Document Detail

FAST Enough? A Validation Study for Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma Ultrasounds in a Level II Trauma Center.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23025935     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
The Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is widely used as the initial screening tool for abdominal trauma. Several recent studies have questioned its use. Using the Trauma Registry, 1 year of data at a Level II trauma center were reviewed. All trauma patients with dictated FAST examinations were identified. Disconcordant findings were reviewed. Predictive values for determining intraperitoneal injuries were calculated. Nine hundred seventy-four designated trauma patients were entered into the Trauma Registry. Of these, 633 had dictated FAST examinations. There were 533 true-negatives, 11 true-positives, 77 false-negatives, and six false-positives. Of the 77 false-negatives, 33 had retroperitoneal injuries and 25 had intraperitoneal injuries. No adverse outcomes were identified from diagnostic delay. For predicting intraperitoneal injury, FAST had a negative predictive value of 96 per cent, positive predictive value of 63 per cent, sensitivity of 29 per cent, specificity of 99 per cent, and accuracy of 95 per cent. Our data demonstrate that FAST was useful for the initial assessment of intraperitoneal injuries. FAST was 95 per cent accurate and allowed for rapid triage to operative management when indicated. The data also confirm that a negative FAST does not exclude abdominal injury.
Galen Holmes; Javier Romero; Kenneth Waxman; Graal Diaz
Related Documents :
23903085 - Intraoperative adjustment of eyelid level in aponeurotic blepharoptosis surgery.
24255865 - Selective head cooling for the treatment of neurologic complications of acute liver fai...
23710555 - Ct scan-based modeling of anastomotic leak risk after colorectal surgery.
23356705 - Gunshot wounds in military working dogs in operation enduring freedom and operation ira...
21388785 - Parotid duct repair using an epidural catheter.
23846665 - Comparative analysis of resection tools suited for transoral robot-assisted surgery.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American surgeon     Volume:  78     ISSN:  1555-9823     ISO Abbreviation:  Am Surg     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-02     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370522     Medline TA:  Am Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1038-40     Citation Subset:  IM    
Ventura County Medical Center, Ventura, California, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Robotic-assisted extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the lithotomy position: technique and ea...
Next Document:  Enhanced recovery protocol: implementation at a county institution with limited resources.