Document Detail

Facet joint biomechanics at the treated and adjacent levels after total disc replacement.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20975623     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical study using human cadaveric lumbar spines.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of total disc replacement (TDR) on spine biomechanics at the treated and adjacent levels.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies on spine biomechanics after TDR were focused on facet forces and range of motion and report contradictory results. Characterization of contact pressure, peak contact pressure, force, and peak force before and after TDR may lead to a better understanding of facet joint function and may aid in prediction of long-term outcomes after TDR.
METHODS: Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric lumbar spines were potted at T12 and L5 and installed in a 6 degrees of freedom displacement-controlled testing system. Displacements of 15° flexion/extension, 10° right/left bending, and 10° right/left axial rotation were applied. Contact pressure, peak contact pressure, force, peak force, and contact area for each facet joint were recorded at L2-L3 and L3-L4 both before and after TDR at L3-L4. The data were analyzed with analysis of variance and t tests.
RESULTS: Axial rotation had the most impact on contact pressure, peak contact pressure, force, peak force, and contact area in intact spines. During lateral bending and axial rotation, TDR resulted in a significant increase in facet forces at the level of treatment and a decrease in contact pressure, peak contact pressure, and peak force at the level superior to the TDR. With flexion/extension, there was a decrease in peak contact pressure and peak contact force at the superior level.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that rotation is the most demanding motion for the spine. We also found an increase in facet forces at the treated level after TDR. We are the first to show a decrease in several biomechanical parameters after TDR at the adjacent superior level. In general, our findings suggest there is an increase in loading of the facet joints at the level of disc implantation and an overall unloading effect at the level above.
Sergiu Botolin; Christian Puttlitz; Todd Baldini; Anthony Petrella; Evalina Burger; Celeste Abjornson; Vikas Patel
Related Documents :
23400193 - Low-cost quantitative tool-tissue applied pressure indication method for surgical train...
21097333 - Insole with pressure control and tissue neoformation induction systems for diabetic foot.
1466213 - A device for measuring the lateral wall cuff pressure of endotracheal tubes.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Spine     Volume:  36     ISSN:  1528-1159     ISO Abbreviation:  Spine     Publication Date:  2011 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-12-30     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7610646     Medline TA:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  E27-32     Citation Subset:  IM    
University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The influence of orthotopic paraspinal muscle-pediculated bone flaps on posterior spinal fusion in a...
Next Document:  Strengths and limitations of international classification of disease ninth revision clinical modific...