Document Detail


FDG PET/CT interobserver agreement in head and neck cancer: FDG and CT measurements of the primary tumor site.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22227560     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Interobserver agreement in measuring positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) parameters is critical for head and neck cancer management. The purpose of this study is to assess the interobserver agreement when measuring the standardized uptake value (SUV) parameters and the diameter of primary head and neck tumors between readers with varied experience in PET/CT. METHODS: PET/CT images of 47 patients (59.8±10.6 years, range 26-86 years) with head and neck cancer who had a baseline PET/CT at our institution (January 2007-May 2009) were retrieved and independently reviewed by four readers with varying experience reading PET/CT. Novice reader 1 was a preinternship medical student; novice reader 2 was a fourth-year radiology resident; expert reader 1 was a board-certified radiologist with a nuclear radiology fellowship and a junior faculty; and expert reader 2 was a dual radiology and nuclear medicine board-certified radiologist and a senior faculty. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated separately across novice and expert readers, between novice 1 and expert 1, and between novice 2 and expert 1 readers. RESULTS: The ICCs (95% confidence interval) for primary tumor diameter, primary tumor SUVmax, and primary tumor SUVmax normalized to liver SUVmean within novices were 0.36 (0.09-0.59) (slight agreement), 0.60 (0.38-0.80) (fair agreement), and 0.91 (0.84-0.94) (almost perfect agreement), respectively. ICCs within experts were 0.84 (0.73-0.90) (almost perfect agreement), 0.91 (0.84-0.94) (almost perfect agreement), and 0.91 (0.84-0.95) (almost perfect agreement), respectively. The ICCs between novice 1 and experts are lower than those between novice 2 and experts for all parameters, and this disparity is greater for anatomic diameter than for fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic parameters. CONCLUSION: Fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic parameters have higher interobserver agreement than anatomic diameter measurement and are more robust in the setting of varied reading experiences.
Authors:
Tatianie Jackson; Margaret K Chung; Gustavo Mercier; Al Ozonoff; Rathan M Subramaniam
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-1-5
Journal Detail:
Title:  Nuclear medicine communications     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1473-5628     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-1-9     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8201017     Medline TA:  Nucl Med Commun     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
aDepartment of Radiology, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine bDepartment of Clinical Research Program, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Intrabullous ventilation in pulmonary emphysema: assessment with dynamic xenon-133 gas SPECT.
Next Document:  Regulation of a Disintegrin and Metalloprotease-33 Expression by Transforming Growth Factor-?