Document Detail


Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12626986     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurement with two different devices (M3000A using a new algorithm and M1008A using an established algorithm, both Hewlett Packard) and evaluation of current recommendations concerning the relation between cuff size and upper arm circumference in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective data collection. SETTING: Emergency department in a 2000-bed inner-city hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 30 patients categorized into three groups according to their upper arm circumference (I, 18-25 cm; II, 25.1-33 cm; III, 33.1-47.5 cm) were enrolled in the study protocol. INTERVENTIONS In each patient, two noninvasive blood pressure devices with three different cuff sizes were used to perform oscillometric blood pressure measurement. Invasive mean arterial blood pressure measurement was done by cannulation of the radial artery. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 1,011 pairs of simultaneous oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements were collected in 30 patients (group I, n = 10; group II, n = 10; group III, n = 10). The overall discrepancy between both methods with the M3000A was -2.4 +/- 11.8 mm Hg (p <.0001) and, with the M1008A, -5.3 +/- 11.6 mm Hg (p <.0001) if the recommended cuff size according to the upper arm circumference was used (352 measurements). If smaller cuff sizes than recommended were used (308 measurements performed in group II and III), the overall discrepancy between both methods with the M3000A was 1.3 +/- 13.4 mm Hg (p <.024) and, with the M1008A, -2.3 +/- 11.5 mm Hg (p <.0001). CONCLUSION: The new algorithm reduced the overall bias of the oscillometric method but still showed a significant discrepancy between both methods of blood pressure measurement, primarily due to the mismatch between upper arm circumference and cuff size. The improvement of the algorithm alone could not result in a sufficient improvement of oscillometric blood pressure measurement. A reevaluation of the recommendations concerning the relation between upper arm circumference and cuff size are urgently required if oscillometric blood pressure measurement should become a reasonable alternative to intra-arterial blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.
Authors:
Andreas Bur; Harald Herkner; Marianne Vlcek; Christian Woisetschläger; Ulla Derhaschnig; Georg Delle Karth; Anton N Laggner; Michael M Hirschl
Related Documents :
4093786 - Evaluation of two prototype devices producing noninvasive, pulsatile, calibrated blood ...
23931326 - Pressure and temperature dependence of growth and morphology of escherichia coli: expe...
23479456 - Prolonged hypotensive and bradycardic effects of passive mandibular extension: evidence...
3225416 - New finger cuffs for use with digital tourniquets.
11307866 - Obesity, hypertension, and the heart.
15350086 - Photoinduced phase separation and miscibility in the condensed phase of a mixed langmui...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Validation Studies    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Critical care medicine     Volume:  31     ISSN:  0090-3493     ISO Abbreviation:  Crit. Care Med.     Publication Date:  2003 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-03-10     Completed Date:  2003-04-11     Revised Date:  2009-11-03    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0355501     Medline TA:  Crit Care Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  793-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vienna General Hospital, University Clinics, Austria.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Anthropometry
Arm / anatomy & histology
Bias (Epidemiology)
Blood Pressure Determination / instrumentation*,  methods*,  standards
Critical Illness*
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Manometry / instrumentation*,  methods*,  standards
Middle Aged
Oscillometry / instrumentation*,  methods*,  standards
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Free radical and drug oxidation products in an intensive care unit sedative: propofol with sulfite.
Next Document:  Comparison of different airway management strategies to ventilate apneic, nonpreoxygenated patients.