traceability and Hygiene, French Livestock Institute, F-75595 Paris, France.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Non-classical mechanisms of steroid sensing in the ovary: lessons from the bovine oxytocin model.
Next Document:  Significant influence of particular unsaturated fatty acids and pH on the volatile compounds in meat...